Processing derived verbs: the role of motor-relatedness and type of morphological priming

References

• Amenta, S., & Crepaldi, D. (2012). Morphological processing as we know it: An analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, S., & Lo, S. (2013). Is morphological priming stronger for transparent than opaque words? It depends on individual differences in spelling and vocabulary. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 279–296. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andringa, S., Olsthoorn, N., Van Beuningen, C., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. (2012). Determinants of success in native and non-native listening comprehension: An individual differences approach. Language Learning, 62, 49–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00706.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, H., & Schreuder, R. (1999). War and peace: Morphemes and full forms in a noninteractive activation parallel dual-route model. Brain and Language, 68(1–2), 27–32. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 617–645. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Simmons, W. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2008). Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In M. De Vega, A. M. Glenberg, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Symbols and embodiment: Debates on meaning and cognition (pp. 245–283). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, S. D. R., Burnett, A. N., Siakaluk, P. D., & Pexman, P. M. (2011). Imageability and body–object interaction ratings for 599 multisyllabic nouns. Behavior Research Methods, 43(4), 1100–1109. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0117-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonin, P., Méot, A., Ferrand, L., & Bugaïska, A. (2014). Sensory experience ratings (SERs) for 1,659 French words: Relationships with other psycholinguistic variables and visual word recognition. Behavior Research Methods, 47(3), 800–812. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0503-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozic, M., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Stamatakis, E. A., Davis, M. H., & Tyler, L. K. (2007). Differentiating morphology, form, and meaning: Neural correlates of morphological complexity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(9), 1464–1475. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozic, M., Tyler, L. K., Su, L., Wingfield, C., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2013). Neurobiological systems for lexical representation and analysis in English. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(10), 1678–1691. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clahsen, H., Sonnenstuhl, I., & Blevins, J. P. (2003). Derivational morphology in the German mental lexicon: A dual mechanism account. In H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing ( Vol. 151, pp. 125–155). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, L., & Lynott, D. (2012). Strength of perceptual experience predicts word processing performance better than concreteness or imageability. Cognition, 125(3), 452–465. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Deyne, S. (2010). Dutch word association database. Retrieved from http://www.kuleuven.be/semlab/interface/index.php
   Google Scholar
• De Grauwe, S., Willems, R. M., Rueschemeyer, S.-A., Lemhöfer, K., & Schriefers, H. (2014). Embodied language in first- and second-language speakers: Neural correlates of processing motor verbs. Neuropsychologia, 56, 334–349. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dressler, W. U. (2005). Morphological typology and first language acquisition: Some mutual challenges. In E. Booij, A. Guevara, S. Ralli Sgroi, & S. Scalise (Eds.), Morphology and linguistic typology: On-line proceedings of the Fourth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM4). Retrieved from http://morbo.lingue.unibo.it/mmm/
   Google Scholar
• Duñabeitia, J. A., Laka, I., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2009). Is Milkman a superhero like Batman? Constituent morphological priming in compound words. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(4), 615–640. doi: 10.1080/09541440802079835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, L. G., Casalis, S., & Colé, P. (2009). Early metalinguistic awareness of derivational morphology: Observations from a comparison of English and French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30(03), 405–440. doi: 10.1017/S0142716409090213
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. B., Barac-Cikoja, D., Kostić, A. (2002). Semantic aspects of morphological processing: Transparency effects in Serbian. Memory & Cognition, 30(4), 629–636. doi: 10.3758/bf03194964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. B., Basnight-Brown, D., & Pastizzo, M. J. (2006). Semantic influences on morphological facilitation: Concreteness and family size. The Mental Lexicon, 1(1), 59–84. doi: 10.1075/ml.1.1.06fel
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. B., & Soltano, E. G. (1999). Morphological priming: The role of prime duration, semantic transparency, and affix position. Brain and Language, 68(1–2), 33–39. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. B., Soltano, E. G., Pastizzo, M. J., & Francis, S. E. (2004). What do graded effects of semantic transparency reveal about morphological processing? Brain and Language, 90(1–3), 17–30. doi: 10.1016/s0093-934x(03)00416-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2004). Effect of relation availability on the interpretation and access of familiar noun–noun compounds. Brain and Language, 90(1–3), 478–486. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00459-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonnerman, L. M., Seidenberg, M. S., & Andersen, E. S. (2007). Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: Evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(2), 323–345. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haman, E., Zevenbergen, A., Andrus, M., & Chmielewska, M. (2009). Coining compounds and derivations: A crosslinguistic elicitation study of word-formation abilities of preschool children and adults in Polish and English. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 40(4), 176–192. doi: 10.2478/s10059-009-0013-3
   Google Scholar
• Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41(2), 301–307. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00838-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickmann, M., Hendriks, H., Roland, F., & Liang, J. (1996). The marking of new information in children’s narratives: A comparison of English, French, German and Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Child Language, 23(03), 591–619. doi: 10.1017/S0305000900008965
   Google Scholar
• Ji, H., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2011). Benefits and costs of lexical decomposition and semantic integration during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(4), 406–430. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia, X., Wang, S., Zhang, B., & Zhang, J. X. (2013). Electrophysiological evidence for relation information activation in Chinese compound word comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 51(7), 1296–1301. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.03.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhasz, B. J., & Yap, M. J. (2013). Sensory experience ratings for over 5,000 mono- and disyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods, 45(1), 160–168. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0242-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhasz, B. J., Yap, M. J., Dicke, J., Taylor, S. C., & Gullick, M. M. (2011). Tangible words are recognized faster: The grounding of meaning in sensory and perceptual systems. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(9), 1683–1691. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.605150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkici, B., & Clahsen, H. (2013). Inflection and derivation in native and non-native language processing: Masked priming experiments on Turkish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(04), 776–791. doi: 10.1017/S1366728912000648
   Google Scholar
• Koester, D., Gunter, T. C., & Wagner, S. (2007). The morphosyntactic decomposition and semantic composition of German compound words investigated by ERPs. Brain and Language, 102(1), 64–79. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V. (2013). Accentuate the positive: Semantic access in English compounds. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., Bertram, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2010). Processing trade-offs in the reading of Dutch derived words. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(2), 83–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., Schreuder, R., Bertram, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2009). Reading polymorphemic Dutch compounds: Toward a multiple route model of lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(3), 876–895. doi: 10.1037/a0013484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langereis, M. P., & Elshout, J. J. (n.d.). Orthografie-lijst. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Lemhöfer, K., Koester, D., & Schreuder, R. (2011). When bicycle pump is harder to read than bicycle bell: Effects of parsing cues in first and second language compound reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(2), 364–370. doi: 10.3758/s13423-010-0044-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longtin, C.-M., Segui, J., & Hallé, P. A. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(3), 313–334. doi: 10.1080/01690960244000036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüttmann, H., Zwitserlood, P., & Bölte, J. (2011). Sharing morphemes without sharing meaning: Production and comprehension of German verbs in the context of morphological relatives. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 65(3), 173–191. doi: 10.1037/a0023794
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101(1), 3–33. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Zhou, X. (1999). Abstractness, allomorphy, and lexical architecture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(4), 321–352. doi: 10.1080/016909699386257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollatsek, A., Hyönä, J., & Bertram, R. (2000). The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(2), 820–833. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prado, E. L., & Ullman, M. T. (2009). Can imageability help us draw the line between storage and composition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(4), 849–866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raposo, A., Moss, H. E., Stamatakis, E. A., & Tyler, L. K. (2009). Modulation of motor and premotor cortices by actions, action words and action sentences. Neuropsychologia, 47(2), 388–396. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.09.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(4-5), 507–537. doi: 10.1080/01690960050119689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rüschemeyer, S.-A., Brass, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2007). Comprehending prehending: Neural correlates of processing verbs with motor stems. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(5), 855–865. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.5.855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandra, D. (1990). On the representation and processing of compound words: Automatic access to constituent morphemes does not occur. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 42(3), 529–567. doi: 10.1080/14640749008401236
   Google Scholar
• Schreuder, R., & Baayen, H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131–154). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Siakaluk, P. D., Pexman, P. M., Aguilera, L., Owen, W. J., & Sears, C. R. (2008). Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: The body–object interaction effect. Cognition, 106(1), 433–443. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siakaluk, P. D., Pexman, P. M., Sears, C. R., Wilson, K., Locheed, K., & Owen, W. J. (2008). The benefits of sensorimotor knowledge: Body–object interaction facilitates semantic processing. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 32(3), 591–605. doi: 10.1080/03640210802035399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidhu, D. M., Kwan, R., Pexman, P. M., & Siakaluk, P. D. (2014). Effects of relative embodiment in lexical and semantic processing of verbs. Acta Psychologica, 149, 32–39. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.02.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolka, E., Gondan, M., & Rösler, F. (2015). Take a stand on understanding: Electrophysiological evidence for stem access in German complex verbs. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.0062 doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolka, E., Komlósi, S., & Rösler, F. (2009). When semantics means less than morphology: The processing of German prefixed verbs. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(3), 337–375. doi: 10.1080/01690960802075497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolka, E., Preller, K. H., & Eulitz, C. (2014). ‘Verstehen’ (‘understand’) primes ‘stehen’ (‘stand’): Morphological structure overrides semantic compositionality in the lexical representation of German complex verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 72, 16–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolka, E., Zwitserlood, P., & Rösler, F. (2007). Stem access in regular and irregular inflection: Evidence from German participles. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 325–347. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M. (2003). Morphological representation as a correlation between form and meaning. In E. M. H. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words ( Vol. 22, pp. 113–137). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Van Kol, A. (2006–2014). Synoniemen.net. Retrieved from http://synoniemen.net/
   Google Scholar
• Zwitserlood, P. (1994). The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9(3), 341–368. doi: 10.1080/01690969408402123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwitserlood, P., Bolwiender, A., & Drews, E. (2005). Priming morphologically complex verbs by sentence contexts: Effects of semantic transparency and ambiguity. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(1-2), 395–415. doi: 10.1080/01690960444000160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar