References
- Abdel Rahman, R., & Melinger, A. (2007). When bees hamper the production of honey: Lexical interference from associates in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(3), 604–614.
- Abdel Rahman, R., & Melinger, A. (2008). Enhanced phonological facilitation and traces of concurrent word form activation in speech production: An object-naming study with multiple distractors. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(9), 1410–1440. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701560724
- Abdel Rahman, R., & Melinger, A. (2009a). Dismissing lexical competition does not make speaking any easier: A rejoinder to Mahon and Caramazza (2009). Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(5), 749–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802648491
- Abdel Rahman, R., & Melinger, A. (2009b). Semantic context effects in language production: A swinging lexical network proposal and a review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(5), 713–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802597250
- Abdel Rahman, R., & Melinger, A. (2011). The dynamic microstructure of speech production: Semantic interference built on the fly. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(1), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021208
- Abdel Rahman, R., & Sommer, W. (2002). Brain-potential evidence for the time course of access to biographical facts and names of familiar persons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(2), 366–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.2.366
- Abdel Rahman, R., & Sommer, W. (2003). Does phonological encoding in speech production always follow the retrieval of semantic knowledge? Electrophysiological evidence for parallel processing. Cognitive Brain Research, 16(3), 372–382. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00305-1.
- Abdel Rahman, R., van Turennout, M., & Levelt, W. J. (2003). Phonological encoding is not contingent on semantic feature retrieval: An electrophysiological study on object naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(5), 850–860. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.850
- Alario, F. X., & Martin, F. M. (2010). On the origin of the “cumulative semantic inhibition” effect. Memory & Cognition, 38(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.1.57
- Alario, F. X., Segui, J., & Ferrand, L. (2000). Semantic and associative priming in picture naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A-Human Experimental Psychology, 53(3), 741–764.
- Aristei, S., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2013). Semantic interference in language production is due to graded similarity, not response relevance. Acta Psychologica, 144(3), 571–582. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.09.006
- Aristei, S., Melinger, A., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2019). Semantic distance effects in blocked cyclic object naming. Manuscript in preparation.
- Aristei, S., Melinger, A., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2011). Electrophysiological chronometry of semantic context effects in language production. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(7), 1567–1586. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21474
- Aristei, S., Zwitserlood, P., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2012). Picture-induced semantic interference reflects lexical competition during object naming. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(28), 1–9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00028.
- Bar, M. (2004). Visual objects in context. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(8), 617–629. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1476
- Bar, M., & Aminoff, E. (2003). Cortical analysis of visual context. Neuron, 38(2), 347–358. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12718867
- Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition, 11(3), 211–227. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6621337
- Barsalou, L. W. (1993). Structure, flexibility, and linguistic vagary in concepts: Manifestations of a compositional system of perceptual symbols. In A. C. Collins, S. E. Gathercole, & M. A. Conway (Eds.), Theories of memory (pp. 29–101). London, UK: Erlbaum.
- Baus, C., Sebanz, N., de la Fuente, V., Branzi, F. M., Martin, C., & Costa, A. (2014). On predicting others’ words: Electrophysiological evidence of prediction in speech production. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.07.006
- Belke, E. (2013). Long-lasting inhibitory semantic context effects on object naming are necessarily conceptually mediated: Implications for models of lexical-semantic encoding. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 228–256.
- Belke, E., Meyer, A. S., & Damian, M. F. (2005). Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(4), 667–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980443000142
- Belke, E., & Stielow, A. (2013). Cumulative and non-cumulative semantic interference in object naming: Evidence from blocked and continuous manipulations of semantic context. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(11), 2135–2160. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.775318
- Bloem, I., van den Boogaard, S., & La Heij, W. (2004). Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in language production: Further evidence for the conceptual selection model of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(2), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.001
- Bormann, T. (2011). The role of lexical-semantic neighborhood in object naming: Implications for models of lexical access. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 127.
- Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14(1), 177–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/026432997381664
- Caramazza, A., & Miozzo, M. (1997). The relation between syntactic and phonological knowledge in lexical access: evidence from the tip-of-the-tongue'phenomenon. Cognition, 64(3), 309–343.
- Costa, A., Alario, F. X., & Caramazza, A. (2005). On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196357
- Costa, A., Strijkers, K., Martin, C., & Thierry, G. (2009). The time course of word retrieval revealed by event-related brain potentials during overt speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(50), 21442–21446. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908921106
- Cree, G. S., & McRae, K. (2003). Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(2), 163.
- Damian, M. F., & Als, L. C. (2005). Long-lasting semantic context effects in the spoken production of object names. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1372–1384. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1372
- Damian, M. F., & Bowers, J. S. (2003). Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(1), 111–117.
- Damian, M. F., Vigliocco, G., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2001). Effects of semantic context in the naming of pictures and words. Cognition, 81(3), B77–B86.
- Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93(3), 283–321. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3749399
- Dell’Acqua, R., Sessa, P., Peressotti, F., Mulatti, C., Navarrete, E., & Grainger, J. (2010). ERP evidence for ultra-fast semantic processing in the picture–word interference paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 177.
- de Zubicaray, G. I., Hansen, S., & McMahon, K. L. (2013). Differential processing of thematic and categorical conceptual relations in spoken word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028717
- de Zubicaray, G., Johnson, K., Howard, D., & McMahon, K. (2014). A perfusion fMRI investigation of thematic and categorical context effects in the spoken production of object names. Cortex, 54, 135–149.
- de Zubicaray, G. I., McMahon, K., & Howard, D. (2015). Perfusion fMRI evidence for priming of shared feature-to-lexical connections during cumulative semantic interference in spoken word production. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(3), 261–272.
- de Zubicaray, G. I., & Piai, V. (2019). Investigating the spatial and temporal components of speech production. In The oxford handbook of neurolinguistics (pp. 472). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Dhooge, E., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2011). How do speakers resist distraction? Evidence from a taboo picture-word interference task. Psychological Science, 22(7), 855–859.
- Estes, Z., Golonka, S., & Jones, L. L. (2011). Thematic Thinking. The Apprehension and consequences of thematic relations. Psychology of Learning and Motivation – Advances in Research and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385527-5.00008-5
- Fieder, N., Krajenbrink, T., Foxe, D., Hodges, J., Piguet, O., & Nickels, L. (2016). Less is more-effects of semantic neighbourhood on naming in semantic dementia (svPPA). Stem-, Spraak- en Taalpathologie, 21, 65–68.
- Fieder, N., Wartenburger, I., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2019). A close call: Interference from semantic neighbourhood density and similarity in language production. Memory & Cognition, 47(1), 145–168.
- Gambi, C., Van de Cavey, J., & Pickering, M. J. (2015). Interference in joint picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(1), 1–21. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0037438
- Glaser, W. R., & Düngelhoff, F. J. (1984). The time course of picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.10.5.640
- Hameau, S. (2017). Neighbourhood density effects in spoken word production. (PhD thesis). Sydney, Australia: Macquarie University.
- Hansen, S. J., McMahon, K. L., Burt, J. S., & de Zubicaray, G. I. (2017). The locus of taboo context effects in picture naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(1), 75–91.
- Hantsch, A., Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. (2005). Semantic competition between hierarchically related words during speech planning. Memory & Cognition, 33(6), 984–1000. Retrieved from http://proxy.consortiumlibrary.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2009329978&site=ehost-live
- Harley, T. A. (1993a). Connectionist approaches to language disorders. Aphasiology, 7, 221–249.
- Harley, T. A. (1993b). Phonological activation of semantic competitors during lexical access in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 291–309.
- Hoedemaker, R. S., Ernst, J., Meyer, A. S., & Belke, E. (2017). Language production in a shared task: Cumulative semantic interference from self- and other-produced context words. Acta Psychologica. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.11.007
- Hoedemaker, R. S., & Meyer, A. S. (2018). Planning and coordination of utterances in a joint naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advance Online Publication. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000603
- Howard, D., Nickels, L., Coltheart, M., & Cole-Virtue, J. (2006). Cumulative semantic inhibition in picture naming: Experimental and computational studies. Cognition, 100(3), 464–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.006
- Hutson, J., & Damian, M. F. (2014). Semantic gradients in picture-word interference tasks: Is the size of interference effects affected by the degree of semantic overlap? Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00872
- Indefrey, P. (2011). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components: A critical update. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 255.
- Indefrey, P. (2016). On putative shortcomings and dangerous future avenues: Response to Strijkers & Costa. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31, 517–520.
- Jescheniak, J. D., Matushanskaya, A., Mädebach, A., & Müller, M. M. (2014). Semantic interference from distractor pictures in single-picture naming: Evidence for competitive lexical selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(5), 1294–1300.
- Jescheniak, J. D., Oppermann, F., Hantsch, A., Wagner, V., Mädebach, A., & Schriefers, H. (2009). Do perceived context pictures automatically activate their phonological code? Experimental Psychology, 56(1), 56–65.
- Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. (1998). Discrete serial versus cascaded processing in lexical access in speech production: Further evidence from the coactivation of near-synonyms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(5), 1256–1274. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.24.5.1256
- Kittredge, A. K., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2007). Omissions in aphasic picture naming: Late age-of-acquisition is the culprit, not low semantic density. Brain and Language, 103(1–2), 132–133.
- Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for Asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 149–174.
- Kuhlen, A. K., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2017). Having a task partner affects lexical retrieval: Spoken word production in shared task settings. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.024
- Kuipers, J. R., La Heij, W., & Costa, A. (2006). A further look at semantic context effects in language production: The role of response congruency. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(7-8), 892–919.
- Kveraga, K., Ghuman, A. S., Kassam, K. S., Aminoff, E. A., Hamalainen, M. S., Chaumon, M., & Bar, M. (2011). Early onset of neural synchronization in the contextual associations network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(8), 3389–3394. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1013760108
- La Heij, W. (1988). Components of Stroop-like interference in picture naming. Memory & Cognition, 16(5), 400–410.
- La Heij, W., Dirkx, J., & Kramer, P. (1990). Categorical interference and associative priming in picture naming. British Journal of Psychology, 81(4), 511–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02376.x
- La Heij, W., Kuipers, J. R., & Starreveld, P. A. (2006). In defense of the lexical-competition account of picture-word interference: A comment on Finkbeiner and Caramazza (2006). Cortex, 42(7), 1026–1028. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17172183
- Levelt, W. J. (1992). Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations. Cognition, 42(1-3), 1–22.
- Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1.
- Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. New York, NY: Wiley.
- Maess, B., Friederici, A. D., Damian, M., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. (2002). Semantic category interference in overt picture naming: Sharpening current density localization by PCA. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(3), 455–462.
- Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K. A., & Caramazza, A. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(3), 503–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.503
- Mahon, B. Z., Garcea, F. E., & Navarrete, E. (2012). Picture-word interference and the response-exclusion hypothesis: A response to Mulatti and Coltheart. Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2011.10.008
- Mahon, B. Z., & Navarrete, E. (2014). The critical difference in models of speech production: A response to Roelofs and Piai. Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.12.001
- McRae, K., Cree, G. S., Seidenberg, M. S., & McNorgan, C. (2005). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behavior Research Methods, 37(4), 547–559. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16629288
- McRae, K., Khalkhali, S., & Hare, M. (2012). Semantic and associative relations in adolescents and young adults: Examining a tenuous dichotomy. The Adolescent Brain: Learning, Reasoning, and Decision Making. https://doi.org/10.1037/13493-002
- Melinger, A., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2013). Lexical selection is competitive: Evidence from indirectly activated semantic associates during picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(2), 348–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028941
- Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (2003). When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(2), 228.
- Mirman, D. (2011). Effects of near and distant semantic neighbors on word production. Cognitive,Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 11(1), 32–43.
- Mirman, D., Landrigan, J. F., & Britt, A. E. (2017). Taxonomic and thematic semantic systems. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000092
- Muehlhaus, J., Heim, S., Altenbach, F., Chatterjee, A., Habel, U., & Sass, K. (2014). Deeper insights into semantic relations: An fMRI study of part-whole and functional associations. Brain and Language. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.01.003
- Munding, D., Dubarry, A.-S., & Alario, F.-X. (2015). On the cortical dynamics of word production: A review of the MEG evidence. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1071857
- Navarrete, E., Del Prato, P., & Mahon, B. Z. (2012). Factors determining semantic facilitation and interference in the cyclic naming paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(38). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00038
- Navarrete, E., Del Prato, P., Peressotti, F., & Mahon, B. Z. (2014). Lexical selection is not by competition: Evidence from the blocked naming paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2014.05.003
- Navarrete, E., Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2010). The cumulative semantic cost does not reflect lexical selection by competition. Acta Psychologica. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.009
- Nozari, N., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2011). Is comprehension necessary for error detection? A conflict-based account of monitoring in speech production. Cognitive psychology, 63(1), 1–33.
- Oppenheim, G. M., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2010). The dark side of incremental learning: A model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production. Cognition, 114, 227–252. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.007.
- Ouyang, G., Sommer, W., Zhou, C., Aristei, S., Pinkpank, T., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2016). Articulation Artifacts during Overt language production in Event-related brain Potentials: Description and Correction. Brain Topography, 29(6), 791–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-016-0515-1
- Pexman, P. M., Holyk, G. G., & Monfils, M. H. (2003). Number-of-features effects and semantic processing. Memory & Cognition, 31(6), 842–855.
- Pexman, P. M., Lupker, S. J., & Hino, Y. (2002). The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: Number-of-features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin& Review, 9(3), 542–549.
- Piai, V. (2016). The role of electrophysiology in informing theories of word production: A critical standpoint. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31, 471–473.
- Piai, V., Riès, S. K., & Knight, R. T. (2015). The electrophysiology of language production: What could be improved. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1560.
- Piai, V., Roelofs, A., Jensen, O., Schoffelen, J. M., & Bonnefond, M. (2014). Distinct patterns of brain activity characterise lexical activation and competition in spoken word production. PLoS ONE, 9(2), e88674.
- Python, G., Fargier, R., & Laganaro, M. (2018). ERP evidence of distinct processes underlying semantic facilitation and interference in word production. Cortex, 99, 1–12.
- Rabovsky, M., Schad, D. J., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2016). Language production is facilitated by semantic richness but inhibited by semantic density: Evidence from picture naming. Cognition, 146, 240–244. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.016
- Rabovsky, M., Schad, D., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2019). Semantic richness and density effects on language production: Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence. Manuscript in preparation.
- Rabovsky, M., Sommer, W., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2012a). Implicit word learning benefits from semantic richness: Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(4), 1076.
- Rabovsky, M., Sommer, W., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2012b). Depth of conceptual knowledge modulates visual processes during word reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(4), 990–1005. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00117
- Riès, S. K., Dhillon, R. K., Clarke, A., King-Stephens, D., Laxer, K. D., Weber, P. B., & Lin, J. J. (2017). Spatiotemporal dynamics of word retrieval in speech production revealed by cortical high-frequency band activity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114, E4530–E4538.
- Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42(1–3), 107–142. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1582154
- Roelofs, A. (1993). Testing a non-decompositional theory of lemma retrieval in speaking: Retrieval of verbs. Cognition, 47(1), 59–87.
- Roelofs, A. (1997). A case for nondecomposition in conceptually driven word retrieval. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26(1), 33–67. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025060104569
- Roelofs, A. (2018). A unified computational account of cumulative semantic, semantic blocking, and semantic distractor effects in picture naming. Cognition, 172, 59–72.
- Roelofs, A., & Piai, V. (2013). Associative facilitation in the Stroop task: Comment on Mahon et al.(2012). Cortex, 49(6), 1767–1769.
- Roelofs, A., & Piai, V. (2015). Aspects of competition in word production: Reply to Mahon and Navarrete. Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.10.016
- Rohr, L., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2015). Affective responses to emotional words are boosted in communicative situations. Neuroimage, 109, 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.031
- Rohr, L., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2018). Emotional language production: Time course, behavioral and electrophysiological correlates. Neuropsychologia, 117, 241–252.
- Rose, S. B., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2016). Cumulative semantic interference for associative relations in language production. Cognition, 152, 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.03.013
- Rose, S. B., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2017). Semantic similarity promotes interference in the continuous naming paradigm: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2016.1212081
- Rose, S. B., Aristei, S., Melinger, A., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2018). The closer they Are, the more they interfere: Semantic similarity of word distractors increases competition in language production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000592
- Rose, S. B., Spalek, K., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2015). Listening to Puns Elicits the Co-activation of alternative Homophone Meanings during language production. Plos One, 10(6), e0130853. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130853
- Sailor, K., & Brooks, P. J. (2014). Do part–whole relations produce facilitation in the picture–word interference task? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.870589
- Schindler, S., Wegrzyn, M., Steppacher, I., & Kissler, J. (2015). Perceived communicative context and emotional content amplify visual word processing in the fusiform gyrus. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(15), 6010–6019.
- Schnur, T., Schwartz, M., Brecher, A., & Hodgson, C. (2006). Semantic interference during blocked-cyclic naming: Evidence from aphasia. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(2), 199–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.10.002
- Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(1), 86–102.
- Schwartz, M. F., Kimberg, D. Y., Walker, G. M., Brecher, A., Faseyitan, O. K., Dell, G. S., … Coslett, H. B. (2011). Neuroanatomical dissociation for taxonomic and thematic knowledge in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 201014935.
- Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1996). Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(4), 896.
- Stemberger, J. P. (1985). An interactive activation model of language production. In Progress in the psychology of language. London: Erlbaum.
- Strijkers, K., & Costa, A. (2016). The cortical dynamics of speaking: Present shortcomings and future avenues, Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(4), 484–503.
- Strijkers, K., Costa, A., & Pulvermüller, F. (2017). The cortical dynamics of speaking: Lexical and phonological knowledge simultaneously recruit the frontal and temporal cortex within 200 ms. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.041
- van der Meer, E. (1991). Zur Dynamik von Ereigniswissen. In F. Klix, E. Roth, & E. van der Meer (Eds.), Kognitive Prozesse und geistige Leistungen [Cognitive processes and mental performance] (pp. 41–63). Berlin, Germany: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.
- Vieth, H. E., McMahon, K. L., & de Zubicaray, G. I. (2014). The roles of shared vs. distinctive conceptual features in lexical access. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1014.
- Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Damian, M. F., & Levelt, W. (2002). Semantic distance effects on object and action naming. Cognition, 85(3), B61–B69. https://doi.org/Pii
- Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Lewis, W., & Garrett, M. F. (2004). Representing the meanings of object and action words: The featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 48(4), 422–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2003.09.001
- Vitkovitch, M., & Tyrrell, L. (1999). The effects of distractor words on naming pictures at the subordinate level. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A-Human Experimental Psychology, 52(4), 905–926.