Co-registration of eye movements and neuroimaging for studying contextual predictions in natural reading

References

• Adams, R. A., Aponte, E., Marshall, L., & Friston, K. J. (2015). Active inference and oculomotor pursuit: The dynamic causal modelling of eye movements. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 242, 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, R. A., Bauer, M., Pinotsis, D., & Friston, K. J. (2016). Dynamic causal modelling of eye movements during pursuit: Confirming precision-encoding in V1 using MEG. NeuroImage, 132, 175–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, R. A., Stephan, K. E., Brown, H. R., Frith, C. D., & Friston, K. J. (2013). The computational anatomy of psychosis. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 4, 47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Altarriba, J., Kroll, J. F., Sholl, A., & Rayner, K. (1996). The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: Evidence from eye fixations and naming times. Memory & Cognition, 24(4), 477–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnal, L. H., & Giraud, A. L. (2012). Cortical oscillations and sensory predictions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(7), 390–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashby, J., Rayner, K., & Clifton, C. (2005). Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: Differential effects of frequency and predictability. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology, 58(6), 1065–1086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baccino, T. (2011). Eye movements and concurrent event-related potentials: Eye fixation-related potential investigations in reading. In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), Eye movements handbook (pp. 857–870). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baccino, T., & Manuta, Y. (2005). Eye-fixation-related potentials: Insight into parafoveal processing. Journal of Psychophysiology, 19, 204–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baggio, G. (2012). Selective alignment of brain responses by task demands during semantic processing. Neuropsychologia, 50(5), 655–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baggio, G., & Hagoort, P. (2011). The balance between memory and unification in semantics: A dynamic account of the N400. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(9), 1338–1367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17(3), 364–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassett, D. S., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Achard, S., Duke, T., & Bullmore, E. (2006). Adaptive reconfiguration of fractal small-world human brain functional networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 103(51), 19518–19523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaansen, M., & Hagoort, P. (2006). Oscillatory neuronal dynamics during language comprehension. Progress in Brain Research, 159, 179–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastos, A. M., Litvak, V., Moran, R., Bosman, C. A., Fries, P., & Friston, K. J. (2015). A DCM study of spectral asymmetries in feedforward and feedback connections between visual areas V1 and V4 in the monkey. NeuroImage, 108, 460–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastos, A. M., Usrey, W. M., Adams, R. A., Mangun, G. R., Fries, P., & Friston, K. J. (2012). Canonical microcircuits for predictive coding. Neuron, 76(4), 695–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonhage, C. E., Mueller, J. L., Friederici, A. D., & Fiebach, C. J. (2015). Combined eye tracking and fMRI reveals neural basis of linguistic predictions during sentence comprehension. Cortex, 68, 33–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bressler, S. L. (1995). Large-scale cortical networks and cognition. Brain Research Reviews, 20(3), 288–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bressler, S. L., & Richter, C. G. (2015). Interareal oscillatory synchronization in top-down neocortical processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 31, 62–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brothers, T., Swaab, T. Y., & Traxler, M. J. (2015). Effects of prediction and contextual support on lexical processing: Prediction takes precedence. Cognition, 136, 135–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, A.-M., Reuderink, B., Vincent, J., van Gerven, M. A. J., & van Erp, J. B. F. (2013). Distinguishing between target and nontarget fixations in a visual search task using fixation-related potentials. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzsáki, G., & Draguhn, A. (2004). Neuronal oscillations in cortical networks. Science, 304(5679), 1926–1929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M., Armstrong, B. C., Perea, M., & Frost, R. (2014). The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(2), 90–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Davis, M. H., Pulvermüller, F., & Hauk, O. (2015). Early visual word processing is flexible: evidence from spatiotemporal brain dynamics. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(9), 1738–1751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. C., Kiebel, S. J., & Friston, K. J. (2008). Dynamic causal modelling of induced responses. Neuroimage, 41(4), 1293–1312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, W., Desai, R. H., & Henderson, J. M. (2014). The neural substrates of natural reading: A comparison of normal and nonword text using eyetracking and fMRI. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. X. (2017). Where does EEG come from and what does it mean? Trends in Neurosciences, 40(4), 208–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Lehéricy, S., Chochon, F., Lemer, C., Rivaud, S., & Dehaene, S. (2002). Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the visual word form area. Brain, 125(5), 1054–1069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, A. M., & Buckner, R. L. (1997). Selective averaging of rapidly presented individual trials using fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 5(5), 329–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dambacher, M., Dimigen, O., Braun, M., Wille, K., Jacobs, A. M., & Kliegl, R. (2012). Stimulus onset asynchrony and the timeline of word recognition: Event-related potentials during sentence reading. Neuropsychologia, 50(8), 1852–1870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dambacher, M., Kliegl, R., Hofmann, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2006). Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials during reading. Brain Research, 1084, 89–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dambacher, M., Rolfs, M., Göllner, K., Kliegl, R., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). Event-related potentials reveal rapid verification of predicted visual input. PLoS One, 4, e5047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degno, F., Loberg, O., Zang, C., Zhang, M., Donnelly, N., & Liversedge, S. P. (2018). Parafoveal previews and lexical frequency in natural reading: Evidence from eye movements and fixation-related potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 148, 453–474. Epub ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000494
   Google Scholar
• DeLong, K. A., Troyer, M., & Kutas, M. (2014). Pre-processing in sentence comprehension: Sensitivity to likely upcoming meaning and structure. Language and Linguistics Compass, 8(12), 631–645.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8(8), 1117–1121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2017). Is there a replication crisis? Perhaps. Is this an example? No: A commentary on Ito, Martin, and Nieuwland (2016). Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(8), 966–973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, R. H., Choi, W., Lai, V. T., & Henderson, J. M. (2016). Toward semantics in the wild: Activation to manipulable nouns in naturalistic reading. The Journal of Neuroscience, 36(14), 4050–4055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devillez, H., Guyader, N., & Guérin-Dugué, A. (2015). An eye fixation-related potentials analysis of the P300 potential for fixations onto a target object when exploring natural scenes. Journal of Vision, 15(13), 20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimigen, O. (2018). Optimized ICA-based removal of ocular EEG artifacts from free viewing experiments. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/446955
   Google Scholar
• Dimigen, O., Kliegl, R., & Sommer, W. (2012). Trans-saccadic parafoveal preview benefits in fluent reading: A study with fixation-related brain potentials. Neuroimage, 62(1), 381–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimigen, O., Sommer, W., Dambacher, M., & Kliegl, R. (2008). Simultaneous recording of eye movements and ERPs indicates early access to word meaning in natural, left-to-right reading. International Journal of Psychology, 43(3–4), 47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimigen, O., Sommer, W., Hohlfeld, A., Jacobs, A. M., & Kliegl, R. (2011). Coregistration of eye movements and EEG in natural reading: Analyses and review. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(4), 552–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehinger, B. V., & Dimigen, O. (2018). Unfold: An integrated toolbox for overlap correction, non-linear modeling, and regression-based EEG analysis. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/360156
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, S. E., & Rayner, K. (1981). Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(6), 641–655.
   Google Scholar
• Engel, A. K., & Fries, P. (2010). Beta-band oscillations—Signalling the status quo? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 20(2), 156–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, A. K., Fries, P., & Singer, W. (2001). Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(10), 704–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 469–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedorenko, E., Scott, T. L., Brunner, P., Coon, W. G., Pritchett, B., Schalk, G., & Kanwisher, N. (2016). Neural correlate of the construction of sentence meaning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(41), E6256–E6262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finke, A., Essig, K., Marchioro, G., & Ritter, H. (2016). Toward FRP-based brain-machine interfaces—Single-trial classification of fixation-related potentials. PLoS One, 11(1), e0146848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, T., Graupner, S.-T., Velichkovsky, B. M., & Pannasch, S. P. (2013). Attentional dynamics during free picture viewing: Evidence from oculomotor behavior and electrocortical activity. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7, 17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fitzsimmons, G., & Drieghe, D. (2013). How fast can predictability influence word skipping during reading? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(4), 1054–1063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisson, S., Rayner, K., & Pickering, M. J. (2005). Effects of contextual predictability and transitional probability on eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(5), 862–877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K. J. (2005). A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 360(1456), 815–836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K. J. (2009). The free-energy principle: A rough guide to the brain? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(7), 293–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K. J. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 127–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K. J. (2011). Functional and effective connectivity: A review. Brain Connectivity, 1(1), 13–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friston, K. J., Bastos, A. M., Pinotsis, D., & Litvak, V. (2015). LFP and oscillations—What do they tell us? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 31, 1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K. J., Harrison, L., & Penny, W. (2003). Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage, 19(4), 1273–1302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M., & Petersson, K. M. (2004). Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304(5669), 438–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haller, M., Donoghue, T., Peterson, E., Varma, P., Sebastian, P., Gao, R., & Voytek, B. (2018). Parameterizing neural power spectra. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/299859
   Google Scholar
• Hand, C. J., Miellet, S., O’Donnell, P. J., & Sereno, S. C. (2010). The frequency-predictability interaction in reading: It depends where you’re coming from. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(5), 1294–1313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harley, T. (2014). The psychology of language (4th ed). London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hauk, O., Davis, M. H., Ford, M., Pulvermuller, F., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2006). The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data. Neuroimage, 30(4), 1383–1400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Effects of word length and frequency on the human event-related potential. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 1090–1103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawelka, S., Schuster, S., Gagl, B., & Hutzler, F. (2015). On forward inferences of fast and slow readers. An eye movement study. Scientific Reports, 5, 8432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, D., & Müller, H. (1983). On the relationship of saccade size and fixation duration in reading. In R. Groner, C. Menz, D. F. Fisher, & R. A. Monty (Eds.), Eye movements and psychological functions: International views (pp. 287–302). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. M., & Choi, W. (2015). Neural correlates of fixation duration during Real-world scene viewing: Evidence from fixation-related (FIRE) fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(6), 1137–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. M., Choi, W., Lowder, M. W., & Ferreira, F. (2016). Language structure in the brain: A fixation-related fMRI study of syntactic surprisal in reading. Neuroimage, 132, 293–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. M., Choi, W., Luke, S. G., & Desai, R. H. (2015). Neural correlates of fixation duration in natural reading: Evidence from fixation-related fMRI. Neuroimage, 119, 390–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. M., Choi, W., Luke, S. G., & Schmidt, J. (2018). Neural correlates of individual differences in fixation duration during natural reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (Hove), 71, 314–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1993). Eye movement control during reading: Fixation measures reflect foveal but not parafoveal processing difficulty. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 47(2), 201–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. M., Luke, S. G., Schmidt, J., & Richards, J. E. (2013). Co-registration of eye movements and event-related potentials in connected-text paragraph reading. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7, 28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hipp, J. F., Engel, A. K., & Siegel, M. (2011). Oscillatory synchronization in large-scale cortical networks predicts perception. Neuron, 69(2), 387–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, M. J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2014). Interactive activation and competition models and semantic context: From behavioral to brain data. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 46(1), 85–104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huettig, F. (2015). Four central questions about prediction in language processing. Brain Research, 1626, 118–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huettig, F., & Mani, N. (2016). Is prediction necessary to understand language? Probably not. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 19–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutzler, F., Braun, M., Võ, M. L., Engl, V., Hofmann, M., Dambacher, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2007). Welcome to the real world: Validating fixation-related brain potentials for ecologically valid settings. Brain Research, 1172, 124–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutzler, F., Fuchs, I., Gagl, B., Schuster, S., Richlan, F., Braun, M., & Hawelka, S. (2013). Parafoveal X-masks interfere with foveal word recognition: Evidence from fixation-related brain potentials. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7, 33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hyönä, J., & Olson, R. K. (1995). Eye fixation patterns among dyslexic and normal readers: Effects of word length and word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(6), 1430–1440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhoff, A. W. (1984). Two stages of word processing during eye fixations in the reading of prose. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23(5), 612–624.
   Google Scholar
• Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 40(6), 431–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, A., Martin, A. E., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2017a). How robust are prediction effects in language comprehension? Failure to replicate article-elicited N400 effects. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(8), 954–965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, A., Martin, A. E., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2017b). Why the A/AN prediction effect may be hard to replicate: A rebuttal to Delong, Urbach, and Kutas (2017). Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(8), 974–983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jobard, G., Crivello, F., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2003). Evaluation of the dual route theory of reading: A metanalysis of 35 neuroimaging studies. Neuroimage, 20(2), 693–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamienkowski, J. E., Ison, M. J., Quiroga, R. Q., & Sigman, M. (2012). Fixation-related potentials in visual search: A combined EEG and eye tracking study. Journal of Vision, 12(7), 4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaunitz, L. N., Kamienkowski, J. E., Varatharajah, A., Sigman, M., Quiroga, R. Q., & Ison, M. J. (2014). Looking for a face in the crowd: Fixation-related potentials in an eye-movement visual search task. Neuroimage, 89, 297–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiebel, S. J., Garrido, M. I., & Friston, K. J. (2007). Dynamic causal modelling of evoked responses: The role of intrinsic connections. Neuroimage, 36(2), 332–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1998). Neural plasticity in the dynamics of human visual word recognition. Neuroscience Letters, 244, 61–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliegl, R., Dambacher, M., Dimigen, O., Jacobs, A. M., & Sommer, W. (2012). Eye movements and brain electric potentials during reading. Psychological Research, 76(2), 145–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliegl, R., Dambacher, M., Dimigen, O., & Sommer, W. (2014). Oculomotor control, brain potentials, and timelines of word recognition during natural reading. In M. Horsley, M. Eliot, B. Knight, & R. Reilly (Eds.), Current trends in eye tracking research (pp. 141–155). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kliegl, R., Grabner, E., Rolfs, E., & Engbert, R. (2004). Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1–2), 262–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliegl, R., Hohenstein, S., Yan, M., & McDonald, S. A. (2013). How preview space/time translates into preview cost/benefit for fixation durations during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (Hove), 66(3), 581–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2006). Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1), 12–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimesch, W., Sauseng, P., & Hanslmayr, S. (2007). EEG alpha oscillations: The inhibition–timing hypothesis. Brain Research Reviews, 53(1), 63–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körner, C., Braunstein, V., Stangl, M., Schlögl, A., Neuper, C., & Ischebeck, A. (2014). Sequential effects in continued visual search: Using fixation-related potentials to compare distractor processing before and after target detection. Psychophysiology, 51(4), 385–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornrumpf, B., Dimigen, O., & Sommer, W. (2017). Lateralization of posterior alpha EEG reflects the distribution of spatial attention during saccadic reading. Psychophysiology, 54(6), 809–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornrumpf, B., Niefind, F., Sommer, W., & Dimigen, O. (2016). Neural correlates of word recognition: A Systematic comparison of natural reading and rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(9), 1374–1391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kretzschmar, F., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2009). Parafoveal versus foveal N400s dissociate spreading activation from contextual fit. Neuroreport, 20(18), 1613–1618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kretzschmar, F., Schlesewsky, M., & Staub, A. (2015). Dissociating word frequency and predictability effects in reading: Evidence from coregistration of eye movements and EEG. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(6), 1648–1662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronbichler, M., Hutzler, F., Wimmer, H., Mair, A., Staffen, W., & Ladurner, G. (2004). The visual word form area and the frequency with which words are encountered: Evidence from a parametric fMRI study. Neuroimage, 21(3), 946–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R. (2016). Separate streams or probabilistic inference? What the N400 can tell us about the comprehension of events. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(5), 602–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 32–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R., Kreher, D. A., & Ditman, T. (2010). What can event-related potentials tell us about language, and perhaps even thought, in schizophrenia? International Journal of Psychophysiology, 75(2), 66–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R., Sitnikova, T., Caplan, D., & Holcomb, P. J. (2003). Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 17(1), 117–129.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kutas, M., DeLong, K. A., & Smith, N. J. (2011). A look around at what lies ahead: Prediction and predictability in language processing. In M. Bar (Ed.), Predictions in the brain: Using our past to generate a future (pp. 190–207). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(12), 463–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307(5947), 161–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszlo, S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2014). Never seem to find the time: Evaluating the physiological time course of visual word recognition with regression analysis of single-item event-related potentials. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 642–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, E. F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(12), 920–933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavigne, F., Vitu, F., & d’Ydewalle, G. (2000). The influence of semantic context on initial eye landing sites in words. Acta Psychologica, 104(2), 191–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C.-Y., Liu, Y.-N., & Tsai, J.-L. (2012). The time-course of contextual effects on visual word recognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, A. G., & Bastiaansen, M. (2015). A predictive coding framework for rapid neural dynamics during sentence-level language comprehension. Cortex, 68, 155–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, A. G., Schoffelen, J.-M., Hoffmann, C., Bastiaansen, M., & Schriefers, H. (2017). Discourse-level semantic coherence influences beta oscillatory dynamics and the N400 during sentence comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(5), 601–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, A. G., Schoffelen, J.-M., Schriefers, H., & Bastiaansen, M. (2016). A predictive coding perspective on beta oscillations during sentence-level language comprehension. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, A. G., Wang, L., & Bastiaansen, M. (2015). Fast oscillatory dynamics during language comprehension: Unification versus maintenance and prediction? Brain and Language, 148, 51–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsman, J. B., Renken, R., Velichkovsky, B. M., Hooymans, J. M., & Cornelissen, F. W. (2012). Fixation based event-related fMRI analysis: Using eye fixations as events in functional magnetic resonance imaging to reveal cortical processing during the free exploration of visual images. Human Brain Mapping, 33(2), 307–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C. D., Thierry, G., Kuipers, J.-R., Boutonnet, B., Foucart, A., & Costa, A. (2013). Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(4), 574–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, C., Hawelka, S., Schuster, S., & Hutzler, F. (2015). An incremental boundary study on parafoveal preprocessing in children reading aloud: Parafoveal masks overestimate the preview benefit. Journal of Cognitive Psychology (Hove), 27(5), 549–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathys, C. D., Lomakina, E. I., Daunizeau, J., Iglesias, S., Brodersen, K. H., Friston, K. J., & Stephan, K. E. (2014). Uncertainty in perception and the hierarchical Gaussian filter. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S. A., & Shillcock, R. C. (2003). Eye movements reveal the on-line computation of lexical probabilities during reading. Psychological Science, 14(6), 648–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzner, P., von der Malsburg, T., Vasishth, S., & Rösler, F. (2015). Brain responses to world knowledge violations: A comparison of stimulus- and fixation-triggered event-related potentials and neural oscillations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(5), 1017–1028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzner, P., von der Malsburg, T., Vasishth, S., & Rösler, F. (2017). The importance of reading naturally: Evidence from combined recordings of eye movements and electric brain potentials. Cognitive Science, 41(6), 1232–1263.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meyer, L. (2018). The neural oscillations of speech processing and language comprehension: State of the art and emerging mechanisms. European Journal of Neuroscience, 48(7), 2609–2621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miellet, S., Sparrow, L., & Sereno, S. C. (2007). Word frequency and predictability effects in reading French: An evaluation of the E-Z reader model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(4), 762–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinaro, N., Barraza, P., & Carreiras, M. (2013). Long-range neural synchronization supports fast and efficient reading: EEG correlates of processing expected words in sentences. NeuroImage, 72, 120–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, R., Pinotsis, D. A., & Friston, K. (2013). Neural masses and fields in dynamic causal modeling. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 7, 57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niefind, F., & Dimigen, O. (2016). Dissociating parafoveal preview benefit and parafovea-on-fovea effects during reading: A combined eye tracking and EEG study. Psychophysiology, 53(12), 1784–1798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M. S., Barr, D. J., Bartolozzi, F., Busch-Moreno, S., Darley, E., Donaldson, D. I., … Von Grebmer Zu Wolfsthurn, S. (2018a). Dissociable effects of prediction and integration during language comprehension: Evidence from a large-scale study using brain potentials. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/267815
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M. S., Politzer-Ahles, S., Heyselaar, E., Segaert, K., Darley, E., Kazanina, N., … Huettig, F. (2018b). Limits on prediction in language comprehension: A multi-lab failure to replicate evidence for probabilistic pre-activation of phonology. eLife, 7, e33468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaev, A. R., Jurica, P., Nakatani, C., Plomp, G., & van Leeuwen, C. (2013). Visual encoding and fixation target selection in free viewing: Presaccadic brain potentials. Frontiers in System Neuroscience, 7, 26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nikolaev, A. R., Nakatani, C., Plomp, G., Jurica, P., & van Leeuwen, C. (2011). Eye fixation-related potentials in free viewing identify encoding failures in change detection. Neuroimage, 56(3), 1598–1607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ossandón, J. P., Helo, A. V., Montefusco-Siegmund, R., & Maldonado, P. E. (2010). Superposition model Predicts EEG occipital activity during free viewing of natural Scenes. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30(13), 4787–4795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penolazzi, B., Angrilli, A., & Job, R. (2009). Gamma EEG activity induced by semantic violation during sentence reading. Neuroscience Letters, 465, 74–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penolazzi, B., Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2007). Early semantic context integration and lexical access as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Biological Psychology, 74(3), 374–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plöchl, M., Ossandón, J. P., & König, P. (2012). Combining EEG and eye tracking: Identification, characterization, and correction of eye movement artifacts in electroencephalographic data. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, C. J. (2012). A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading. Neuroimage, 62(2), 816–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, R. P., & Ballard, D. H. (1999). Predictive coding in the visual cortex: A functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nature Neuroscience, 2(1), 79–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauss, K., & Pourtois, G. (2013). What is bottom-up and what is top-down in predictive coding? Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7(1), 65–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (Hove), 62(8), 1457–1506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Ashby, J., Pollatsek, A., & Reichle, E. D. (2004). The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: Implications for the E-Z reader model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(4), 720–732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Binder, K. S., Ashby, J., & Pollatsek, A. (2001). Eye movement control in reading: Word predictability has little influence on initial landing positions in words. Vision Research, 41(7), 943–954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14(3), 191–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., Morris, R. K., Schmauder, A. R., & Clifton, C. (1989). Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes. Language and Cognition Processes, 4(3–4), 21–49.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., & Raney, G. E. (1996). Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 22(5), 1188–1200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., & Well, A. D. (1996). Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(4), 504–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., Tokowicz, N., Liu, Y., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Testing an assumption of the E-Z reader model of eye-movement control during reading: Using event-related potentials to examine the familiarity check. Psychophysiology, 48(7), 993–1003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly, R. G. (2014). Triangulating the reading brain: Eye movements, computational models, and EEG. In M. Horsley, M. Eliot, B. A. Knight, & R. G. Reilly (Eds.), Current trends in eye tracking research (pp. 131–139). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Reingold, E. M., Reichle, E. D., Glaholt, M. G., & Sheridan, H. (2012). Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations. Cognitive Psychology, 65(2), 177–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richlan, F., Gagl, B., Hawelka, S., Braun, M., Schurz, M., Kronbichler, M., & Hutzler, F. (2014). Fixation-related fMRI analysis in the domain of reading research: Using self-paced eye movements as markers for hemodynamic brain responses during visual letter string processing. Cerebral Cortex, 24(10), 2647–2656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richlan, F., Gagl, B., Schuster, S., Hawelka, S., Humberger, J., & Hutzler, F. (2013). A new high-speed visual stimulation method for gaze-contingent eye movement and brain activity studies. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7, 24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rommers, J., Dickson, D. S., Norton, J. J. S., Wlotko, E. W., & Federmeier, K. D. (2017). Alpha and theta band dynamics related to sentential constraint and word expectancy. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(5), 576–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugg, M. D. (1990). Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high-and low-frequency words. Memory & Cognition, 18, 367–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, H. H., Rayner, K., & Chumbley, J. I. (1998). Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory & Cognition, 26(6), 1270–1281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schotter, E. R., Tran, R., & Rayner, K. (2014). Don’t believe what you read (only once): comprehension is supported by regressions during reading. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1218–1226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster, S., Hawelka, S., Himmelstoss, N. A., Richlan, F., & Hutzler, F. (in press). The neural correlates of word position and lexical predictability during sentence reading: Evidence from fixation-related fMRI. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. doi:10.1080/23273798.2019.1575970.
   Google Scholar
• Schuster, S., Hawelka, S., Hutzler, F., Kronbichler, M., & Richlan, F. (2016). Words in context: The effects of length, frequency, and predictability on brain responses during natural reading. Cerebral Cortex, 26(10), 3889–3904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster, S., Hawelka, S., Richlan, F., Ludersdorfer, P., & Hutzler, F. (2015). Eyes on words: A fixation-related fMRI study of the left occipito-temporal cortex during self-paced silent reading of words and pseudowords. Scientific Reports, 5, 12686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sereno, S. C., Brewer, C. C., & O’Donnell, P. J. (2003). Context effects in word recognition: Evidence for early interactive processing. Psychological Science, 14(4), 328–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sereno, S. C., Hand, C. J., Shahid, A., Yao, B., & O’Donnell, P. J. (2018). Testing the limits of contextual constraint: Interactions with word frequency and parafoveal preview during fluent reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (Hove), 71(1), 302–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sereno, S. C., & Rayner, K. (2003). Measuring word recognition in reading: Eye movements and event-related potentials. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(11), 489–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sereno, S. C., Rayner, K., & Posner, M. I. (1998). Establishing a time-line of word recognition: Evidence from eye movements and event-related potentials. Neuroreport, 9(10), 2195–2200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, H., & Reingold, E. M. (2012). The time course of contextual influences during lexical ambiguity resolution: Evidence from distributional analyses of fixation durations. Memory & Cognition, 40(7), 1122–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simola, J., Holmqvist, K., & Lindgren, M. (2009). Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: Evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials. Brain and Language, 111(2), 101–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slattery, T. J., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2007). The effect of the frequencies of three consecutive content words on eye movements during reading. Memory & Cognition, 35(6), 1283–1292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slattery, T. J., Staub, A., & Rayner, K. (2012). Saccade launch site as a predictor of fixation durations in reading: Comments on Hand, Miellet, O’Donnell, and Sereno (2010). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(1), 251–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub, A. (2015). The effect of lexical predictability on eye movements in reading: Critical review and theoretical interpretation. Language and Linguistics Compass, 9(8), 311–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, K. E., Penny, W. D., Moran, R. J., den Ouden, H. E., Daunizeau, J., & Friston, K. J. (2010). Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling. Neuroimage, 49(4), 3099–3109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strijkers, K., Bertrand, D., & Grainger, J. (2015). Seeing the same words differently: The time course of automaticity and top-down intention in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(8), 1542–1551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaab, T. Y., Ledoux, K., Camblin, C. C., & Boudewyn, M. A. (2012). Language-related ERP components. In S. J. Luck & E. S. Kappenman (Eds.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components (pp. 397–439). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szewczyk, J. M., & Schriefers, H. (2018). The N400 as an index of lexical preactivation and its implications for prediction in language comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33(6), 665–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, W. (1953). Cloze procedure: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 30, 414–433.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. S., Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2013). Can cognitive models explain brain activation during word and pseudoword reading? A meta-analysis of 36 neuroimaging studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 766–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornhill, D. E., & Van Petten, C. (2012). Lexical versus conceptual anticipation during sentence processing: Frontal positivity and N400 ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(3), 382–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Berkum, J. J., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1999). Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(6), 657–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Petten, C. (1993). A comparison of lexical and sentence-level context effects in event-related potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 485–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1990). Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials. Memory & Cognition, 18, 380–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1991). Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open and closed-class words. Memory & Cognition, 19, 95–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Petten, C., & Luka, B. J. (2012). Prediction during language comprehension: Benefits, costs, and ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(2), 176–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varela, F., Lachaux, J., Rodriguez, E., & Martinerie, J. (2001). The brainweb: Phase synchronization and large-scale integration. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(4), 229–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal, J. R., Freyermuth, S., Jerbi, K., Hamamé, C. M., Ossandon, T., Bertrand, O., … Lachaux, J.-P. (2012). Long-distance amplitude correlations in the high gamma band reveal segregation and integration within the reading network. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(19), 6421–6434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vignali, L., Himmelstoss, N. A., Hawelka, S., Richlan, F., & Hutzler, F. (2016). Oscillatory brain dynamics during sentence reading: A fixation-related spectral perturbation analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Stein, A., Chiang, C., & König, P. (2000). Top-down processing mediated by interareal synchronization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 97(26), 14748–14753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Hagoort, P., & Jensen, O. (2018a). Language prediction is reflected by coupling between frontal gamma and posterior alpha oscillations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 30(3), 432–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Hagoort, P., & Jensen, O. (2018b). Gamma oscillatory activity related to language prediction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 30(8), 1075–1085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, B., Knakker, B., & Vidnyánszky, Z. (2016). Visual processing during natural reading. Scientific Reports, 6, 26902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzel, M. A., Golenia, J.-E., & Blankertz, B. (2016). Classification of eye fixation related potentials for variable stimulus saliency. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10, 23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems, R. M., Frank, S. L., Nijhof, A. D., Hagoort, P., & van den Bosch, A. (2016). Prediction during natural language comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 26(6), 2506–2516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wlotko, E. W., & Federmeier, K. D. (2012). Age-related changes in the impact of contextual strength on multiple aspects of sentence comprehension. Psychophysiology, 49(6), 770–785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wlotko, E. W., & Federmeier, K. D. (2015). Time for prediction? The effect of presentation rate on predictive sentence comprehension during word-by-word reading. Cortex, 68, 20–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woldorff, M. G. (1993). Distortion of ERP averages due to overlap from temporally adjacent ERPs: Analysis and correction. Psychophysiology, 30(1), 98–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodhead, Z. V. J., Barnes, G. R., Penny, W., Moran, R., Teki, S., Price, C. J., & Leff, A. P. (2014). Reading Front to Back: MEG evidence for early feedback effects during word recognition. Cerebral Cortex, 24(3), 817–825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, S., Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, F. (2017). Prediction (or not) during language processing. A commentary on Nieuwland et al. (2017) and Delong et al. (2005). bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/143750
   Google Scholar
• Yvert, G., Perrone-Bertolotti, M., Baciu, M., & David, O. (2012). Dynamic causal Modeling of Spatiotemporal integration of phonological and semantic processes: An electroencephalographic study. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(12), 4297–4306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar