Any leftovers from a discarded prediction? Evidence from eye-movements during sentence comprehension

References

• Akinina, Y., Malyutina, S., Ivanova, M., Iskra, E., Mannova, E., & Dragoy, O. (2015). Russian normative data for 375 action pictures and verbs. Behavior Research Methods, 47(3), 691–707. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0492-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38(4), 419–439. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, J. (2004). Now you see it, now you don’t: Mediating the mapping between language and the visual world. In J. M. Henderson & F. Ferreira (Eds.), The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world (pp. 347–386). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73(3), 247–264. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00059-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (2007). The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: Linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(4), 502–518. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arai, M., & Keller, F. (2013). The use of verb-specific information for prediction in sentence processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(4), 525–560. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2012.658072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Dai, B. (2009). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. 2009. R package version 0.999375-31. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-Project.Org/Package=Lme4
   Google Scholar
• Bentrovato, S., Devescovi, A., D’Amico, S., Wicha, N., & Bates, E. (2003). The effect of grammatical gender and semantic context on lexical access in Italian using a timed word-naming paradigm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(4), 417–430. doi: 10.1023/A:1024899513147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boland, J. E. (2005). Visual arguments. Cognition, 95(3), 237–274. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caffarra, S., & Martin, C. D. (2018). Not all errors are the same: ERP sensitivity to error typicality in foreign accented speech perception. Cortex. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, C. G., Tanenhaus, M. K., Eberhard, K. M., Filip, H., & Carlson, G. N. (2002). Circumscribing referential domains during real-time language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 30–49. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christianson, K., Hollingworth, A., Halliwell, J. F., & Ferreira, F. (2001). Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology, 42(4), 368–407. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(03), 181–204. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. M. (1974). The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language. Cognitive Psychology, 6(1), 84–107. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(74)90005-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corley, M. (2010). Making predictions from speech with repairs: Evidence from eye movements. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(5), 706–727. doi: 10.1080/01690960903512489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahan, D., Swingley, D., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Magnuson, J. S. (2000). Linguistic gender and spoken-word recognition in French. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(4), 465–480. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahan, D., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2005). Looking at the rope when looking for the snake: Conceptually mediated eye movements during spoken-word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(3), 453–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8(8), 1117–1121. doi: 10.1038/nn1504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikker, S., & Pylkkanen, L. (2011). Before the N400: Effects of lexical–semantic violations in visual cortex. Brain and Language, 118(1–2), 23–28. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikker, S., & Pylkkänen, L. (2013). Predicting language: MEG evidence for lexical preactivation. Brain and Language, 127(1), 55–64. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchon, A., Perea, M., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Martí, A., & Carreiras, M. (2013). Espal: One-stop shopping for Spanish word properties. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1246–1258. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0326-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duñabeitia, J. A., Crepaldi, D., Meyer, A. S., New, B., Pliatsikas, C., Smolka, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2017). Multipic: A standardized set of 750 drawings with norms for six European languages. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1–24. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1310261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberhard, K. M., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Sedivy, J. C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1995). Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24(6), 409–436. doi: 10.1007/BF02143160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, T. A., Brown, M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2013). Prediction, explanation, and the role of generative models in language processing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(03), 211–212. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12002312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D. (2007). Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 44(4), 491–505. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00531.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 469–495. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., McLennan, D. B., Ochoa, E. D., & Kutas, M. (2002). The impact of semantic memory organization and sentence context information on spoken language processing by younger and older adults: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 39(2), 133–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Bailey, K. G. D. (2004). Disfluencies and human language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(5), 231–237. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.03.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., Lau, E. F., & Bailey, K. G. D. (2004). Disfluencies, language comprehension, and tree adjoining grammars. Cognitive Science, 28(5), 721–749. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsci.2003.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D., & Jacobsen, T. (1999). Processing grammatical gender during language comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(5), 467–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K. J., & Stephan, K. E. (2007). Free-energy and the brain. Synthese, 159(3), 417–458. doi: 10.1007/s11229-007-9237-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J. W. (1991). The exponence of gender in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry, 22(1), 27–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman, M., & Hasher, L. (1991). Aging and suppression: Memory for previously relevant information. Psychology and Aging, 6(4), 587–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, D. J., Foss, D. J., & Carroll, P. (1995). Effects of global and local context on lexical processing during language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(1), 62–82. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.124.1.62
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huettig, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2007). The tug of war between phonological, semantic and shape information in language-mediated visual search. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(4), 460–482. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, T. R., & Thomas, S. M. (2002). In search of perceptual influences of sentence context on word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(1), 34–45. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.28.1.34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, E., & Trueswell, J. (2004). The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language. Cognition, 94(2), 113–147. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(1), 133–156. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00023-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamide, Y., Scheepers, C., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2003). Integration of syntactic and semantic information in predictive processing: Cross-linguistic evidence from German and English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(1), 37–55. doi: 10.1023/A:1021933015362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapnoula, E. C., & McMurray, B. (2016). Training alters the resolution of lexical interference: Evidence for plasticity of competition and inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(1), 8–30. doi: 10.1037/xge0000123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 32–59. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, E. F., & Ferreira, F. (2005). Lingering effects of disfluent material on comprehension of garden path sentences. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(5), 633–666. doi: 10.1080/01690960444000142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2007). Young children learning Spanish make rapid use of grammatical gender in spoken word recognition. Psychological Science, 18(3), 193–198. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01871.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowder, M. W., & Ferreira, F. (2016). Prediction in the processing of repair disfluencies: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(9), 1400–1416. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matin, E., Shao, K. C., & Boff, K. R. (1993). Saccadic overhead: Information-processing time with and without saccades. Perception & Psychophysics, 53(4), 372–380. doi: 10.3758/BF03206780
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., & O’Regan, J. K. (1981). Expectations increase the benefit derived from parafoveal visual information in reading words aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7(3), 634–644. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.7.3.634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurray, B., Samelson, V. M., Lee, S. H., & Tomblin, J. B. (2010). Individual differences in online spoken word recognition : implications for SLI. Cognitive Psychology, 60(1), 1–39. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access. Cognition, 86(2), B33–B42. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00157-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQueen, J. M., & Huettig, F. (2012). Changing only the probability that spoken words will be distorted changes how they are recognized. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(1), 509–517. doi: 10.1121/1.3664087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinaro, N., Conrad, M., Barber, H. A., & Carreiras, M. (2010). On the functional nature of the N400: Contrasting effects related to visual word recognition and contextual semantic integration. Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(1), 1–7. doi: 10.1080/17588920903373952
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinaro, N., Giannelli, F., Caffarra, S., & Martin, C. (2017). Hierarchical levels of representation in language prediction: The influence of first language acquisition in highly proficient bilinguals. Cognition, 164, 61–73. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(2), 61–64.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Salverda, A. P., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2017). The visual world paradigm. In A. M. B. de Groot & P. Hagoort (Eds.), Research methods in psycholinguistics and the neurobiology of language: A practical guide (pp. 89–110). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Tanenhaus, M. K., Magnuson, J. S., Dahan, D., & Chambers, C. (2000). Eye movements and lexical Access in spoken-language comprehension: Evaluating a linking hypothesis between fixations and linguistic processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(6), 557–580. doi: 10.1023/A:1026464108329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268(5217), 1632–1634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanenhaus, M. K., & Trueswell, J. C. (2006). Eye movements and spoken language comprehension. In M. Traxler & M. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 863–900). New York, NY: Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(3), 443–467. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, A., Grice, M., & Crocker, M. (2006). The role of prosody in the interpretation of structural ambiguities: A study of anticipatory eye movements. Cognition, 99(2), B63–B72. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicha, N. Y. Y., Bates, E. A., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2003). Potato not pope: Human brain potentials to gender expectation and agreement in Spanish spoken sentences. Neuroscience Letters, 346(3), 165–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicha, N. Y. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2003). Expecting gender: An event related Brain potential study on the role of grammatical gender in comprehending a line drawing within a written sentence in Spanish. Cortex, 39(3), 483–508. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70260-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicha, N. Y. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2004). Anticipating words and their gender: An event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(7), 1272–1288. doi: 10.1162/0898929041920487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicha, N. Y. Y., Orozco-Figueroa, A., Reyes, I., Hernandez, A., Gavaldón de Barreto, L., & Bates, E. A. (2005). When zebras become painted donkeys: Grammatical gender and semantic priming interact during picture integration in a spoken Spanish sentence. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(4), 553–587. doi: 10.1080/01690960444000241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, I., & Czigler, I. (1998). Mismatch negativity: Deviance detection or the maintenance of the standard? NeuroReport, 9(17), 3809–3813. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199812010-00008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, I., Karmos, G., & Näätänen, R. (1996). Adaptive modeling of the unattended acoustic environment reflected in the mismatch negativity event-related potential. Brain Research, 742(1–2), 239–252. doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(96)01008-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar