Toward an (even) more comprehensive model of speech production planning

References

• Babel, M. (2012). Evidence for phonetic and social selectivity in spontaneous phonetic imitation. Journal of Phonetics, 40, 177–189. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckman, M., & Edwards, J. (1994). Articulatory evidence for differentiating stress categories. In P. A. Keating (Ed.), Phonological structure and phonetic form: Papers in laboratory Phonology III (pp. 7–33). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beckman, M. E., & Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1986). Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 255–309. doi: 10.1017/S095267570000066X
   Google Scholar
• Bell, A., Brenier, J. M., Gregory, M., Girand, C., & Jurafsky, D. (2009). Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 92–111. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierne, M., & Croot, K. (2018). The prosodic domain of phonological encoding: Evidence from speech errors. Cognition, 2018, 177. (e-publication ahead of print). doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.004
   Google Scholar
• Browman, C., & Goldstein, L. (1986). Towards an articulatory phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 219–252. doi: 10.1017/S0952675700000658
   Google Scholar
• Brugos, A., Breen, M., Veilleux, N., Barnes, J., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2018). Cue-based annotation and analysis of prosodic boundary events. Proceedings of Speech Prosody IX, Poznan, Poland. 245–249.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. (2009). Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrd, D., & Saltzman, E. (2003). The elastic phrase: Modeling the dynamics of boundary-adjacent lengthening. Journal of Phonetics, 31, 149–180. doi: 10.1016/S0095-4470(02)00085-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14(1), 177–208. doi:10.1080/026432997381664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Miozzo, M. (1997). The relation between syntactic and phonological knowledge in lexical access: Evidence from the 'tip-of-the-tongue' phenomenon. Cognition, 64, 309–343. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00031-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, J., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2018). Quantifying phonetic variation: Landmark labelling of imitated utterances. In F. Cangemi, M. Clayards, O. Niebuhr, B. Schuppler, & M. Zellers (Eds.), Rethinking reduction (pp. 164–204). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Condon, W. S., & Ogston, R. D. (1966). Sound film analysis of normal and pathological behavior patterns. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 143, 338–347. doi: 10.1097/00005053-196610000-00005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condon, W. S., & Ogston, R. D. (1967). A segmentation of behavior. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 5, 221–235. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(67)90004-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, A. M. (1991). An articulatory account of aspiration in English. PhD dissertation. Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• Croot, K., Au, C., & Harper, A. (2010). Prosodic structure and tongue twister errors. In C. Fougeron, B. Kuhnert, M. D’Imperio, & N. Valee (Eds.), Laboratory Phonology 10 (pp. 433–461). Berlin & New York: Mouiton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Crystal, T. H., & House, A. S. (1988). Segmental durations in connected-speech signals: Current results. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83, 1553–1573. doi: 10.1121/1.395911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Burger, L. K., & Svec, W. R. (1997). Language production and serial order: A functional analysis and a model. Psychological Review, 104(1), 123–147. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Ruiter, J. (2000). The production of gesture and speech. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 248–311). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dilley, L., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Ostendorf, M. (1996). Glottalization of word-initial vowels as a function of prosodic structure. Journal of Phonetics, 24(4), 425–444. doi: 10.1006/jpho.1996.0023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, L., & Hardcastle, W. J. (2002). Categorical and gradient properties of assimilation in alveolar to velar sequences: Evidence from EPG and EMA data. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 373–396. doi: 10.1006/jpho.2001.0162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F. (1993). The creation of prosody during sentence processing. Psychological Review, 100, 233–253. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fougeron, C., & Keating, P. A. (1997). Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 3728–3740. doi: 10.1121/1.418332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garellek, M. (2014). Voice quality strengthening and glottalization. Journal of Phonetics, 45, 106–113. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2014.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P., & Grosjean, F. (1983). Performance structures: A psycholinguistic and linguistic appraisal. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 411–458. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(83)90014-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gow, D. (2001). Assimilation and anticipation in continuous spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 133–159. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gow, D. W., & Gordon, P. C. (1995). Lexical and prelexical influences on word segmentation: Evidence from priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance, 21, 344–359. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.21.2.344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halle, M. (1992). Phonological features. In W. Bright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of linguistics, vol. 3 (pp. 207–212). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, S. (2011). Does phonetic detail guide situation-specific speech recognition? Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences XVII, Saarbrueken, 9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, B. (1984). The phonology of rhythm in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 33–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, B. (1989). The prosodic hierarchy in meter. In P. Kiparsky & G. Youmans (Eds.), Phonetics and Phonology I: Rhythm and Meter (pp. 201–260). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heyward, J., Turk, A., & Geng, C. (2014). Does /t/ produced as [ʔ] involve tongue tip raising? Articulatory evidence for the nature of phonological representations. Poster presented at the 14th Conference on Laboratory Phonology, Tokyo.
   Google Scholar
• Hockett, C. (1955). A manual of phonology. Indiana University Publications in Anthropology and Linguistics 11.
   Google Scholar
• Jannedy, S., & Mendoza-Denton, N. (2005). Structuring information through gesture and Intonation. In S. Ishihara, M. Schmitz, & A. Schwarz (Eds.), Interdisciplinary studies on information structure 03 (pp. 199–244). Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. (2004). Massive reduction in conversational American English. In K. Yoneyama & K. Maekawa (Eds.), Spontaneous speech: Data and analysis. Proceedings of the 1st Session of the 10th International Symposium (pp. 29–54). Tokyo, Japan: The National International Institute for Japanese Language.
   Google Scholar
• Kazanina, N., Bowers, J. S., & Idsardi, W. (2017). Phonemes: Lexical access and beyond. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 24, 1–27. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1113-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keating, P., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2002). A prosodic view of word form encoding for speech production. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 101, 112–156.
   Google Scholar
• Kendon, A. (1972). Some relationships between body motion and speech. In A. Seigman & B. Pope (Eds.), Studies in dyadic communication. elmsford (pp. 177–216). New York: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kendon, A. (1980). Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In M. R. Key (Ed.), Nonverbal communication and language (pp. 207–227). The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal:: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 16–32. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00505-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kita, S., Özyürek, A., Allen, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., & Ishizuka, T. (2007). Relations between syntactic encoding and co-speech gestures: Implications for a model of speech and gesture production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(8), 1212–1236. doi: 10.1080/01690960701461426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klatt, D. H. (1976). Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59, 1208–1221. doi: 10.1121/1.380986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler, K. (1999). Articulatory prosodies in German reduced speech. In: Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, San Francisco, Volume 1, 89–92.
   Google Scholar
• Kornfeld, J. R. (1971). What initial clusters tell us about a child’s speech code. Quarterly Progress Report 101, Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts institute of Technology, 218–221.
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, R. M., Chen, Y., & Chawla, P. (1996). Nonverbal behavior and nonverbal communication: What do conversational hand gestures tell us? In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 389–450). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, R. M., Chen, Y., & Gottesman, R. F. (2000). Lexical gestures and lexical access: A process model. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 261–283). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krivokapić, J. (2012). Prosodic planning in speech production. In S. Fuchs, M. Weihrich, D. Pape, & P. Perrier (Eds.), Speech planning and dynamics (pp. 157–190). Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Lahiri, A., & Reetz, H. (2002). Underspecified recognition. In C. Gussenhoven & N. Warner (Eds.), Laboratory phonology VII (pp. 637–677). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Lahiri, A., & Reetz, H. (2010). Distinctive features: Phonological underspecification in representation and processing. Journal of Phonetics, 38, 44–59. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehiste, I. (1972). The timing of utterances and linguistic boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51(6B), 2008–2024. doi: 10.1121/1.1913062
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (2002a). Picture naming and word frequency: Comments on Alario, Costa and Caramazza. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17(3), 299–319. doi: 10.1080/01690960143000236
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (2002b). Phonological encoding in speech production: Comments on Jurafsky et al., Schiller et al., and van Heuven & Haan. In C. Gussenhover & N. Warner (Eds.), Laboratory Phonology VII (pp. 87–99). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Science, 22, 1–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman, M., & Prince, A. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(2), 249–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loehr, D. (2004). Gesture and intonation. PhD Thesis, Georgetown University.
   Google Scholar
• Loehr, D. P. (2012). Temporal, structural, and pragmatic synchrony between intonation and gesture. Laboratory Phonology, 3(1), 71–89. doi: 10.1515/lp-2012-0006
   Google Scholar
• Macken, M. A., & Barton, D. (1980). A longitudinal study of the acquisition of the voicing contrast in American English word-initial stops, as measured by voice onset time. Journal of Child Language, 7, 433–458. doi: 10.1017/S0305000900002774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manuel, S. Y. (1995). Speakers nasalize /dh/ after /n/, but listeners still hear /dh/. Journal of Phonetics, 23(4), 453–476. doi: 10.1006/jpho.1995.0033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister Byun, T., Richtsmeier, P., & Maas, E. (2013). Covert contrast in child phonology is not necessarily extragrammatical. LSA Annual Meeting Extended Abstracts, 4(28), 1–5. doi: 10.3765/exabs.v0i0.786
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (1996). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, Illinois: University Of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago, Illinois: University Of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (2018). Growth Points. Retrieved from http://mcneilllab.uchicago.edu/writing/growth_points.html
   Google Scholar
• Melinger, A., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). Gesture and the communicative intention of the speaker. Gesture, 4(2), 119–141. doi: 10.1075/gest.4.2.02mel
   Google Scholar
• Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1997). On knowing the auxiliary of a verb that cannot be named: Evidence for the independence of grammatical and phonological aspects of lexical knowledge. Journal of Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9, 160–166.
   Google Scholar
• Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Niebuhr, O., & Kohler, K. (2011). Perception of phonetic detail in the identification of highly reduced words. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 319–329. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielson, K. (2011). Specificity and abstractness of VOT imitation. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 132–142. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S., Furman, R., & Brown, A. (2005). How does linguistic framing influence co-speech gestures? Insights from crosslinguistic differences and similarities. Gesture, 5(1–2), 219–240. doi: 10.1075/gest.5.1-2.15ozy
   Google Scholar
• Pardo, J. S. (2006). On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 2382–2393. doi: 10.1121/1.2178720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1990). Phonological and phonetic representation. Journal of Phonetics, 18, 375–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency effects and the emergence of lexical structure (pp. 137–157). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2016). Beyond abstract vs. episodic. Annual Review of Linguistics, 2, 33–52. doi: 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030514-125050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierrehumbert, J. B., & Beckman, M. (1988). Japanese tone structure. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierrehumbert, J., & Talkin, D. (1991). Lenition of /h/ and glottal stop. Papers in Laboratory Phonology II, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK. 90–117.
   Google Scholar
• Renwick, M., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Yasinnik, Y. (2004). The timing of speech-accompanying gestures with respect to prosody (Abstract). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, 2397. doi: 10.1121/1.4780717
   Google Scholar
• Richtsmeier, P. T. (2010). Child phoneme errors are not substitutions. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 33. Retrieved from http://twpl.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/twpl/article/view/6889
   Google Scholar
• Rochet-Capellan, A., & Fuchs, S. (2013). The interplay of linguistic structure and breathing in German spontaneous speech. Proceedings of Interspeech, 2013, 1128–1132.
   Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64, 249–284. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00027-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A., Meyer, A., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1998). A case for the lemma/lexeme distinction in models of speaking: Comment on Caramazza and Miozzo (1997). Cognition , 69, 219–230. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00056-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller, N., & Caramazza, A. (2002). The selection of grammatical features in word production: The case of plural nouns in German. Brain & Language, 81(1–3), 342–357. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selkirk, E. O. (1984). Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1987). The role of word onset consonants in speech production planning: New evidence form speech error patterns. In E. Keller & M. Gopnik (Eds.), Motor and sensory processing in language (pp. 17–51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1992). The role of word structure in segmental serial ordering. Cognition, 42, 213–259. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90044-I
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2017). Individual differences in the signalling of prosodic structure by changes in voice quality. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142, 2521. doi:10.1121/1.5014213.
   Google Scholar
• Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Ren, A. (2018). The prosodic characteristics of non-referential co-speech gestures in a sample of academic lecture-style speech. Frontiers of Psychology, 09, 1514. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01514
   Google Scholar
• Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Turk, A. E. (1996). A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(2), 193–247. doi: 10.1007/BF01708572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., Yasinnik, Y., Veilleux, N., & Renwick, M. (2007). A method for studying the time alignment of gestures and prosody in American English: ‘Hits’ and pitch accents in academic-lecture-style speech. In A. Esposito, M. Bratanic, E. Keller, & M. Marinaro (Eds.), Fundamentals of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication and the Biometric issue (pp. 34–44). Brussels: NATO.
   Google Scholar
• Steedman, M. (2000). Information structure and the syntax-phonology interface. Linguistic Inquiry, 31(4), 649–689. doi: 10.1162/002438900554505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, K. N. (2002). Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111, 1872–1891. doi: 10.1121/1.1458026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiede, M. K., Boyce, S. E., Espy-Wilson, C., & Gracco, V. (2010). Variability of North American English /r/ production in response to palatal perturbation. In B. Maassen & P. van Lieshout (Eds.), Speech motor control: New developments in Basic and Applied research (pp. 53–67). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turk, A. E., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (forthcoming). Speech timing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turk, A., & White, L. (1999). Structural influences on accentual lengthening in English. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 171–206. doi: 10.1006/jpho.1999.0093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umeda, N. (1978). Occurrence of glottal stops in fluent speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64(1), 88–94. doi: 10.1121/1.381959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, M. (2010). Prosody and recursion in coordinate structures and beyond. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 28, 183–237. doi: 10.1007/s11049-009-9086-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, M., & Watson, D. (2010). Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review. Introduction to Special Issue of Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(7), 905–945. doi: 10.1080/01690961003589492
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wheeldon, L., & Lahiri, A. (1997). Prosodic units in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 356–381. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeldon, L., & Lahiri, A. (2002). The minimal unit of phonological encoding: Prosodic or lexical word. Cognition, 85(2), B31–B41. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00103-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wightman, C., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., Ostendorf, M., & Price, P. (1992). Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91(3), 1707–1717. doi: 10.1121/1.402450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne, H., Wheeldon, L., & Lahiri, A. (2018). Compounds, phrases and clitics in connected speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 98, 45–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2017.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zsiga, E. C. (1997). Features, gestures and Igbo vowels: An approach to the phonology-phonetics Interface. Language, 73(2), 227–274. doi: 10.2307/416019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar