Abstraction and concepts: when, how, where, what and why?

References

• Allport, D. A. (1985). Distributed memory, modular subsystems and dysphasia. In S. K. Newman, & R. Epstein (Eds.), Current perspectives in Dysphasia (pp. 207–244). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
   Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. T. M. (2017). Abstraction and generalization in statistical learning: Implications for the relationship between semantic types and episodic tokens. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372. doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X99002149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W., Dutriaux, L., & Scheepers, C. (2018). Moving beyond the distinction between concrete and abstract concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752). doi:10.1098/rstb.2017.0144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borghi, A. M., & Binkofski, F. (2014). Words as social tools: An embodied view on abstract concepts. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, E. M., Henderson, M. D., & Markman, A. B. (2013). There are many ways to see the forest for the trees: A tour guide for abstraction. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5), 501–520. doi: 10.1177/1745691613497964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casasanto, D., & Lupyan, G. (2015). All concepts are ad hoc concepts. In E. Margolis, & S. Laurence (Eds.), The conceptual mind: New directions in the study of concepts (pp. 543–566). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chrysikou, E. G., Casasanto, D., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2017). Motor experience influences object knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(3), 395–408. doi: 10.1037/xge0000269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2006). Language, embodiment, and the cognitive niche. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(8), 370–374. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.06.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, A., Pell, P. J., Ranganath, C., & Tyler, L. K. (2016). Learning warps object representations in the ventral temporal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(7), 1010–1023. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8(2), 240–247. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80069-1
   Google Scholar
• Connell, L. (2018). What have labels ever done for us? The linguistic shortcut in conceptual processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(10), 1308–1318.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, L., & Lynott, D. (2014). Principles of representation: Why you can’t represent the same concept twice. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6, 390–406. doi: 10.1111/tops.12097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. P., Altmann, G. T. M., & Yee, E. (2019). Situational systematicity: A role for schema in understanding the differences between abstract and concrete concepts. PsyArXiv. doi:10.31234/osf.io/5qud8
   Google Scholar
• Davis, C. P., & Yee, E. (2018). Features, labels, space, and time: Factors supporting taxonomic relationships in the anterior temporal lobe and thematic relationships in the angular gyrus. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(10), 1347–1357.
   Google Scholar
• Dove, G. (2018). Language as a disruptive technology: Abstract concepts, embodiment and the flexible mind. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752). doi:10.1098/rstb.2017.0135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dove, G. (2019). More than a scaffold: Language is a neuroenhancement. Cognitive Neuropsychology. doi:10.1080/02643294.2019.1637338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179–211. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1402_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., & Asmuth, J. (2017). Metaphoric extension, relational categories, and abstraction. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(10), 1298–1307.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, A. L., Regier, T., Kay, P., & Ivry, R. B. (2006). Whorf hypothesis is supported in the right visual field but not the left. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(2), 489–494. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509868103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, P., McClelland, J. L., Ralph, L., & Matthew, A. (2018). Concepts, control, and context: A connectionist account of normal and disordered semantic cognition. Psychological Review, 125(3), 293–328. doi: 10.1037/rev0000094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. N. (2018). When does abstraction occur in semantic memory: Insights from distributional models. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(10), 1338–1346.
   Google Scholar
• Lebois, L. A., Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D., & Barsalou, L. W. (2015). Are automatic conceptual cores the gold standard of semantic processing? The context-dependence of spatial meaning in grounded congruency effects. Cognitive Science, 39(8), 1764–1801. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louwerse, M. M. (2011). Symbol interdependency in symbolic and embodied cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(2), 273–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01106.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louwerse, M. M. (2018). Knowing the meaning of a word by the linguistic and perceptual company it keeps. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(3), 573–589. doi: 10.1111/tops.12349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupyan, G., & Lewis, M. (2017). From words-as-mappings to words-as- cues: The role of language in semantic knowledge. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(10), 1319–1337.
   Google Scholar
• Lupyan, G., & Winter, B. (2018). Language is more abstract than you think, or, why aren’t languages more iconic? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752). doi:10.1098/rstb.2017.0137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markman, E. M. (1990). Constraints children place on word meanings. Cognitive Science, 14(1), 57–77. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1401_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matheson, H. E., & Barsalou, L. W. (2018). Embodiment and grounding in cognitive neuroscience. Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Mirman, D., Landrigan, J. F., & Britt, A. E. (2017). Taxonomic and thematic semantic systems. Psychological Bulletin, 143(5), 499–520. doi: 10.1037/bul0000092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pexman, P. M. (2017). The role of embodiment in conceptual development. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(10), 1274–1283.
   Google Scholar
• Prinz, J. J. (2002). Furnishing the mind: Concepts and their perceptual basis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F. (2013). How neurons make meaning: Brain mechanisms for embodied and abstract- symbolic semantics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(9), 458–470. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F. (2018). Neural reuse of action perception circuits for language, concepts and communication. Progress in Neurobiology, 160, 1–44. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2017.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1991). Why are abstract concepts so hard to understand? In P. J. Schwanenflugel (Ed.), The psychology of word meanings (pp. 223–250). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Sheya, A., & Smith, L. (2018). Development weaves brains, bodies and environments into cognition. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(10), 1266–1273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloutsky, V. M. (2010). From perceptual categories to concepts: What develops? Cognitive Science, 34, 1244–1286. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01129.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloutsky, V. M., & Deng, W. (2017). Categories, concepts, and conceptual development. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(10), 1284–1297.
   Google Scholar
• Wellsby, M., & Pexman, P. M. (2014). Developing embodied cognition: Insights from children’s concepts and language processing. Frontiers in Cognitive Science, 5, 506.
   Google Scholar
• Winkielman, P., Coulson, S., & Niedenthal, P. (2018). Dynamic grounding of emotion concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752). doi:10.1098/rstb.2017.0127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee, E., Jones, M. N., & McRae, K. (2018). Semantic memory. In J. T. Wixted, & S. L. Thompson-Schill (Eds.), Stevens’ Handbook of experimental Psychology and cognitive neuroscience (4th ed., Vol. 3: Language and Thought, pp. 319–356). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Yee, E., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2016). Putting concepts into context. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1015–1027. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0948-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar