Shaping the precision of letter position coding by varying properties of a writing system

References

• Andrews, S. (1996). Lexical retrieval and selection processes: Effects of transposed-letter confusability. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(6), 775–800. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.0040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castles, A., Davis, C., Cavalot, P., & Forster, K. (2007). Tracking the acquisition of orthographic skills in developing readers: Masked priming effects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97(3), 165–182. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2007.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, S. M. (1979). Letter and order information in lexical access. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 18(2), 225–241. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90136-1
   Google Scholar
• Colombo, L., Sulpizio, S., & Peressotti, F. (2017). Serial mechanism in transposed letters effects: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 161, 46–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J. (1999). The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition (Doctoral dissertation). University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117(3), 713–758. doi: 10.1037/a0019738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M., & Vinckier, F. (2005). The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(7), 335–341. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1980). The influence of orthography on readers’ conceptualization of the phonemic structure of words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1(4), 371–385. doi: 10.1017/S0142716400009802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 39(2), 211–251. doi: 10.1080/14640748708401785
   Google Scholar
• Frost, R. (2012). A universal approach to modelling visual word recognition and reading: Not only possible, but also inevitable. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 35(5), 310–329. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115(3), 577–600. doi: 10.1037/a0012667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., Dufau, S., & Ziegler, J. C. (2016). A vision of reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(3), 171–179. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.12.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Whitney, C. (2004). Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(2), 58–59. 10.1016/j.tics.2003.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 54. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrera, C., & Forster, K. (2008). Masked form priming with extreme transposition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(1), 117–142. doi: 10.1080/01690960701579722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinoshita, S., Castles, A., & Davis, C. (2009). The role of neighbourhood density in transposed-letter priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(4), 506–526. doi: 10.1080/01690960802289213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. H., & Taft, M. (2011). Subsyllabic structure reflected in letter confusability effects in Korean word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(1), 129–134. doi: 10.3758/s13423-010-0028-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, I., Armstrong, B. C., & Frost, R. (2014). What can we learn from learning models about sensitivity to letter-order in visual word recognition? Journal of Memory and Language, 77, 40–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1(4), 476–490. doi: 10.3758/BF03210951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupker, S. J., Perea, M., & Davis, C. J. (2008). Transposed-letter effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(1), 93–116. doi: 10.1080/01690960701579714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, D., & Kinoshita, S. (2012). Reading through a noisy channel: Why there’s nothing special about the perception of orthography. Psychological Review, 119(3), 517–545. doi: 10.1037/a0028450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2012). Perceptual uncertainty is a property of the cognitive system. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(5), 298–299. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory & Cognition, 31(6), 829–841. doi: 10.3758/BF03196438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(2), 231–246. doi.org/10.1080/01690960701579714 doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., & Rosa, E. (2000). Repetition and form priming interact with neighborhood density at a brief stimulus onset asynchrony. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(4), 668–677. doi: 10.3758/BF03213005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383. doi: 10.1080/10888430701530730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protopapas, A. (2007). Check vocal: A program to facilitate checking the accuracy and response time of vocal responses from DMDX. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 859–862. doi: 10.3758/BF03192979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., Lally, C., & Lee, C. H. (2019). No flexibility in letter position coding in Korean. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(4), 458–473. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 333–367. doi: 10.1080/01690960344000198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. S. H., Davis, M. H., & Rastle, K. (2017). Comparing and validating methods of reading instruction using behavioural and neural findings in an artificial orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(6), 826–858. doi: 10.1037/xge0000301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. S. H., Plunkett, K., & Nation, K. (2011). The influence of consistency, frequency, and semantics on learning to read: An artificial orthography paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(1), 60–76. doi: 10.1037/a0020126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2007). Cambridge University versus Hebrew University: The impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 913–918. doi: 10.3758/BF03194121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2011). Words with and without internal structure: What determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing? Cognition, 118(2), 141–156. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Bertrand, D., Lété, B., & Grainger, J. (2014). Orthographic and phonological contributions to reading development: Tracking developmental trajectories using masked priming. Developmental Psychology, 50(4), 1026–1036. doi: 10.1037/a0035187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar