Word recall is affected by surrounding metrical context

References

• Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009). Verbal working memory and language production: Common approaches to the serial ordering of verbal information. Psychological Bulletin, 135(1), 50–68. doi: 10.1037/a0014411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2011). The rhymes that the reader perused confused the meaning: Phonological effects during on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(2), 193–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman, G., & Carter, D. (1989). Lexical stress and lexical discriminability: Stressed syllables are more informative, but why? Computer Speech & Language, 3(3), 265–275. doi: 10.1016/0885-2308(89)90022-3
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). CELEX2 LDC96L14 Web Download. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D. (1966). Short-term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic and formal similarity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(4), 362–365. doi: 10.1080/14640746608400055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, R., & Jones, M. R. (2000). Expectancy, attention, and time. Cognitive Psychology, 41(3), 254–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, A.-K. R., Jaeger, M., Thorne, J. D., Bendixen, A., & Debener, S. (2015). The auditory dynamic attending theory revisited. Brain Research, 1626(c), 198–210. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.04.032
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beckman, M. E. (1992). Evidence for speech rhythms across languages. In Speech perception, production, and linguistic structure (pp. 457–463). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, S., & Clifton, C. (1995). Focus, accent, and argument structure: effects on language comprehension. Language and Speech, 38, 365–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, J. K., & Mazzella, J. R. (1983). Intonational marking of given and new information: Some consequences for comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 11(1), 64–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2017). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Available from http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat
   Google Scholar
• Bohn, K., Knaus, J., Wiese, R., & Domahs, U. (2013). The influence of rhythmic (ir) regularities on speech processing: Evidence from an ERP study on German phrases. Neuropsychologia, 51(4), 760–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bousfield, W. A., & Cohen, B. H. (1955). The occurrence of clustering in the recall of randomly arranged words of different frequencies-of-usage. The Journal of General Psychology, 52(1), 83–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breen, M., & Clifton, C., Jr. (2011). Stress matters: Effects of anticipated lexical stress on silent reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 64(2), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M., Salverda, A. P., Dilley, L. C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2015). Metrical expectations from preceding prosody influence perception of lexical stress. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(2), 306–323. doi: 10.1037/a0038689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterfield, S., & Cutler, A. (1988). Segmentation errors by human listeners: Evidence for a prosodic segmentation strategy. In Seventh Symposium of the Federation of Acoustic Societies of Europe (pp. 827–833). Institute of Acoustics.
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun, S. (2007). Information structure and the prosodic structure of English: A probabilistic relationship. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Cason, N., & Schön, D. (2012). Rhythmic priming enhances the phonological processing of speech. Neuropsychologia, 50(11), 2652–2658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clopper, C. G. (2002). Frequency of stress patterns in English: A computational analysis. Indiana University Linguistics Club Working Papers, 2, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, R. (1964). Acoustic confusions in immediate memory. British Journal of Psychology, 55(1), 75–84. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1964.tb00899.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, R., Freeman, P. R., & Hull, A. J. (1965). Acoustic factors versus language factors in short-term memory. Psychonomic Science, 3(1–12), 57–58. doi: 10.3758/BF03343017
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., & Carter, D. M. (1987). The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech & Language, 2(3), 133–142.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., & Darwin, C. (2017). Phoneme-monitoring reaction time and preceding prosody: Effects of stop closure duration and of fundamental frequency. Perception and Psychophysics, 29(3), 217–224.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., & Foss, D. J. (1977). On the role of sentence stress in sentence processing. Language and Speech, 20(1), 1–10. doi:10.1177/002383097702000101
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., Junge, C., Spokes, T., & Kidd, E. (2018). Phonological acquisition: Stress-based segmentation in English. Paper at Laboratory Phonology (LabPhon16), Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., McQueen, J. M., Norris, D., & Somejuan, A. (2001). The roll of the silly ball. In Language, brain, and cognitive development Essays in honor of Jacques Mehler (pp. 181–194). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(1), 113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauer, R. M. (1983). Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. Journal of Phonetics, 11(1), 51–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilley, L. C., & McAuley, J. D. (2008). Distal prosodic context affects word segmentation and lexical processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(3), 294–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilley, L., Wallace, J., & Heffner, C. (2012). Perceptual isochrony and fluency in speech by normal talkers under varying task demands. In O. Niebuhr, & H. Pfitzinger (Eds.), Prosodies context, function, and communication (pp. 237–258). Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Domahs, U., Klein, E., Huber, W., & Domahs, F. (2013). Good, bad and ugly word stress–fMRI evidence for foot structure driven processing of prosodic violations. Brain and Language, 125(3), 272–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96(3), 433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairhall, A. L., Lewen, G. D., Bialek, W., & van Steveninck, R. R. D. R. (2001). Efficiency and ambiguity in an adaptive neural code. Nature, 412(6849), 787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, P. C., Anderson, J. M., Shanks, D. R., Honey, R., Carpenter, T. A., Donovan, T., … Bullmore, E. T. (2001). Responses of human frontal cortex to surprising events are predicted by formal associative learning theory. Nature Neuroscience, 4(10), 1043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankish, C. (1995). Intonation and auditory grouping in immediate serial recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiser, E., Zaehle, T., Jancke, L., & Meyer, M. (2008). The neural correlate of speech rhythm as evidenced by metrical speech processing. Journal of Cognition Neuroscience, 20, 541–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabe, E., & Low, E. L. (2002). Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. In C. Gussenhoven & N. Warner (Eds.), Laboratory Phonology 7. Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, S., Hollenback, J., & Ellis, D. (1996). The Switchboard transcription project. LVCSR Summer Workshop Technical Reports, 72, 1–104.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. F. (1954). Learning as a function of word-frequency. The American Journal of Psychology, 67(1), 138–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, M. (1999). The phonology of English: A prosodic optimality-theoretic approach. UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, E. E., Sammler, D., Henry, M. J., Large, E. W., & Kotz, S. A. (2019). Cortical tracking of rhythm in music and speech. NeuroImage, 185, 96–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies.
   Google Scholar
• Heffner, C. C., Dilley, L. C., McAuley, J. D., & Pitt, M. A. (2013). When cues combine: How distal and proximal acoustic cues are integrated in word segmentation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(9), 1275–1302. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2012.672229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich, K., Alter, K., Wiese, R., & Domahs, U. (2014). The relevance of rhythmical alternation in language processing: An ERP study on English compounds. Brain and Language, 136, 19–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, R. R. (1995). The subtlety of distinctiveness: What von Restorff really did. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2(1), 105–112. doi: 10.3758/BF03214414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itti, L., & Baldi, P. (2005). A Principled Approach to Detecting surprising Events in Video. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Itti, L., & Baldi, P. (2009). Bayesian surprise attracts human attention. Vision Research, 49(10), 1295–1306. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F., Furth, K., & Hilliard, C. (2012). Phonological overlap affects lexical selection during sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(5), 1439–1449. doi: 10.1037/a0027862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. R. (2010). Attending to sound patterns and the role of entrainment. In Attention and time (pp. 317–330). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. R., Moynihan, H., MacKenzie, N., & Puente, J. (2002). Temporal aspects of stimulus-driven attending in dynamic arrays. Psychological Science, 13, 1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakouros, S., & Räsänen, O. (2015). Perception of sentence stress in speech correlates with the temporal unpredictability of prosodic features. Cognitive Science, 40(7), 1739–1774. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandylaki, K. D., Henrich, K., Nagels, A., Kircher, T., Domahs, U., Schlesewsky, M., … Wiese, R. (2017). Where is the beat? The neural correlates of lexical stress and rhythmical well-formedness in auditory story comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29(7), 1119–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Large, E., & Jones, M. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: how people track time-varying events. Psychological Review, 106, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, J. (1994). Principles of phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehiste, I. (1977). Isochrony reconsidered. Journal of Phonetics, 5(3), 253–263.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2002). Reassessing working memory: Comment on just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, 109(1), 35–54. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87(3), 252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marie, C., Magne, C., & Besson, M. (2011). Musicians and the metric structure of words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(2), 294–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuley, J. D., & Fromboluti, E. K. (2014). Attentional entrainment and perceived event duration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 369(1658), 20130401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuley, J. D., & Jones, M. R. (2003). Modeling effects of rhythmic context on perceived duration: A comparison of interval and entrainment approaches to short-interval timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(6), 1102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdock Jr., B. B. (1962). The serial position effect of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(5), 482–488. doi: 10.1037/h0045106
   Google Scholar
• Nazzi, T., Bertoncini, J., & Mehler, J. (1998). Language discrimination by newborns: Toward an understanding of the role of rhythm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 756–766. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazzi, T., & Ramus, F. (2003). Perception and acquisition of linguistic rhythm by infants. Speech Communication, 41(1), 233–243. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00106-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1989). On Clashes and Lapses. Phonology, 6(1), 69–116.
   Google Scholar
• O'Seaghdha, P. G., & Marin, J. W. (2000). Phonological competition and cooperation in form-related priming: Sequential and nonsequential processes in word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(1), 57–73. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.26.1.57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostendorf, M., Price, P. J., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1995). The Boston University radio news corpus. Linguistic Data Consortium
   Google Scholar
• Peelle, J. E., & Davis, M. H. (2012). Neural oscillations carry speech rhythm through to comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 3), doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitt, M. A., & Samuel, A. G. (1990). The use of Rhythm in Attending to Speech, 16(3), 564–573. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.16.3.564
   Google Scholar
• Quené, H., & Port, R. F. (2005). Effects of timing regularity and metrical expectancy on spoken-word perception. Phonetica, 62(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1159/000087222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramus, F. (2002). Language discrimination by newborns: Teasing apart phonotactic, rhythmic, and into national cues. Annual Review of Language Acquisition, 2, 85–115.
   Google Scholar
• Ranganath, C., & Rainer, G. (2003). Cognitive neuroscience: Neural mechanisms for detecting and remembering novel events. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(3), 193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothermich, K., & Kotz, S. A. (2013). Predictions in speech comprehension: fMRI evidence on the meter–semantic interface. Neuroimage, 70, 89–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothermich, K., Schmidt-Kassow, M., & Kotz, S. A. (2012). Rhythm's gonna get you: Regular meter facilitates semantic sentence processing. Neuropsychologia, 50(2), 232–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothermich, K., Schmidt-Kassow, M., Schwartze, M., & Kotz, S. A. (2010). Event-related potential responses to metric violations: Rules versus meaning. Neuroreport, 21(8), 580–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schock, J., Cortese, M. J., & Khanna, M. M. (2012). Imageability estimates for 3,000 disyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 374–379. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0162-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, W., & Dickinson, A. (2000). Neuronal coding of prediction errors. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23(1), 473–500.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Selkirk, E. O. (1984). Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sevald, C. A., & Dell, G. S. (1994). The sequential cuing effect in speech production. Cognition, 53(2), 91–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1987). The role of word-onset consonants in speech production planning: New evidence from speech error patterns. In E. Keller & M. Gopnik (Eds.), Neuropsychology and neurolinguistics. Motor and sensory processes of language (pp. 17–51). Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, R. N. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. Journal of Memory and Language, 6(1), 156.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, J., McHugh, A., & Martin, J. G. (1974). Reaction time to phoneme targets as a function of rhythmic cues in continuous speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102(2), 250–255.
   Google Scholar
• Temperley, D. (2008). Distributional stress regularity: A corpus study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 38(1), 75–92. doi: 10.1007/s10936-008-9084-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilsen, S. (2011). Metrical regularity facilitates speech planning and production. Laboratory Phonology, 2, 1. doi: 10.1515/labphon.2011.006
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, B. J., Ekstrand, B. R., & Keppel, G. (1965). An analysis of intralist similarity in verbal learning with experiments on conceptual similarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 4(6), 447.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, I., Bunnell, T., & Hoskins, S. (1995). The phonology and phonetics of the rhythm rule. In B. Connell & A. Arvaniti (Eds.), Phonology and phonetic evidence: Papers in laboratory phonology IV (pp. 111–127). Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511554315
   Google Scholar
• Weber, C., Hahne, A., Friedrich, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2004). Discrimination of word stress in early infant perception: Electrophysiological evidence. Cognitive Brain Research, 18(2), 149–161. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.10.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winkler, I., Horváth, J., Weisz, J., & Trejo, L. J. (2009). Deviance detection in congruent audiovisual speech: Evidence for implicit integrated audiovisual memory representations. Biological Psychology, 82(3), 281–292. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.08.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiu, L. K., & Watson, D. G. (2015). When overlap leads to competition: Effects of phonological encoding on word duration. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(6), 1701–1708. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0828-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, X., & Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2010). The effects of prosodic prominence and serial position on duration perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(2), 851–859. doi: 10.1121/1.3455796
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar