329
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Regular Articles

Producing regularly and irregularly inflected verb forms: behavioural and neuroimaging data from the three Italian conjugations

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 420-439 | Received 09 Aug 2018, Accepted 04 Sep 2019, Published online: 22 Sep 2019

References

  • Albright, A. (2002). Islands of reliability for regular morphology: Evidence from Italian. Language, 78, 684–709.
  • Albright, A., & Hayes, B. (2003). Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: A computational/experimental study. Cognition, 90(2), 119–161.
  • Allen, M., & Badecker, W. (2002). Inflectional regularity: Probing the nature of lexical representation in a cross-modal priming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(4), 705–722.
  • Aronoff, M. (1994). Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
  • Badre, D., & Wagner, A. D. (2002). Semantic retrieval, mnemonic control, and prefrontal cortex. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 1(3), 206–218.
  • Bakker, I., MacGregor, L. J., Pulvermüller, F., & Shtyrov, Y. (2013). Past tense in the brain's time: Neurophysiological evidence for dual-route processing of past-tense verbs. NeuroImage, 71, 187–195.
  • Bates, E., & Goodman, J. C. (1997). On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: Evidence from acquisition, aphasia and real-time processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12(5/6), 507–584.
  • Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R Package Version, 1(7), 1–23.
  • Beretta, A., Campbell, C., Carr, T. H., Huang, J., Schmitt, L. M., Christianson, K., & Cao, Y. (2003). An ER-fMRI investigation of morphological inflection in German reveals that the brain makes a distinction between regular and irregular forms. Brain and Language, 85(1), 67–92.
  • Bertinetto, P. M., Burani, C., Laudanna, A., Marconi, L., Ratti, D., Rolando, C., & Thornton, A. M. (2005). CoLFIS (Corpus e Lessico di Frequenza dell’Italiano Scritto http://linguistica.sns.it/CoLFIS/CoLFIS_home.htm
  • Bordag, D., & Pechmann, T. (2009). Externality, internality, and (in) dispensability of grammatical features in speech production: Evidence from Czech declension and conjugation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(2), 446–465.
  • Bozic, M., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2010). Neurocognitive contexts for morphological complexity: Dissociating inflection and derivation. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(11), 1063–1073.
  • Bozic, M., Szlachta, Z., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2013). Cross-linguistic parallels in processing derivational morphology: Evidence from Polish. Brain and Language, 127(3), 533–538.
  • Brovetto, C., & Ullman, M. T. (2005). The mental representation and processing of Spanish verbal morphology. In Selected proceedings of the 7th Hispanic linguistics symposium (pp. 98–105).
  • Burzio, L. (1998). Multiple correspondence. Lingua, 104(1-2), 79–109.
  • Bybee, J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10(5), 425–455.
  • Bybee, J., & Moder, C. L. (1983). Morphological classes as natural categories. Language, 59, 251–270.
  • Carota, F., Bozic, M., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2016). Decompositional representation of morphological complexity: Multivariate fMRI evidence from Italian. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(12), 1878–1896.
  • Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (1994). Inflection classes, gender, and the principle of contrast. Language, 70(4), 737–788.
  • Carter, C. S., & Van Veen, V. (2007). Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: An update of theory and data. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(4), 367–379.
  • Clahsen, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(6), 991–1013.
  • Clahsen, H., Eisenbeiss, S., & Sonnenstuhl-Henning, I. (1997). Morphological structure and the processing of inflected words. Theoretical Linguistics, 23(3), 201–250.
  • Cohen-Shikora, E. R., & Balota, D. A. (2013). Past tense route priming. Cognition, 126(3), 397–404.
  • Colombo, L., Laudanna, A., De Martino, M., & Brivio, C. (2004). Regularity and/or consistency in the production of the past-participle? Brain and Language, 90(1), 128–142.
  • Colombo, L., Stoianov, I., Pasini, M., & Zorzi, M. (2006). The role of phonology in the inflection of Italian verbs: A connectionist investigation. The Mental Lexicon, 1(1), 147–181.
  • de Diego Balaguer, R., Rodríguez-Fornells, A., Rotte, M., Bahlmann, J., Heinze, H. J., & Münte, T. F. (2006). Neural circuits subserving the retrieval of stems and grammatical features in regular and irregular verbs. Human Brain Mapping, 27(11), 874–888.
  • De Martino, M., & Laudanna, A. (2017). The role of grammatical properties in the word-picture interference paradigm: Data from single verbs production in Italian. Paper presented at the 20th Conference of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology, Potsdam, Germany.
  • De Mauro, T., Mancini, F., Vedovelli, M., & Voghera, M. (1993). Lessico di frequenza dell’italiano parlato (LIP). Milano: Etaslibri.
  • Desai, R., Conant, L. L., Waldron, E., & Binder, J. R. (2006). FMRI of past tense processing: The effects of phonological complexity and task difficulty. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(2), 278–297.
  • Dhond, R. P., Marinkovic, K., Dale, A. M., Witzel, T., & Halgren, E. (2003). Spatiotemporal maps of past-tense verb inflection. Neuroimage, 19(1), 91–100.
  • Di Tella, S., Baglio, F., Cabinio, M., Nemni, R., Traficante, D., & Silveri, M. C. (2018). Selection processing in noun and verb production in left-and right-sided Parkinson’s disease patients. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–13.
  • Eddington, D. (2002). Dissociation in Italian conjugations: A single-route account. Brain and Language, 81(1-3), 291–302.
  • Forman, S. D., Cohen, J. D., Fitzgerald, M., Eddy, W. F., Mintun, M. A., & Noll, D. C. (1995). Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 33(5), 636–647.
  • Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39(2), 211–251.
  • Fowler, C. A., Napps, S. E., & Feldman, L. (1985). Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory & Cognition, 13(3), 241–255.
  • Goebel, R., Esposito, F., & Formisano, E. (2006). Analysis of functional image analysis contest (FIAC) data with brainvoyager QX: From single-subject to cortically aligned group general linear model analysis and self-organizing group independent component analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 27(5), 392–401.
  • Indefrey, P., Brown, C. M., Hagoort, P., Herzog, H., Sach, M., & Seitz, R. J. (1997). A PET study of cerebral activation patterns induced by verb inflection. NeuroImage, 5, S548.
  • Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92(1-2), 101–144.
  • Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434–446.
  • Jaeger, J. J., Lockwood, A. H., Kemmerer, D. L., Van Valin Jr, R. D., Murphy, B. W., & Khalak, H. G. (1996). A positron emission tomographic study of regular and irregular verb morphology in English. Language, 72, 451–497.
  • Joanisse, M. F., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2005). Imaging the past: Neural activation in frontal and temporal regions during regular and irregular past-tense processing. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5(3), 282–296.
  • Justus, T., Larsen, J., Yang, J., de Mornay Davies, P., Dronkers, N., & Swick, D. (2011). The role of Broca's area in regular past-tense morphology: An event-related potential study. Neuropsychologia, 49(1), 1–18.
  • Kielar, A., & Joanisse, M. F. (2010). Graded effects of regularity in language revealed by N400 indices of morphological priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(7), 1373–1398.
  • Kielar, A., Milman, L., Bonakdarpour, B., & Thompson, C. K. (2011). Neural correlates of covert and overt production of tense and agreement morphology: Evidence from fMRI. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 24(2), 183–201.
  • Kireev, M., Slioussar, N., Korotkov, A. D., Chernigovskaya, T. V., & Medvedev, S. V. (2015). Changes in functional connectivity within the fronto-temporal brain network induced by regular and irregular Russian verb production. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 36.
  • Klimovich-Gray, A., Bozic, M., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2017). Domain-specific and domain-general processing in left perisylvian cortex: Evidence from Russian. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29(2), 382–397.
  • Laudanna, A. (1999). Regular versus irregular inflection: A question of levels. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(6), 1029–1030.
  • Laudanna, A. (2007). Representation and processing of regular and sub-regular verbal forms in Italian. Lingue e Linguaggio, 6(2), 227–246.
  • Laudanna, A., De Martino, M., & Postiglione, F. (2011). Processing finite and non-finite inflected verbal forms of Italian. Paper presented at the 7th International Morphological Processing Conference, San Sebastian, Spain.
  • Laudanna, A., Gazzellini, S., & De Martino, M. (2004). Representation of grammatical properties of Italian verbs in the mental lexicon. Brain and Language, 90(1-3), 95–105.
  • Magen, H. S. (2014). A behavioral study of regularity, irregularity and rules in the English past tense. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 43(6), 791–814.
  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Hare, M., & Older, L. (1993). Inflectional morphology and phonological regularity in the English mental lexicon. Paper presented at the 15th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Colorado.
  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Hare, M., Older, L., & Ford, M. (1995). Priming and blocking in English inflectional morphology. Paper presented at the experimental Psychology Society, London.
  • Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. (2007). Morphology, language and the brain: the decompositional substrate for language comprehension. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1481), 823–836.
  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2004). The lexicon, grammar, and the past tense: Dissociation revisited. In M. Tomasello, & D. Slobin (Eds.), Beyond Nature-Nurture: Essays in Honor of Elizabeth Bates (pp. 263–279). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • McClelland, J. L., & Patterson, K. (2002). Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: What does the evidence rule out? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(11), 465–472.
  • Meunier, F., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2004). Regularity and irregularity in French verbal inflection. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(4), 561–580.
  • Miceli, G., Mazzucchi, A., Menn, L., & Goodglass, H. (1983). Contrasting cases of Italian agrammatic aphasia without comprehension disorder. Brain and Language, 19(1), 65–97.
  • Miceli, G., Silveri, M. C., Villa, G., & Caramazza, A. (1984). On the basis for the agrammatic's difficulty in producing main verbs. Cortex, 20(2), 207–220.
  • Napps, S. E. (1989). Morphemic relationships in the lexicon: Are they distinct from semantic and formal relationships? Memory & Cognition, 17(6), 729–739.
  • Nevat, M., Ullman, M. T., Eviatar, Z., & Bitan, T. (2017). The neural bases of the learning and generalization of morphological inflection. Neuropsychologia, 98, 139–155.
  • Oh, T. M., Tan, K. L., Ng, P., Berne, Y. I., & Graham, S. (2011). The past tense debate: Is phonological complexity the key to the puzzle? NeuroImage, 57(1), 271–280.
  • Orsolini, M., Fanari, R., & Bowles, H. (1998). Acquiring regular and irregular inflection in a language with verb classes. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13(4), 425–464.
  • Orsolini, M., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1997). Universals in morphological representation: Evidence from Italian. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12(1), 1–47.
  • Penke, M., & Krause, M. (2002). German noun plurals: A challenge to the dual-mechanism model. Brain and Language, 81(1-3), 303–311.
  • Perani, D., Schnur, T., Tettamanti, M., Cappa, S. F., & Fazio, F. (1999). Word and picture matching: A PET study of semantic category effects. Neuropsychologia, 37(3), 293–306.
  • Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language. Science, 253(5019), 530–535.
  • Pinker, S. (2015). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Pinker, S., & Ullman, M. T. (2002). The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(11), 456–463.
  • Pirrelli, V., & Herreros, I. (2005). Learning morphology by itself. Paper presented at the 5th Mediterranean Morphology Meetings, Bologna.
  • Pirrelli, V., Herreros, I., Calderone, B., & Virgilio, M. (2004). Non-locality all the way through: Emergent global constraints in the Italian morphological lexicon. In Proceedings of the 7th Meeting of the ACL Special interest group in Computational Phonology: Current Themes in Computational Phonology and Morphology (pp. 11–19). Association for Computational Linguistics.
  • Prasada, S., & Pinker, S. (1993). Generalisation of regular and irregular morphological patterns. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8(1), 1–56.
  • Prasada, S., Pinker, S., & Snyder, W. (1990). Some evidence that irregular forms are retrieved from memory but regular forms are rule generated. Paper presented at the 31st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomics Society, New Orleans.
  • Quené, H., & Van den Bergh, H. (2008). Examples of mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects and with binomial data. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 413–425.
  • Regel, S., Kotz, S. A., Henseler, I., & Friederici, A. D. (2017). Left inferior frontal gyrus mediates morphosyntax: ERP evidence from verb processing in left-hemisphere damaged patients. Cortex, 86, 156–171.
  • Regel, S., Opitz, A., Müller, G., & Friederici, A. D. (2015). The past tense debate revisited: Electrophysiological evidence for subregularities of irregular verb inflection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(9), 1870–1885.
  • Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). Parallel Distributed Processing (Vol. 1 & 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Sach, M., Seitz, R. J., & Indefrey, P. (2004). Unified inflectional processing of regular and irregular verbs: A PET study. Neuroreport, 15(3), 533–537.
  • Sahin, N. T., Pinker, S., & Halgren, E. (2006). Abstract grammatical processing of nouns and verbs in Broca's area: Evidence from fMRI. Cortex, 42(4), 540–562.
  • Say, T., & Clahsen, H. (2002). Words, rules and stems in the Italian mental lexicon. In S. Nooteboom, F. Weerman, & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Storage and computation in the language faculty (pp. 93–129). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Schreuder, R., de Jong, N., Krott, A., & Baayen, H. (1999). Rules and rote: Beyond the linguistic either-or fallacy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(6), 1038–1039.
  • Serianni, L. (1988). Grammatica italiana. Suoni, forme, costrutti. Torino: Utet.
  • Shapiro, K. A., Moo, L. R., & Caramazza, A. (2006). Cortical signatures of noun and verb production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(5), 1644–1649.
  • Slioussar, N., Kireev, M. V., Chernigovskaya, T. V., Kataeva, G. V., Korotkov, A. D., & Medvedev, S. V. (2014). An ER-fMRI study of Russian inflectional morphology. Brain and Language, 130, 33–41.
  • Smolka, E., Khader, P. H., Wiese, R., Zwitserlood, P., & Rösler, F. (2013). Electrophysiological evidence for the continuous processing of linguistic categories of regular and irregular verb inflection in German. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(8), 1284–1304.
  • Smolka, E., Zwitserlood, P., & Rösler, F. (2007). Stem access in regular and irregular inflection: Evidence from German participles. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(3), 325–347.
  • Stanners, R. F., Neiser, J. J., Hernon, W. P., & Hall, R. (1979). Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(4), 399–412.
  • Stemberger, J. P., & MacWhinney, B. (1988). Are inflected forms stored in the lexicon? In M. Hammond, & M. Noonan (Eds.), Theoretical approaches to morphology (pp. 101–116). San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Thornton, A. M., Iacobini, C., & Burani, C. (1997). BDVDB. Una base di dati per il vocabolario di base della lingua italiana. Roma: Bulzoni Editore.
  • Tranel, D., Adolphs, R., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (2001). A neural basis for the retrieval of words for actions. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18(7), 655–674.
  • Tyler, L., Bright, P., Fletcher, P., & Stamatakis, E. (2004). Neural processing of nouns and verbs: The role of inflectional morphology. Neuropsychologia, 42(4), 512–523.
  • Ullman, M. T. (1993). The computation of inflectional morphology (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
  • Ullman, M. T. (1999). Acceptability ratings of regular and irregular past-tense forms: Evidence for a dual-system model of language from word frequency and phonological neighbourhood effects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(1), 47–67.
  • Ullman, M. T. (2001). A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(10), 717–727.
  • Van der Lely, H. K., & Ullman, M. T. (2001). Past tense morphology in specifically language impaired and normally developing children. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16(2-3), 177–217.
  • Veríssimo, J., & Clahsen, H. (2009). Morphological priming by itself: A study of Portuguese conjugations. Cognition, 112(1), 187–194.
  • Whiting, C. M., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Shtyrov, Y. (2013). Neural dynamics of inflectional and derivational processing in spoken word comprehension: Laterality and automaticity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 759.
  • Willms, J. L., Shapiro, K. A., Peelen, M. V., Pajtas, P. E., Costa, A., Moo, L. R., & Caramazza, A. (2011). Language-invariant verb processing regions in Spanish–English bilinguals. NeuroImage, 57(1), 251–261.
  • Worsley, K. J., Marrett, S., Neelin, P., Vandal, A. C., Friston, K. J., & Evans, A. C. (1996). A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation. Human Mapping, 4(1), 58–73.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.