2,772
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Regular Articles

Going places in Dutch and mandarin Chinese: conceptualising the path of motion cross-linguistically

, , &
Pages 498-520 | Received 05 Oct 2018, Accepted 24 Sep 2019, Published online: 17 Oct 2019

References

  • Athanasopoulos, P., & Bylund, E. (2013). Does grammatical aspect affect motion event cognition? A cross-linguistic comparison of English and Swedish speakers. Cognitive Science, 37, 286–309. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12006
  • Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
  • Beavers, J., Levin, B., & Tham, S. W. (2010). The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics, 46, 331–377. doi: 10.1017/S0022226709990272
  • Bohnemeyer, J., & Swift, M. (2004). Event realization and default aspect. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, 263–296. doi: 10.1023/B:LING.0000023371.15460.43
  • Carroll, M., Weimar, K., Flecken, M., Lambert, M., & von Stutterheim, C. (2012). Tracing trajectories: Motion event construal by advanced L2 French-English and L2 French-German speakers. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 3, 202–230. doi: 10.1075/lia.3.2.03car
  • Chen, L., & Guo, J. (2009). Motion events in Chinese novels: Evidence for an equipollently-framed language. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1749–1766. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.015
  • Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Croft, W. (2012). Verbs: Aspect and causal structure. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Croissant, Y. (2018). mlogit: Multinomial logit models. R package version 0.3-0. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mlogit
  • Defina, R. (2016a). Events in language and thought: the case of serial verb constructions in Avatime (Doctoral dissertation). Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Defina, R. (2016b). Do serial verb constructions describe single events? A study of co-speech gesture in Avatime. Language, 92, 890–910. doi: 10.1353/lan.2016.0076
  • De Knop, S., & Gallez, F. (2011). Manner of motion: A privileged dimension of German expressions. International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics, 2, 25–40.
  • Filippo-Enrico, C. (2008). Manner of motion saliency: An inquiry into Italian. Cognitive Linguistics, 19, 533–570.
  • Flecken, M. (2011). What native speaker judgments tell us about the grammaticalization of a progressive aspectual marker in Dutch. Linguistics, 49, 479–524. doi: 10.1515/ling.2011.015
  • Flecken, M., Carroll, M., & von Stutterheim, C. (2014). Grammatical aspect influences motion event perception: Findings from a cross-linguistic nonverbal recognition task. Language and Cognition, 6, 45–78.
  • Flecken, M., Carroll, M., Weimar, K., & Von Stutterheim, C. (2015). Driving along the road or heading for the village? Conceptual differences underlying motion event encoding in French, German, and French-German L2 users. Modern Language Journal, 99, 100–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2015.12181.x
  • Gennari, S. P., Sloman, S. A., Malt, B. C., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition, 83, 49–79. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00166-4
  • Georgakopoulos, T., Härtl, H., & Sioupi, A. (2019). Goal realization: An empirically based comparison between English. German, and Greek. Languages in Contrast, 19, 280–309. doi: 10.1075/lic.17010.geo
  • Gerwien, J., & Stutterheim, C. (2018). Event segmentation: Cross-linguistic differences in verbal and non-verbal tasks. Cognition, 180, 225–237. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.07.008
  • Hickmann, M., & Hendriks, H. (2010). Typological constraints on the acquisition of spatial language in French and English. Cognitive Linguistics, 21, 189–215. doi: 10.1515/COGL.2010.007
  • Huette, S., Winter, B., Matlock, T., Ardell, D. H., & Spivey, M. (2014). Eye movements during listening reveal spontaneous grammatical processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 410. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00410
  • Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2004). Language typology in our language use: The case of Basque motion events in adult oral narratives. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 317–349. doi: 10.1515/cogl.2004.012
  • Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Ji, Y., Hendriks, H., & Hickmann, M. (2011). The expression of caused motion events in Chinese and in English: Some typological issues. Linguistics, 49, 1041–1077. doi: 10.1515/ling.2011.029
  • Ji, Y., & Hohenstein, J. (2017). Conceptualising voluntary motion events beyond language use: A comparison of English and Chinese speakers’ similarity judgments. Lingua. International Review of General Linguistics. Revue internationale De Linguistique Generale, 195, 57–71.
  • Kan, Z. (2010). Motion-event typology in mandarin Chinese revisited. Contemporary Linguistics, 2, 126–135.
  • Klein, W. (1994). Time in language. London, England: Routledge.
  • Klein, W., Li, P., & Hendriks, H. (2000). Aspect and assertion in mandarin Chinese. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 18, 723–770. doi: 10.1023/A:1006411825993
  • Lakusta, L., & Landau, B. (2005). Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial language. Cognition, 96, 1–33. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.009
  • Lamarre, C. (2005). The linguistic encoding of motion events in Chinese: With reference to cross-dialectal variation. Typological studies of the linguistic expression of motion events, (pp. 3–33). COE-ECS Working Paper.
  • Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (2019). Lexicalization patterns. In R. Truswell (Ed.), Oxford handbook of event structure (pp. 395–425). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Li, N., & Thompson, S. (1981). Mandarin Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Liu, L. (2014). How Chinese codes path of a motion: A typological study of motion events in modern Chinese. Chinese Teaching in the World, 3, 322–332.
  • Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Madden, C. J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2003). How does verb aspect constrain event representations? Memory & Cognition, 31, 663–672. doi: 10.3758/BF03196106
  • Ochsenbauer, A. K., & Hickmann, M. (2010). Children's verbalizations of motion events in German. Cognitive Linguistics, 21, 217–238. doi: 10.1515/COGL.2010.008
  • Papafragou, A. (2010). Source-goal asymmetries in motion representation: Implications for language production and comprehension. Cognitive Science, 34, 1064–1092. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01107.x
  • Papafragou, A., Hulbert, J., & Trueswell, J. (2008). Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements. Cognition, 108, 155–184. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.02.007
  • Papafragou, A., & Selimis, S. (2010). Event categorisation and language: A cross-linguistic study of motion. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 224–260. doi: 10.1080/01690960903017000
  • R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Regier, T., & Zheng, M. (2007). Attention to endpoints: A cross-linguistic constraint on spatial meaning. Cognitive Science, 31, 705–719. doi: 10.1080/15326900701399954
  • Shen, J. (2003). The resultative construction in Chinese: A typological perspective. Chinese Teaching in the World, 3, 17–23.
  • Shi, W., & Wu, Y. (2014). Which way to move: The evolution of motion expressions in Chinese. Linguistics, 52, 1237–1292. doi: 10.1515/ling-2014-0024
  • Slobin, D. I. (1996). Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (pp. 195–220). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
  • Slobin, D. I. (2004). The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspective (pp. 219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Slobin, D. I. (2006). What makes manner of motion salient? Exploration in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In M. Hickmann, & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 59–81). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  • Slobin, D. I. (2008). Relations between paths of motion and paths of vision: A cross-linguistic and developmental exploration. In V. M. Gathercole (Ed.), Routes to language: Studies in honour of Melissa Bowerman (pp. 197–221). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Smith, C. (1991). The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Stefanowitsch, A., & Rohlde, A. (2004). The goal bias in the encoding of motion events. In G. Radden, & K. U. Panther (Eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation (pp. 249–267). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Tai, J. H. (2003). Cognitive relativism: Resultative construction in Chinese. Language and Linguistics, 4, 301–316.
  • Tai, J. H., & Su, S. (2013). Encoding motion events in Taiwan sign language and mandarin Chinese: Some typological implications. In G. Cao, H. Chappell, R. Djamouri, & T. Wiebusch (Eds.), Language and linguistics monograph series 50-breaking down the barriers: Interdisciplinary studies in Chinese linguistics and beyond (pp. 79–98). Taipei, Taiwan: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
  • Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and lexical description: Vol. 3. Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 36–149). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Talmy, L. (1991). Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 17, 480–519. doi: 10.3765/bls.v17i0.1620
  • Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics: Vol. II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • von Stutterheim, C., Andermann, M., Carroll, M., Flecken, M., & Schmiedtová, B. (2012). How grammaticized concepts shape event conceptualization in language production: Insights from linguistic analysis, eye tracking data, and memory performance. Linguistics, 50, 833–867.
  • von Stutterheim, C., Bouhaous, A., & Carroll, M. (2017). From time to space. The impact of aspectual categories on the construal of motion events: The case of Tunisian Arabic and modern Standard Arabic. Linguistics, 55, 207–249. doi: 10.1515/ling-2016-0038
  • von Stutterheim, C., & Carroll, M. (2006). The impact of grammaticalised temporal categories on ultimate attainment in advanced L2-acquisition. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Educating for advanced foreign language capacities: Constructs, curriculum, instruction, assessment (pp. 40–53). Georgetown, WA: Georgetown University Press.
  • Xiao, R., & McEnery, T. (2004). Aspect in mandarin Chinese: A corpus-based study. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  • Xu, Z. (2013). An empirical study of motion expressions in mandarin Chinese. English Language and Literature Studies, 3, 53–67. doi: 10.5539/ells.v3n4p53
  • Zacks, J., Speer, N., & Reynolds, J. R. (2009). Segmentation in reading and film comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 307–327. doi: 10.1037/a0015305
  • Zacks, J., Speer, N., Swallow, K. M., Braver, T. S., & Reynolds, J. R. (2007). Event perception: A mind/brain perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 273–293. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.273
  • Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162