The representation of plural inflectional affixes in English: evidence from priming in an auditory lexical decision task

References

• Amenta, S., & Crepaldi, D. (2012). Morphological processing as we know it: An analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 232. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S. R. (1992). A-morphous morphology (Vol. 60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., & Milin, P. (2010). Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(2), 12–28. doi: 10.21500/20112084.807
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Ðurđević, D. F., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M. (2011). An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review, 118(3), 438–481. doi: 10.1037/a0023851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacovcin, H., Goodwin Davies, A., Wilder, R., & Embick, D. (2017). Auditory morphological processing: Evidence from phonological priming. Cognition, 164, 102–106. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartoń, K. (2018). Mumin: Multi-model inference (R package version 1.42.1). Retrieved from CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., & Baayen, H. (2015). Parsimonious mixed models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.04967.
   Google Scholar
• Berko, J. (1958). The child's learning of English morphology. Word, 14(2–3), 150–177. doi: 10.1080/00437956.1958.11659661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernolet, S., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2010). Does verb bias modulate syntactic priming? Cognition, 114(3), 455–461. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18(3), 355–387. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, J. (2000). In defense of abstractionist theories of word identification and repetition priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 83–99. doi: 10.3758/BF03210726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–990. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creemers, A., Goodwin Davies, A., Wilder, R. J., Tamminga, M., & Embick, D. (2020). Opacity, transparency, and morphological priming: A study of prefixed verbs in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 110. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2019.104055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damer, E. and Colleagues (2018). Prolific (Crowd sourcing platform for research participant recruitment). Retrieved from prolific.ac
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, S. (2007). How to use the LSA web site. In T. K. Landauer, D. S. McNamara, S. Dennis, & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 57–70). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Drummond, A. (2017). Ibex: Internet based experiments. Retrieved from spellout.net/ibexfarm/
   Google Scholar
• Duñabeitia, J., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Does darkness lead to happiness? Masked suffix priming effects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(7–8), 1002–1020. doi: 10.1080/01690960802164242
   Google Scholar
• Embick, D. (2015). The morpheme: A theoretical introduction (Vol. 31). Boston/Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
   Google Scholar
• Emmorey, K. D. (1989). Auditory morphological priming in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4(2), 73–92. doi: 10.1080/01690968908406358
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47(2), 164–203. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00005-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(4), 680–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraudo, H., & Dal Maso, S. (2016). The salience of complex words and their parts: Which comes first? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1778. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2001). Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(1), 127–131. doi: 10.3758/BF03196148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin Davies, A. (2018). Morphological representations in lexical processing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Green, P., & MacLeod, C. J. (2016). SIMR: An R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 493–498. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20 (pp. 111–76). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F., & Snider, N. E. (2013). Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime's prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition, 127, 57–83. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinoshita, S. (2006). Additive and interactive effects of word frequency and masked repetition in the lexical decision task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(4), 668–673. doi: 10.3758/BF03193979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., Estes, Z., Brysbaert, M., & Warriner, A. B. (2014). Emotion and language: Valence and arousal affect word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1065. doi: 10.1037/a0035669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2018). lmertest: Tests in linear mixed effects models (R package version 3.0-1). Retrieved from CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest
   Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2007). Morphological processes in language comprehension. In M. G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 175–194). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Ford, M., Older, L., & Zhou, X. (1996). The combinatorial lexicon: Priming derivational affixes. Proceedings of the 18th conference of the cognitive science society, University of California, San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, P. H. (1972). Inflectional morphology: A theoretical study based on aspects of Latin verb conjugation (Vol. 6). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milin, P., Feldman, L. B., Ramscar, M., Hendrix, P., & Baayen, R. H. (2017). Discrimination in lexical decision. PloS one, 12(2), e0171935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, J., & Stockall, L. (2012). Early, equivalent ERP masked priming effects for regular and irregular morphology. Brain and Language, 123(2), 81–93. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76(2), 165. doi: 10.1037/h0027366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H. (2013). A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4(2), 133–142. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2002). Bias effects in facilitatory phonological priming. Memory & Cognition, 30(3), 399–411. doi: 10.3758/BF03194940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastizzo, M. J., & Feldman, L. B. (2002). Discrepancies between orthographic and unrelated baselines in masked priming undermine a decompositional account of morphological facilitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(1), 244–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2000). Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing?Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(4-5), 445–485. doi: 10.1080/01690960050119661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, A., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2000). Organising principles in lexical representation: Evidence from Polish. In L. R. Gleitman & A. K. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 387–392). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satterthwaite, F. E. (1946). An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrics Bulletin, 2(6), 110–114. doi: 10.2307/3002019
   Google Scholar
• Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., & Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3(1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmauder, A. R., Morris, R. K., & Poynor, D. V. (2000). Lexical processing and text integration of function and content words: Evidence from priming and eye fixations. Memory and Cognition, 28(7), 1098–1108. doi: 10.3758/BF03211811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slowiaczek, L. M., McQueen, J. M., Soltano, E. G., & Lynch, M. (2000). Phonological representations in prelexical speech processing: Evidence from form-based priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(3), 530–560. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolík, F. (2010). Inflectional suffix priming in Czech verbs and nouns. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1667–1672). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Smolka, E., Gondan, M., & Rösler, F. (2015). Take a stand on understanding: Electrophysiological evidence for stem access in german complex verbs. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 62. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(6), 638–647. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80051-X
   Google Scholar
• VanWagenen, S. (2005). The morphologically organized mental lexicon: Further experimental evidence (Unpublished master's thesis). University of California, Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• VanWagenen, S., & Pertsova, K. (2014). Asymmetries in priming of verbal and nominal inflectional affixes in Russian. In C. Schutze & L. Stockall (Eds.), UCLA working papers in linguistics: Connectedness. Papers by and for Sarah VanWagenen. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Wilder, R. J., Goodwin Davies, A., & Embick, D. (2019). Differences between morphological and repetition priming in auditory lexical decision: Implications for decompositional models. Cortex; A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 116, 122–142. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap, M. J., Pexman, P. M., Wellsby, M., Hargreaves, I. S., & Huff, M. (2012). An abundance of riches: Cross-task comparisons of semantic richness effects in visual word recognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 72. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar