Synchronous, but not entrained: exogenous and endogenous cortical rhythms of speech and language processing

References

• Addante, R. J., Watrous, A. J., Yonelinas, A. P., Ekstrom, A. D., & Ranganath, C. (2011). Prestimulus theta activity predicts correct source memory retrieval. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 10702–10707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitchison, J. (2012). Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Arnal, L. H., Doelling, K. B., & Poeppel, D. (2015). Delta-beta coupled oscillations underlie temporal prediction accuracy. Cerebral Cortex, 25(9), 3077–3085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnal, L. H., & Giraud, A. L. (2012). Cortical oscillations and sensory predictions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(7), 390–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnal, L. H., Wyart, V., & Giraud, A. L. (2011). Transitions in neural oscillations reflect prediction errors generated in audiovisual speech. Nature Neuroscience, 14(6), 797–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A., Hitch, G., & Allen, R. (2009). Working memory and binding in sentence recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 438–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, R., Ritter, P., & Villringer, A. (2008). Influence of ongoing alpha rhythm on the visual evoked potential. Neuroimage, 39, 707–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bever, T. G., & Poeppel, D. (2010). Analysis by synthesis: A (re-)emerging program of research for language and vision. Biolinguistics, 4(2–3), 174–200.
   Google Scholar
• Bonhage, C. E., Meyer, L., Gruber, T., Friederici, A. D., & Mueller, J. L. (2017). Oscillatory EEG dynamics underlying automatic chunking during sentence processing. NeuroImage, 152, 647–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosker, H. R. (2017). Accounting for rate-dependent category boundary shifts in speech perception. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79, 333–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosseler, A. N., Taulu, S., Pihko, E., Makela, J. P., Imada, T., Ahonen, A., & Kuhl, P. K. (2013). Theta brain rhythms index perceptual narrowing in infant speech perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boucher, V. J., Gilbert, A. C., & Jemel, B. (2019). The role of low-frequency neural oscillations in speech processing: Revisiting delta entrainment. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 31(8), 1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourguignon, M., De Tiege, X., de Beeck, M. O., Ligot, N., Paquier, P., Van Bogaert, P., … Jousmaki, V. (2013). The pace of prosodic phrasing couples the listener’s cortex to the reader’s voice. Human Brain Mapping, 34(2), 314–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzsaki, G. (2006). Rhythms of the brain. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buzsaki, G. (2019). The brain from inside out. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calderone, D. J., Lakatos, P., Butler, P. D., & Castellanos, F. X. (2014). Entrainment of neural oscillations as a modifiable substrate of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(6), 300–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, Z. C., Takaura, K., Wang, L., Fujii, N., & Dehaene, S. (2018). Large-scale cortical networks for hierarchical prediction and prediction error in the primate brain. Neuron, 100(5), 1252–1266.e3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, F. (2012). Oscillators and syllables: A cautionary note. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Liberto, G. M., O’Sullivan, J. A., & Lalor, E. C. (2015). Low-frequency cortical entrainment to speech reflects phoneme-level processing. Current Biology, 25(19), 2457–2465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikker, S., Rabagliati, H., & Pylkkänen, L. (2009). Sensitivity to syntax in visual cortex. Cognition, 110, 293–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilley, L. C., & Pitt, M. A. (2010). Altering context speech rate can cause words to appear or disappear. Psychological Science, 21, 1664–1670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, N., & He, H. (2016). Rhythm of silence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(2), 82–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, N., Melloni, L., Zhang, H., Tian, X., & Poeppel, D. (2016). Cortical tracking of hierarchical linguistic structures in connected speech. Nature Neuroscience, 19(1), 158–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, N., & Simon, J. Z. (2014). Cortical entrainment to continuous speech: Functional roles and interpretations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Lupyan, G., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P. (2015). Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(10), 603–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doelling, K., Arnal, L., Ghitza, O., & Poeppel, D. (2014). Acoustic landmarks drive delta-theta oscillations to enable speech comprehension by facilitating perceptual parsing. Neuroimage, 85(2), 761–768.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Engel, A. K., & Fries, P. (2010). Beta-band oscillations—Signalling the status quo? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 20(2), 156–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernald, A., & McRoberts, G. (1996). Prosodic bootstrapping: A critical analysis of the argument and the evidence. In J. L. Morgan & K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp. 365–388). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. D. (1998). Learning to parse? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27(2), 285–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, S. L., Otten, L. J., Galli, G., & Vigliocco, G. (2015). The ERP response to the amount of information conveyed by words in sentences. Brain and Language, 140, 1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A., Wang, Y., Herrmann, C., Maess, B., & Oertel, U. (2000). Localization of early syntactic processes in frontal and temporal cortical areas: A magnetoencephalographic study. Human Brain Mapping, 11, 1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D., & Singer, W. (2015). Grounding language processing on basic neurophysiological principles. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 329–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K. (2005). A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 360(1456), 815–836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervain, J. (2015). Plasticity in early language acquisition: The effects of prenatal and early childhood experience. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 35, 13–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghitza, O. (2011). Linking speech perception and neurophysiology: Speech decoding guided by cascaded oscillators locked to the input rhythm. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghitza, O., & Greenberg, S. (2009). On the possible role of brain rhythms in speech perception: Intelligibility of time-compressed speech with periodic and aperiodic insertions of silence. Phonetica, 66(1–2), 113–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraud, A. L., & Poeppel, D. (2012). Cortical oscillations and speech processing: Emerging computational principles and operations. Nature Neuroscience, 15(4), 511–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami, U., & Leong, V. (2013). Speech rhythm and temporal structure: Converging perspectives? Laboratory Phonology, 4(1), 2013–0004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, S. (2001). What are the essential cues for understanding spoken language? The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109(5), 2382–2382.
   Google Scholar
• Grillo, N., Costa, J., Fernandes, B., & Santi, A. (2015). Highs and lows in English attachment. Cognition, 144, 116–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, J., Hoogenboom, N., Thut, G., Schyns, P., Panzeri, S., Belin, P., & Garrod, S. (2013). Speech rhythms and multiplexed oscillatory sensory coding in the human brain. PLoS Biology, 11(12), e1001752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, J. (2001). A probabilistic Earley parser as a psycholinguistic model. Proceedings of the second meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Language Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, J., Dyer, C., Kuncoro, A., & Brennan, J. R. (2018). Finding syntax in human encephalography with beam search. Proceedings of the 56th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Melbourne, Australia (pp. 2727–2736). ACL.
   Google Scholar
• Halle, M., & Stevens, K. (1962). Speech recognition: A model and a program for research. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 8(2), 155–159.
   Google Scholar
• Hanslmayr, S., Aslan, A., Staudigl, T., Klimesch, W., Herrmann, C. S., & Bäuml, K.-H. (2007). Prestimulus oscillations predict visual perception performance between and within subjects. Neuroimage, 37, 1465–1473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemforth, B., Fernandez, S., Clifton, C., Frazier, L., Konieczny, L., & Walter, M. (2015). Relative clause attachment in German, English, Spanish and French: Effects of position and length. Lingua, 166, 43–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, B., Maess, B., Hasting, A. S., & Friederici, A. D. (2009). Localization of the syntactic mismatch negativity in the temporal cortex: An MEG study. Neuroimage, 48, 590–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, C. S., Munk, M. H., & Engel, A. K. (2004). Cognitive functions of gamma-band activity: Memory match and utilization. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(8), 347–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickok, G., Farahbod, H., & Saberi, K. (2015). The rhythm of perception entrainment to acoustic rhythms induces subsequent perceptual oscillation. Psychological Science, 26(7), 1006–1013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., & Steinhauer, K. (2011). Phrase length matters: The interplay between implicit prosody and syntax in Korean “garden path” sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(11), 3555–3575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iemi, L., Busch, N. A., Laudini, A., Haegens, S., Samaha, J., Villringer, A., & Nikulin, V. V. (2019). Multiple mechanisms link prestimulus neural oscillations to sensory responses. Elife, 8, e43620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isobe, M. (2007). The acquisition of nominal compounding in Japanese: A parametric approach. Proceedings of the 2nd conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America.
   Google Scholar
• Jusczyk, P. W. (1997). The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kayser, C., Wilson, C., Safaai, H., Sakata, S., & Panzeri, S. (2015). Rhythmic auditory cortex activity at multiple timescales shapes stimulus-response gain and background firing. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(20), 7750–7762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keitel, A., & Gross, J. (2016). Individual human brain areas can be identified from their characteristic spectral activation fingerprints. PLoS Biology, 14(6), e1002498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. A., Saltzman, E. L., & Tuller, B. (1986). The dynamical perspective on speech production: Data and theory. Journal of Phonetics, 14(1), 29–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. S., & Chung, C. K. (2008). Language lateralization using MEG beta frequency desynchronization during auditory oddball stimulation with one-syllable words. Neuroimage, 42, 1499–1507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kösem, A., Basirat, A., Azizi, L., & van Wassenhove, V. (2016). High-frequency neural activity predicts word parsing in ambiguous speech streams. Journal of Neurophysiology, 116(6), 2497–2512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kösem, A., Bosker, H. R., Takashima, A., Meyer, A., Jensen, O., & Hagoort, P. (2018). Neural entrainment determines the words we hear. Current Biology, 28(18), 2867–2875.e3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhl, P. K. (2000). A new view of language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97(22), 11850–11857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhl, P. K., Ramirez, R. R., Bosseler, A., Lin, J. F., & Imada, T. (2014). Infants’ brain responses to speech suggest analysis by synthesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(31), 11238–11245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakatos, P., Karmos, G., Mehta, A. D., Ulbert, I., & Schroeder, C. E. (2008). Entrainment of neuronal oscillations as a mechanism of attentional selection. Science, 320(5872), 110–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakatos, P., Shah, A. S., Knuth, K. H., Ulbert, I., Karmos, G., & Schroeder, C. E. (2005). An oscillatory hierarchy controlling neuronal excitability and stimulus processing in the auditory cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94(3), 1904–1911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lany, J., & Saffran, J. R. (2010). From statistics to meaning: Infants’ acquisition of lexical categories. Psychological Science, 21(2), 284–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehongre, K., Ramus, F., Villiermet, N., Schwartz, D., & Giraud, A. L. (2011). Altered low-gamma sampling in auditory cortex accounts for the three main facets of dyslexia. Neuron, 72(6), 1080–1090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, M. K., Baud, M. O., Sjerps, M. J., & Chang, E. F. (2016). Perceptual restoration of masked speech in human cortex. Nature Communications, 7, 13619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, R. (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106(3), 1126–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, A., & Bastiaansen, M. (2015). A predictive coding framework for rapid neural dynamics during sentence-level language comprehension. Cortex, 68, 155–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, A., Schoffelen, J.-M., Hoffmann, C., Bastiaansen, M., & Schriefers, H. (2017). Discourse-level semantic coherence influences beta oscillatory dynamics and the N400 during sentence comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(5), 601–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, A. G., Schoffelen, J.-M., Schriefers, H., & Bastiaansen, M. (2016). A predictive coding perspective on beta oscillations during sentence-level language comprehension. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lizarazu, M., Lallier, M., Molinaro, N., Bourguignon, M., Paz-Alonso, P. M., Lerma-Usabiaga, G., & Carreiras, M. (2015). Developmental evaluation of atypical auditory sampling in dyslexia: Functional and structural evidence. Human Brain Mapping, 36(12), 4986–5002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101(4), 676–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoudzadeh, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Fournier, M., Kongolo, G., Goudjil, S., Dubois, J., … Wallois, F. (2013). Syllabic discrimination in premature human infants prior to complete formation of cortical layers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(12), 4846–4851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mai, G., Minett, J. W., & Wang, W. S. (2016). Delta, theta, beta, and gamma brain oscillations index levels of auditory sentence processing. Neuroimage, 133, 516–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltseva, I., Geissler, H. G., & Başar, E. (2000). Alpha oscillations as an indicator of dynamic memory operations – anticipation of omitted stimuli. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 36(3), 185–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Männel, C., & Friederici, A. D. (2009). Pauses and intonational phrasing: ERP studies in 5-month-old German infants and adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(10), 1988–2006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Männel, C., Schipke, C. S., & Friederici, A. D. (2013). The role of pause as a prosodic boundary marker: Language ERP studies in German 3-and 6-year-olds. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 86–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10(1), 29–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. E. (2016). Language processing as cue integration: Grounding the psychology of language in perception and neurophysiology. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. E., & Doumas, L. A. (2017). A mechanism for the cortical computation of hierarchical linguistic structure. PLoS Biology, 15(3), e2000663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. E., & Doumas, L. A. (2019). Predicate learning in neural systems: Using oscillations to discover latent structure. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 29, 77–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathewson, K. E., Gratton, G., Fabiani, M., Beck, D. M., & Ro, T. (2009). To see or not to see: Prestimulus α phase predicts visual awareness. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 2725–2732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathewson, K. E., Prudhomme, C., Fabiani, M., Beck, D. M., Lleras, A., & Gratton, G. (2012). Making waves in the stream of consciousness: Entraining oscillations in EEG alpha and fluctuations in visual awareness with rhythmic visual stimulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(12), 2321–2333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesgarani, N., Cheung, C., Johnson, K., & Chang, E. F. (2014). Phonetic feature encoding in human superior temporal gyrus. Science, 343(6174), 1006–1010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, L. (2017). The neural oscillations of speech processing and language comprehension: State of the art and emerging mechanisms. European Journal of Neuroscience, 48(7), 2609–2621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, L., Elsner, A., Turker, S., Kuhnke, P., & Hartwigsen, G. (2018). Perturbation of left posterior prefrontal cortex modulates topdown processing in sentence comprehension. NeuroImage, 181, 598–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, L., & Gumbert, M. (2018). Synchronization of electrophysiological responses with speech benefits syntactic information processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 30(8), 1066–1074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, L., Henry, M. L., Schmuck, N., Gaston, P., & Friederici, A. (2016). Linguistic bias modulates interpretation of speech via neural delta-band oscillations. Cerebral Cortex, 27(9), 4293–4302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinaro, N., & Lizarazu, M. (2017). Delta(but not theta)-band cortical entrainment involves speech-specific processing. European Journal of Neuroscience, 48(7), 2642–2650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinaro, N., Lizarazu, M., Lallier, M., Bourguignon, M., & Carreiras, M. (2016). Out-of-synchrony speech entrainment in developmental dyslexia. Human Brain Mapping, 37, 2767–2783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, C., Lagercrantz, H., & Kuhl, P. K. (2013). Language experienced in utero affects vowel perception after birth: A two-country study. Acta Paediatrica, 102(2), 156–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuling, T., Rach, S., Wagner, S., Wolters, C. H., & Herrmann, C. S. (2012). Good vibrations: Oscillatory phase shapes perception. Neuroimage, 63(2), 771–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M. S., Politzer-Ahles, S., Heyselaar, E., Segaert, K., Darley, E., Kazanina, N., … Mézière, D. (2018). Large-scale replication study reveals a limit on probabilistic prediction in language comprehension. ELife, 7, e33468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. J. (2006). When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(7), 1098–1111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nourski, K. V., Steinschneider, M., Rhone, A. E., Oya, H., Kawasaki, H., Howard, M. A., 3rd, & McMurray, B. (2015). Sound identification in human auditory cortex: Differential contribution of local field potentials and high gamma power as revealed by direct intracranial recordings. Brain and Language, 148, 37–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obleser, J., & Kayser, C. (2019). Neural entrainment and attentional selection in the listening brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(11), 913–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz-Mantilla, S., Hamalainen, J. A., Realpe-Bonilla, T., & Benasich, A. A. (2016). Oscillatory dynamics underlying perceptual narrowing of native phoneme mapping from 6 to 12 months of age. Journal of Neuroscience, 36(48), 12095–12105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H., Ince, R. A., Schyns, P. G., Thut, G., & Gross, J. (2015). Frontal top-down signals increase coupling of auditory low-frequency oscillations to continuous speech in human listeners. Current Biology, 25(12), 1649–1653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peelle, J. E., Gross, J., & Davis, M. H. (2013). Phase-locked responses to speech in human auditory cortex are enhanced during comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 23(6), 1378–1387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, F., Coupé, C., & Marsico, E. (2011). Across-language perspective on speech information rate. Language, 87(3), 539–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pikovsky, A., Rosenblum, M., & Kurths, J. (2003). Synchronization: A universal concept in nonlinear sciences (Vol. 12). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poeppel, D., & Monahan, P. J. (2011). Feedforward and feedback in speech perception: Revisiting analysis by synthesis. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(7), 935–951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pöppel, E. (1997). A hierarchical model of temporal perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1(2), 56–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinacher, M., Becker, R., Villringer, A., & Ritter, P. (2009). Oscillatory brain states interact with late cognitive components of the somatosensory evoked potential. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 183(1), 49–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimmele, J. M., Morillon, B., Poeppel, D., & Arnal, L. H. (2018). Proactive sensing of periodic and aperiodic auditory patterns. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(10), 870–882.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roll, M., Lindgren, M., Alter, K., & Horne, M. (2012). Time-driven effects on parsing during reading. Brain and Language, 121, 267–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roopun, A. K., Kramer, M. A., Carracedo, L. M., Kaiser, M., Davies, C. H., Traub, R. D., … Whittington, M. A. (2008). Period concatenation underlies interactions between gamma and beta rhythms in neocortex. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 1, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Sarnthein, J., Petsche, H., Rappelsberger, P., Shaw, G. L., & von Stein, A. (1998). Synchronization between prefrontal and posterior association cortex during human working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95(12), 7092–7096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saussure, F. D. (1916). Course in general linguistics (W. Baskin, Trans.). London: Fontana/Collins, 74.
   Google Scholar
• Schremm, A., Horne, M., & Roll, M. (2015). Brain responses to syntax constrained by time-driven implicit prosodic phrases. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 35, 68–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, C. E., & Lakatos, P. (2009). Low-frequency neuronal oscillations as instruments of sensory selection. Trends in Neurosciences, 32(1), 9–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, C. E., Wilson, D. A., Radman, T., Scharfman, H., & Lakatos, P. (2010). Dynamics of active sensing and perceptual selection. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 20, 172–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedivy, J., & Spivey-Knowlton, M. (1994). The use of structural, lexical, and pragmatic information in parsing attachment ambiguities. In C. Clifton Jr., L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing. Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seidl, A. (2007). Infants’ use and weighting of prosodic cues in clause segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(1), 24–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, M. T., Kanai, R., Seth, A. K., & VanRullen, R. (2016). Rhythmic influence of top–down perceptual priors in the phase of prestimulus occipital alpha oscillations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(9), 1318–1330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinhauer, K., Alter, K., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing. Nature Neuroscience, 2(2), 191–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swets, B., Desmet, T., Hambrick, D. Z., & Ferreira, F. (2007). The role of working memory in syntactic ambiguity resolution: A psychometric approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 136, 64–81.
   Google Scholar
• Szymanski, F. D., Rabinowitz, N. C., Magri, C., Panzeri, S., & Schnupp, J. W. (2011). The laminar and temporal structure of stimulus information in the phase of field potentials of auditory cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(44), 15787–15801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanRullen, R. (2016). Perceptual cycles. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(10), 723–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanRullen, R., Busch, N., Drewes, J., & Dubois, J. (2011). Ongoing EEG phase as a trial-by-trial predictor of perceptual and attentional variability. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Stein, A., Rappelsberger, P., Sarnthein, J., & Petsche, H. (1999). Synchronization between temporal and parietal cortex during multimodal object processing in man. Cerebral Cortex, 9(2), 137–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wales, R., & Toner, H. (1979). Intonation and ambiguity. Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Jensen, O., van den Brink, D., Weder, N., Schoffelen, J. M., Magyari, L., … Bastiaansen, M. (2012). Beta oscillations relate to the N400m during language comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 33, 2898–2912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webman-Shafran, R., & Fodor, J. D. (2016). Phrase length and prosody in on-line ambiguity resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45(3), 447–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, S., & Mueller, H. M. (2012). “Too many betas do not spoil the broth”: The role of beta brain oscillations in language processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisz, N., Wühle, A., Monittola, G., Demarchi, G., Frey, J., Popov, T., & Braun, C. (2014). Prestimulus oscillatory power and connectivity patterns predispose conscious somatosensory perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, E417–E425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiedmann, N., & Winkler, S. (2015). The influence of prosody on children’s processing of ambiguous sentences. In S. Winkler (Ed.), Ambiguity: Language and communication (pp. 185–197). Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Wöstmann, M., Waschke, L., & Obleser, J. (2019). Prestimulus neural alpha power predicts confidence in discriminating identical auditory stimuli. European Journal of Neuroscience, 49, 94–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoefel, B., & VanRullen, R. (2015). Selective perceptual phase entrainment to speech rhythm in the absence of spectral energy fluctuations. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(5), 1954–1964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar