Masking auditory feedback does not eliminate repetition reduction

References

• Agnello, J. G. (1970). Durational differences in speech production under normal and delayed auditory feedback. Communications Monographs, 37, 195–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. E., Kahn, J. M., & Pancani, G. C. (2012). Audience design affects acoustic reduction via production facilitation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 505–512. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0233-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Boland, J. E., & Shields, L. W. (1989). Priming in pronunciation: Beyond pattern recognition and onset latency. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 14–36. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(89)90026-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bard, E. G., Anderson, A. H., Sotillo, C., Aylett, M., Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Newlands, A. (2000). Controlling the intelligibility of referring expressions in dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 1–22. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2018). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.19. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
   Google Scholar
• Bürkner, P.-C. (2017). Brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80, 1–28. doi: 10.18637/jss.v080.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buz, E., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). The (in) dependence of articulation and lexical planning during isolated word production. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31, 404–424. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1105984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, Y. H., Lin, F. H., Chou, Y. J., Tsai, K. W. K., Kuo, W. J., Jääskeläinen, I. P., & Zhan, W. (2013). Effective cerebral connectivity during silent speech reading revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. PLoS One, 8, e80265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080265
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dean, C. E. (1930). Audition by bone conduction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2, 281–296. doi: 10.1121/1.1915256
   Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Juliano, C., & Govindjee, A. (1993). Structure and content in language production: A theory of frame constraints in phonological speech errors. Cognitive Science, 17, 149–195. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1702_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbanks, G., & Guttman, N. (1958). Effects of delayed auditory feedback upon articulation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1, 12–22. doi: 10.1044/jshr.0101.12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fowler, C. A. (1988). Differential shortening of repeated content words produced in various communicative contexts. Language and Speech, 31, 307–319. doi: 10.1177/002383098803100401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, C. A., & Housum, J. (1987). Talkers’ signaling of “new” and “old” words in speech and listeners’ perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 489–504. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(87)90136-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridriksson, J., Moser, D., Ryalls, J., Bonilha, L., Rorden, C., & Baylis, G. (2009). Modulation of frontal lobe speech areas associated with the production and perception of speech movements. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 812–819. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/06-0197)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahl, S. (2008). Time and thyme are not homophones: The effect of lemma frequency on word durations in spontaneous speech. Language, 84, 474–496. doi: 10.1353/lan.0.0035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenther, F. H. (1995). Speech sound acquisition, coarticulation, and rate effects in a neural network model of speech production. Psychological Review, 102, 594–621. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.3.594
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenther, F. H., & Hickok, G. (2015). Role of the auditory system in speech production. In Michael J. Aminoff, François Boller, & Dick F. Swaab, (Eds.), Handbook of clinical neurology (Vol. 129, pp. 161–175). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hickok, G. (2012). Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13, 135–145. doi: 10.1038/nrn3158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houde, J. F., & Jordan, M. I. (1998). Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production. Science, 279(5354), 1213–1216. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5354.1213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houde, J. F., & Nagarajan, S. S. (2011). Speech production as state feedback control. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 82. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houde, J. F., Nagarajan, S. S., Sekihara, K., & Merzenich, M. M. (2002). Modulation of the auditory cortex during speech: An MEG study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1125–1138. doi: 10.1162/089892902760807140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, P., & Archer, A. (1984). Susceptibility to the effects of delayed auditory feedback. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 296–302. doi: 10.3758/BF03206371
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacobs, C. L., Yiu, L. K., Watson, D. G., & Dell, G. S. (2015). Why are repeated words produced with reduced durations? Evidence from inner speech and homophone production. Journal of Memory and Language, 84, 37–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, J. A., & Munhall, K. G. (2000). Perceptual calibration of F0 production: Evidence from feedback perturbation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 1246–1251. doi: 10.1121/1.1288414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, J. M., & Arnold, J. E. (2015). Articulatory and lexical repetition effects on durational reduction: Speaker experience vs. common ground. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30, 103–119. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2013.848989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kell, C. A., Darquea, M., Behrens, M., Cordani, L., Keller, C., & Fuchs, S. (2017). Phonetic detail and lateralization of reading-related inner speech and of auditory and somatosensory feedback processing during overt reading. Human Brain Mapping, 38, 493–508. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, T. Q., & Watson, D. G. (2010). Repetition is easy: Why repeated referents have reduced prominence. Memory & Cognition, 38, 1137–1146. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.8.1137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, T. Q., & Watson, D. G. (2014). Repetition reduction: Lexical repetition in the absence of referent repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 829–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, H., & Tranel, B. (1971). The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 677–709. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1404.677
   Google Scholar
• Lane, H., Wozniak, J., Matthies, M., Svirsky, M., Perkell, J., O’Connell, M., & Manzella, J. (1997). Changes in sound pressure and fundamental frequency contours following changes in hearing status. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 2244–2252. doi: 10.1121/1.418245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior (Vol. 21). Oxford, United Kingdom: Bobbs-Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14, 41–104. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(83)90026-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombard, E. (1911). Le signe de l’elevation de la voix. Ann. Mal. de L’Oreille et du Larynx, XXXVII (2), 101–119.
   Google Scholar
• Okada, K., Matchin, W., & Hickok, G. (2018). Neural evidence for predictive coding in auditory cortex during speech production. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 423–430. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1284-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheim, G. M. (2013). Inner speech as a forward model? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 369–370. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12002798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheim, G. M., & Dell, G. S. (2008). Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect. Cognition, 106, 528–537. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkell, J. S. (2012). Movement goals and feedback and feedforward control mechanisms in speech production. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 25, 382–407. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.02.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postma, A. (2000). Detection of errors during speech production: A review of speech monitoring models. Cognition, 77, 97–132. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00090-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, D. W., & Munhall, K. G. (2006). Adaptive control of vowel formant frequency: Evidence from real-time formant manipulation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 966–977. doi: 10.1121/1.2217714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisberg, D. (2014). Auditory imagery. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rossion, B., & Pourtois, G. (2004). Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart’s object pictorial set: The role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition. Perception, 33, 217–236. doi: 10.1068/p5117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuerman, W. L., Nagarajan, S., McQueen, J. M., & Houde, J. (2017). Sensorimotor adaptation affects perceptual compensation for coarticulation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141, 2693–2704. doi: 10.1121/1.4979791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevald, C. A., & Dell, G. S. (1994). The sequential cuing effect in speech production. Cognition, 53, 91–127. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90067-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadmehr, R., Smith, M. A., & Krakauer, J. W. (2010). Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 33, 89–108. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiller, D. M., Sato, M., Gracco, V. L., & Baum, S. R. (2009). Perceptual recalibration of speech sounds following speech motor learning. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 1103–1113. doi: 10.1121/1.3058638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, A., Kalinowski, J., Rastatter, M. P., & Lynch, K. (2002). Effect of delayed auditory feedback on normal speakers at two speech rates. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111, 2237–2241. doi: 10.1121/1.1466868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers, W. V., Pisoni, D. B., Bernacki, R. H., Pedlow, R. I., & Stokes, M. A. (1988). Effects of noise on speech production: Acoustic and perceptual analyses. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 917–928. doi: 10.1121/1.396660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, X., & Poeppel, D. (2010). Mental imagery of speech and movement implicates the dynamics of internal forward models. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, X., & Poeppel, D. (2014). Dynamics of self-monitoring and error detection in speech production: Evidence from mental imagery and MEG. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27, 352–364. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonndorf, J. (1976). Bone conduction. In E. de Boer (Ed.), Auditory system (pp. 37–84). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tourville, J. A., & Guenther, F. H. (2011). The DIVA model: A neural theory of speech acquisition and production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 952–981. doi: 10.1080/01690960903498424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, S., Shiller, D. M., & Ostry, D. J. (2003). Somatosensory basis of speech production. Nature, 423(6942), 866–869. doi: 10.1038/nature01710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, T. H., Fridriksson, J., Baker, J., Eoute Jr., D., Bonilha, L., & Rorden, C. (2009). Obligatory Broca’s area modulation associated with passive speech perception. Neuroreport, 20, 492–496. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32832940a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, N. A. (1938). Limits of audition for bone conduction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 9, 294–300. doi: 10.1121/1.1915936
   Google Scholar
• Watson, D. G., Buxó-Lugo, A., & Simmons, D. C. (2015). The effect of phonological encoding on word duration: Selection takes time. In L. Frazier & E. Gibson (Eds.), Explicit and implicit prosody in sentence processing (pp. 85–98). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, A. J. (1963). Delayed auditory feedback. Psychological Bulletin, 60, 213–232. doi: 10.1037/h0044155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar