Predicting (in)correctly: listeners rapidly use unexpected information to revise their predictions

References

• Allan, K. (1977). Classifiers. Language, 53, 285–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38(38), 419–439. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. T. M. (2011). Language can mediate eye movement control within 100 milliseconds, regardless of whether there is anything to move the eyes to. Acta Psychologica, 137(2), 190–200. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73(3), 247–264. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00059-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J. (2008). Analyzing “visual world” eye tracking data using multilevel logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 457–474. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendixen, A., Schroger, E., & Winkler, I. (2009). I heard that coming: Event-related potential evidence for stimulus-driven prediction in the auditory system. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(26), 8447–8451. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.1493-09.2009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudewyn, M. A., Long, D. L., & Swaab, T. Y. (2015). Graded expectations: Predictive processing and the adjustment of expectations during spoken language comprehension. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15, 607–624. doi: 10.3758/s13415-015-0340-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, W.-Y., Lau, E., Wang, S., & Phillips, C. (2018). Wait a second! Delayed impact of argument roles on on-line verb prediction. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33, 803–828. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2018.1427878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, W.-Y., Smith, C., Lau, E., & Phillips, C. (2016). A “bag-of-arguments” mechanism for initial verb predictions. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(5). doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1066832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifton, C. J., Traxler, M. J., Mohamed, M. T., Williams, R. S., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (2003). The use of thematic role information in parsing: Syntactic processing autonomy revisited. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(3), 317–334. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00070-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong, K. A., Quante, L., & Kutas, M. (2014). Predictability, plausibility, and two late ERP positivities during written sentence comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 61(1), 150–162. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.06.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8(8), 1117–1121. doi: 10.1038/nn1504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dink, J. W., & Ferguson, B. (2015). eyetrackingR: An R library for eye-tracking data analysis. Retrieved from http://www.eyetrackingr.com
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, S., & Verkuilen, J. (2017). Empirical logit analysis is not logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 28–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond, A. (2013). IbexFarm (Version 0.3) [Software]. Retrieved from http://spellout.net/ibexfarm/
   Google Scholar
• Erbaugh, M. S. (2004). Chinese classifiers: Their use and acquisition. In P. Li, L. H. Tan, E. Bates, & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Handbook of East Asian psycholinguistics: Vol. 1. Chinese (pp. 39–51). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 469–495. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., Wlotko, E. W., De Ochoa-Dewald, E., & Kutas, M. (2007). Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing. Brain Research, 1146(1), 75–84. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.101
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14(2), 178–210. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(82)90008-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisson, S., Harvey, D. R., & Staub, A. (2017). No prediction error cost in reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 95, 200–214. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2017.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, M. Y., & Malt, B. C. (2009). Mental representation and cognitive consequences of Chinese individual classifiers. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 1124–1179. doi: 10.1080/01690960802018323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grüter, T., Lau, E., & Ling, W. (2018). L2 listeners rely on the semantics of classifiers to predict. In A. B. Bertolini & M. J. Kaplan (Eds.), BUCLD 42: Proceedings of the 42nd annual Boston University conference on language development (pp. 303–316). Somerville , MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hintz, F, & Huettig, F. (2015). The complexity of the visual environment modulates language-mediated eye gaze. In R. Mishra, N. Srinivasan, & F. Huettig (Eds.), Attention and Vision in Language Processing (pp. 39–55). Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-81-322-2443-3
   Google Scholar
• Huettig, F., Chen, J., Bowerman, M., & Majid, A. (2010). Do language-specific categories shape conceptual processing? Mandarin classifier distinctions influence eye gaze behavior, but only during linguistic processing. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10, 39–58.
   Google Scholar
• Huettig, F, & McQueen, J.M. (2007). The tug of war between phonological, semantic and shape information in language-mediated visual search. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(4), 460–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, A., Corley, M., Pickering, M. J., Martin, A. E., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2016). Predicting form and meaning: Evidence from brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 86, 157–171. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, A., Martin, A. E., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2017). How robust are prediction effects in language comprehension? Failure to replicate article-elicited N400 effects. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(8), 954–965. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1242761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamide, Y. (2008). Anticipatory processes in sentence processing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(4), 647–670. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00072.x
   Google Scholar
• Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(1), 133–156. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00023-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, N. M., Carlson, G. N., Li, R., Jaeger, T. F., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2012). Classifying and massifying incrementally in Chinese language comprehension. In D. Massam (Ed.), Count and mass across languages (pp. 261–282). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654277.003.0014
   Google Scholar
• Kochari, A. R., & Flecken, M. (2018). Lexical prediction in language comprehension: A replication study of grammatical gender effects in Dutch. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2018.1524500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M. (1993). In the company of other words: Electrophysiological evidence for single-word and sentence context effects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8(4), 533–572. doi: 10.1080/01690969308407587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., DeLong, K. A., & Smith, N. J. (2011). A look around at what lies ahead: Prediction and predictability in language processing. In M. Bar (Ed.), Predictions in the brain: Using our past to generate a future. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195395518.003.0065
   Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 161–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, N, Sturt, P, & Liu, P. (2017). Predicting semantic features in Chinese: Evidence from ERPs. Cognition, 166, 433–446. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, N., Sturt, P., & Liu, P. (2017). Predicting semantic features in Chinese: Evidence from ERPs. Cognition, 166, 433–446. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, E, & Grüter, T. (2015). Real-time processing of classifier information by L2 speakers of Chinese. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 311–323.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, E. F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics: (De)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(12), 920–933. doi: 10.1038/nrn2532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1989). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, S. G., & Christianson, K. (2016). Limits on lexical prediction during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 88, 22–60. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maris, E., & Oostenveld, R. (2007). Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 164(1), 177–190. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M. S., Politzer-Ahles, S., Heyselaar, E., Segaert, K., Darley, E., Kazanina, N., … Huettig, F. (2018). Large-scale replication study reveals a limit on probabilistic prediction in language comprehension. eLife, 7, e33468. doi: 10.7554/eLife.33468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otten, M., Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. J. (2007). Great expectations: Specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language. BMC Neuroscience, 8(1), 89. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-8-89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otten, M., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2008). Discourse-based word anticipation during language processing: Prediction or priming? Discourse Processes, 45(6), 464–496. doi: 10.1080/01638530802356463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otten, M., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2009). Does working memory capacity affect the ability to predict upcoming words in discourse? Brain Research, 1291, 92–101. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.07.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Sassenhagen, J., & Draschkow, D. (2019). Cluster-based permutation tests of MEG/EEG data do not establish significance of effect latency or location. Psychophysiology, 56(6), 1–8. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedivy, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., Chambers, C. G., & Carlson, G. N. (1999). Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation. Cognition, 71(2), 109–147. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00025-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summerfield, C., & Egner, T. (2009). Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 403–409. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szewczyk, J. M. (2018). Prediction-inconsistent information leads to prediction updating – An ERP study on sentence comprehension. Talk given at the 31st annual CUNY sentence processing conference, Davis, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Szewczyk, J. M., & Schriefers, H. (2013). Prediction in language comprehension beyond specific words: An ERP study on sentence comprehension in Polish. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(4), 297–314. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szewczyk, J. M., & Schriefers, H. (2018). The N400 as an index of lexical preactivation and its implications for prediction in language comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33(6), 665–686. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2017.1401101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai, J. H.-Y. (1994). Chinese classifier systems and human categorization. In M. Y. Chen & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), In honor of William S.-Y. Wang: Interdisciplinary studies on language and language change (pp. 479–494). Taipei: Pyramid Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268(5217), 1632–1634. doi: 10.1126/science.7777863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, W. L. (1953). “Cloze procedure”: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly, 30(4), 415–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1994.1014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang, C, & Chambers, C.G. (2011). Appearances aren’t everything: Shape classifiers and referential processing in cantonese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 37(5), 1065–1080. doi: 10.1037/a0023601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(3), 443–467. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Petten, C, & Luka, B.J. (2012). Prediction during language comprehension: Benefits, costs, and ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(2), 176–190. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicha, N. Y. Y., Bates, E. A., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2003). Potato not pope: Human brain potentials to gender expectation and agreement in Spanish spoken sentences. Neuroscience Letters, 346(3), 165–168. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00599-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicha, N. Y. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2003). Expecting gender: An event related brain potential study on the role of grammatical gender in comprehending a line drawing within a written sentence in Spanish. Cortex, 39(3), 483–508. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70260-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicha, N. Y. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2004). Anticipating words and their gender: An event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(7), 1272–1288. doi: 10.1162/0898929041920487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wlotko, E. W., & Federmeier, K. D. (2012). So that’s what you meant! event-related potentials reveal multiple aspects of context use during construction of message-level meaning. NeuroImage, 62(1), 356–366. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert, D. M., & Flanagan, J. R. (2001). Motor prediction. Current Biology, 11, R729–R732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar