“Acoustic-driven oscillators as cortical pacemaker”: a commentary on Meyer, Sun & Martin (2019)

References

• Ahissar, E., & Ahissar, M. (2005). Processing of the temporal envelope of speech. In R. Konig, P. Heil, E. Bundinger, & H. Scheich (Eds.), The auditory cortex. A synthesis of human and animal research Ch 18. (pp. 295–314). Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410613066.
   Google Scholar
• Ahissar, E., Haidarliu, S., & Zacksenhouse, M. (1997). Decoding temporally encoded sensory input by cortical oscillations and thalamic phase comparators. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94(21), 11633–11638. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.21.11633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, T., Gao, Y., Guyton, M., Ru, P., & Shamma, S. A. (1999). Spectro-temporal modulation transfer functions and speech intelligibility. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(5), 2719–2732. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.428100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2016). The Now-or-Never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1500031X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, N., & Simon, J. Z. (2009). Neural representations of complex temporal modulations in the human auditory cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 102(5), 2731–2743. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00523.2009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doelling, K. B., Arnal, L. H., Ghitza, O., & Poeppel, D. (2014). Acoustic landmarks drive delta–theta oscillations to enable speech comprehension by facilitating perceptual parsing. Neuroimage, 85, 761–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foulke, E., & Sticht, T. G. (1969). Review of research on the intelligibility and comprehension of accelerated speech. Psychological Bulletin, 72(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garvey, W. D. (1953). The intelligibility of speeded speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45(2), 102–108. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054381
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghitza, O. (2011). Linking speech perception and neurophysiology: Speech decoding guided by cascaded oscillators locked to the input rhythm. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 130. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghitza, O. (2012). On the role of theta-driven syllabic parsing in decoding speech: Intelligibility of speech with a manipulated modulation spectrum. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 238. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghitza, O. (2013). The theta-syllable: A unit of speech information defined by cortical function. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 138. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghitza, O. (2014). Behavioral evidence for the role of cortical theta oscillations in determining auditory channel capacity for speech. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 652. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghitza, O. (2017). Acoustic-driven delta rhythms as prosodic markers. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. 32(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2016.1232419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghitza, O., & Greenberg, S. (2009). On the possible role of brain rhythms in speech perception: Intelligibility of time-compressed speech with periodic and aperiodic insertions of silence. Phonetica, 66(1-2), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1159/000208934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraud, A. L., & Poeppel, D. (2012). Cortical oscillations and speech processing: Emerging computational principles and operations. Nature Neuroscience, 15(4), 511–517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, J., Hoogenboom, N., Thut, G., Schyns, P., Panzeri, S., Belin, P., Garrod, S., & Poeppel, D. (2013). Speech rhythms and multiplexed Oscillatory sensory coding in the Human Brain. PLoS Biology, 11(12), e1001752. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce, P. A., & McLennan, C. (2005). Spoken word recognition: The challenge of variation. In D. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 591–609). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757024.ch24
   Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25(1–2), 71–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(87)90005-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messing, D. P., Delhorne, L., Bruckert, E., Braida, L. D., & Ghitza, O. (2009). A non-linear efferent-inspired model of the auditory system; matching human confusions in stationary noise. Speech Communication, 51(8), 668–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2009.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, L., & Gumbert, M. (2018). Synchronization of delta-band oscillations to syntax benefits linguistic information processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 30(8), 1066–1074. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, L., Sun, Y., & Martin, A. E. (2019). Synchronous, but not entrained: Exogenous and endogenous cortical rhythms of speech and language processing. Language, Cognition & Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1693050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peelle, J. E., & Davis, M. H. (2012). Neural oscillations carry speech rhythm through to comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 320. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittman-Polletta, B. R., Wang, Y., Stanley, D. A., Schroeder, C. E., Whittington, M. A., & Kopell, N. J. (2020). Differential contributions of synaptic and intrinsic inhibitory currents to parsing via excitable phase-locking in neural oscillators. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.11.902858
   Google Scholar
• Poeppel, D. (2003). The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: Cerebral lateralization as “asymmetric sampling in time”. Speech Communication, 41(1), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00107-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimmele, J. M., Poeppel, D., & Ghitza, O. (2020). Acoustically driven cortical delta-band oscillations underpin perceptual chunking. Submitted.
   Google Scholar
• Shamir, M., Ghitza, O., Epstein, S., & Kopell, N. (2009). Representation of time-varying stimuli by a network exhibiting oscillations on a faster time scale. PLoS Computational Biology, 5(5), e1000370. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, K. (2005). Features in speech perception and lexical access. In D. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 125–155). Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Viterbi, A. J. (1966). Principles of coherent communication. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar