References
- Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
- Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
- Badecker, W., & Straub, K. (2002). The processing role of structural constraints on interpretation of pronouns and anaphors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(4), 748–769. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.4.748
- Barr, Dale J., Levy, Roger, Scheepers, Christoph, & Tily, Harry J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
- Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
- Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433–436. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856897X00357
- Bürkner, P.-C. (2017). Brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01
- Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS ONE, 5(6), e10729. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010729
- Chen, Z., Jäger, L., & Vasishth, S. (2012). How structure-sensitiveis the parser? Evidence from Mandarin Chinese. In B. Stolterfoht & S. Featherston (Eds.), Empirical approaches to linguistic theory: Studies of meaning and structure (studies in generative grammar) (pp. 43–62). Mouton de Gruyter.
- Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa Lectures. Foris Publications.
- Cornelissen, F. W., Peters, E. M., & Palmer, J. (2002). The Eyelink Toolbox: Eye tracking with MATLAB and the Psychophysics Toolbox. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34(4), 613–617. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195489
- Cunnings, I., & Felser, C. (2013). The role of working memory in the processing of reflexives. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(1-2), 188–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.548391
- Cunnings, I., Patterson, C., & Felser, C. (2015). Structural constraints on pronoun binding and coreference: Evidence from eye movements during reading. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(840). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00840
- Cunnings, I., & Sturt, P. (2014). Coargumenthood and the processing of reflexives. Journal of Memory and Language, 75, 117–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2014.05.006
- Dillon, B., Chow, W.-Y., Wagers, M., Guo, T., Liu, F., & Phillips, C. (2014). The structure-sensitivity of memory access: Evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1025). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01025
- Dillon, B., Chow, W.-Y., & Xiang, M. (2016). The relationship between anaphor features and antecedent retrieval: Comparing Mandarin Ziji and Ta-Ziji. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(1966). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01966
- Dillon, B., Mishler, A., Sloggett, S., & Phillips, C. (2013). Contrasting intrusion profiles for agreement and anaphora: Experimental and modeling evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(2), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.04.003
- Fine, A. B., Jäger, T. F., Farmer, T. A., & Qian, T. (2013). Rapid expectation adaptation during syntactic comprehension. PLoS ONE, 8(10), e77661. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077661
- Frazier, M., Ackerman, L., Baumann, P., Potter, D., & Yoshida, M. (2015). Wh-filler-gap dependency formation guides reflexive antecedent search. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(1504). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01504
- Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Inference from Iterative Simulation using multiple Sequences. Statistical Science, 7(4), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177011136
- Gibson, E., Bergen, L., & Piantadosi, S. T. (2013). Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(20), 8051–8056. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1216438110
- Hohenstein, S., & Kliegl, R. (2014). Semantic preview benefit during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(1), 166–190. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033670
- Huang, C.-T. J., Li, Y. A., & Li, Y. (2009). The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge University Press.
- Inhoff, A. W., & Liu, W. (1998). The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.1.20
- Jäger, L. A., Engelmann, F., & Vasishth, S. (2015). Retrieval interference in reflexive processing: Experimental evidence from Mandarin, and computational modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(617). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00617
- Jäger, L. A., Engelmann, F., & Vasishth, S. (2017). Similarity-based interference in sentence comprehension: Literature review and Bayesian meta-analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 316–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.004
- Jäger, L. A., Mertzen, D., Van Dyke, J. A., & Vasishth, S. (2020). Interference patterns in subject-verb agreement and reflexives revisited: A large-sample study. Journal of Memory and Language, 111, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104063
- Jin, Z. (2003). Verb restraint function to Ziji (自己) long-distance binding. Chinese Language Learning, 4, 9–12. (in Chinese).
- Kennedy, A. (1998). The influence of parafoveal words on foveal inspection time: Evidence for a processing trade-off. In Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 149–179). Elsevier Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008043361-5/50008-0
- Kennedy, A., Pynte, J., & Ducrot, S. (2002). Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 55(4), 1307–1337. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980244000071
- Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2006). Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1), 12–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.12
- Kush, D., & Phillips, C. (2014). Local anaphor licensing in an SOV language: Implications for retrieval strategies. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1252). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01252
- Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
- Kwon, N., & Sturt, P. (2014). The use of control information in dependency formation: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Memory and Language, 73, 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2014.02.005
- Laurinavichyute, A., Jäger, L. A., Akinina, Y., Roß, J., & Dragoy, O. (2017). Retrieval and encoding interference: Cross-linguistic evidence from anaphor processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(965). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00965
- Levy, R., Bicknell, K., Slattery, T., & Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(50), 21086–21090. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907664106
- Lewandowski, D., Kurowicka, D., & Joe, H. (2009). Generating random correlation matrices based on vines and extended onion method. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 100(9), 1989–2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2009.04.008
- Lewis, R. L., & Vasishth, S. (2005). An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cognitive Science, 29(3), 375–419. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_25
- Li, N., Wang, S., Mo, L., & Kliegl, R. (2018). Contextual constraint and preview time modulate the semantic preview effect: Evidence from Chinese sentence reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1310914
- Li, X., & Zhou, X. (2010). Who is ziji? ERP responses to the Chinese reflexive pronoun during sentence comprehension. Brain Research, 1331, 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.03.050
- Logačev, P., & Vasishth, S. (2016). A multiple-channel model of task-dependent ambiguity resolution in sentence comprehension. Cognitive Science, 40(2), 266–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12228
- Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, H., & Bates, D. (2017). Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.001
- McElree, B., Foraker, S., & Dyer, L. (2003). Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 67–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00515-6
- Nuthmann, A., & Kliegl, R. (2009). An examination of binocular reading fixations based on sentence corpus data. Journal of Vision, 9(5), 31–31. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.5.31
- Pan, J., Yan, M., & Laubrock, J. (2017). Perceptual span in oral reading: The case of Chinese. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(3), 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1283694
- Parker, D., & Phillips, C. (2017). Reflexive attraction in comprehension is selective. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 272–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.002
- Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 437–442. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856897X00366
- Qian, J., & Wu, F. (2016). Immediate effects of Binding Principle A on complex reflexive processing in Chinese. Modern Foreign Languages, 39(4), 495–506. (in Chinese).
- Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5
- Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
- Schotter, E. R., Lee, M., Reiderman, M., & Rayner, K. (2015). The effect of contextual constraint on parafoveal processing in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 83, 118–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.04.005
- Sturt, P. (2003). The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(3), 542–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00536-3
- Sturt, P., & Kwon, N. (2015). The processing of raising and nominal control: An eye-tracking study. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(331). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00331
- Tsai, J.-L., Kliegl, R., & Yan, M. (2012). Parafoveal semantic information extraction in traditional Chinese reading. Acta Psychologica, 141(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.06.004
- Van Dyke, J. A., & McElree, B. (2006). Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.007
- Vasishth, S., Brüssow, S., Lewis, R. L., & Drenhaus, H. (2008). Processing polarity: How the ungrammatical intrudes on the grammatical. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 32(4), 685–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210802066865
- von der Malsburg, T., & Angele, B. (2017). False positives and other statistical errors in standard analyses of eye movements in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.10.003
- Wagers, M. W., Lau, E. F., & Phillips, C. (2009). Agreement attraction in comprehension: Representations and processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(2), 206–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.04.002
- Xiang, M., Dillon, B., & Phillips, C. (2009). Illusory licensing effects across dependency types: ERP evidence. Brain and Language, 108(1), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2008.10.002
- Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Shu, H., Pan, J., & Zhou, X. (2010). Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(6), 1669–1676. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019329
- Yan, M., Richter, E. M., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2009). Readers of Chinese extract semantic information from parafoveal words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(3), 561–566. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.3.561
- Yan, M., Risse, S., Zhou, X., & Kliegl, R. (2012). Preview fixation duration modulates identical and semantic preview benefit in Chinese reading. Reading and Writing, 25(5), 1093–1111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9274-7
- Yan, M., & Sommer, W. (2015). Parafoveal-on-foveal effects of emotional word semantics in reading Chinese sentences: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(4), 1237–1243. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000095
- Yan, M., Wang, A., Song, H., & Kliegl, R. (2019). Parafoveal processing of phonology and semantics during the reading of Korean sentences. Cognition, 193, 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104009
- Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2012). Lexical and sublexical semantic preview benefits in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(4), 1069–1075. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026935
- Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2015). Perceptual span depends on font size during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(1), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038097
- Yang, J., Li, N., Wang, S., Slattery, T. J., & Rayner, K. (2014). Encoding the target or the plausible preview word? The nature of the plausibility preview benefit in reading Chinese. Visual Cognition, 22(2), 193–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2014.890689
- Yang, J., Wang, S., Chen, H.-C., & Rayner, K. (2009). The time course of semantic and syntactic processing in Chinese sentence comprehension: Evidence from eye movements. Memory & Cognition, 37(8), 1164–1176. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.8.1164
- Yang, J., Wang, S., Tong, X., & Rayner, K. (2012). Semantic and plausibility effects on preview benefit during eye fixations in Chinese reading. Reading and Writing, 25(5), 1031–1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9281-8
- Yen, M.-H., Tsai, J.-L., Tzeng, O. J. L., & Hung, D. L. (2008). Eye movements and parafoveal word processing in reading Chinese. Memory & Cognition, 36(5), 1033–1045. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.5.1033
- Zang, C., Wang, Y., Bai, X., Yan, G., Drieghe, D., & Liversedge, S. P. (2016). The use of probabilistic lexicality cues for word segmentation in Chinese reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(3), 548–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1061030