References
- Arai, M., van Gompel, R. P. G., & Scheepers, C. (2007). Priming ditransitive structures in comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 54(3), 218–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.07.001
- Atkinson, E., Rigby, I., Shapiro, N., Woo, B., & Omaki, A. (2018). Syntactic adaptation effects do not transfer across tasks. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing (pp. 138–139). Davis, CA: CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing.
- Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
- Baayen, R. H., & Milin, P. (2010). Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(2), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.807
- Balota, D. A., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17(3), 364–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(85)90013-1
- Bates, D., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., & Baayen, H. (2015). Parsimonious mixed models. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1506.04967. https://doi.org/arXiv:1506.04967
- Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i0
- Bicknell, K., & Levy, R. (2010). A rational model of eye movement control in reading. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) (pp. 1168–1178). Uppsala: Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Bicknell, K., & Levy, R. (2011). Why readers regress to previous words: A statistical analysis. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 931–936). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
- Binder, K. S., Duffy, S. A., & Rayner, K. (2001). The effects of thematic fit and discourse context on syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(2), 297–324. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2754
- Boston, M. F., Hale, J. T., Vasishth, S., Kliegl, R. (2011). Parallel processing and sentence comprehension difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(3), 301–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.492228
- British National Corpus Consortium. (2007). British National Corpus version 3 (BNC XML edition). Oxford University Computing Services.
- Burchill, Z., Bushong, W., & Jaeger, T. F. (2018). Wasted power and false interactions in reading time analyses. In The 24th Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing (AMLaP) (pp. 323). Berlin, Germany: Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing.
- Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113(2), 234–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.234
- Chow, W., Momma, S., Smith, C., Lau, E., & Phillips, C. (2016). Prediction as memory retrieval: Timing and mechanisms. Language Cognition & Neuroscience, 31(5), 617–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2016.1160135
- Clifton, C., Staub, A., & Rayner, K. (2007). Eye movements in reading words and sentences. In Eye movements (pp. 341–371). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044980-7/50017-3
- Clifton, C., Traxler, M. J., Mohamed, M. T., Williams, R. S., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (2003). The use of thematic role information in parsing: Syntactic processing autonomy revisited. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(3), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00070-6
- Craycraft, N. (2014). Adapting syntactic expectations in the face of changing cue informativity. University of Rochester.
- Crocker, M. W., & Brants, T. (2000). Wide-coverage probabilistic sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(6), 647–669. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026560822390
- Cummings, P., & Koepsell, T. D. (2010). P values vs estimates of association with confidence intervals. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 164(2), 193–196. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.266
- Dahan, D., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Chambers, C. G. (2002). Accent and reference resolution in spoken-language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(2), 292–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00001-3
- Demberg, V., & Keller, F. (2008). Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity. Cognition, 109(2), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.008
- Engelmann, F., Vasishth, S., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2013). A framework for modeling the interaction of syntactic processing and eye movement control. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5(3), 452–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12026
- Farmer, T. A., Brown, M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2013). Prediction, explanation, and the role of generative models in language processing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 211–212. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12002312
- Farmer, T. A., Fine, A. B., Yan, S., Cheimariou, S., & Jaeger, T. F. (2014). Syntactic expectation adaptation in the eye-movement record. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2181–2186). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
- Ferreira, F., & Clifton, C. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 25(3), 348–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(86)90006-9
- Ferreira, F., Clifton, C., Frazier, L., Rayner, K., & Rosenbaum, D. (1993). Creation of prosody during sentence production. Psychological Review, 100(2), 233–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.233
- Fine, A. B., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). The role of verb repetition in cumulative structural priming in comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 42(9), 1362–1376. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000236
- Fine, A. B., Jaeger, T. F., Farmer, T. A., & Qian, T. (2013). Rapid expectation adaptation during syntactic comprehension. PLoS One, 8(10), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077661
- Fine, A. B., Qian, T., Jaeger, T. F., & Jacobs, R. A. (2010). Is there syntactic adaptation in language comprehension? In Proceedings of ACL: Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics (pp. 18–26). Uppsala: Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Frank, S. L., & Bod, R. (2011). Insensitivity of the human sentence-processing system to hierarchical structure. Psychological Science, 22(6), 829–834. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611409589
- Fraundorf, S. H., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). Readers generalize adaptation to newly-encountered dialectal structures to other unfamiliar structures. Journal of Memory and Language, 91, 28–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.05.006
- Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 6(4), 291–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(78)90002-1
- Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14(2), 178–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90008-1
- Garnsey, S. M., Pearlmutter, N. J., Myers, E., & Lotocky, M. A. (1997). The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(1), 58–93. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2512
- Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2009). Joint action, interactive alignment, and dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 292–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01020.x
- Gibson, E., & Pearlmutter, N. J. (1998). Constraints on sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(7), 262–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01187-5
- Hale, J. (2001). A probabilistic earley parser as a psycholinguistic model. In Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Language Technologies (pp. 159–166). Pittsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.https://doi.org/10.3115/1073336.1073357.
- Hare, M., McRae, K., & Elman, J. L. (2003). Sense and structure: Meaning as a determinant of verb subcategorization preferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(2), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00516-8
- Harrington Stack, C. M., James, A. N., & Watson, D. G. (2018). A failure to replicate rapid syntactic adaptation in comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0808-6
- Hartsuiker, R. J., Bernolet, S., Schoonbaert, S., Speybroeck, S., & Vanderelst, D. (2008). Syntactic priming persists while the lexical boost decays: Evidence from written and spoken dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 214–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.003
- Huettig, F., & Mani, N. (2015). Is prediction necessary to understand language? Probably not. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 3798, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1072223
- Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
- Jaeger, T. F., Burchill, Z., & Bushong, W. (2019). Strong evidence for expectation adaptation during language understanding, not a replication failure. A reply to Harrington Stack, James, and Watson (2018). Unversity of Rochester.
- Jurafsky, D. (1996). A probabilistic model of lexical and syntactic access and disambiguation. Cognitive Science, 20(2), 137–194. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2002_1
- Kaschak, M. P. (2007). Long-term structural priming affects subsequent patterns of language production. Memory & Cognition, 35(5), 925–937. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193466
- Kaschak, M. P., & Glenberg, A. M. (2004). This construction needs learned. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 133(3), 450–467. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.450
- Kemper, S., Crow, A., & Kemtes, K. (2004). Eye-fixation patterns of high- and low-span young and older adults: Down the garden path and back again. Psychology and Aging, 19(1), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.19.1.157
- Kleinschmidt, D. F., & Jaeger, T. F. (2015). Robust speech perception: Recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel. Psychological Review, 122(2), 148.
- Kleinschmidt, D. F., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). What do you expect from an unfamiliar talker? In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2351–2356). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038695.
- Kuhlen, A. K., & Brennan, S. E. (2013). Language in dialogue: When confederates might be hazardous to your data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(1), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0341-8
- Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 32–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299
- Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2014). lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models. R package version 2.0-11. R package version 2.0-11. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest
- Levy, R. (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106(3), 1126–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006
- Levy, R., Bicknell, K., Slattery, T., & Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(50), 21086–21090. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907664106
- Lewis, R. L., Shvartsman, M., & Singh, S. (2013). The adaptive nature of eye movements in linguistic tasks: How payoff and architecture shape speed-accuracy trade-offs. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5(3), 581–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12032
- Lewis, R. L., Vasishth, S., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2006). Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(10), 447–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.007
- Linzen, T., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). Uncertainty and expectation in sentence processing: Evidence from subcategorization distributions. Cognitive Science, 40(6), 1382–1411. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12274
- Liversedge, S. P., Paterson, K. B., & Clayes, E. L. (2002). The influence of only on syntactic processing of “long” relative clause sentences. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 55(1), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980143000253
- MacDonald, M. C. (2013). How language production shapes language form and comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00226
- MacDonald, M. C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2002). Reassessing working memory: Comment on just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, 109(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.35
- MacDonald, M. C., Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity. Cognitive Psychology, 24(1), 56–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90003-K
- MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101(4), 676–703. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.676
- Mcrae, K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and other constraints) in on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 38(3), 283–312. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2543
- Nicenboim, B., & Vasishth, S. (2018). Models of retrieval in sentence comprehension: A computational evaluation using Bayesian hierarchical modeling. Journal of Memory and Language, 99, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.08.004
- Novick, J. M., Hussey, E., Teubner-Rhodes, S., Harbison, J. I., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Clearing the garden-path: Improving sentence processing through cognitive control training. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(2), 186–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.758297
- Paterson, K. B., Liversedge, S. P., & Underwood, G. (1999). The influence of focus operators on syntactic processing of short relative clause sentences. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 52(3), 717–737. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755827
- Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12001495
- Prasad, G., & Linzen, T. (submitted). Do self-paced reading studies provide evidence for rapid syntactic adaptation.
- Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25(1995), 111–163. https://doi.org/10.2307/271063
- Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
- Rayner, K., Carlson, M., & Frazier, L. (1983). The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: Eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(3), 358–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90236-0
- Rayner, K., & Well, A. D. (1996). Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(4), 504–509. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214555
- R Development Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
- Roland, D., Dick, F., & Elman, J. L. (2007). Frequency of basic English grammatical structures: A corpus analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(3), 348–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.002
- Rouder, J. (2019). On the interpretation of Bayes factors: A reply to de Heide and Grünwald.
- Salverda, A. P., Kleinschmidt, D., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2014). Immediate effects of anticipatory coarticulation in spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 71(1), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.11.002
- Schotter, E. R., Bicknell, K., Howard, I., Levy, R., & Rayner, K. (2014). Task effects reveal cognitive flexibility responding to frequency and predictability: Evidence from eye movements in reading and proofreading. Cognition, 131(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.018
- Schramm, P., & Rouder, J. (2019). Are reaction time Transformations really beneficial? https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io
- Seidenberg, M. S. (2017). Language at the speed of sight: How we read, why so many can’t, and what can be done about it. Basic Books.
- Seidenberg, M. S., & MacDonald, M. C. (1999). A probabilistic constraints approach to language acquisition and processing. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(4), 569–588. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2304
- Smith, N. J., & Levy, R. (2013). The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic. Cognition, 128(3), 302–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.013
- Spivey, M. J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: Modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(6), 1521–1543. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.24.6.1521
- Sturt, P. (2007). Semantic re-interpretation and garden path recovery. Cognition, 105(2), 477–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.009
- Tabor, W., Juliano, C., & Tanenhaus, M. (1997). Parsing in a dynamical system: An attractor-based account of the interaction of lexical and structural constraints in sentence processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12(2), 211–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909697386853
- Tanenhaus, M. K. (2004). On-line sentence processing: Past, present and, future. In M. Carreiras & C. CliftonJr (Eds.), On-line sentence processing: ERPS, eye movements and beyond (pp. 371–392). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- Thothathiri, M., & Snedeker, J. (2008). Give and take: Syntactic priming during spoken language comprehension. Cognition, 108(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.012
- Traxler, M. J. (2008). Lexically independent priming in online sentence comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15(1), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.1.149
- Trueswell, J. C. (1996). The role of lexical frequency in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(4), 566–585. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0030
- Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(3), 285–318. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1014
- Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Kello, C. (1993). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(3), 528–553. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.3.528
- Vasishth, S., Mertzen, D., Jager, L. A., & Gelman, A. (2018). The statistical significance filter leads to overoptimistic expectations of replicability. Journal of Memory and Language, 103, 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2018.07.004
- Vasishth, S., von der Malsburg, T., & Engelmann, F. (2013). What eye movements can tell us about sentence comprehension. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1209
- von der Malsburg, T., & Angele, B. (2017). False positives and other statistical errors in standard analyses of eye movements in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.10.003
- Wagenmakers, E. J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bullitin & Review, 14(5), 779–804. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194105
- Wagenmakers, E. J., & Brown, S. (2007). On the linear relation between the mean and the standard deviation of a response time distribution. Psychological Review, 114(3), 830–841. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.830
- Wells, J. B., Christiansen, M. H., Race, D. S., Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009). Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.08.002
- Wilson, M. P., & Garnsey, S. M. (2009). Making simple sentences hard: Verb bias effects in simple direct object sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(3), 368–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.09.005
- Wood, S. N. (2006). Generalized additive models. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471667196.ess0297.pub2