References
- Albrecht, J. E., & Myers, J. L. (1995). Role of context in accessing distant information during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory & Cognition, 21(6), 1459–1468. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.6.1459
- Albrecht, J. E., & Myers, J. L. (1998). Accessing distant text information during reading: Effects of contextual cues. Discourse Processes, 26(2-3), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539809545040
- Albrecht, J. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (1993). Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19(5), 1061–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.5.1061
- Barton, S. B., & Sanford, A. J. (1993). A case study of anomaly detection: Shallow semantic processing and cohesion establishment. Memory & Cognition, 21(4), 477–487. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197179
- Bohan, J., Leuthold, H., Hijikata, Y., & Sanford, A. J. (2012). The processing of good-fit semantic anomalies: An ERP investigation. Neuropsychologia, 50(14), 3174–3184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.008
- Bredart, S., & Modolo, K. (1988). Moses strikes again: Focalization effect on a semantic illusion. Acta Psychologia (Amst), 67(2), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(88)90009-1
- Brouwer, H., Fitz, H., & Hoeks, J. (2012). Getting real about semantic illusions: Rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension. Brain Research, 1446(2), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.055
- Brouwer, H., & Hoeks, J. C. J. (2013). A time and place for language comprehension: Mapping the N400 and the P600 to a minimal cortical network. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(16), 758–758. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00758
- Buttner, A. C. (2007). Questions versus statements: Challenging an assumption about semantic illusions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(6), 779–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701228744
- Cook, A. E., Halleran, J. G., & O‘Brien, E. J. (2009). What is readily available during reading? A memory-based view of text processing. Discourse Processes, 26(2-3), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539809545041
- Daneman, M., Lennertz, T., & Hannon, B. (2007). Shallow semantic processing of text: Evidence from eye movements. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(1), 83–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960500372725
- Delong, K. A., Quante, L., & Kutas, M. (2014). Predictability, plausibility, and two late ERP positivities during written sentence comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 61(1), 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.06.016
- Ditman, T., Holcomb, P. J., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2008). Time travel through language: Temporal shifts rapidly decrease information accessibility during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(4), 750–756. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.4.750
- Erickson, T. D., & Mattson, M. E. (1981). From words to meaning: A semantic illusion. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(5), 540–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90165-1
- Federmeier, K. D., & Laszlo, S. (2009). Time for meaning: Electrophysiology provides insights into the dynamics of representation and processing in semantic memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 51, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(09)51001-8
- Ferreira, F., Bailey, K. G. D., & Ferraro, V. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00158
- Hagoort, P. (2016). MUC (memory, unification, control): A model on the neurobiology of language beyond single word processing. Neurobiology of Language, 339–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407794-2.00028-6
- Hagoort, P., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2007). Beyond the sentence given. Philosophical Transactions Of the Royal Society. Series B: Biological Sciences, 362(1481), 801–811. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2089
- Hannon, B. (2015). Conscious and unconscious detection of semantic anomalies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(7), 1404–1425. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.982138
- Hegarty, M., Gundel, J. K., & Borthen, K. (2001). Information structure and the accessibility of clausally Iintroduced referents. Theoretical Linguistics, 27(2-3), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.2001.27.2-3.163
- Karimi, H., & Ferreira, F. (2016). Good-enough linguistic representations and online cognitive equilibrium in language processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(5), 1013–1040. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1053951
- Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
- Kos, M., Van Den Brink, D., & Hagoort, P. (2012). Individual variation in the late positive complex to semantic anomalies. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 318. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00318
- Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(12), 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01560-6
- Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 621–647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
- Kutas, M., Federmeier, K. D., & Urbach, T. P. (2014). The ‘negatives’ and ‘positives’ of prediction in language. In M. S. Gazzaniga & G. R. Mangun (Eds.), The cognitive neurosciences (5th ed., pp. 649–656). MIT Press.
- Leckey, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2019). The P3b and P600(s): positive contributions to language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 57(7), e13351. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13351
- McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99(3), 440–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.440
- Morrow, D. G., Greenspan, S. L., & Bower, G. H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26(2), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(87)90122-7
- Myers, J. L., & O'Brien, E. J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26(2-3), 131–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539809545042
- Nieuwland, M. S., Barr, D. J., Bartolozzi, F., Busch-Moreno, S., Darley, E., Donaldson, D. I., Ferguson, H. J., Fu, X., Heyselaar, E., Huettig, F., Husband, E. M., Ito, A., Kazanina, N., Kogan, V., Kohút, Z., Kulakova, E., Mézière, D., Politzer-Ahles, S., Rousselet, G. A., … Von Grebmer Zu Wolfsthurn, S. (2019). Dissociable effects of prediction and integration during language comprehension: Evidence from a large-scale study using brain potentials. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, https://doi.org/10.1101/267815
- Nieuwland, M. S., Politzer-Ahles, S., Heyselaar, E., Segaert, K., Darley, E., Kazanina, N., Von Grebmer Zu Wolfsthurn, S., Bartolozzi, F., Kogan, V., Ito, A., Mézière, D., Barr, D. J., Rousselet, G. A., Ferguson, H. J., Busch-Moreno, S., Fu, X., Tuomainen, J., Kulakova, E., Husband, E. M., … Huettig, F. (2018). Large-scale replication study reveals a limit on probabilistic prediction in language comprehension. eLife, 7, e33468. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33468
- Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2005). Testing the limits of the semantic illusion phenomenon: ERPs reveal temporary semantic change deafness in discourse comprehension. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(3), 691–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.04.003
- O’Brien, E. J., Plewes, P. S., & Albrecht, J. E. (1990). Antecedent retrieval processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(2), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.2.241
- Qiu, L., Swaab, T. Y., Chen, H.-C., & Wang, S. (2012). The role of gender information in pronoun resolution: Evidence from Chinese. PLoS One, 7(5), e36156. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036156
- Sanford, A. J., Leuthold, H., Bohan, J., & Sanford, A. J. S. (2011). Anomalies at the borderline of awareness: An ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(3), 514–523. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21370
- Sanford, A. J., & Sturt, P. (2002). Depth of processing in language comprehension: Not noticing the evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(9), 382–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01958-7
- Sanford, A. J. S., Sanford, A. J., Molle, J., & Emmott, C. (2006). Shallow processing and attention capture in written and spoken discourse. Discourse Processes, 42(2), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp4202_2
- Sturt, P., Sanford, A. J., Stewart, A., & Dawydiak, E. (2004). Linguistic focus and good-enough representations: An application of the change-detection paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(5), 882–888. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196716
- Swett, K., Miller, A. C., Burns, S., Hoeft, F., Davis, N., Petrill, S. A., & Cutting, L. E. (2013). Comprehending expository texts: The dynamic neurobiological correlates of building a coherent text representation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00853
- Van Berkum, J. J. A., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1999). Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(6), 657–671. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892999563724
- Van Berkum, J. J. A., Zwitserlood, P., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2003). When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect. Cognitive Brain Research, 17(3), 701–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00196-4
- Van Den Broek, P., Rapp, D. N., & Kendeou, P. (2005). Integrating memory-based and constructionist processes in accounts of reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 39(2-3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2005.9651685
- Van Petten, C., & Luka, B. J. (2012). Prediction during language comprehension: Benefits, costs, and ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(2), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.015
- Wang, L., Hagoort, P., & Yang, Y. (2009). Semantic illusion depends on information structure: ERP evidence. Brain Research, 1282, 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.069
- Wiley, J., & Myers, J. L. (2003). Availability and accessibility of information and causal inferences from scientific text. Discourse Processes, 36(2), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3602_2
- Yang, X., Chen, S., Chen, X., & Yang, Y. (2015). How distance affects semantic integration in discourse: Evidence from event-related potentials. PLoS One, 10(11), e0142967. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142967
- Yang, X., Chen, X., Chen, S., Xu, X., & Yang, Y. (2013). Topic structure affects semantic integration: Evidence from event-related potentials. PLOS ONE, 8(12), e79734. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079734