References
- Baayen, H., Bates, D., Kliegl, R., & Vasishth, S. (2015). Repsychling: Data sets from psychology and linguistics experiments. R package version 0.0.4.
- Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
- Bates, D., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., & Baayen, H. (2015). Parsimonious mixed models. arXivpreprint arXiv:1506.04967.
- Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
- Bock, K., & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(2), 177. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.2.177
- Boudewyn, M. A., Zirnstein, M., Swaab, T. Y., & Traxler, M. J. (2014). Priming prepositional phrase attachment: Evidence from eye-tracking and event-related potentials. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(3), 424–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.815237
- Brandt, S., Nitschke, S., & Kidd, E. (2017). Priming the comprehension of German object relative clauses priming the comprehension of German object relative clauses. Language Learning and Development, 5441(March). https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2016.1235500
- Branigan, H. P., & McLean, J. F. (2016). What children learn from adults’ utterances: An ephemeral lexical boost and persistent syntactic priming in adult–child dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 91, 141–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.02.002
- Branigan, H. P., McLean, J. F., & Jones, M. (2005). A blue cat or a cat that is blue? – Evidence for abstract syntax in young children’s noun phrases. Proceedings of the 29th annual Boston University conferece on language development (Vol. 1 and 2. pp. 109–121), 2014, November 5–7. Boston, MA.
- Branigan, Holly P., & Messenger, Katherine. (2016). Consistent and cumulative effects of syntactic experience in children’s sentence production: Evidence for error-based implicit learning. Cognition, 157, 250–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.09.004.
- Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & McLean, J. F. (2005). Priming prepositional-phrase attachment during comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(3), 468–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.468
- Brooks, P. A., & Tomasello, M. (1999). Young children learn to produce passives with nonce verbs. Developmental Psychology, 35(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.29
- Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113(2), 234–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.234
- Chang, F., Dell, G. S., Bock, K., & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). Structural priming as implicit learning: A comparison of models of sentence production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005101313330
- Cleland, A. A., & Pickering, M. J. (2003). The use of lexical and syntactic information in language production: Evidence from the priming of noun-phrase structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(2), 214–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00060-3
- de Carvalho, A., Dautriche, I., Lin, I., & Christophe, A. (2017). Phrasal prosody constrains syntactic analysis in toddlers. Cognition, 163, 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.018
- Frank, M. C., Sugarman, E., Horowitz, A. C., Lewis, M. L., & Yurovsky, D. (2016). Using tablets to collect data from young children. Journal of Cognition and Development, 17(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2015.1061528
- Gibson, E., & Pearlmutter, N. J. (1998). Constraints on sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(7), 262–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01187-5
- Havron, N., de Carvalho, A., Fiévet, A., & Christophe, A. (2019). Three- to four-year-old children rapidly adapt their predictions and use them to learn novel word meanings. Child Development, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13113
- Jaeger, T. F., & Snider, N. E. (2013). Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime’s prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition, 127(1), 57–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.013
- Kaschak, M. P., Kutta, T. J., & Jones, J. L. (2011a). Structural priming as implicit learning: Cumulative priming effects and Individual differences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(6), 1133–1139. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0157-y.
- Kaschak, M. P., Kutta, T. J., & Schatschneider, C. (2011b). Long-term cumulative structural priming persists for (at least) one week. Memory & Cognition, 39(3), 381–388. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-010-0042-3.
- Kidd, E., & Holler, J. (2009). Children’s use of gesture to resolve lexical ambiguity. Developmental Science, 12(6), 903–913. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00830.x
- Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). Lmertest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
- MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101(4), 676–703. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.676
- Mahowald, K., James, A., Futrell, R., & Gibson, E. (2015). A meta-analysis of syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 91, 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.03.009
- Meyer, L., Henry, M. J., Gaston, P., Schmuck, N., & Friederici, A. D. (2016). Linguistic bias modulates interpretation of speech via neural delta-band oscillations. Cerebral Cortex, 27(9), 4293–4302. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw228
- Morris, L. C., & Scheepers, C. (2015). Syntactic priming and the lexical boost in preschool children. Open access manuscript.
- Peter, M., Chang, F., Pine, J. M., Blything, R., & Rowland, C. F. (2015). When and how do children develop knowledge of verb argument structure? Evidence from verb bias effects in a structural priming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 81(December), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2014.12.002
- Qi, Z., Yuan, S., & Fisher, C. (2011). Where does verb bias Come from? Experience with particular verbs affects online sentence processing. Proceedings of the 35th annual Boston University conference on language development (pp. 500–512), November 5–7, 2010. Boston, MA: Cascadilla Press.
- R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org /
- Reitter, D., Keller, F., & Moore, J. D. (2011). A computational cognitive model of syntactic priming. Cognitive Science, 35(4), 587–637. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01165.x
- Rowland, C. F., Chang, F., Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., & Lieven, E. V. M. (2012). The development of abstract syntax: Evidence from structural priming and the lexical boost. Cognition, 125(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.008
- Shimpi, P. M., Gámez, P. B., Huttenlocher, J., & Vasilyeva, M. (2007). Syntactic priming in 3-and 4-year-old children: Evidence for abstract representations of transitive and dative forms. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1334–1346. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1334
- Snedeker, J., & Trueswell, J. C. (2004). The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing. Cognitive Psychology, 49(3), 238–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.03.001
- Snedeker, J., & Yuan, S. (2008). Effects of prosodic and lexical constraints on parsing in young children (and adults). Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 574–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.08.001
- Thothathiri, M., & Snedeker, J. (2008). Syntactic priming during language comprehension in three-and four-year-old children. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 188–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.012
- Traxler, M. J. (2002). Plausibility and subcategorization preference in children’s processing of temporarily ambiguous sentences: Evidence from self-paced reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 55(1), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980143000172
- Weighall, A. R. (2008). The kindergarten path effect revisited: Children’s use of context in processing structural ambiguities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 99(2), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2007.10.004
- Wickham, H. (2016). Ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag.
- Zimmer, E. J. (2017). Children’s comprehension of two types of syntactic ambiguity. First Language, 37(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723716673952