References
- Altmann, G. T. M., & Ekves, Z. (2019). Events as intersecting object histories: A new theory of event representation. Psychological Review, 126(6), 817–840. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000154
- Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
- Bach, E. (1986). The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy, 9(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627432.
- Baldwin, D., Baird, J. A., Saylor, M. M., & Clark, M. A. (2001). Infants parse dynamic action. Child Development, 72(3), 708–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00310
- Barner, D., & Snedeker, J. (2005). Quantity judgements and individuation: Evidence that mass nouns count. Cognition, 97(1), 41–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.06.009
- Barner, D., Wagner, L., & Snedeker, J. (2008). Events and the ontology of individuals: Verbs as a source of individuating mass and count nouns. Cognition, 106(2), 805–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.001
- Barr, D. (2008). Analyzing ‘visual world’ eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.09.002
- Boltz, M. G. (1995). Effects of event structure on retrospective duration judgments. Perception and Psychophysics, 57(7), 1080–1096. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205466
- Brockhoff, A., Huff, M., Maurer, A., & Papenmeier, F. (2016). Seeing the unseen? Illusory causal filling in FIFA referees, players, and novices. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0008-5
- Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect: An introduction to the study of verb aspect and related problems. Cambridge University Press.
- Csibra, G., Biro, S., Koos, O., & Gergely, G. (2003). One-year-old infants use teleological representations of actions productively. Cognitive Science, 27(1), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2701_4
- Depraetere, I. (2007). (A)telicity and intentionality. Linguistics, 45(2), 243–269. https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2007.008
- Dowty, D. (1979). Word meaning and Montague grammar. Kluwer.
- Filip, H. (2001). Nominal and verbal semantic structure: Analogies and interactions. Language Sciences, 23(4), 453–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(00)00033-4
- Filip, H. (2004). The telicity parameter revisited. In R. Young (Ed.), Proceedings of the 14th Semantics and linguistic theory Conference (pp. 92–109). LSA.
- Folli, R., & Harley, H. (2006). What language says about the psychology of events. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10(3), 91–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.01.002
- Gold, D., Zacks, J., & Flores, S. (2017). Effects of cues to event segmentation on subsequent memory. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0043-2
- Hafri, A., Papafragou, A., & Trueswell, J. C. (2013). Getting the gist of events: Recognition of two-participant actions from brief displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(3), 880–905. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030045
- Hard, B. M., Meyer, M., & Baldwin, D. (2019). Attention reorganizes as structure is detected in dynamic action. Memory & Cognition, 47(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0847-z
- Hard, B. M., Recchia, G., & Tversky, B. (2011). The shape of action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(4), 586–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024310
- Hard, B. M., Tversky, B., & Lang, D. S. (2006). Making sense of abstract events: Building event schemas. Memory & Cognition, 34(6), 1221–1235. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193267
- Hindy, N. C., Altmann, G. T. M., Kalenik, E., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2012). The effect of object state-changes on event processing: Do objects compete with themselves? The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(17), 5795–5803. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6294-11.2012
- Hinrichs, E. (1985). A compositional semantics for Aktionsarten and NP reference in English [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The Ohio State University.
- Huff, M., & Papenmeier, F. (2017). Event perception: From event boundaries to ongoing events. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(2), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.01.003
- Huff, M., Papenmeier, F., & Zacks, J. M. (2012). Visual target detection is impaired at event boundaries. Visual Cognition, 20(7), 848–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2012.705359
- Jackendoff, R. (1991). Parts and boundaries. Cognition, 41(1–3), 9–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90031-X
- Ji, Y., & Papafragou, A. (2018). Midpoints and endpoints in event perception. In T. T. Rogers, M. Rau, X. Zhu, & C. W. Kalish (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the cognitive Science Society (pp. 1874–1879). Cognitive Science Society.
- Ji, Y., & Papafragou, A. (2020). Is there an end in sight? Viewers’ sensitivity to abstract event structure. Cognition, 197, 104197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104197
- Krifka, M. (1989). Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem, & P. van Emde Boas (Eds.), Semantics and contextual expression, Groningen-Amsterdam studies in semantics 11 (pp. 75–115). Foris Publications.
- Krifka, M. (1998). The origins of telicity. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Events and grammar (pp. 197–235). Kluwer.
- Lakusta, L., & Landau, B. (2005). Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial language. Cognition, 96(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.009
- Lakusta, L., & Landau, B. (2012). Language and memory for motion events: Origins of the asymmetry between source and goal. Cognitive Science, 36(3), 517–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01220.x
- Levine, D., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Pace, A., & Golinkoff, R. (2017). A goal-bias in action: The boundaries adults perceive in events align with sites of actor intent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(6), 916–927. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000364
- Loucks, J., Mutschler, C., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2017). Children’s representation and imitation of events: How goal organization influences 3-year-old children’s memory for action sequences. Cognitive Science, 41(7), 1904–1933. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12446
- Magliano, J. P., Miller, J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). Indexing space and time in film understanding. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15(5), 533–545. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.724
- Malaia, E. (2014). It still isn’t over: Event boundaries in language and perception. Language and Linguistics Compass, 8(3), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12071
- Malaia, E., Renaweera, R., Wilbur, R., & Talavage, T. (2012). Event segmentation in a visual language: Neural bases of processing American Sign language predicates. Neuroimage, 59(4), 4094–4101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.034
- Mereu, S., Zacks, J. M., Kurby, C. A., & Lleras, A. (2014). The role of prediction in perception: Evidence from interrupted visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(4), 1372–1389. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036646
- Mittwoch, A. (2013). On the criteria for distinguishing accomplishments from activities, and two types of aspectual misfits. In B. Arsenijević, B. Gehrke, & R. Marín (Eds.), Studies in the composition and decomposition of event predicates (pp. 27–48). Springer.
- Newtson, D. (1973). Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035584
- Newtson, D., & Engquist, G. (1976). The perceptual organization of ongoing behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12(5), 436–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(76)90076-7
- Newtson, D., Engquist, G., & Bois, J. (1977). The objective basis of behavior units. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(12), 847–862. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.12.847
- Ongchoco, J. D. K., & Scholl, B. J. (2019). Did that just happen? Event segmentation influences enumeration and working memory for simple overlapping visual events. Cognition, 187, 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.01.002
- Papafragou, A. (2010). Source-goal asymmetries in motion representation: Implications for language production and comprehension. Cognitive Science, 34(6), 1064–1092. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01107.x
- Papafragou, A. (2015). The representation of events in language and cognition. In E. Margolis, & S. Laurence (Eds.), The conceptual mind: New directions in the study of concepts (pp. 327–345). MIT Press.
- Papenmeier, F., Brockhoff, A., & Huff, M. (2019). Filling the gap despite full attention: The role of fast backward inferences for event completion. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 4(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0151-2
- Parsons, T. (1990). Events in the semantics of English: A study in subatomic semantics. MIT Press.
- Radvansky, G., & Zacks, J. (2017). Event boundaries in memory and cognition. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 17, 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.08.006
- Regier, T., & Zheng, M. (2007). Attention to endpoints: A cross-linguistic constraint on spatial meaning. Cognitive Science, 31(4), 705–719. https://doi.org/10.1080/15326900701399954
- Sakarias, M., & Flecken, M. (2019). Keeping the result in sight and mind: General cognitive principles and language-specific influences in the perception and memory of resultative events. Cognitive Science, 43(1), e12708–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12708
- Smith, C. S. (1991). The parameter of aspect. Kluwer.
- Solomon, S. H., Hindy, N. C., Altmann, G. T., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2015). Competition between mutually exclusive object states in event comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(12), 2324–2338. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00866
- Strickland, B., Geraci, C., Chemla, E., Schlenker, P., Kelepir, M., & Pfau, R. (2015). Event representations constrain the structure of language: Sign language as a window into universally accessible linguistic biases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(19), 5968–5973. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1423080112
- Strickland, B., & Keil, F. (2011). Event completion: Event based inferences distorts memory in a matter of seconds. Cognition, 121(3), 409–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.04.007
- Strickland, B., & Scholl, B. (2015). Visual perception involves event-type representations: The case of containment versus occlusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(3), 570–580. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037750
- Swallow, K., Zacks, J., & Abrams, R. (2009). Event boundaries in perception affect memory encoding and updating. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(2), 236–257. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015631
- Taylor, B. (1977). Tense and continuity. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1, 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00351103
- Tenny, C. (1987). Grammaticalizing aspect and affectedness [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. MIT.
- Tversky, B., Zacks, J., Morrison, J., & Hard, B. (2011). Talking about events. In J. Bohnemeyer, & E. Pederson (Eds.), Event representation in language and cognition (pp. 216–227). Cambridge University Press.
- Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.1.3
- Van Hout, A. (2007). Acquiring telicity cross-linguistically: On the acquisition of telicity entailments associated with transitivity. In P. Brown, & M. Bowerman (Eds.), Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability (pp. 255–278). Routledge.
- Van Hout, A. (2016). Lexical and grammatical aspect. In J. Lidz, W. Synder, & J. Pater (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of developmental linguistics (pp. 587–610). Oxford University Press.
- Van Hout, A. (2018). On the acquisition of event culmination. In K. Syrett, & S. Arunachalam (Eds.), Semantics in language acquisition (pp. 96–121). John Benjamins Publishers.
- Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review, 66(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2182371
- Wagner, L. (2009). Manners and goals in pre-linguistic thought: The origins of aspectual construal. In J. Chandlee, M. Franchini, S. Lord, & G. Rheiner (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33th Annual Boston University Conference on language development (pp. 599–610). Cascadilla Press.
- Wagner, L. (2012). First language Acquisition. In R. Binnick (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect (pp. 458–480). Oxford University Press.
- Wagner, L., & Carey, S. (2003). Individuation of objects and events: A developmental study. Cognition, 90(2), 163–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00143-4
- Waxman, S., & Gelman, R. (1986). Preschoolers’ use of superordinate relations in classification and language. Cognitive Development, 1(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(86)80016-8
- Wellwood, A., Hespos, S. J., & Rips, L. (2018). The object: Substance:: Event: Process analogy. In T. Lombrozo, J. Knobe, & S. Nichols (Eds.), Oxford studies in experimental philosophy (volume 2 (pp. 183–212). Oxford University Press.
- Wilder, D. A. (1978). Predictability of behaviors, goals, and unit of perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4(4), 604–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616727800400422
- Zacks, J. (2004). Using movement and intentions to understand simple events. Cognitive Science, 28(6), 979–1008. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2806_5
- Zacks, J., Speer, N., Swallow, K., Braver, T., & Reynolds, J. (2007). Event perception: A mind-brain perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 133(2), 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.273
- Zacks, J., & Swallow, M. (2007). Event segmentation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(2), 80–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00480.x
- Zacks, J., & Tversky, B. (2001). Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.3
- Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6(5), 292–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00513.x