References
- Alario, F.-X., Ferrand, L., Laganaro, M., New, B., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Segui, J. (2004). Predictors of picture naming speed. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(1), 140–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195559
- Allison, P. (2012). When can you safely ignore multicollinearity? | Statistical horizons. Statistical Horizons. https://statisticalhorizons.com/multicollinearity
- Baayen, H. R., & Milin, P. (2010). Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(2), 12–28. http://www.redalyc.org/html/2990/299023506003, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.807
- Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Rijn, v. H. (1993). The {CELEX} lexical data base on {CD-ROM}.
- Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software. http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.5823
- Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–204). York Press.
- Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In O.-S. Bohn, & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Fledge (pp. 13–34). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Bonin, P., Chalard, M., Méot, A., & Fayol, M. (2002). The determinants of spoken and written picture naming latencies. British Journal of Psychology, 93(1), 89–114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1348/000712602162463
- Box, G. E. P., & Cox, D. R. (1964). An analysis of Transformations. In Journal of the royal statistical society. series B (methodological) (Vol. 26, pp. 211–252). WileyRoyal Statistical Society. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2984418
- Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004). Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods and Research, 33(2), 261–304. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644
- Chen, X., & Dong, Y. (2019). Evaluating objective and subjective frequency measures in L2 lexical processing. Lingua. International Review of General Linguistics. Revue internationale De Linguistique Generale, 230, 102738. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LINGUA.2019.102738
- Chen, Q., & Mirman, D. (2012). Competition and cooperation among similar representations: Toward a unified account of facilitative and inhibitory effects of lexical neighbors. Psychological Review, 119(2), 417–430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027175
- Colomé, À. (2001). Lexical activation in bilinguals’ speech production: Language-specific or language-independent? Journal of Memory and Language, 45(4), 721–736. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2793
- Colomé, À, & Miozzo, M. (2010). Which words are activated during bilingual word production? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 36(1), 96–109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017677
- Coltheart, M., Jonasson, J. T., Davelaar, E., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI. Academic P. (pp. 64-85). Erlbaum.
- Costa, A., Caramazza, A., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2000). The cognate facilitation effect: Implications for models of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 26(5), 1283–1296. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1283
- Costa, A., Roelstraete, B., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2006). The lexical bias effect in bilingual speech production: Evidence for feedback between lexical and sublexical levels across languages. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(6), 972–977. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213911
- Costa, A., Santesteban, M., & Caño, A. (2005). On the facilitatory effects of cognate words in bilingual speech production. Brain and Language, 94(1), 94–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2004.12.002
- de Groot, A. M. B., Borgwaldt, S., Bos, M., & van den Eijnden, E. (2002). Lexical decision and word naming in bilinguals: Language effects and task effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 91–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/JMLA.2001.2840
- Dell, G. S., & Gordon, J. K. (2003). Neighbors in the lexicon! Friends or foes? In N. O. Schiller, & A. S. Meyer (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production (pp. 9–47). Mouton de Gruyter.
- Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104(4), 801–838. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.801
- Fledge, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning. Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). York Press.
- Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(1), 116–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195503
- Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2019). An R companion to applied regression. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/effects/effects.pdf
- García Lecumberri, M. L., & Cenoz Iragui, J. (1997). L2 perception of English vowels: Testing the validity of Kuhl’s prototypes. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 10(10), 55–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.1997.10.06
- Garlock, V. M., Walley, A. C., & Metsala, J. L. (2001). Age-of-acquisition, word frequency, and neighborhood density effects on spoken word recognition by children and adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(3), 468–492. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/JMLA.2000.2784
- Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(2), 256–281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.2.256
- Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., Cera, C., & Sandoval, T. C. (2008). More use almost always means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(3), 787–814. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.001
- Grosjean, F. (1998). Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672899800025X
- Grosjean, F. (2001). The bilingual’s language modes. In J. L. Nicol (Ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp. 1–22). Blackwell. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431
- Hall, K. C., Allen, B., Fry, M., Mackie, S., & McAuliffe, M. (2015). Phonological corpus tools, version 1.1.0. https://github.com/PhonologicalCorpusTools/CorpusTools/releases
- Hameau, S. (2016). Neighbourhood density effects in spoken word production. Macquarie University.
- Hameau, S., Biedermann, B., & Nickels, L. (2018). Effects of phonological neighbourhood density and frequency in picture naming: Australian and British English, and computational modelling. 10th International Workshop on Language Production.
- Hutcheson, G., & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist: introductory statistics using generalized linear models. Sage Publications.
- Iverson, P., & Evans, B. G. (2007). Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems: Perception of formant targets, formant movement, and duration. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122(5), 2842–2854. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2783198
- Johnston, R. A., Dent, K., Humphreys, G. W., & Barry, C. (2010). British-English norms and naming times for a set of 539 pictures: The role of age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 461–469. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.2.461
- Kirsner, K., Lalor, E., & Hird, K. (1993). The bilingual lexicon. In R. Schreuder, & B. Weltens (Eds.), Studies in bilingualism, Vol. 6. The bilingual lexicon (pp. 215–248). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.6.11kir
- Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). Lmertest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
- Luce, P. A. (1987). Neighborhoods of words in the Mental lexicon. Dissertation Abstracts International, B: Sciences and Engineering, 47(12), https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED353610
- Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19(1), 1–36. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9504270 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199802000-00001
- Luce, P. A., Pisoni, D. B., & Goldinger, S. D. (1990). Similarity neighborhoods of spoken words. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), ACL–MIT Press series in natural language processing. Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 122–147). The MIT Pr. http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1991-97555-005
- Marian, V., Bartolotti, J., Chabal, S., & Shook, A. (2012). CLEARPOND: Cross-linguistic easy-access resource for phonological and orthographic neighborhood densities. PLoS One, 7(8), e43230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043230
- Marian, V., & Blumenfeld, H. K. (2006). Phonological neighborhood density guides: Lexical access in native and non-native language production. Journal of Social and Ecological Boundaries, 2.1(1), 3–35.
- Morton, J. (1970). A functional model for memory. In D. A. Norman (Ed.), Models of human memory (pp. 203–254). Academic Press.
- Mulatti, C., Reynolds, M. G., & Besner, D. (2006). Neighborhood effects in reading aloud: New findings and new challenges for computational models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(4), 799–810. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.799
- New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., & Ferrand, L. (2004). Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(3), 516–524. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195598
- Nickels, L., & Howard, D. (1995). Aphasic naming: What matters? Neuropsychologia, 33(10), 1281–1303. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(95)00102-9
- Pallier, C., Colomé, À, & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). The influence of native-language phonology on lexical access: Exemplar-based versus abstract lexical entries. Psychological Science, 12(6), 445–449. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00383
- Protopapas, A. (2007). Check vocal: A program to facilitate checking the accuracy and response time of vocal responses from DMDX. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 859–862. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192979
- R Development Core Team. (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
- Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Van Der Lugt, A., Rotte, M., Britti, B., Heinze, H. J., & Münte, T. F. (2005). Second language interferes with word production in fluent bilinguals: Brain potential and functional imaging evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(3), 422–433. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929053279559
- Sadat, J., Martin, C. D., Costa, A., & Alario, F.-X. (2014). Reconciling phonological neighborhood effects in speech production through single trial analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 68, 33–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COGPSYCH.2013.10.001
- Sadat, J., Martin, C. D., Magnuson, J. S., Alario, F.-X., & Costa, A. (2016). Breaking down the bilingual cost in speech production. Cognitive Science, 40(8), 1911–1940. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12315
- Schielzeth, H. (2010). Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 1(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00012.x
- Starreveld, P. A., De Groot, A. M. B., Rossmark, B. M. M., & Van Hell, J. G. (2014). Parallel language activation during word processing in bilinguals: Evidence from word production in sentence context. Bilingualism, 17(2), 258–276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000308
- Strijkers, K., Costa, A., & Thierry, G. (2010). Tracking lexical access in speech production: Electrophysiological correlates of word frequency and cognate effects. Cerebral Cortex, 20(4), 912–928. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp153
- Székely, A., & Bates, E. (2000). Objective visual complexity as a variable in studies of picture naming. Center for Research in Language Newsletter, 12(2), 3–33.
- Szekely, A., Jacobsen, T., D'Amico, S., Devescovi, A., Andonova, E., Herron, D., Lu, C. C., Pechmann, T., Pléh, C., Wicha, N., Federmeier, K., Gerdjikova, I., Gutierrez, G., Hung, D., Hsu, J., Iyer, G., Kohnert, K., Mehotcheva, T., Orozco-Figueroa, A., … Bates, E. (2004). A new on-line resource for psycholinguistic studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(2), 247–250. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.03.002
- Test your vocab. (2013). http://www.testyourvocab.com
- Thordardottir, E. (2011). The relationship between bilingual exposure and vocabulary development. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15(4), 426–445. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006911403202
- van Hell, J. G., & de Groot, A. M. B. (1998). Conceptual representation in bilingual memory: Effects of concreteness and cognate status in word association. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(3), 193–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728998000352
- van Heuven, W. J. B., Dijkstra, T., & Grainger, J. (1998). Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(3), 458–483. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/JMLA.1998.2584
- Vitevitch, M. S. (2012). What do foreign neighbors say about the mental lexicon? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(1), 167–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000149
- Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1998). When words compete: Levels of processing in perception of spoken words. Psychological Science, 9(4), 325–329. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00064
- Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(3), 374–408. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/JMLA.1998.2618
- Wickham, H. (2016). Ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggplot2/ggplot2.pdf