The influence of language dominance and domain-general executive control on semantic context effects

References

• Abdel Rahman, R., & Melinger, A. (2009). Semantic context effects in language production: A swinging lexical network proposal and a review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(5), 713–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802597250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel Rahman, R., & Melinger, A. (2011). The dynamic microstructure of speech production: Semantic interference built on the fly. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(1), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alario, F.-X., Ziegler, J. C., Massol, S., & de Cara, B. (2012). Probing the link between cognitive control and lexical selection in monolingual speakers. L’Année psychologique, 112(4), 545–559. https://doi.org/10.4074/S0003503312004010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belke, E., Meyer, A. S., & Damian, M. F. (2005). Refractory effects in picture naming assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(4), 667–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980443000142
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown, A. S. (1981). Inhibition in cued retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7(3), 204–215. http://dx.doi.org.sire.ub.edu/10.1037/0278-7393.7.3.204
   Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & Duyck, W. (2010). Is it time to leave behind the Revised Hierarchical Model of bilingual language processing after fifteen years of service? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(3), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabria, M., Grunden, N., Serra, M., García-Sánchez, C., & Costa, A. (2019). Semantic processing in bilingual aphasia: Evidence of language dependency. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13, 205. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campanella, F., & Shallice, T. (2011). Refractoriness and the healthy brain: A behavioural study on semantic access. Cognition, 118(3), 417–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14(1), 177–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/026432997381664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A., & Santesteban, M. (2004). Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(4), 491–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A., Santesteban, M., & Ivanova, I. (2006). How do highly proficient bilinguals control their lexicalization process? Inhibitory and language-specific selection mechanisms are both functional. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 32(5), 1057–1074. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.1057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1(1), 4–45. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.01.1.p004
   Google Scholar
• Crowther, J. E., & Martin, R. C. (2014). Lexical selection in the semantically blocked cyclic naming task: The role of cognitive control and learning. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., Vigliocco, G., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2001). Effects of semantic context in the naming of pictures and words. Cognition, 81(3), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00135-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93(3), 283–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Zubicaray, G., Johnson, K., Howard, D., & McMahon, K. (2014). A perfusion fMRI investigation of thematic and categorical context effects in the spoken production of object names. Cortex, 54, 13–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhooge, E., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2010). The distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: Evidence for response exclusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(4), 878–891. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferré, P., Sánchez-Casas, R., & Guasch, M. (2006). Can a horse be a donkey? Semantic and form interference effects in translation recognition in early and late proficient and nonproficient Spanish–Catalan bilinguals. Language Learning, 56(4), 571–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00389.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 35(1), 116–124. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195503
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freund, M., & Nozari, N. (2018). Is adaptive control in language production mediated by learning? Cognition, 176, 107–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funes, M. J., Lupiáñez, J., & Humphreys, G. (2010). Sustained vs. Transient cognitive control: Evidence of a behavioral dissociation. Cognition, 114(3), 338–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. E., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Dodds, N., Jones, T., Ehsan, S., & Jefferies, E. (2012). The differential contributions of pFC and temporo-parietal Cortex to multimodal semantic control: Exploring Refractory effects in semantic aphasia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(4), 778–793. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. Y., & Schnur, T. T. (2016). Different loci of semantic interference in picture naming vs. Word-picture matching tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 710. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D., Nickels, L., Coltheart, M., & Cole-Virtue, J. (2006). Cumulative semantic inhibition in picture naming: Experimental and computational studies. Cognition, 100(3), 464–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hübner, R., Steinhauser, M., & Lehle, C. (2010). A dual-stage two-phase model of selective attention. Psychological Review, 117(3), 759–784. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hübner, R., & Töbel, L. (2019). Conflict resolution in the eriksen flanker task: Similarities and differences to the Simon task. PLoS One, 14(3), e0214203. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huibregtse, I., Admiraal, W., & Meara, P. (2002). Scores on a yes–no vocabulary test: Correction for guessing and response style. Language Testing, 19(3), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532202lt229oa
   Google Scholar
• Izura, C., Cuetos, F., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). Lextale-Esp: A test to rapidly and efficiently assess the Spanish vocabulary size. Psicológica, 35, 49–66. https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.63.104215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, N., Schirm, W., Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: Evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(1), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferies, E., Baker, S. S., Doran, M., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2007). Refractory effects in stroke aphasia: A consequence of poor semantic control. Neuropsychologia, 45(5), 1065–1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotz, S. A., & Elston-Güttler, K. (2004). The role of proficiency on processing categorical and associative information in the L2 as revealed by reaction times and event-related. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17(2–3), 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0911-6044(03)00058-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 149–174. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, J. F., Van Hell, J. G., Tokowicz, N., & Green, D. W. (2010). The Revised Hierarchical Model: A critical review and assessment. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(3), 373–381. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672891000009X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Heij, W. (1988). Components of stroop-like interference in picture naming. Memory and Cognition, 16(5), 400–410. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99001776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91(3), 295–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, S. G. (2017). Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R. Behavior Research Methods, 49(4), 1494–1502. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0809-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K. A., & Caramazza, A. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(3), 503–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRae, K., & Boisvert, S. (1998). Automatic semantic similarity priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(3), 558–572. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.24.3.558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathaniel, U., Thompson, H. E., Davies, E., Arnold, D., Hallam, G., Stampacchia, S., Smallwood, J., & Jefferies, E. (2018). When comprehension elicits incomprehension: Deterioration of semantic categorisation in the absence of stimulus repetition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(9), 1817–1843. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1363793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarrete, E., Del Prato, D., & Mahon, B. Z. (2012). Factors determining semantic facilitation and interference in the cyclic naming paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 38. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarrete, E., Del Prato, P., Peressotti, F., & Mahon, B. Z. (2014). Lexical retrieval is not by competition: Evidence from the blocked naming paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2014.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarrete, E., Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2010). The cumulative semantic cost does not reflect lexical selection by competition. Acta Psychologica, 134(3), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarrete, E., Mahon, B. Z., Lorenzoni, A., & Peressotti, F. (2016). What can written-words tell us about lexical retrieval in speech production? Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1982. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01982
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nozari, N., & Hepner, C. R. (2018). To select or to wait? The importance of criterion setting in debates of competitive lexical selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2018.1476335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nozari, N., Martin, C. D., & McCloskey, N. (2019). Is repairing speech errors an automatic or a controlled process? Insights from the relationship between error and repair probabilities in English and spanish. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 43(9), 1230–1245. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1637007.
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheim, G., Dell, M., & Schwartz, G. S., & F, M. (2010). The dark side of incremental learning: A model of cumulative semantic interference as learning. Cognition, 114(2), 227–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protopapas, A. (2007). Check Vocal: a program to facilitate checking the accuracy and response time of vocal responses from DMDX. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 859–862. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107(3), 460–499. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002). Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: Empirical clarification through distributional analyses. In W. Prinz, & B. Hommel (Eds.), Attention and performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action (pp. 494–519). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (2003). Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modelling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 110(1), 88–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runnqvist, E., Strijkers, K., Alario, F.-X., & Costa, A. (2012). Cumulative semantic interference is blind to language: Implications for models of bilingual speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 850–869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satterthwaite, F. E. (1941). Synthesis of variance. Psychometrika, 6(5), 309–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288586
   Google Scholar
• Shao, Z., Meyer, A. S., & Roelofs, A. (2013). Selective and nonselective inhibition of competitors in picture naming. Memory & Cognition, 41(8), 1200–1211. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0332-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao, Z., Roelofs, A., Martin, R. C., & Meyer, A. S. (2015). Selective inhibition and naming performance in semantic blocking, picture-word interference, and colot-word Stroop tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(6), 1806–1820. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao, Z., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (2012). Sources of individual differences in the speed of naming objects and actions: The contribution of executive control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 65(10), 1927–1944. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.670252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverberg, S., & Samuel, A. G. (2004). The effects of age of acquisition and fluency on processing second language words: Translation or direct conceptual access? Journal of Memory and Language, 51(3), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor, & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 31–86). North-Holland: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(2), 174–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strijkers, K., Baus, C., Runnqvist, E., FitzPatrick, I., & Costa, A. (2013). The temporal dynamics of first versus second language production. Brain & Language, 127(1), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2013.07.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A(3), 631–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749408401131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, P., Kang, G., & Zhou, X. (2013). Attentional selection within and across hemispheres: Implications for the perceptual load theory. Experimental Brain Research, 225(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3346-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, T., & Schnur, T. T. (2016). Long-Term interference at the semantic level: Evidence from blocked-cyclic picture matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(1), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar