Delayed prediction of idiom constituent meaning points to weak holistic multi-word representation in children

References

• Ackerman, B. (1982). On comprehending idioms: Do children get the picture? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33(3), 439–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(82)90058-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73(3), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00059-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnon, I., & Christiansen, M. H. (2017). The role of multiword building blocks in explaining L1–L2 differences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(3), 621–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnon, I., & Clark, E. V. (2011). Why brush your teeth is better than teeth – Children's word production is facilitated in familiar sentence-frames. Language Learning and Development, 7(2), 107–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2010.505489
   Google Scholar
• Arnon, I., & Cohen Priva, U. (2014). Time and again: The changing effect of word and multiword frequency on phonetic duration for highly frequent sequences. The Mental Lexicon, 9(3), 377–400. https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.9.3.01arn
   Google Scholar
• Arnon, I., McCauley, S. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2017). Digging up the building blocks of language: Age-of-acquisition effects for multiword phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnon, I., & Snider, N. (2010). More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannard, C., & Matthews, D. (2008). Stored word sequences in language learning: The effect of familiarity on children's repetition of four-word combinations. Psychological Science, 19(3), 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02075.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, S. D., & Weber, A. (2016a). Bilingual and monolingual idiom processing is cut from the same cloth: The role of the L1 in literal and figurative meaning activation. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1305. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, S. D., & Weber, A. (2016b). L2 idiom processing: Figurative attunement in highly idiomatic contexts. Conference proceedings paper at CogSci.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, P., & Scherg, M. (1994). A multiple source approach to the correction of eye artifacts. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 90(3), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(94)90094-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bernicot, J., Laval, V., & Chaminaud, S. (2007). Nonliteral language forms in children: In what order are they acquired in pragmatics and metapragmatics? Journal of Pragmatics, 39(12), 2115–2132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonin, P., Meot, A., & Bugaiska, A. (2013). Norms and comprehension times for 305 French idiomatic expressions. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1259–1271. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0331-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borovsky, A., Elman, J. L., & Fernald, A. (2012). Knowing a lot for one's age: Vocabulary skill and not age is associated with anticipatory incremental sentence interpretation in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112(4), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brothers, T., Swaab, T. Y., & Traxler, M. J. (2015). Effects of prediction and contextual support on lexical processing: Prediction takes precedence. Cognition, 136, 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cacciari, C., & Corradini, P. (2015). Literal analysis and idiom retrieval in ambiguous idioms processing: A reading-time study. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(7), 797–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2015.1049178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciari, C., & Tabossi, P. (1988). The comprehension of idioms. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(6), 668–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(88)90014-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canal, P., Pesciarelli, F., Vespignani, F., Molinaro, N., & Cacciari, C. (2017). Basic composition and enriched integration in idiom processing: An EEG study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(6), 928–943. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrol, G., & Conklin, K. (2020). Is all formulaic language created equal? Unpacking the processing advantage for different types of formulaic sequences. Language and Speech, 63(1), 95–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830918823230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrol, G., & Littlemore, J. (2020). Resolving figurative expressions during reading: The role of familiarity, transparency, and context. Discourse Processes, 57(7), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1729041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N. (2008). Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers? Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortés-Monter, D. R., Angulo-Chavira, A. Q., & Arias-Trejo, N. (2017). Differences between skilled and less-skilled young readers in the retrieval of semantic, phonological, and shape information. Journal of Research in Reading, 40, S170–S189. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruttenden, A. (1981). Item-learning and system-learning. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 10(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong, K. A., Chan, W. H., & Kutas, M. (2018). Similar time courses for word form and meaning preactivation during sentence comprehension. Psychophysiology, 56(4), e13312. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz, M. T., & Swaab, T. Y. (2007). Electrophysiological differentiation of phonological and semantic integration in word and sentence contexts. Brain Research, 1146, 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.07.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanari, R., Cacciari, C., & Tabossi, P. (2010). The role of idiom length and context in spoken idiom comprehension. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22(3), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440902843866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 469–495. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., McLennan, D. B., De Ochoa, E., & Kutas, M. (2002). The impact of semantic memory organization and sentence context information on spoken language processing by younger and older adults: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 39(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3920133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fillmore, C. (2008). Border conflicts: FrameNet meets construction grammar. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the XIII Euralex international congress, Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, C. K., & Kotz, S. A. (2007). ERP evidence of form and meaning coding during online speech recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(4), 594–604. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.4.594
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W. (1980). Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation. Memory & Cognition, 8(2), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Günther, F., Dudschig, C., & Kaup, B. (2015). LSAfun-An R package for computations based on latent semantic analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 930–944. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0529-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holsinger, E. (2013). Representing idioms: Syntactic and contextual effects on idiom processing. Language and Speech, 56(3), 373–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830913484899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y. T., & Snedeker, J. (2011). Cascading activation across levels of representation in children's lexical processing. Journal of Child Language, 38(3), 644–661. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000910000206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huettig, F., & Pickering, M. (2019). Literacy advantages beyond reading: Prediction of spoken language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(6), 464–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, A., Corley, M., Pickering, M. J., Martin, A. E., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2016). Predicting form and meaning: Evidence from brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 86, 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackendoff, R. (1996). The architecture of the language faculty. Mass.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kamide, Y. (2008). Anticipatory processes in sentence processing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 20(4), 647–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00072.x
   Google Scholar
• Kessler, R., Weber, A., & Friedrich, C. K. (2021). Activation of literal word meanings in idioms: Evidence from Eye-tracking and ERP experiments. Language and Speech, 64(3), 594-624. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830920943625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G., & Wlotko, E. (2020). A tale of two positivities and the N400: Distinct neural signatures are evoked by confirmed and violated predictions at different levels of representation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32(1), 12–35. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(12), 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01560-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 621–647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307(5947), 161–163. https://doi.org/10.1038/307161a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• la Roi, A., Sprenger, S. A., & Hendriks, P. (2019). Event-related potentials reveal increased dependency on linguistic context due to cognitive aging. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(7), 1226–1257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830920943625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libben, M. R., & Titone, D. A. (2008). The multidetermined nature of idiom processing. Memory & Cognition, 36(6), 1103–1121. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.6.1103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahler, N. A., & Chenery, H. J. (2018). A developmental perspective on processing semantic context: Preliminary evidence from sentential auditory word repetition in school-aged children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48(1), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-018-9591-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mani, N., & Huettig, F. (2012). Prediction during language processing is a piece of cake-but only for skilled producers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(4), 843–847. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mani, N., & Huettig, F. (2014). Word reading skill predicts anticipation of upcoming spoken language input: A study of children developing proficiency in reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 264–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marantz, A.. (1997). No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 4(2), 201–225.
   Google Scholar
• Meng, X., Tian, X., Jian, J., & Zhou, X. (2007). Orthographic and phonological processing in Chinese dyslexic children: An ERP study on sentence reading. Brain Research, 1179, 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.08.046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirman, D., Dixon, J. A., & Magnuson, J. S. (2008). Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M. S. (2019). Do ‘early’ brain responses reveal word form prediction during language comprehension? A critical review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 96, 367–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.11.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, A. M. (1983). The units of language acquisition (vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language. Science, 253(5019), 530–535. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1857983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules. Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Qualls, C. D., Treaster, B., Blood, G. W., & Hammer, C. S. (2003). Lexicalization of idioms in urban fifth graders: A reaction time study. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36(4), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00015-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabanus, S., Smolka, E., Streb, J., & Rösler, F. (2008). Die mentale verarbeitung von verben in idiomatischen konstruktionen. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik, 36(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1515/ZGL.2008.003
   Google Scholar
• Reuterskiöld, C., & Van Lancker Sidtis, D. (2013). Retention of idioms following one-time exposure. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 29(2), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659012456859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rommers, J., Dijkstra, T., & Bastiaansen, M. (2013). Context-dependent semantic processing in the human brain: Evidence from idiom comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(5), 762–776. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saslow, M. G. (1967). Effects of components of displacement-step stimuli upon latency for saccadic eye movement. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 57(8), 1024–1029. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.57.001024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schild, U., Becker, A. B., & Friedrich, C. K. (2014a). Phoneme-free prosodic representations are involved in pre-lexical and lexical neurobiological mechanism underlying spoken word processing. Brain and Language, 136, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schild, U., Becker, A. B., & Friedrich, C. K. (2014b). Processing of syllable stress is functionally different from phoneme processing and does not profit from literacy acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 530. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N. (2011a). Adding more fuel to the fire: An eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and non-native speakers. Second Language Research, 27(2), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658310382068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., & van Heuven, W. J. (2011b). Seeing a phrase “time and again” matters: The role of phrasal frequency in the processing of multiword sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(3), 776–784. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolka, E., Rabanus, S., & Rösler, F. (2007). Processing verbs in German idioms: Evidence against the configuration hypothesis. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(3), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480701357638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprenger, S., la Roi, A., & van Rij, J. (2019). The development of idiom knowledge across the lifespan. Frontiers in Communication, 4, 29. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00029
   Google Scholar
• Sprenger, S., Levelt, W., & Kempen, G. (2006). Lexical access during the production of idiomatic phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(2), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinney, D. A., & Cutler, A. (1979). The access and processing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(5), 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90284-6
   Google Scholar
• Tabossi, P., Fanari, R., & Wolf, K. (2009). Why are idioms recognized fast? Memory & Cognition, 37(4), 529–540. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.4.529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titone, D. A., & Connine, C. M. (1999). On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(12), 1655–1674. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00008-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titone, D. A., Lovseth, K., Kasparian, K., & Tiv, M. (2019). Are figurative interpretations of idioms directly retrieved, compositionally built, or both? Evidence from eye movement measures of reading. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(4), 216–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2000). First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(1/2), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2001.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay, A., & Baayen, R. H. (2010). Holistic processing of regular four-word sequences: A behavioral and ERP study of the effects of structure, frequency, and probability on immediate free recall. In D. Wood (Ed.), Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and communication (pp. 151–173). Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G., & Westbury, C. (2011). Processing advantages of lexical bundles: Evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks. Language Learning, 61(2), 569–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00622.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood, G., Schmitt, N., & Galpin, A. (2004). The eyes have it: An eye-movement study into the processing of formulaic sequences. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences (pp. 155–172). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• van Ginkel, W., & Dijkstra, T. (2019). The tug of war between an idiom's figurative and literal meanings: Evidence from native and bilingual speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(1), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918001219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lancker Sidtis, D. (2009). Formulaic and novel language in a ‘dual process’ model of language competence. Formulaic Language, 2, 445–470. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.83.11van
   Google Scholar
• Van Lancker Sidtis, D., Cameron, K., Bridges, K., & Sidtis, J. J. (2015). The formulaic schema in the minds of two generations of native speakers. Ampersand, 2, 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2015.02.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Petten, C., & Luka, B. J. (2012). Prediction during language comprehension: Benefits, costs, and ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(2), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vespignani, F., Canal, P., Molinaro, N., Fonda, S., & Cacciari, C. (2010). Predictive mechanisms in idiom comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(8), 1682–1700. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vulchanova, M., Milburn, E., Vulchanov, V., & Baggio, G. (2019). Boon or burden? The role of compositional meaning in figurative language processing and acquisition. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 28(2), 359–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-019-09282-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vulchanova, M. D., Vulchanov, V., & Stankova, M. (2011). Idiom comprehension in the first language: A developmental study. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8, 207–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wray, A. (2005). Formulaic language and the Lexicon. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar