No looking back: the effects of visual cues on the lexical boost in structural priming

References

• Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., Massonnié, J., Flitton, A., Kirkham, N., & Evershed, J. K. (2020). Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior Research Methods, 52(1), 388–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18(3), 355–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, K. (1989). Closed-class immanence in sentence production. Cognition, 31(2), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(89)90022-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branigan, H. P., & McLean, J. F. (2016). What children learn from adults’ utterances: An ephemeral lexical boost and persistent syntactic priming in adult–child dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 91, 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & Cleland, A. A. (1999). Syntactic priming in written production: Evidence for rapid decay. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6(4), 635–640. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & Cleland, A. A. (2000). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75(2), B13–B25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00081-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carminati, M. N., Van Gompel, R. P. G., & Wakeford, L. J. (2019). An investigation into the lexical boost with nonhead nouns. Journal of Memory and Language, 108, 104031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, F., Baumann, M., Pappert, S., & Fitz, H. (2015). Do lemmas speak German? A verb position effect in German structural priming. Cognitive Science, 39(5), 1113–1130. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113(2), 234–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corley, M., & Scheepers, C. (2002). Syntactic priming in English sentence production: Categorical and latency evidence from an internet-based study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(1), 126–131. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmet, T., & Declercq, M. (2006). Cross-linguistic priming of syntactic hierarchical configuration information. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(4), 610–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., Bernolet, S., Schoonbaert, S., Speybroeck, S., & Vanderelst, D. (2008). Syntactic priming persists while the lexical boost decays: Evidence from written and spoken dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 214–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantola, L., & Van Gompel, R. P. G. (2011). Between- and within-language priming is the same: Evidence for shared bilingual syntactic representations. Memory & Cognition, 39(2), 276–290. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-010-0016-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, G., Pickering, M., Branigan, B., & Bednar, J. A. (2008). On the persistence of structural priming: Mechanisms of decay and influence of word-forms. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 657–662). Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, H., & Bates, D. (2017). Balancing type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(4), 633–651. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., Branigan, H. P., & McLean, J. F. (2002). Constituent structure is formulated in one stage. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(3), 586–605. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Ferreira, V. S. (2008). Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 427–459. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, M. C., & Lombardi, L. (1998). Syntactic priming in immediate recall of sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 38(3), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Reitter, D., Keller, F., & Moore, J. D. (2011). A computational cognitive model of syntactic priming. Cognitive Science, 35(4), 587–637. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01165.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheepers, C. (2003). Syntactic priming of relative clause attachments: Persistence of structural configuration in sentence production. Cognition, 89(3), 179–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00119-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheepers, C., Raffray, C., & Myachykov, A. (2017). The lexical boost effect is not diagnostic of lexically-specific syntactic representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 95, 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoonbaert, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). The representation of lexical and syntactic information in bilinguals: Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segaert, K., Wheeldon, L., & Hagoort, P. (2016). Unifying structural priming effects on syntactic choices and timing of sentence generation. Journal of Memory and Language, 91, 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gompel, R. P. G., Arai, M., & Pearson, J. (2012). The representation of mono- and intransitive structures. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(2), 384–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernice, M., Pickering, M. J., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2012). Thematic emphasis in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(5), 631–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2011.572468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar