Consonant, vowel and lexical neighbourhood processing during word recognition: New evidence using the sandwich priming technique

References

• Acha, J., & Perea, M. (2010a). On the role of consonants and vowels in visual-word processing: Evidence with a letter search paradigm. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(3), 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960903411666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acha, J., & Perea, M. (2010b). Does Kaniso Activate CASINO? Experimental Psychology, 57(4), 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., & Shafaei-Bajestan, E. (2019). R language: Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics (R package version 1.5. 0).
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-8. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
   Google Scholar
• Berent, I., & Perfetti, C. A. (1995). A rose is a REEZ: The two-cycles model of phonology assembly in reading English. Psychological Review, 102(1), 146–184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonatti, L., Peña, M., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2005). Linguistic constraints on statistical computations: The role of consonants and vowels in continuous speech processing. Psychological Science, 16(6), 451–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01556.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchon, C., Floccia, C., Fux, T., Adda-Decker, M., & Nazzi, T. (2015). Call me Alix, not Elix: Vowels are more important than consonants in own name recognition at 5 months. Developmental Science, 18(4), 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchwald, A., & Rapp, B. (2006). Consonants and vowels in orthographic representations. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23(2), 308–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., Chialant, D., Capasso, R., & Miceli, G. (2000). Separable processing of consonants and vowels. Nature, 403(6768), 428–430. https://doi.org/10.1038/35000206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M., & Price, C. J. (2008). Brain activation for consonants and vowels. Cerebral Cortex, 18(7), 1727–1735. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhm202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H., Lee, D. T., Luo, Z., Lai, R. Y., Cheung, H., & Nazzi, T. (2021). Variation in phonological bias: Bias for vowels, rather than consonants or tones in lexical processing by cantonese-learning toddlers. Cognition, 213, 104486. ISSN 0010-0277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetail, F., & Content, A. (2012). The internal structure of chaos: Letter category determines visual word perceptual units. Journal of Memory and Language, 67(3), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetail, F., & Content, A. (2014). What is the difference between OASIS and OPERA? Roughly five pixels orthographic structure biases the perceived length of letter strings. Psychological Science, 25(1), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613500508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetail, F., Drabs, V., & Content, A. (2014). The role of consonant/vowel organization in perceptual discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(4), 938–961. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comesaña, M., Soares, A. P., Marcet, A., & Perea, M. (2016). On the nature of consonant/vowel differences in letter position coding: Evidence from developing and adult readers. British Journal of Psychology, 107(4), 651–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Soler-Vilageliu, O., & van Ooijen, B. (2000). Constraints of vowels and consonants on lexical selection: Cross-linguistic comparisons. Memory & Cognition, 28(5), 746–755. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J., & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(3), 668–687. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J., Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: The role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(5), 1550–1570. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delle Luche, C., Poltrock, S., Goslin, J., New, B., Floccia, C., & Nazzi, T. (2014). Differential processing of consonants and vowels in the auditory modality: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Memory and Language, 72, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Moor, W., & Brysbaert, M. (2000). Neighborhood-frequency effects when primes and targets are of different lengths. Psychological Research, 63(2), 159–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00008174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2011). The relative position priming effect depends on whether letters are vowels or consonants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(5), 1143–1163. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-López, M., Davis, C. J., Perea, M., Marcet, A., & Gómez, P. (2021). Unveiling the boost in the sandwich priming technique. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218211055097
   Google Scholar
• Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1993). The time-course of phonological and orthographic code activation in the early phases of visual word recognition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31(2), 119–122. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334157
   Google Scholar
• Ferreres, A. R., López, C. V., & China, N. N. (2003). Phonological alexia with vowel–consonant dissociation in non-word reading. Brain and Language, 84(3), 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00559-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floccia, C., Nazzi, T., Delle Luche, C., Poltrock, S., & Goslin, J. (2014). English-learning one- to two-year-olds do not show a consonant bias in word learning. Journal of Child Language, 41(5), 1085–1114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000913000287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez, D. M., Mok, P., Ordin, M., Mehler, J., & Nespor, M. (2018). Statistical speech segmentation in tone languages: The role of lexical tones. Language and Speech, 61(1), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830917706529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1996). Masked orthographic and phonological priming in visual word recognition and naming: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(5), 623–647. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2009). Watching the word go by: On the time-course of component processes in visual word recognition. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 128–156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00121.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grainger, J., Lopez, D., Eddy, M., Dufau, S., & Holcomb, P. J. (2012). How word frequency modulates masked repetition priming: An ERP investigation. Psychophysiology, 49(5), 604–616. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01337.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., Muneaux, M., Farioli, F., & Ziegler, J. C. (2005). Effects of phonological and orthographic neighbourhood density interact in visual word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(6), 981–998. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980443000386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havy, M., Serres, J., & Nazzi, T. (2014). A consonant/vowel asymmetry in word-form processing: Evidence in childhood and in adulthood. Language and Speech, 57(2), 254–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830913507693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochmann, J. R., Benavides-Varela, S., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2011). Consonants and vowels: Different roles in early language acquisition. Developmental Science, 14(6), 1445–1458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01089.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Højen, A., & Nazzi, T. (2016). Vowel bias in Danish word-learning: processing biases are language-specific. Developmental Science, 19(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keidel, J., Jenison, R., Kluender, K., & Seidenberg, M. (2007). Does grammar constrain statistical learning? Commentary on Bonatti, Peña, Nespor, and Mehler (2005). Psychological Science, 18(10), 922–923. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02001.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenth, R. V. (2021). Emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, Aka Least-squares Means. R [R package version 1.6.3]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
   Google Scholar
• Lupker, S. J., & Davis, C. J. (2009). Sandwich priming: A method for overcoming the limitations of masked priming by reducing lexical competitor effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(3), 618–639. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupker, S. J., Perea, M., & Davis, C. J. (2008). Transposed-letter effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701579714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazzi, T. (2005). Use of phonetic specificity during the acquisition of new words: Differences between consonants and vowels. Cognition, 98(1), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazzi, T., & Cutler, A. (2019). How consonants and vowels shape spoken-language recognition. Annual Review of Linguistics, 5(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-011919
   Google Scholar
• Nazzi, T., Floccia, C., Moquet, B., & Butler, J. (2009). Bias for consonantal information over vocalic information in 30-month-olds: Cross-linguistic evidence from French and English. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102(4), 522–537. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2008.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazzi, T., & New, B. (2007). Beyond stop consonants: Consonantal specificity in early lexical acquisition. Cognitive Development, 22(2), 271–279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2006.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazzi, T., Poltrock, S., & Von Holzen, K. (2016). The developmental origins of the consonant bias in lexical processing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(4), 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416655786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nespor, M., Peña, M., & Mehler, J. (2003). On the different roles of vowels and consonants in speech processing and language acquisition. Lingue e Linguaggio, 2(2), 203–230. https://doi.org/10.1418/10879
   Google Scholar
• New, B., Araujo, V., & Nazzi, T. (2008). Differential processing of consonants and vowels in lexical access through reading. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1223–1227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02228.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New, B., & Nazzi, T. (2014). The time course of consonant and vowel processing during word recognition. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(2), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.735678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishibayashi, L. L., & Nazzi, T. (2016). Vowels, then consonants: Early bias switch in recognizing segmented word forms. Cognition, 155, 188–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Does letter position coding depend on consonant/vowel status? Evidence with the masked priming technique. Acta Psychologica, 130(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(2), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., Marcet, A., & Acha, J. (2018). Does consonant–vowel skeletal structure play a role early in lexical processing? Evidence from masked priming. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(1), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716417000431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poltrock, S., Chen, H., Kwok, C., Cheung, H., & Nazzi, T. (2018). Adult learning of novel words in a non-native language: Consonants, vowels, and tones. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1211. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poltrock, S., & Nazzi, T. (2015). Consonant/vowel asymmetry in early word form recognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 131, 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.11.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter? Cognitive Psychology, 53(2), 97–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegelman, N., Bogaerts, L., & Frost, R. (2019). What determines visual statistical learning performance? Insights from information theory. Cognitive Science, 43(12), e12803. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe, E. J., Lupker, S. J., & Davis, C. J. (2012). Transposed-letter priming effects with masked subset primes: A re-examination of the “relative position priming constraint”. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(4), 475–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.550928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trifonova, I. V., & Adelman, J. S. (2018). The sandwich priming paradigm does not reduce lexical competitor effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(11), 1743–1764. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Heuven, W. J. B., Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & Schriefers, H. (2001). Shared neighborhood effects in masked orthographic priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(1), 96–101. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ooijen, B. (1996). Vowel mutability and lexical selection in English: Evidence from a word reconstruction task. Memory & Cognition, 24(5), 573–583. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, S. (2020). Second language learners develop non-native lexical processing biases. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(1), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918001165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, S., & Turnbull, R. (2016). Constraints of tones, vowels and consonants on lexical selection in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Speech, 59(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830915578000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarkoni, T., Balota, D., & Yap, M. (2008). Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(5), 971–979. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.5.971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, M. (2013). How the clustering of phonological neighbors affects visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(5), 1649–1656. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Ferrand, L., Jacobs, A. M., Rey, A., & Grainger, J. (2000). Visual and phonological codes in letter and word recognition: Evidence from incremental priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 53(3), 671–692. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713755906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar