Cognitive features of indirect speech acts

References

• Amodio, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2006). Meeting of minds: The medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(4), 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, C. L. (1970). Double negatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 1(2), 169–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bašnáková, J., van Berkum, J., Weber, K., & Hagoort, P. (2015). A job interview in the MRI scanner: How does indirectness affect addressees and overhearers? Neuropsychologia, 76, 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.03.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bašnáková, J., Weber, K., Petersson, K. M., Van Berkum, J., & Hagoort, P. (2014). Beyond the language given: The neural correlates of inferring speaker meaning. Cerebral Cortex, 24(10), 2572–2578. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boux, I., Tomasello, R., Grisoni, L., & Pulvermüller, F. (2021). Brain signatures predict communicative function of speech production in interaction. Cortex, 5, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.11.008
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness, some universals in language use. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (2006). Politeness: Some universals in language use. In A. Jaworski & N. Coupland (Eds.), The discourse reader (2nd ed., pp. 311–323). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (1979). Responding to indirect speech acts. Cognitive Psychology, 11(4), 430–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(79)90020-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulson, S., & Lovett, C. (2010). Comprehension of non-conventional indirect requests: An event-related brain potential study. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 22(1), 107–124.
   Google Scholar
• De La Vega, A., Chang, L. J., Banich, M. T., Wager, T. D., & Yarkoni, T. (2016). Large-scale meta-analysis of human medial frontal cortex reveals tripartite functional organization. The Journal of Neuroscience, 36(24), 6553–6562. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4402-15.2016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018). Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805.
   Google Scholar
• Egorova, N., Pulvermüller, F., & Shtyrov, Y. (2014). Neural dynamics of speech act comprehension: An MEG study of naming and requesting. Brain Topography, 27(3), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-013-0329-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egorova, N., Shtyrov, Y., & Pulvermüller, F. (2013). Early and parallel processing of pragmatic and semantic information in speech acts: Neurophysiological evidence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 86. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egorova, N., Shtyrov, Y., & Pulvermüller, F. (2016). Brain basis of communicative actions in language. NeuroImage, 125, 857–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, W., Wu, Y., Jan, C., Yu, H., Jiang, X., & Zhou, X. (2017). Effects of contextual relevance on pragmatic inference during conversation: An fMRI study. Brain and Language, 171, 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2017.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, W., Yu, H., & Zhou, X. (2021). Understanding particularized and generalized conversational implicatures: Is theory-of-mind necessary? Brain and Language, 212(August 2020), 104878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104878
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Field, A. (2000). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (Fourth). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Friston, K. (2005). A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 360(1456), 815–836. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W. (2002). A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(4), 457–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00046-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W., & Mueller, R. A. G. (1988). Conversational sequences and preference for indirect speech acts. Discourse Processes, 11(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538809544693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giora, R. (1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(3), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1997.8.3.183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giora, R. (2002). Literal vs. Figurative language: Different or equal? Journal of Pragmatics, 34(4), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00045-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work. Psychiatry, 18(3), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01229.x
   Google Scholar
• Grisoni, L., Dreyer, F. R., & Pulvermüller, F. (2016). Somatotopic semantic priming and prediction in the motor system. Cerebral Cortex, 26(5), 2353–2366. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grisoni, L., Miller, T. M., & Pulvermüller, F. (2017). Neural correlates of semantic prediction and resolution in sentence processing. The Journal of Neuroscience, 37(18), 4848–4858. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2800-16.2017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grisoni, L., Mohr, B., & Pulvermüller, F. (2019). Prediction mechanisms in motor and auditory areas and their role in sound perception and language understanding. NeuroImage, 199, 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grisoni, L., Tomasello, R., & Pulvermüller, F. (2020). Correlated brain indexes of semantic prediction and prediction error: Brain localizationand category specificity. Cerebral Cortex, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa308
   Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T. (1991). Interpreting questions and replies : effects of face-threat, question form, and gender. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T. (1994). Communication in context: Effects of speaker status on the comprehension of indirect requests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1205–1218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T. (1998). Interpreting indirect replies. Cognitive Psychology, 37(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T. (1999). Comprehending indirect replies: When and how are their conveyed meanings activated? Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 519–540. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T., & Robinson, C. (2020). Emoji can facilitate recognition of conveyed indirect meaning. PLoS ONE, 15(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huettig, F. (2015). Four central questions about prediction in language processing. Brain Research, 1626, 118–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, G., Yoon, S. A., Lee, S. E., Park, H., Kim, J., Ko, J. H., & Park, H. J. (2013). Everyday conversation requires cognitive inference: Neural bases of comprehending implicated meanings in conversations. NeuroImage, 81, 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectantcy and semantic association. Nature, 307(5947), 161–163. https://doi.org/10.1038/307161a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25(2–3), 259–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539809545028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K., McNamara, D. S., Dennis, S., & Kintsch, W. (2007). Handbook of latent semantic analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. J., & Pinker, S. (2010). Rationales for indirect speech: The theory of the strategic speaker. Psychological Review, 117(3), 785–807. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019688
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• León-Cabrera, P., Flores, A., Rodríguez-Fornells, A., & Morís, J. (2019). Ahead of time: Early sentence slow cortical modulations associated to semantic prediction. NeuroImage, 189, 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• León-Cabrera, P., Rodríguez-Fornells, A., & Morís, J. (2017). Electrophysiological correlates of semantic anticipation during speech comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 99, 326–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.02.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (1983). Conversational implicature. In Pragmatics (pp. 97–166). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313.006
   Google Scholar
• Meibauer, J. (2019). What is an indirect speech act? Reconsidering the literal force hypothesis. Pragmatics and Cognition, 26(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.19009.mei
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). Psychopy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, M. E., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018). Deep contextualized word representations. In NAACL HLT 2018 – 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies – Proceedings of the Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 2227–2237). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/n18-1202
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Clark, A. (2014). Getting ahead: Forward models and their place in cognitive architecture. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(9), 451–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S., Nowak, M. A., & Lee, J. J. (2008). The logic of indirect speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(3), 833–838. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707192105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F., & Grisoni, L. (2020). Semantic prediction in brain and mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(10), 781–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RC-Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.5. 2, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2018). In R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Reboul, A. (2017). Is implicit communication a way to escape epistemic vigilance? Pragmatics at Its Interfaces, 17(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501505089-006
   Google Scholar
• Ruytenbeek, N. (2017). The comprehension of indirect requests: Previous work and future directions. In R. Salkie & I. Depraetere (Eds.), Semantics and pragmatics: Drawing a line (p. Springer Nature). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32247-6
   Google Scholar
• Ruytenbeek, N. (2021). The comprehension of ISAs. In Indirect speech acts (pp. 107–140). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole, & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantix. Vol. 3: Speech acts (pp. 59–82). Acad. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theories of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shibata, M., Abe, J. i., Itoh, H., Shimada, K., & Umeda, S. (2011). Neural processing associated with comprehension of an indirect reply during a scenario reading task. Neuropsychologia, 49(13), 3542–3550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance. Communication & cognition (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sternau, M., Ariel, M., Giora, R., & Fein, O. (2015). Levels of interpretation: New tools for characterizing intended meanings. Journal of Pragmatics, 84, 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, A., Wood, J., Le-luan, E., Yao, B., & Haigh, M. (2017). “It’s hard to write a good article.” The online comprehension of excuses as indirect replies. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 0218(May), https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1327546
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, R., Grisoni, L., Boux, I., Sammler, D., & Pulvermüller, F. (2022). Instantaneous neural processing of communicative functions conveyed by speech prosody. Cerebral Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhab522
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, R., Kim, C., Dreyer, F. R., Grisoni, L., & Pulvermüller, F. (2019). Neurophysiological evidence for rapid processing of verbal and gestural information in understanding communicative actions. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52158-w
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tromp, J., Hagoort, P., & Meyer, A. S. (2016). Pupillometry reveals increased pupil size during indirect request comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(6), 1093–1108. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1065282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trott, S., & Bergen, B. (2018). Individual differences in mentalizing capacity predict indirect request comprehension. Discourse Processes, 00(00), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2018.1548219
   Google Scholar
• van Ackeren, M. J., Casasanto, D., Bekkering, H., Hagoort, P., & Rueschemeyer, S. A. (2012). Pragmatics in action: Indirect requests engage theory of mind areas and the cortical motor network. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(11), 2237–2247. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ackeren, M. J., Smaragdi, A., & Rueschemeyer, S. A. (2016). Neuronal interactions between mentalising and action systems during indirect request processing. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(9), 1402–1410. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(3), 443–467. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., Jordan, M. I., Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. (1995). An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science, 269(5232), 1880–1882. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7569931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert, D. M., & Kawato, M. (1998). Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Networks, 11(7–8), 1317–1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-6080(98)00066-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Web references
   Google Scholar
• Retrieved September 21, 2018, from http://lsa.colorado.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Retrieved December 10, 2020, from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/emmeans/index.html
   Google Scholar