When facilitation becomes inhibition: effects of modality and lexicality on transposed-phoneme priming

References

• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., & Milin, P. (2010). Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(2), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.807
   Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D. M., & Sarkar, D. (2007). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes, R package version 2.6, retrieved 20 November 2017 from http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Colombo, L. (1986). Activation and inhibition with orthographically similar words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12(2), 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.12.2.226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dufour, S., & Grainger, J. (2019). Phoneme-order encoding during spoken word recognition: A priming investigation. Cognitive Science, 43(10), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufour, S., & Grainger, J. (2020). The influence of word frequency on the transposed-phoneme priming effect. Attention, Perception, and Pyschophysics, 82, 2060–2069. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02060-9
   Google Scholar
• Dufour, S., & Grainger, J. (2022). When you hear /baksεt/ do you think /baskεt/? Evidence for transposed-phoneme effects with multi-syllabic words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory and Cognition, 48(1), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufour, S., Mirault, J., & Grainger, J. (2021). Do you want /ʃoloka/ on a /bistɔk/? On the scope of transposed-phoneme effects with non-adjacent phonemes. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 28(5), 1668–1678. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-01926-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufour, S., Mirault, J., & Grainger, J. (2022). Investigating the locus of transposed- phoneme effects using cross-modal priming. Acta Psychologica, 226, 103578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufour, S., & Peereman, R. (2003a). Lexical competition in phonological priming: Assessing the role of phonological match and mismatch lengths between primes and targets. Memory and Cognition, 31(8), 1271–1283. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufour, S., & Peereman, R. (2003b). Inhibitory priming effects in auditory word recognition: When the target’s competitors conflict with the prime word. Cognition, 88(3), B33–B44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00046-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufour, S., Peereman, R., Pallier, C., & Radeau, M. (2002). Vocolex: A lexical database on phonological similarity between French words. L’Année Psychologique, 102(4), 725–746. https://doi.org/10.3406/psy.2002.29616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumay, N., Benraïss, A., Barriol, B., Colin, C., Radeau, M., & Besson, M. (2001). Behavioral and electrophysiological study of phonological priming between bisyllabic spoken words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(1), 121–143. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892901564117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1992). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked nonword priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A(3), 353–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724989208250619
   Google Scholar
• Finger, H., Goeke, C., Diekamp, D., Standvoß, K., & König, P. (2017). LabVanced: A Unified JavaScript Framework for Online Studies. In International Conference on Computational Social Science IC2S2, Cologne.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open Science Framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203–206. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88
   Google Scholar
• Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1997). Integrating form and meaning: A distributed model of speech perception. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12(5–6), 613–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909697386646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamburger, M., & Slowiaczek, L. M. (1996). Phonological priming reflects lexical competition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(4), 520–525. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannagan, T., Magnuson, J. S., & Grainger, J. (2013). Spoken word recognition without a TRACE. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 563. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce, P. A., Goldinger, S. D., Auer, E. T., Jr., & Vitevitch, M. S. (2000). Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(3), 615–625. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupker, S. J., & Colombo, L. (1994). Inhibitory effects in form priming: Evaluating a phonological competition explanation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(2), 437–451. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.20.2.437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interaction and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10(1), 29–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(78)90018-X
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18(1), 1–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQueen, J. M., & Sereno, J. (2005). Cleaving automatic processes from strategic biases in phonological priming. Memory & Cognition, 33(7), 1185–1209. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehler, J. (1981). The role of syllables in speech processing: Infant and adult data. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, 295(1077), 333–352. https://doi-org.lama.univ-amu.fr/10 .1098/rstb.1981.0144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, D. (1994). SHORTLIST: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52(3), 189–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90043-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2002). Bias effects in facilitatory phonological priming. Memory & Cognition, 30(3), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palan, S., & Schitter, C. (2018). Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2017.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Transposed-letter priming effects for close versus distant transpositions. Experimental Psychology, 55(6), 397–406. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.55.6.384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory & Cognition, 31(6), 829–841. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(2), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available from http://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Radeau, M. (1995). Facilitatory and inhibitory phonological priming effects as a function of overlap position. Abstracts of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, p. 59, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Radeau, M., Morais, J., & Segui, J. (1995). Phonological priming between monosyllabic spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(6), 1297–1311. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.21.6.1297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slowiaczek, L. M., & Hamburger, M. B. (1992). Prelexical facilitation and lexical interference in auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory and Cognition, 18(6), 1239–1250. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.18.6.1239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinelli, E., Segui, J., & Radeau, M. (2001). Phonological priming in spoken word recognition with bisyllabic targets. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16(4), 367–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960042000111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toscano, J. C., Anderson, N. D., & McMurray, B. (2013). Reconsidering the role of temporal order in spoken word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(5), 981–987. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0417-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You, H., & Magnuson, J. (2018). TISK 1.0: An easy-to-use python implementation of the time-invariant string kernel model of spoken word recognition. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 871–889. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-1012-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar