967
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
REVIEW ARTICLES

The acquisition of speech categories: beyond perceptual narrowing, beyond unsupervised learning and beyond infancy

ORCID Icon
Pages 419-445 | Received 24 Jan 2022, Accepted 01 Jul 2022, Published online: 08 Aug 2022

References

  • Albareda-Castellot, B., Pons, F., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2011). The acquisition of phonetic categories in bilingual infants: New data from an anticipatory eye movement paradigm. Developmental Science, 14(2), 395–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00989.x
  • Andruski, J. E., Blumstein, S. E., & Burton, M. W. (1994). The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access. Cognition, 52(3), 163–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90042-6
  • Apfelbaum, K. S., Kutlu, E., McMurray, B., & Kapnoula, E. (submitted). Don’t force It! gradient speech categorization calls for continuous categorization tasks. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7w93f.
  • Apfelbaum, K. S., & McMurray, B. (2011). Using variability to guide dimensional weighting: Associative mechanisms in early word learning. Cognitive Science, 35(6), 1105–1138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01181.x
  • Benders, T. (2013). Nature’s distributional-learning experiment. Amsterdam: The University of Amsterdam.
  • Benders, T., Pokharel, S., & Demuth, K. (2019). Hypo-articulation of the four-way voicing contrast in Nepali infant-directed speech. Language Learning and Development, 15(3), 232–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2019.1577139
  • Bergelson, E., & Swingley, D. (2012). At 6–9 months, human infants know the meanings of many common nouns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(9), 3253–3258. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1113380109
  • Bernstein, L. E. (1983). Perceptual development for labeling words varying in voice onset time and fundamental frequency. Journal of Phonetics, 11(4), 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30837-X
  • Binnie, C. A., Montgomery, A. A., & Jackson, P. L. (1974). Auditory and visual contributions to the perception of consonants. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 17(4), 619–630. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1704.619
  • Bion, R. A. H., Miyazawa, K., Kikuchi, H., & Mazuka, R. (2013). Learning phonemic vowel length from naturalistic recordings of Japanese infant-directed speech. PLoS ONE, 8(2), e51594. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051594
  • Blandón, M. A. C., Cristia, A., & Räsänen, O. (2021). Evaluation of computational models of infant language development against robust empirical data from meta-analyses: What, why, and how? https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/yjz5a.
  • Bradlow, A. R., & Bent, T. (2008). Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition, 106(2), 707–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.005
  • Bulgarelli, F., Mielke, J., & Bergelson, E. (2021). Quantifying talker variability in North-American infants’ daily input. Cognitive Science, 46(1), e13075. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13075
  • Caplan, S., Hafri, A., & Trueswell, J. C. (2021). Now you hear me, later you don’t: The immediacy of linguistic computation and the representation of speech. Psychological Science, 32(3), 410–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620968787.
  • Carney, A. E., Widin, G. P., & Viemeister, N. F. (1977). Noncategorical perception of stop consonants differing in VOT. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62(4), 961–970. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381590
  • Chandrasekaran, B., Yi, H.-G., & Maddox, W. T. (2014). Dual-learning systems during speech category learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(2), 488–495. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0501-5
  • Claussenius-Kalman, H., Hernandez, A. E., & Li, P. (2021). Expertise, ecosystem, and emergentism: Dynamic developmental bilingualism. Brain and Language, 222, 105013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2021.105013
  • Clayards, M., Tanenhaus, M. K., Aslin, R. N., & Jacobs, R. A. (2008). Perception of speech reflects optimal use of probabilistic speech cues. Cognition, 108(3), 804–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.004
  • Cole, J. S., Linebaugh, G., Munson, C., & McMurray, B. (2010). Unmasking the acoustic effects of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: A statistical modeling approach. Journal of Phonetics, 38(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2009.08.004
  • Creel, S. C., & Jimenez, S. R. (2012). Differences in talker recognition by preschoolers and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113(4), 487–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.07.007
  • Cristia, A. (2018). Can infants learn phonology in the lab? A meta-analytic answer. Cognition, 170, 312–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.09.016
  • Cristia, A., & Seidl, A. (2013). The hyperarticulation hypothesis of infant-directed speech. Journal of Child Language, 41, 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000912000669
  • Crowder, R. G. (1989). Categorical perception of speech: A largely dead horse, surpassingly well kicked. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(04), 760–760. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0002567X
  • Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., Hervais-Adelman, A., Taylor, K., & McGettigan, C. (2005). Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: Evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(2), 222–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.134.2.222
  • de Boer, B., & Kuhl, P. K. (2003). Investigating the role of infant-directed speech with a computer model. Auditory Research Letters On-Line (ARLO), 4, 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1613311.
  • Dich, N., & Cohn, A. C. (2013). A review of spelling acquisition: Spelling development as a source of evidence for the psychological reality of the phoneme. Lingua. International Review of General Linguistics. Revue internationale De Linguistique Generale, 133, 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.04.010
  • Dietrich, C., Swingley, D., & Werker, J. F. (2007). Native language governs interpretation of salient speech sound differences at 18 months. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(41), 16027–16031. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0705270104
  • Duff, D., Tomblin, J. B., & Catts, H. (2015). The influence of reading on vocabulary growth: A case for a Matthew effect. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(3), 853–864. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-13-0310
  • Earle, F. S., & Myers, E. B. (2015). Sleep and native language interference affect non-native speech sound learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(6), 1680–1695. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000113
  • Eaves, Jr, B. S., Feldman, N. H., Griffiths, T. L., & Shafto, P. (2016). Infant-directed speech is consistent with teaching. Psychological Review, 123(6), 758–771. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000031
  • Eilers, R. E., Wilson, W. R., & Moore, J. M. (1977). Developmental changes in speech discrimination in infants. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 20(4), 766–780. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2004.766.
  • Eimas, P. D., Siqueland, E. R., Jusczyk, P., & Vigorito, J. (1971). Speech perception in infants. Science, 171(3968), 303–306. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3968.303
  • Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1402_1
  • Elman, J. L., & Zipser, D. (1988). Learning the hidden structure of speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83(4), 1615–1626. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.395916
  • Escudero, P., Benders, T., & Wanrooij, K. (2011). Enhanced bimodal distributions facilitate the learning of second language vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(4), EL206–EL212. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3629144
  • Escudero, P., & Williams, D. (2014). Distributional learning has immediate and long-lasting effects. Cognition, 133(2), 408–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.07.002
  • Feldman, N. H., Goldwater, S., Dupoux, E., & Schatz, T. (2021). Do infants really learn phonetic categories? Open Mind, 5, 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00046
  • Feldman, N. H., Griffiths, T. L., Goldwater, S., & Morgan, J. L. (2013). A role for the developing lexicon in phonetic category acquisition. Psychological Review, 120(4), 751–778. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034245
  • Feldman, N. H., Griffiths, T. L., & Morgan, J. L. (2009). The influence of categories on perception: Explaining the perceptual magnet effect as optimal statistical inference. Psychological Review, 116(4), 752–782. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017196
  • Feldman, N. H., Myers, E. B., White, K. S., Griffiths, T. L., & Morgan, J. L. (2013). Word-level information influences phonetic learning in adults and infants. Cognition, 127(3), 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.007
  • Fennell, C. T., & Waxman, S. R. (2010). What paradox? Referential cues allow for infant use of phonetic detail in word learning. Child Development, 81(5), 1376–1383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01479.x
  • Frye, R. E., McGraw Fisher, J., Cody, A., Zarella, M., Liederman, J., & Halgren, E. (2007). Linear coding of voice onset time. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(9), 1476–1487. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1476
  • Fuhrmeister, P., Schlemmer, B., & Myers, E. B. (2020). Adults show initial advantages over children in learning difficult nonnative speech sounds. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63(8), 2667–2679. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00358
  • Galle, M. E., Apfelbaum, K. S., & McMurray, B. (2015). Within-speaker variability benefits phonological word learning. Language Learning and Development, 11(1), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2014.895249
  • Galle, M. E., & McMurray, B. (2014). The development of voicing categories: A quantitative review of over 40 years of infant speech perception research. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(4), 884–906. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0569-y
  • Garcia-Sierra, A., Ramírez-Esparza, N., & Kuhl, P. K. (2016). Relationships between quantity of language input and brain responses in bilingual and monolingual infants. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 110, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.10.004
  • Gauthier, B., Shi, R., & Xu, Y. (2007). Learning phonetic categories by tracking movements. Cognition, 103(1), 80–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.03.002
  • Gerken, L. (2009). Language development. Plural Publishing.
  • Gerrits, E., & Schouten, M. E. H. (2004). Categorical perception depends on the discrimination task. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(3), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194885
  • Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access.. Psychological Review, 105(2), 251–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.2.251
  • Goldstone, R. L., & Kersten, A. (2003). Concepts and categories. In A. F. Healy, & W. Proctor (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology, volume 4: Experimental psychology (pp. 591–621). Wiley.
  • Gottlieb, G. (2007). Probabilistic epigenesis. Developmental Science, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00556.x
  • Goudbeek, M., Cutler, A., & Smits, R. (2008). Supervised and unsupervised learning of multidimensionally varying non-native speech categories. Speech Communication, 50(2), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2007.07.003
  • Guenther, F. H., & Gjaja, M. (1996). The perceptual magnet effect as an emergent property of neural map formation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100(2), 1111–1121. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.416296
  • Haith, M. M. (1998). Who put the cog in infant cognition? Is rich interpretation too costly? Infant Behavior and Development, 21(2), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(98)90001-7
  • Hartshorne, J. K., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Pinker, S. (2018). A critical period for second language acquisition: Evidence from 2/3 million English speakers. Cognition, 177, 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.007
  • Hay, J. F., Graf Estes, K., Wang, T., & Saffran, J. R. (2015). From flexibility to constraint: The contrastive Use of lexical tone in early word learning. Child Development, 86(1), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12269
  • Hazan, V., & Barrett, S. (2000). The development of phonemic categorization in children aged 6–12. Journal of Phonetics, 28(4), 377–396. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2000.0121
  • Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  • Heeren, W. F. L., & Schouten, M. E. H. (2010). Perceptual development of the Finnish /t-tː/ distinction in Dutch 12-year-old children: A training study. Journal of Phonetics, 38(4), 594–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.08.005
  • Hillenbrand, J. M., Getty, L., Clark, M. J., & Wheeler, K. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(5), 3099–3111. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.411872
  • Holt, L. L., & Lotto, A. J. (2010). Speech perception as categorization, Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72(5), 1218-1227. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.5.1218
  • Jongman, A., Wayland, R., & Wong, S. (2000). Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108(3), 1252–1263. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1288413
  • Jusczyk, P. W. (1993). From general to language-specific capacities: The WRAPSA model of how speech perception develops. Journal of Phonetics, 21(1-2), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31319-1.
  • Jusczyk, P. W., & Aslin, R. N. (1995). Infants’ detection of the sound patterns of words in fluent speech. Cognitive Psychology, 29(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1995.1010
  • Kapnoula, E. C., Edwards, J., & McMurray, B. (2021). Gradient activation of speech categories facilitates listeners’ recovery from lexical garden paths, but not perception of speech-in-noise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 47(4), 578–595. https://psyarxiv.com/hw24k/; https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000900
  • Kapnoula, E. C., Winn, M. B., Kong, E., Edwards, J., & McMurray, B. (2017). Evaluating the sources and functions of gradiency in phoneme categorization: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(9), 1594–1611. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000410
  • Keil, F. C. (2014). Developmental Psychology: The growth of mind and behavior. W.W. Norton and Company.
  • Kessinger, R. H., & Blumstein, S. E. (1998). Effects of speaking rate on voice-onset time in Thai, French, and English. Journal of Phonetics, 25(2), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1996.0039
  • Kohonen, T. (1982). Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biological Cybernetics, 43(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00337288
  • Kuhl, P. K. (1979). Speech perception in early infancy: Perceptual constancy for spectrally dissimilar vowel categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66(6), 1668–1679. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.383639
  • Kuhl, P. K. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 93–107. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212211.
  • Kuhl, P. K. (2004). Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(11), 831–843. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1533
  • Kuhl, P. K., Andruski, J. E., Chistovich, I. A., Chistovich, L. A., Kozhevnikova, E. V., Ryskina, V. L., Stolyarova, E. I., Sundberg, U., & Lacerda, F. (1997). Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants. Science, 277(5326), 684–686. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5326.684
  • Kuhl, P. K., Conboy, B. T., Padden, D., Nelson, T., & Pruitt, J. (2005). Early speech perception and later language development: Implications for the “critical period”. Language Learning and Development, 1(3-4), 237–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2005.9671948
  • Kuhl, P. K., Stevens, E., Hayashi, A., Deguchi, T., Kiritani, S., & Iverson, P. (2006). Infants show a facilitation effect for native language phonetic perception between 6 and 12 months. Developmental Science, 9(2), F13–F21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00468.x
  • Kuhl, P. K., Stevens, E. H., Deguchi, A., Kiritani, T., & & Iverson, S. (2006). Infants show a facilitation effect for native language phonetic perception between 6 and 12 months. Developmental Science, 9(2), F13–F21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00468.x
  • Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Hoffman, H. S., & Griffith, B. C. (1957). The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54(5), 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044417
  • Lim, S.-j., & Holt, L. L. (2011). Learning foreign sounds in an alien world: Videogame training improves non-native speech categorization. Cognitive Science, 35(7), 1390–1405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01192.x
  • Lipsitt, L. P., & Kaye, H. (1964). Conditioned sucking in the human newborn. Psychonomic Science, 1(1), 29–30. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03342772
  • Lipsitt, L. P., Kaye, H., & Bosack, T. N. (1966). Enhancement of neonatal sucking through reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 4(2), 163–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(66)90016-6
  • Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. S. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20(3), 384–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830
  • Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94(3), 1242–1255. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.408177
  • Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1991). Training Japanese listeners to identify English/r/and/l: A first report. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(2), 874–886. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1894649
  • Ludusan, B., Mazuka, R., & Dupoux, E. (2021). Does infant-directed speech help phonetic learning? A machine learning investigation. Cognitive Science, 45(5), e12946. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12946
  • Martin, A., Schatz, T., Versteegh, M., Miyazawa, K., Mazuka, R., Dupoux, E., & Cristia, A. (2015). Mothers speak less clearly to infants than to adults: A comprehensive test of the hyperarticulation hypothesis. Psychological Science, 26(3), 341–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614562453
  • Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M. (1983). Categorical or continuous speech perception: A new test. Speech Communication, 2(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(83)90061-4
  • Maurer, D., & Werker, J. F. (2014). Perceptual narrowing during infancy: A comparison of language and faces. Developmental Psychobiology, 56(2), 154–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.21177
  • Maye, J., & Gerken, L.. (2000). Learning phonemes without minimal pairs. In S. C. Howell, S. A. Fish, & T. Keith-Lucas (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 522–533). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
  • Maye, J., Weiss, D. J., & Aslin, R. N. (2008). Statistical phonetic learning in infants: Facilitation and feature generalization. Developmental Science, 11(1), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00653.x
  • Maye, J., Werker, J. F., & Gerken, L. (2003). Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition, 82(3), B101–B111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00157-3
  • McCandliss, B. D., Fiez, J. A., Protopapas, A., Conway, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2002). Success and failure in teaching the [r]-[l] contrast to Japanese adults: Tests of a Hebbian model of plasticity and stabilization in spoken language perception. Cognitive, affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 89–108. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.2.2.89.
  • McClay, E. K., Cebioglu, S., Broesch, T., & Yeung, H. H. (2022). Rethinking the phonetics of baby-talk: Differences across Canada and Vanuatu in the articulation of mothers’ speech to infants. Developmental Science, 25(2), e13180. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13180
  • McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264(5588), 746–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/264746a0
  • McMurray, B., Apfelbaum, K. S., & Tomblin, J. B. (2022). The slow development of real-time processing: Spoken-word recognition as a crucible for new thinking about language acquisition and language disorders. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(4), 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214221078325.
  • McMurray, B., & Aslin, R. N. (2004). Anticipatory eye movements reveal infants’ auditory and visual categories. Infancy, 6(2), 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327078in0602_4
  • McMurray, B., & Aslin, R. N. (2005). Infants are sensitive to within-category variation in speech perception. Cognition, 95(2), B15–B26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.07.005
  • McMurray, B., Aslin, R. N., & Toscano, J. C. (2009). Statistical learning of phonetic categories: Insights from a computational approach. Developmental Science, 12(3), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00822.x
  • McMurray, B., Danelz, A., Rigler, H., & Seedorff, M. (2018). Speech categorization develops slowly through adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 54(8), 1472–1491. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000542
  • McMurray, B., Horst, J. S., Toscano, J. C., & Samuelson, L. (2009). Towards an integration of connectionist learning and dynamical systems processing: Case studies in speech and lexical development. In J. Spencer, M. Thomas, & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Toward a unified theory of development: Connectionism and dynamic systems theory re-considered (pp. 369–378). Oxford University Press.
  • McMurray, B., & Jongman, A. (2011). What information is necessary for speech categorization? Harnessing variability in the speech signal by integrating cues computed relative to expectations. Psychological Review, 118(2), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022325
  • McMurray, B., Kovack-Lesh, K., Goodwin, D., & McEchron, W. D. (2013). Infant directed speech and the development of speech perception: Enhancing development or an unintended consequence? Cognition, 129(2), 362–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.015
  • McMurray, B. (submitted). The myth of categorical perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dq7ej/
  • McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access. Cognition, 86(2), B33–B42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00157-9
  • Meehl, P. E. (1990). Why summaries of research on psychological theories are often uninterpretable. Psychological Reports, 66(1), 195–244. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1990.66.1.195
  • Miller, J. L. (1997). Internal structure of phonetic categories. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12(5-6), 865–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909697386754
  • Miller, J. L., & Eimas, P. D. (1996). Internal structure of voicing categories in early infancy. Perception & Psychophysics, 58(8), 1157–1167. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207549
  • Narayan, C. R., Werker, J. F., & Beddor, P. S. (2010). The interaction between acoustic salience and language experience in developmental speech perception: Evidence from nasal place discrimination. Developmental Science, 13(3), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00898.x
  • Nittrouer, S. (1992). Age-related differences in perceptual effects of formant transitions within syllables and across syllable boundaries. Journal of Phonetics, 20(3), 351–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30639-4.
  • Nittrouer, S. (2002). Learning to perceive speech: How fricative perception changes, and how it stays the same. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112(2), 711–719. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1496082
  • Nittrouer, S. (2004). The role of temporal and dynamic signal components in the perception of syllable-final stop voicing by children and adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115(4), 1777–1790. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1651192
  • Nittrouer, S., & Miller, M. E. (1997). Predicting developmental shifts in perceptual weighting schemes. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(4), 2253–2266. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.418207
  • Nittrouer, S., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1987). The role of coarticulatory effects in the perception of fricatives by children and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 30(3), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3003.319
  • Nixon, J. S. (2020). Of mice and men: Speech sound acquisition as discriminative learning from prediction error, not just statistical tracking. Cognition, 197, 104081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104081
  • Nixon, J. S., & Tomaschek, F. (2021). Prediction and error in early infant speech learning: A speech acquisition model. Cognition, 212, 104697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104697
  • Noordenbos, M. W., & Serniclaes, W. (2015). The categorical perception deficit in dyslexia: A meta-analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(5), 340–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2015.1052455
  • Norris, D., McQueen, J., & Cutler, A. (2003). Perceptual learning in speech. Cognitive Psychology, 47(2), 204–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00006-9
  • Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2
  • O’Donoghue, E. M., Broschard, M. B., Freeman, J. H., & Wasserman, E. A. (2022). The lords of the rings: People and pigeons take different paths mastering the concentric-rings categorization task. Cognition, 218, 104920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104920
  • Oyama, S. (2000). The ontogeny of information: Developmental systems and evolution (2nd ed., rev. and expanded). Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822380665
  • Pereira, A., Smith, L., & Yu, C. (2013). A bottom-up view of toddler word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 178–185. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0466-4
  • Perkell, J. S., & Klatt, D. (Eds.). (1986). Invariance and variability in speech processes. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Perrachione, T. K., Lee, J., Ha, L., & Wong, P. C. M. (2011). Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(1), 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3593366
  • Pisoni, D. B., & Lazarus, J. H. (1974). Categorical and noncategorical modes of speech perception along the voicing continuum. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55(2), 328–333. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1914506
  • Pisoni, D. B., & Tash, J. (1974). Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories. Perception & Psychophysics, 15(2), 285–290. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213946
  • Ramscar, M. (2021). A discriminative account of the learning, representation and processing of inflection systems. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2021.2014062
  • Räsänen, O. (2011). A computational model of word segmentation from continuous speech using transitional probabilities of atomic acoustic events. Cognition, 120(2), 149–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.04.001
  • Räsänen, O., & Rasilo, H. (2015). A joint model of word segmentation and meaning acquisition through cross-situational learning. Psychological Review, 122(4), 792–829. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039702
  • Reetzke, R., Maddox, W. T., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2016). The role of age and executive function in auditory category learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 142, 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.09.018
  • Rescorla, R. A. (1988). Pavlovian conditioning: It’s not what you think it is. American Psychologist, 43(3), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.43.3.151
  • Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black, & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II (pp. 64–99). Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Rigler, H., Farris-Trimble, A., Greiner, L., Walker, J., Tomblin, J. B., & McMurray, B. (2015). The slow developmental time course of real-time spoken word recognition.. Developmental Psychology, 51(12), 1690–1703. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000044
  • Roark, C. L., & Holt, L. L. (2018). Task and distribution sampling affect auditory category learning. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(7), 1804–1822. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1552-5
  • Rost, G. C., & McMurray, B. (2009). Speaker variability augments phonological processing in early word learning. Developmental Science, 12(2), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00786.x
  • Rost, G. C., & McMurray, B. (2010). Finding the signal by adding noise: The role of non-contrastive phonetic variability in early word learning. Infancy, 15(6), 608–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7078.2010.00033.x
  • Rumelhart, D., Hinton, G., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323(6088), 533–536. https://doi.org/10.1038/323533a0
  • Rumelhart, D., & Zipser, D. (1986). Feature discovery by competitive learning. In D. Rumelhart, & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (pp. 151–193). The MIT Press.
  • Sadagopan, N., & Smith, A. (2008). Developmental changes in the effects of utterance length and complexity on speech movement variability. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51(5), 1138–1151. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/06-0222)
  • Schatz, T., Feldman, N. H., Goldwater, S., Cao, X.-N., & Dupoux, E. (2021). Early phonetic learning without phonetic categories: Insights from large-scale simulations on realistic input. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(7), e2001844118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2001844118
  • Scheel, A. M., Tiokhin, L., Isager, P. M., & Lakens, D. (2021). Why hypothesis testers should spend less time testing hypotheses. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 744–755. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966795
  • Schouten, M. E. H., Gerrits, E., & Van Hessen, A. (2003). The end of categorical perception as we know it. Speech Communication, 41(1), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00094-8
  • Sekerina, I. A., & Brooks, P. J. (2007). Eye movements during spoken word recognition in Russian children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 98(1), 20–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2007.04.005
  • Shukla, M., Wen, J., White, K. S., & Aslin, R. N. (2011). SMART-T: A system for novel fully automated anticipatory eye-tracking paradigms. Behavior Research Methods, 43(2), 384–398. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-010-0056-6
  • Simmering, V. R. (2016). Working memory capacity in context: Modeling dynamic processes of behavior, memory, and development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 81(3), 1-6. https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/mono.12249; https://doi.org/10.1111/mono.12202
  • Slawinski, E. B., & Fitzgerald, L. K. (1998). Perceptual development of the categorization of the /r-w/ contrast in normal children. Journal of Phonetics, 26(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0057
  • Spencer, J., Blumberg, M., McMurray, B., Robinson, S. R., Samuelson, L., & Tomblin, J. B. (2009). Short arms and talking eggs: Why we should no longer abide the nativist-empiricist debate. Child Development Perspectives, 3(2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00081.x
  • Strange, W., & Shafer, V. L. (2008). Speech perception in second langauge learners: The re-education of selective perception. In J. G. H. Hansen, & M. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 153–192). John Benjamins.
  • Swingley, D. (2019). Learning phonology from surface distributions, considering Dutch and English vowel duration. Language Learning and Development, 15(3), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2018.1562927
  • Teinonen, T., Aslin, R. N., Alku, P., & Csibra, G. (2008). Visual speech contributes to phonetic learning in 6-month-old infants. Cognition, 108(3), 850–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.009
  • Thiessen, E. D. (2007). The effect of distributional information on children’s use of phonemic contrasts⋆. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(1), 16–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.07.002
  • Thiessen, E. D., Girard, S., & Erickson, L. C. (2016). Statistical learning and the critical period: How a continuous learning mechanism can give rise to discontinuous learning. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 7(4), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1394
  • Thiessen, E. D., & Pavlik, P. I. (2016). Modeling the role of distributional information in children’s use of phonemic contrasts. Journal of Memory and Language, 88, 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.01.003
  • Toscano, J. C., Anderson, N. D., Fabiani, M., Gratton, G., & Garnsey, S. M. (2018). The time-course of cortical responses to speech revealed by fast optical imaging. Brain and Language, 184, 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2018.06.006
  • Toscano, J. C., & McMurray, B. (2010). Cue integration with categories: Weighting acoustic cues in speech using unsupervised learning and distributional statistics. Cognitive Science, 34(3), 434–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01077.x
  • Toscano, J. C., McMurray, B., Dennhardt, J., & Luck, S. (2010). Continuous perception and graded categorization electrophysiological evidence for a linear relationship between the acoustic signal and perceptual encoding of speech. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1532–1540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610384142
  • Traxler, M. J. (2012). Introduction to psycholinguistics: Understanding language science. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Tsao, F.-M., Liu, H.-M., & Kuhl, P. K. (2006). Perception of native and non-native affricate-fricative contrasts: Cross-language tests on adults and infants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120(4), 2285–2294. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2338290
  • Tsuji, S., & Cristia, A. (2014). Perceptual attunement in vowels: A meta-analysis. Developmental Psychobiology, 56(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.21179.
  • Vallabha, G. K., McClelland, J. L., Pons, F., Werker, J. F., & Amano, S. (2007). Unsupervised learning of vowel categories from infant-directed speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(33), 13273–13278. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0705369104
  • Wade, T., & Holt, L. L. (2005). Incidental categorization of spectrally complex non-invariant auditory stimuli in a computer game task. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(4), 2618–2633. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2011156
  • Walley, A. C., Metsala, J. L., & Garlock, V. M. (2003). Spoken vocabulary growth: Its role in the development of phoneme awareness and early reading ability. Reading and Writing, 16(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021789804977
  • Wang, Y., & Kuhl, P. K. (2003). Evaluating the “critical period” hypothesis: Perceptual learning of mandarin tones in American adults and American children at 6, 10 and 14 years of age. Proceedings of the 15th international congress of phonetic sciences, Barcelona, Spain (pp. 1537-1540), August 3-9.
  • Werker, J. F. (2018). Perceptual beginnings to language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(4), 703–728. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716418000152
  • Werker, J. F., & Curtin, S. (2005). Primir: A developmental framework of infant speech processing. Language Learning and Development, 1(2), 197–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2005.9684216
  • Werker, J. F., & Hensch, T. K. (2015). Critical periods in speech perception: New directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 173–196. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015104
  • Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(84)80022-3
  • Werker, J. F., & Yeung, H. H. (2005). Infant speech perception bootstraps word learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(11), 519–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.09.003
  • Westermann, G., & Miranda, E. R. (2004). A new model of sensorimotor coupling in the development of speech. Brain and Language, 89(2), 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00345-6
  • Yeung, H. H., Chen, L. M., & Werker, J. F. (2014). Referential labeling can facilitate phonetic learning in infancy. Child Development, 85(3), 1036–1049. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12185
  • Yeung, H. H., & Werker, J. F. (2009). Learning words’ sounds before learning how words sound: 9-month-olds use distinct objects as cues to categorize speech information. Cognition, 113(2), 234–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.010
  • Yi, H.-G., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2016). Auditory categories with separable decision boundaries are learned faster with full feedback than with minimal feedback. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 140(2), 1332–1335. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4961163
  • Yoshida, K. A., Fennell, C. T., Swingley, D., & Werker, J. F. (2009). Fourteen-month-old infants learn similar-sounding words. Developmental Science, 12(3), 412–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00789.x
  • Yoshida, K. A., Pons, F., Maye, J., & Werker, J. F. (2010). Distributional phonetic learning at 10 months of age. Infancy, 15(4), 420–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7078.2009.00024.x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.