Orthographic precision for word naming in skilled readers

References

• Acheson, D. J., Wells, J. B., & MacDonald, M. C. (2008). New and updated tests of print exposure and reading abilities in college students. Behavior Research Methods, 40(1), 278–289. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.1.278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adelman, J. S., Sabatos-DeVito, M. G., Marquis, S. J., & Estes, Z. (2014). Individual differences in reading aloud: A mega-study, item effects, and some models. Cognitive Psychology, 68, 113–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, S. (2012). Individual differences in skilled visual word recognition: The role of lexical quality. In J. S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition: Vol. 2. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, S. (2015). Individual differences among skilled readers: The role of lexical quality. In A. Pollatsek, & R. Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, S., & Hersch, J. (2010). Lexical precision in skilled readers: Individual differences in masked neighbor priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(2), 299–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, S., & Lo, S. (2012). Not all skilled readers have cracked the code: Individual differences in masked form priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(1), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database. [CD-ROM]. University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Dai, B. (2010). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes (R package Version 0.999375-27)[Computer software].
   Google Scholar
• Bernaards, C. A., & Jennrich, R. I. (2005). Gradient projection algorithms and software for arbitrary rotation criteria in factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(5), 676–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164404272507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & Cortese, M. J. (2010). Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(3), 545–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.503374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, J. S., & Fury, M. B. (2000). Spelling in adults: The role of reading skills and experience. Reading and Writing, 13(1-2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008071802996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catling, J. C., & Elsherif, M. M. (2020). The hunt for the age of acquisition effect: It’s in the links!. Acta Psychologica, 209, 103138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catling, J. C., Pymont, C., Johnston, R. A., Elsherif, M. M., Clark, R., & Kendall, E. (2021). Age of acquisition effects in recognition without identification tasks. Memory (Hove, England), 29(5), 662–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2021.1931695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauncey, K., Holcomb, P. J., & Grainger, J. (2008). Effects of stimulus font and size on masked repetition priming: An event-related potentials (ERP) investigation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(1), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701579839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum-Drucker.
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. F., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cortese, M. J., & Khanna, M. M. (2007). Age of acquisition predicts naming and lexical-decision performance above and beyond 22 other predictor variables: An analysis of 2,342 words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(8), 1072–1082. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701315467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortese, M. J., Yates, M., Schock, J., & Vilks, L. (2018). Examining word processing via a megastudy of conditional reading aloud. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(11), 2295–2313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021817741269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1990). Assessing print exposure and orthographic processing skill in children: A quick measure of reading experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 733–740. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J. (2005). N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Methods, 37(1), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J., & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(3), 668–687. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delios, A., Clemente, E. G., Wu, T., Tan, H., Wang, Y., Gordon, M., Viganola, D., Chen, Z., Dreber Johannesson, M., Pfeiffer, T., Generalizability Tests Forecasting Collaboration, & Uhlmann, E. L. (2022). Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(30), e2120377119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2120377119
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dimitropoulou, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2010). Influence of prime lexicality, frequency, and pronounceability on the masked onset priming effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(9), 1813–1837. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210903540763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C., & Burley, J. (1997). British Picture Vocabulary Scale ii. GL Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (2005). Development of sight word reading: Phases and findings. In M. J. Snowling, & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 135–154). Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, C. D., Smith, P., & McCulloch, K. (1996). British ability scales second edition (BAS II): administration and scoring manual. NFER-Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Elsherif, M. M., & Catling, J. C. (2021). Age of acquisition effects on the decomposition of compound words. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2021.2013246
   Google Scholar
• Elsherif, M. M., Wheeldon, L. R., & Frisson, S. (2021). Do dyslexia and stuttering share a processing deficit? Journal of Fluency Disorders, 67(1), 105827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2020.105827
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elsherif, M. M., Wheeldon, L. R., & Frisson, S. (2022). Phonological precision for word recognition in skilled readers. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(6), 1021–1040. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218211046350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrand, L., Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., New, B., Bonin, P., Méot, A., Augustinova, M., & Pallier, C. (2011). Comparing word processing times in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking: Evidence from chronolex. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(306), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00306
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS: (and sex and drugs and rock “n” roll) (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1991). The density constraint on form-priming in the naming task: Interference effects from a masked prime. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(91)90008-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., & Veres, C. (1998). The prime lexicality effect: Form-priming as a function of prime awareness, lexical status, and discrimination difficulty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(2), 498–514. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.24.2.498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisson, S., Bélanger, N. N., & Rayner, K. (2014). Phonological and orthographic overlap effects in fast and masked priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(9), 1742–1767. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.869614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104
   Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2009). Watching the word Go by: On the time-course of component processes in visual word recognition. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 128–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00121.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grainger, J., Kiyonaga, K., & Holcomb, P. J. (2006). The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1021–1026. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01821.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, J., Hilton, K. A., Place, M., Alloway, T. P., Elliott, J. G., & Gathercole, S. E. (2014). Children with low working memory and children with ADHD: Same or different? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 976. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huettig, F., Lachmann, T., Reis, A., & Petersson, K. M. (2018). Distinguishing cause from effect – many deficits associated with developmental dyslexia may be a consequence of reduced and suboptimal reading experience. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33(3), 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2017.1348528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, N.E. (2005). Are university students' component reading skills related to their text comprehension and academic achievement?. Learning and Individual Differences, 15(2), 113–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2004.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, L., Brancazio, L., Irwin, J., Katz, S., Magnuson, J., & Whalen, D. H. (2012). What lexical decision and naming tell US about reading. Reading and Writing, 25(6), 1259–1282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9316-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laberge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Language and Reading Research Consortium. (2015). Learning to read: Should we keep things simple? Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marian, V., Bartolotti, J., Chabal, S., & Shook, A. (2012). CLEARPOND: cross-linguistic easy-access resource for phonological and orthographic neighborhood densities. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e43230. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, V. E., & De Jong, P. F. (2008). Effects of repeated reading on the length effect in word and pseudoword reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(1), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2007.00360.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Chang, S. L., & Gould, O. N. (2008). Revisiting print exposure: Exploring differential links to vocabulary, comprehension and reading rate. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(3), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.00371.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade, G., Grainger, J., Midgley, K. J., Emmorey, K., & Holcomb, P. J. (2018). From sublexical facilitation to lexical competition: ERP effects of masked neighbor priming. Brain Research, 1685, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2018.01.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, K., Fussenegger, B., Willburger, E., & Landerl, K. (2009). Ran is not a measure of orthographic processing. Evidence from the asymmetric German orthography. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430802631684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousikou, P., Rastle, K., Besner, D., & Coltheart, M. (2015). The locus of serial processing in reading aloud: Orthography–to–phonology computation or speech planning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(4), 1076–1099. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, S., Azevedo, F., Elsherif, M. M., Guay, S., Shahimet, O. N., Govaart, G., Norris, M., O’Mahony, A., Parker, A. J., Todorovic, A., Pennington, C. R., Garcia-Pelegrin, E., Lazić, A., Robertson, O., Middleton, S. L., Valentini, B., McCuaig, J., Baker, B. J., Collins, E., … Aczel, B. (2022). A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(3), 312–318. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01269-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145–174). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (2017). Lexical quality revisited. In E. Segers, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Developmental perspectives in written language and literacy: In honor of ludo verhoeven (pp. 51–68). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2001). The lexical bases of comprehension skill. In D. S. Gorfien (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection (pp. 67–86). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Vehoeven, C. Elbron, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189–213). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. In P. V. Marsden (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1995 (pp. 111–163). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter? Cognitive Psychology, 53(2), 97–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven, J. C. (1960). Guide to using the standard progressive matrices. Lewis.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2017). r: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria URL http://www.R-project.org.ISBN3-900051-00-3
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. (2007). Tiwre: Test of Irregular Word Reading efficiency. Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Santiago, J., MacKay, D. G., Palma, A., & Rho, C. (2000). Sequential activation processes in producing words and syllables: Evidence from picture naming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909600386101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, H. E., Rayner, K., & Chumbley, J. I. (1998). Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory & Cognition, 26(6), 1270–1281. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, L. R., Carroll, J. M., & Solity, J. E. (2013). Separating the influences of prereading skills on early word and nonword reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.05.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, R.D., Speece, D.L., Harring, J.R., & Ritchey, K. D. (2013). Fluency Has a Role in the Simple View of Reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(2), 108–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.618153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singmann, H., Bolker, B., Westfall, J., Aust, F., & Ben-Shachar, M. S. (2020). afex: Analysis of factorial experiments (Version 0.28-0) [Computer software]. Comprehensive R Archive Network. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=afex
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(4), 402–433. https://doi.org/10.2307/747605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643–662. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054651
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B.G., Fidell, L.S., & Ullman, J.B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, W., Hardy, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., Hoogeveen, S., Haaf, J., Dreber, A., Johannesson, M., Pfeiffer, T., Huang, J. L., Vaughn, L. A., DeMarree, K., Igou, E. R., Chapman, H., Gantman, A., Vanaman, M., Wylie, J., … Uhlmann, E. L. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, W., Hardy, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., Dreber, A., Johannesson, M., Pfeiffer, T., Hiring Decisions Forecasting Collaboration, & Uhlmann, E. L. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmer, K., Vahid-Gharavi, N., & Schiller, N. O. (2012). Reading aloud in Persian: ERP evidence for an early locus of the masked onset priming effect. Brain and Language, 122(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.04.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., & Wagner, R. K. (1999). Towre: Test of word reading efficiency. Pro-ed.
   Google Scholar
• van Heuven, W. J., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 1176–1190. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.850521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldre, A., & Andrews, S. (2014). Lexical quality and eye movements: Individual differences in the perceptual span of skilled adult readers. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(4), 703–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.826258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing: CTOPP. Pro-ed.
   Google Scholar
• Westfall, J., Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (2014). Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(5), 2020–2045. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheat, K. L., Cornelissen, P. L., Frost, S. J., & Hansen, P. C. (2010). During visual word recognition, phonology Is accessed within 100 ms and May Be mediated by a speech production code: Evidence from magnetoencephalography. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(15), 5229–5233. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4448-09.2010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiederholt, J. L., & Blalock, G. (2000). Gsrt: Gray Silent Reading tests. Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. T. (2007). EVT-2: Expressive vocabulary test. Pearson Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, A. D., Davis-Kean, P., Halvorson, M. A., King, K. M., Logan, J. A. R., Xu, M., Bainter, S., Brown, D., Clay, J.M., Cruz, R.A., Elsherif, M.M., Gerasimova, dD., Joyal-Desmarais, K., Moreau, D., Nissen, J., Schmidt, K., Uzdavines, A., Van Dusen, B., & Vasilev, M. R. (2021). Missing Data and Multiple Imputation Decision Tree. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/mdw5r
   Google Scholar
• Woods, A. D., Gerasimova, D., Van Dusen, B., Nissen, J., Bainter, S., Uzdavines, A., Davis-Kean, P., King, K. M., Logan, J. A. R., Xu, M., Vasilev, M.R., Clay, J.M., Moreau, D., Joyal-Desmarais, J., Cruz, A.R., Brown, D., Schmidt, K., & Elsherif, M. M. (2022). Best practices for addressing missing data through multiple imputation. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/uaezh.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar