Testing the automaticity of syntax using masked visual priming

References

• Ansorge, U., Reynvoet, B., Hendler, J., Oettl, L., & Evert, S. (2013). Conditional automaticity in subliminal morphosyntactic priming. Psychological Research, 77(4), 399–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-012-0442-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(1), 94–117. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Gulikers, L., & Piepenbrock, R. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (WebCelex). University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batterink, L., & Neville, H. J. (2013). The human brain processes syntax in the absence of conscious awareness. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(19), 8528–8533. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0618-13.2013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkovitch, L., & Dehaene, S. (2019). Subliminal syntactic priming. Cognitive Psychology, 109, 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carello, C., Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1988). Rapid naming is affected by association but not by syntax. Memory & Cognition, 16(3), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colé, P., & Segui, J. (1994). Grammatical incongruency and vocabulary types. Memory & Cognition, 22(4), 387–394. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culbertson, J., & Adger, D. (2014). Language learners privilege structured meaning over surface frequency. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(16), 5842–5847. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320525111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., & Changeux, J.-P. (2011). Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. Neuron, 70(2), 200–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.03.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Clec’H, G., Koechlin, E., Mueller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., van de Moortele, P. F., & Le Bihan, D. (1998). Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature, 395(6702), 597–600. https://doi.org/10.1038/26967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikker, S., Rabagliati, H., Farmer, T. A., & Pylkkänen, L. (2010). Early occipital sensitivity to syntactic category is based on form typicality. Psychological Science, 21(5), 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610367751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikker, S., Rabagliati, H., & Pylkkänen, L. (2009). Sensitivity to syntax in visual cortex. Cognition, 110(3), 293–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everaert, M. B. H., Huybregts, M. A. C., Chomsky, N., Berwick, R. C., & Bolhuis, J. J. (2015). Structures, not strings: Linguistics as part of the cognitive sciences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(12), 729–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faussart, C., Jakubowicz, C., & Costes, M. (1999). Gender and number processing in spoken French and Spanish. The Italian Journal of Linguistics, 11, 75–101.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrand, L., & New, B. (2004). Semantic and associative priming in the mental lexicon. In P. Bonin (Ed.), Mental lexicon: “Some words to talk about words” (pp. 25–43). Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D. (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(2), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01839-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D. (2011). The brain basis of language processing: From structure to function. Physiological Reviews, 91(4), 1357–1392. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00006.2011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D., Chomsky, N., Berwick, R. C., Moro, A., & Bolhuis, J. J. (2017). Language, mind and brain. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(10), 713–722. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0184-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., & Mecklinger, A. (1996). Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late event-related brain potential effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(5), 1219–1248. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.5.1219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D., & Jacobsen, T. (1999). Processing grammatical gender during language comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(5), 467–484. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023264209610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, G. O., McClelland, J. L., & Gibbs, R. W. (1981). The role of syntactic context in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 9(6), 580–586. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goucha, T., Zaccarella, E., & Friederici, A. D. (2017). A revival of Homo loquens as a builder of labeled structures: Neurocognitive considerations. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 81(Pt B), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.036
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grant, D. A. (1948). The latin square principle in the design and analysis of psychological experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 45(5), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0053912
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., Klinger, M. R., & Schuh, E. S. (1995). Activation by marginally perceptible (“subliminal”) stimuli: Dissociation of unconscious from conscious cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 124(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.124.1.22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossi, G. (2006). Relatedness proportion effects on masked associative priming: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 43(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00383.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurjanov, M., Lukatela, G., Lukatela, K., Savić, M., & Turvey, M. T. (1985). Grammatical priming of inflected nouns by the gender of possessive adjectives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11(4), 692–701. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.11.1-4.692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurjanov, M., Lukatela, G., Moskovljević, J., Savić, M., & Turvey, M. T. (1985). Grammatical priming of inflected nouns by inflected adjectives. Cognition, 19(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90031-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: Early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(2), 194–205. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892999563328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, J., Mejias, S., Schelstraete, M. A., Pulvermüller, F., Shtyrov, Y., & van der Lely, H. K. J. (2014). Early activation of Broca’s area in grammar processing as revealed by the syntactic mismatch negativity and distributed source analysis. Cognitive Neuroscience, 5(2), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2013.860087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasting, A. S., Kotz, S. A., & Friederici, A. D. (2007). Setting the stage for automatic syntax processing: The mismatch negativity as an indicator of syntactic priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(3), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.3.386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, B., Maess, B., Hasting, A. S., & Friederici, A. D. (2009). Localization of the syntactic mismatch negativity in the temporal cortex: An MEG study. NeuroImage, 48(3), 590–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, G. W., Evett, L. J., & Taylor, D. E. (1982). Automatic phonological priming in visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 10(6), 576–590. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison, K. A. (2007). Attentional control and the relatedness proportion effect in semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(4), 645–662. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iijima, K., & Sakai, K. L. (2014). Subliminal enhancement of predictive effects during syntactic processing in the left inferior frontal gyrus: An MEG study. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8, 217. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00217
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• JASP Team. (2020). JASP (0.13.0).
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Ortega, L., Badaya, E., Casado, P., Fondevila, S., Hernández-Gutiérrez, D., Muñoz, F., Sánchez-García, J., & Martín-Loeches, M. (2021). The automatic but flexible and content-dependent nature of syntax. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.651158
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Ortega, L., García-Milla, M., Fondevila, S., Casado, P., Hernández-Gutiérrez, D., & Martín-Loeches, M. (2014). Automaticity of higher cognitive functions: Neurophysiological evidence for unconscious syntactic processing of masked words. Biological Psychology, 103, 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.08.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaan, E., Kirkham, J., & Wijnen, F. (2016). Prediction and integration in native and second-language processing of elliptical structures. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, L., Boyce, S., Goldstein, L., & Lukatela, G. (1987). Grammatical information effects in auditory word recognition. Cognition, 25(3), 235–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(87)80005-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer, M. (2002). The N400 is modulated by unconsciously perceived masked words: Further evidence for an automatic spreading activation account of N400 priming effects. Cognitive Brain Research, 13(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00085-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kiefer, M. (2019). Cognitive control over unconscious cognition: Flexibility and generalizability of task set influences on subsequent masked semantic priming. Psychological Research, 83(7), 1556–1570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1011-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer, M., Trumpp, N. M., Schaitz, C., Reuss, H., & Kunde, W. (2019). Attentional modulation of masked semantic priming by visible and masked task cues. Cognition, 187, 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.02.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouider, S., & Dehaene, S. (2007). Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: A critical review of visual masking. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1481), 857–875. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krakauer, J. W., Ghazanfar, A. A., Gomez-Marin, A., MacIver, M. A., & Poeppel, D. (2017). Neuroscience needs behavior: Correcting a reductionist bias. Neuron, 93(3), 480–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroczek, L. O. H., & Gunter, T. C. (2021). The time course of speaker-specific language processing. Cortex, 141, 311–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2021.04.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 32–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, E., Stroud, C., Plesch, S., & Phillips, C. (2006). The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis. Brain and Language, 98(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2006.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M., Monahan, P. J., & Poeppel, D. (2011). Evidence for early morphological decomposition: Combining masked priming with magnetoencephalography. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(11), 3366–3379. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leminen, A., Leminen, M., Kujala, T., & Shtyrov, Y. (2013). Neural dynamics of inflectional and derivational morphology processing in the human brain. Cortex, 49(10), 2758–2771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leminen, A., Smolka, E., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Pliatsikas, C. (2019). Morphological processing in the brain: The good (inflection), the bad (derivation) and the ugly (compounding). Cortex, 116, 4–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longtin, C.-M., & Meunier, F. (2005). Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(1), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longtin, C.-M., Segui, J., & Hallé, P. A. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(3), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960244000036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucchese, G., Hanna, J., Autenrieb, A., Miller, T. M. C., & Pulvermüller, F. (2017). Electrophysiological evidence for early and interactive symbol access and rule processing in retrieving and combining language constructions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29(2), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukatela, G., Carello, C., Kostić, A., & Turvey, M. T. (1988). Low-constraint facilitation in lexical decision with single-word contexts. The American Journal of Psychology, 101(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.2307/1422790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukatela, G., Kostić, A., Feldman, L. B., & Turvey, M. T. (1983). Grammatical priming of inflected nouns. Memory & Cognition, 11(1), 59–63. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukatela, G., Kostić, A., Todorović, D., Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T. (1987). Type and number of violations and the grammatical congruency effect in lexical decision. Psychological Research, 49(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukatela, G., Moraca, J., Stojnov, D., Savic, M. D., Katz, L., & Turvey, M. T. (1982). Grammatical priming effects between pronouns and inflected verb forms. Psychological Research, 44(4), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGregor, L. J., Pulvermüller, F., Van Casteren, M., & Shtyrov, Y. (2012). Ultra-rapid access to words in the brain. Nature Communications, 3(1), 711. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1715
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mancini, S., Molinaro, N., Davidson, D. J., Avilés, A., & Carreiras, M. (2014). Person and the syntax–discourse interface: An eye-tracking study of agreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2014.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maran, M., Friederici, A. D., & Zaccarella, E. (2022). Syntax through the looking glass: A review on two-word linguistic processing across behavioral, neuroimaging and neurostimulation studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 142, 104881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maran, M., Numssen, O., Hartwigsen, G., & Zaccarella, E. (2022). Online neurostimulation of Broca’s area does not interfere with syntactic predictions: A combined TMS-EEG approach to basic linguistic combination. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.968836
   Google Scholar
• Marascuilo, L. A. (1970). Extensions of the significance test for one-parameter signal detection hypotheses. Psychometrika, 35(2), 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. F., Brinkmann, U., Clahsen, H., Wiese, R., & Pinker, S. (1995). German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology, 29(3), 189–256. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1995.1015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1973). Linguistic structure and speech shadowing at very short latencies. Nature, 244(5417), 522–523. https://doi.org/10.1038/244522a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Bozic, M., & Randall, B. (2008). Early decomposition in visual word recognition: Dissociating morphology, form, and meaning. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(3), 394–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701588004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (1998). Rules, representations, and the English past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(11), 428–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01239-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matchin, W., Hammerly, C., & Lau, E. (2017). The role of the IFG and pSTS in syntactic prediction: Evidence from a parametric study of hierarchical structure in fMRI. Cortex, 88, 106–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., & Rogers, T. T. (2003). The parallel distributed processing approach to semantic cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(4), 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naccache, L., & Dehaene, S. (2001). Unconscious semantic priming extends to novel unseen stimuli. Cognition, 80(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00139-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura, K., Makuuchi, M., Oga, T., Mizuochi-Endo, T., Iwabuchi, T., Nakajima, Y., & Dehaene, S. (2018). Neural capacity limits during unconscious semantic processing. European Journal of Neuroscience, 47(8), 929–937. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neophytou, K., Manouilidou, C., Stockall, L., & Marantz, A. (2018). Syntactic and semantic restrictions on morphological recomposition: MEG evidence from Greek. Brain and Language, 183, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2018.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M. S. (2019). Do ‘early’ brain responses reveal word form prediction during language comprehension? A critical review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 96, 367–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.11.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortells, J. J., Kiefer, M., Castillo, A., Megías, M., & Morillas, A. (2016). The semantic origin of unconscious priming: Behavioral and event-related potential evidence during category congruency priming from strongly and weakly related masked words. Cognition, 146, 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penke, M., Weyerts, H., Gross, M., Zander, E., Münte, T. F., & Clahsen, H. (1997). How the brain processes complex words: An event-related potential study of German verb inflections. Cognitive Brain Research, 6(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(97)00012-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perea, M., & Rosa, E. (2002a). Does the proportion of associatively related pairs modulate the associative priming effect at very brief stimulus-onset asynchronies? Acta Psychologica, 110(1), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(01)00074-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., & Rosa, E. (2002b). The effects of associative and semantic priming in the lexical decision task. Psychological Research, 66(3), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-002-0086-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language. Science, 253(5019), 530–535. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1857983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, J.-Y. (1989). Verb movement, Universal Grammar and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20(3), 365–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F., & Assadollahi, R. (2007). Grammar or serial order?: Discrete combinatorial brain mechanisms reflected by the syntactic mismatch negativity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(6), 971–980. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.6.971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F., & Shtyrov, Y. (2003). Automatic processing of grammar in the human brain as revealed by the mismatch negativity. NeuroImage, 20(1), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00261-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6), 1090–1098. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R core team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (4.1.1.). R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Sanders, M., & Langer, P. (1984). Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 12(4), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seth, A. K., Dienes, Z., Cleeremans, A., Overgaard, M., & Pessoa, L. (2008). Measuring consciousness: Relating behavioural and neurophysiological approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(8), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.04.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shtyrov, Y., & Lenzen, M. (2017). First-pass neocortical processing of spoken language takes only 30 msec: Electrophysiological evidence. Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2016.1156663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shtyrov, Y., & Macgregor, L. J. (2016). Near-instant automatic access to visually presented words in the human neocortex: Neuromagnetic evidence. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26558
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sonnenstuhl, I., Eisenbeiss, S., & Clahsen, H. (1999). Morphological priming in the German mental lexicon. Cognition, 72(3), 203–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00033-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub, A., & Clifton, C. (2006). Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: Evidence from either … or. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(2), 425–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman, M. T. (2001). A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(10), 717–726. https://doi.org/10.1038/35094573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman, M. T., Corkin, S., Coppola, M., Hickok, G., Growdon, J. H., Koroshetz, W. J., & Pinker, S. (1997). A neural dissociation within language: Evidence that the mental dictionary is part of declarative memory, and that grammatical rules are processed by the procedural system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(2), 266–276. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1997.9.2.266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bussche, E., Van den Noortgate, W., & Reynvoet, B. (2009). Mechanisms of masked priming: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 135(3), 452–477. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyerts, H., Münte, T. F., Smid, H. G. O. M., & Heinze, H.-J. (1996). Mental representations of morphologically complex words: An event-related potential study with adult humans. Neuroscience Letters, 206(2-3), 125–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(96)12442-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, Z., Luo, Y., Friederici, A. D., & Zhou, X. (2006). Semantic and syntactic processing in Chinese sentence comprehension: Evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Research, 1071(1), 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2005.11.085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaccarella, E., Meyer, L., Makuuchi, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2017). Building by syntax: The neural basis of minimal linguistic structures. Cerebral Cortex, 27(1), 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaccarella, E., Papitto, G., & Friederici, A. D. (2021). Language and action in Broca’s area: Computational differentiation and cortical segregation. Brain and Cognition, 147, 105651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar