Do two negatives make a positive? Language and logic in language processing

References

• Agmon, G., Loewenstein, Y., & Grodzinsky, Y. (2019). Measuring the cognitive cost of downward monotonicity by controlling for negative polarity. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 4(1), 1–19, article number 36. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agmon, G., Loewenstein, Y., & Grodzinsky, Y. (2022). Negative sentences exhibit a sustained effect in delayed verification tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 48(1), 122. http://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barwise, J., & Cooper, R.. (1981). Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4(2), 159–219. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF00350139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed- effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bott, O., Schlotterbeck, F., & Klein, U. (2019). Empty-set effects in quantifier interpretation. Journal of Semantics, 36(1), 99–163. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffy015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chierchia, G. (2013). Logic in grammar: Polarity, free choice, and intervention. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697977.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Chase, W. G. (1972). On the process of comparing sentences against pictures. Cognitive Psychology, 3(3), 472–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(72)90019-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deschamps, I., Agmon, G., Loewenstein, Y., & Grodzinsky, Y. (2015). The processing of polar quantifiers, and numerosity perception. Cognition, 143, 115–128. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauconnier, G. (1975). Pragmatic scales and logical structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 6(3), 353–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fechner, G. T. (1860). Elemente der psychophysik (Vol. 2). Breitkopf und Härtel.
   Google Scholar
• Geurts, B., Katsos, N., Cummins, C., Moons, J., & Noordman, L. (2010). Scalar quantifiers: Logic, acquisition, and processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(1), 130–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960902955010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurts, B., & van der Slik, F. (2005). Monotonicity and processing load. Journal of Semantics, 22(1), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffh018
   Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Y., Agmon, G., Snir, K., Deschamps, I., & Loewenstein, Y. (2018). The analysis of less-comparatives: Evidence from the processing cost of downward entailingness. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 22(1), 435–451.
   Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Y., Behrent, K., Agmon, G., Bittner, N., Jockwitz, C., Caspers, S., Amunts, K., & Heim, S. (2021). A linguistic complexity pattern that defies aging: The processing of multiple negations. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 58, 1–11, article number 100982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackl, M. (2009). On the grammar and processing of proportional quantifiers: most versus more than half. Natural Language Semantics, 17(1), 63–98. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-008-9039-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heim, I. (2006). Little. Proceedings of SALT XVI. http://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v16i0.2941
   Google Scholar
• Heim, S., Amunts, K., Drai, D., Eickhoff, S. B., Hautvast, S., & Grodzinsky, Y. (2012). The language–number interface in the brain: A complex parametric study of quantifiers and quantities. Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience, 4, 1–12, article number 4 . http://doi.org/10.3389/fnevo.2012.00004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heim, S., McMillan, C. T., Clark, R., Golob, S., Min, N. E., Olm, C., Powers, J., & Grossman, M. (2015). If so many are “few,” how few are “many”? Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–9, article number 441. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heim, S., McMillan, C. T., Olm, C., & Grossman, M. (2020). So many are “few,” but so few are also “few”–reduced semantic flexibility in bvFTD patients. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–10, article number 582. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homer, V. (2011). Polarity and modality [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of California Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Homer, V. (2021). Domains of polarity items. Journal of Semantics, 38(1), 1–48. doi:10.1093/jos/ffaa006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1971). Comprehension of negation with quantification. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10(3), 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(71)80051-8
   Google Scholar
• Kaup, B. (2001). Negation and its impact on the accessibility of text information. Memory & Cognition, 29(7), 960–967. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03195758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaup, B., Ludtke, J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2005). Effects of negation, truth value, and delay on picture recognition after Reading affirmative and negative sentences. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 27(27), 1114–1119. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/19s068vb
   Google Scholar
• Kaup, B., Lüdtke, J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2006). Processing negated sentences with contradictory predicates: Is a door that is not open mentally closed? Journal of Pragmatics, 38(7), 1033–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koster-Moeller, J., Varvoutis, J., & Hackl, M. (2008). Verification procedures for modified numeral quantifiers. Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 27, 310–317.
   Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). Lmertest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladusaw, W. A. (1980). On the notion affective in the analysis of negative-polarity items. Formal semantics: The essential readings, 457–470. http://doi.org/10.1002/9780470758335.ch18
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M. S., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2008). When the truth is not too hard to handle. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1213–1218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02226.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordmeyer, A., & Frank, M. C. (2013). Measuring the comprehension of negation in 2- to 4-year-old children. Cognitive Science, 35, 3169–3174. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2594h4h2
   Google Scholar
• Paape, D., Vasishth, S., & von der Malsburg, T. (2020). Quadruplex negatio invertit? The on-line processing of depth charge sentences. Journal of Semantics, 37(4), 509–555. http://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffaa009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papeo, L., Hochmann, J. R., & Battelli, L. (2016). The default computation of negated meanings. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(12), 1980–1986. http://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penka, D. (2011). Negative indefinites. Oxford University Press. http://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567263.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Schlotterbeck, F. (2017). From truth conditions to processes: How to model the processing difficulty of quantified sentences based on semantic theory [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Tübingen]. University of Tübingen Dissertation Archive. http://doi.org/10.15496/publikation-18745
   Google Scholar
• Schlotterbeck, F., Ramotowska, S., van Maanen, L., & Szymanik, J. (2020). Representational complexity and pragmatics cause the monotonicity effect. Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 3398-3404.
   Google Scholar
• Schon, C., Siebert, S., & Stolzenburg, F. (2021). Negation in cognitive reasoning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 217–232. https://arXiv:2012.12641
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, L. P., Zurif, E., & Grimshaw, J. (1987). Sentence processing and the mental representation of verbs. Cognition, 27(3), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(87)80010-0http://doi.org/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, M. A. (1973). Bound to be easier? The negative prefix and sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(73)80062-3
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, M. A. (1976). Adjectival negation and the comprehension of multiply negated sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5371(76)90015-3
   Google Scholar
• Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., & Van Heuven, W. J. (2021). Seeing a phrase “time and again” matters: The role of phrasal frequency in the processing of multiword sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(3), 776–784. https://doi.org/10.26686/wgtn.13670671.v1
   Google Scholar
• Tan, I., Segal, N., & Grodzinsky, Y. (2023). The domains of monotonicity processing [Manuscript submitted for publication]. ELSC, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
   Google Scholar
• Tian, Y. (2014). Negation processing: A dynamic pragmatic account [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University College London.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, D., Tomaszewicz, B., & Wellwood, A. (2018). Decomposition and processing of negative adjectival comparatives. In E. Castroviejo, L. McNally, & G. W. Sassoon (Eds.), Language, cognition, and mind (pp. 243–273). Springer Cham. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77791-7_10
   Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C. (1959). The processing of positive and negative information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11(2), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470215908416296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, D., & Besner, D. (2017). Reading aloud: On the determinants of the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(5), 749–756. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeijlstra, H. (2007). Negation in natural language: On the form and meaning of negative elements. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(5), 498–518. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749–818X.2007.00027.x
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., & Pylkkänen, L. (2018). Semantic composition of sentences word by word: MEG evidence for shared processing of conceptual and logical elements. Neuropsychologia, 119, 392–404. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.08.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar