Frequency effects in the auditory grammatical decision task

References

• Armando, M., Grainger, J., & Dufau, S. (2022). Multi-LEX: A database of multi-word frequencies for French and English. Behavior Research Methods, https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-02018-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnon, I., & Snider, N. (2010). More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., & Milin, P. (2010). Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(2), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.807
   Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. (1998). The emergent lexicon (Vol. 34, pp. 421–435). Chicago Linguistic Society.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (1999). Toward a connectionist model of recursion in human linguistic performance. Cognitive Science, 23(2), 157–205. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2302_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N. (2012). The processing of formulaic language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufour, S., Mirault, J., & Grainger, J. (2022). Transposed-word effects in speeded grammatical decisions to sequences of spoken words. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 22035. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26584-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufour, S., Mirault, J., & Grainger, J. (in press). When phonological neighbors cooperate during spoken sentence processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman, J. L. (2009). On the meaning of words and dinosaur bones: Lexical knowledge without a lexicon. Cognitive Science, 33(4), 547–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01023.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finger, H., Goeke, C., Diekamp, D., Standvoß, K., & König, P. (2017). Labvanced: A unified JavaScript framework for online studies. In International Conference on Computational Social Science IC2S2, Cologne.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203–206. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88
   Google Scholar
• Gahl, S., & Yu, A. C. L. (2006). Introduction to the special issue on exemplar-based models in linguistics. The Linguistic Review, 23(3), 213–216. https://doi.org/10.1515/TLR.2006.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2000). Effects of prime word frequency and cumulative root frequency in masked morphological priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(4–5), 421–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, N., & Barber, H. A. (2012). Phrase frequency effects in language production. PLoS One, 7(3), e33202. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, N., Bi, Y., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A tale of two frequencies: Determining the speed of lexical access for Mandarin Chinese and English compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(7–8), 1191–1223. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802250900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, H., van den Hoven, E., Madec, S., & Bürki, A. (2021). Behavioral and brain responses highlight the role of usage in the preparation of multiword utterances for production. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 33(11), 2231–2264. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langacker, R. (1988). A usage-based model. Topics in Cognitive Linguistics, 50, 127–163. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.50.06lan
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (1998). Models of the emergence of language. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 199–227. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.199
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDonald, S. A., & Shillcock, R. (2003). Low-level predictive inference in reading: The influence of transitional probabilities on eye movements. Vision Research, 43(16), 1735–1751. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00237-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirault, J., & Grainger, J. (2020). On the time it takes to judge grammaticality. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(9), 1460–1465. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820913296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirault, J., Massol, S., & Grainger, J. (2021). An algorithm for analyzing cloze test results. Methods in Psychology, 5, 100064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100064
   Google Scholar
• Mirault, J., Snell, J., & Grainger, J. (2018). You that read wrong again! A transposed-word effect in grammaticality judgments. Psychological Science, 29(12), 1922–1929. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618806296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsell, S. (1991). The nature and locus of word-frequency effects in reading. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 148–197). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New, B., Brysbaert, M., Veronis, J., & Pallier, C. (2007). The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(4), 661–677. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271640707035X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New, B., & Grainger, J. (2011). On letter frequency effects. Acta Psychologica, 138, 322–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (1998). Effects of syllable frequency and syllable neighborhood frequency in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(1), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.1.134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierrehumbert, J. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition, and contrast. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency effects and the emergence of lexical structure (pp. 137–157). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (1998). Words and rules. Lingua. International Review of General Linguistics. Revue internationale De Linguistique Generale, 106(1–4), 219–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(98)00035-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S., & Ullman, M. T. (2002). The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(11), 456–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01990-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reali, F., & Christiansen, M. (2007). Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D., & McClelland, J. (1986). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In D. Rumelhart & J. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (pp. 216–271). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmauder, A. R., Morris, R. K., & Poynor, D. V. (2000). Lexical processing and text integration of function and content words: Evidence from priming and eye fixations. Memory & Cognition, 28(7), 1098–1108. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). Language and connectionism: The developing interface. Cognition, 50(1–3), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90037-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sereno, J. A., & Jongman, A. (1997). Processing of English inflectional morphology. Memory & Cognition, 25(4), 425–437. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2011). Seeing a phrase “time and again” matters: The role of phrasal frequency in the processing of multiword sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(3), 776–784. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, J., & Grainger, J. (2019). Readers are parallel processors. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(7), 537–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, J., & Theeuwes, J. (2020). A story about statistical learning in a story: Regularities impact eye movements during book reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 113, 104127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosa, A. V., & MacFarlane, J. (2002). Evidence for frequency-based constituents in the mental lexicon: collocations involving the word. Brain and Language, 83(2), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00032-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinney, D., & Cutler, A. (1979). The access and processing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(5), 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90284-6
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar