Public administration and the promise of evidence-based policy: experience in and beyond Australia

References

• Advisory Group on Reform. (2010). Ahead of the game: Blueprint for the reform of Australian government administration. Canberra: Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet.
   Google Scholar
• Argyrous, G. (Ed.). (2009). Evidence for policy and decision-making. Sydney: UNSW Press.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, I. P. (2009). Singapore in transition: Economic change and political consequences. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 2, 266–278.
   Google Scholar
• Australian National Audit Office (ANAO). (2001). Some better practice principles for developing policy advice. Canberra: ANAO.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskaran, M., Chee, H. S., Low, D., Song, T. K., Vadaketh, S., & Keong, Y. L. (2012, January). Inequality and the need for a new social compact. Background Paper for Singapore Perspectives Conference: Institute of Policy Studies, National University of Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Boruch, R., & Rui, N. (2008). From randomized controlled trials to evidence grading schemes. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 1, 41–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brewer, B., Leung, J., & Scott, I. (2012). A comparative survey of the public sector values of Hong Kong’s senior civil servants 1994 and 2011. Hong Kong: Centre of Anti-Corruption Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Civil Society and Governance (CCSG). (2009). “Serving alone”: The social service sector in Hong Kong. First Annual Report on Civil Society in Hong Kong, Department of Politics & Public Administration, University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, E., & Chan, J. (2007). The first ten years of the HKSAR: Civil society comes of age. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 29, 77–99.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, K. W. (2012). Rethinking flexible welfare strategy in Hong Kong. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 5, 71–81.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, R. H. K., & Chan, C. K. C. (2013). The shifting boundary between work and welfare: Review of active labour market policies in Hong Kong. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 6, 26–41.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. (2008). The story of two administrative states: State capacity in Hong Kong and Singapore. Pacific Review, 21, 121–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. (2009). Public management reform in Hong Kong. In S. Goldfinch, & J. Wallis (Eds.), International handbook of public management reform (pp. 317–335). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. (2011). NPM in Asian countries. In T. Christensen, & P. Laegreid (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to new public management (pp. 131–144). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, H. T., Nutley, S., & Smith, P. (Eds.). (2000). What works? Evidence-based policy and practice in public services. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., & Hood, C. (1994). From old public administration to new public management. Public Money & Management, 14, 9–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, H. (2013). Tom Coburn doesn’t like political science. Higher Education Chronicle, March 22. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/blogs/conversation/2013/03/22/tom-coburn-doesnt-like-political-science/.
   Google Scholar
• t’Hart, P., & Vromen, A. (2008). A new era for think tanks in public policy? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67, 135–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. (2008). Three lenses of evidence-based policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. (2010). Reconsidering evidence-based policy: Key issues and challenges. Policy and Society, 29, 77–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. (2013). How do government agencies use evidence? Stockholm: Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Retrieved from http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/Lists/Artikelkatalog/Attachments/19163/2013-6-38.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Huque, A. S. (2010). Managing the public sector in Hong Kong: Trends and adjustments. Asian Journal of Political Science, 18, 269–288.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, S. H., & Leong, C. H. (Eds.). (2012). Singapore perspectives 2012. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing & Institute of Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. (2009). Developmentalism, social welfare and state capacity in East Asia: Integrating housing and social security in Singapore. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 2, 157–170.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, D., & Lasswell, H. D. (Eds.). (1951). The policy sciences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindquist, E., & Tiernan, A. (2011). The Australian public service and policy advising: Meeting the challenges of 21st century governance. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 70, 437–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Management Advisory Committee (2010). Empowering change: Fostering innovation in the Australian public service. Canberra: Department of Prime Minister & Cabinet.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, I., & Stone, D. (2004). Australian think tanks. In D. Stone, & A. Denham (Eds.), Think tank traditions (pp. 247–263). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milward, B., & Provan, K. (2000). Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 10, 359–380.
   Google Scholar
• Nathan, R. P. (1988). Social science in government. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Nutley, S., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Flynn, J., Blackman, D., & Halligan, J. (Eds.). (2014). Crossing boundaries in public management and policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ortmann, S. (2010). Politics and change in Singapore and Hong Kong: Containing contention. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. (Ed.). (2010). The new public governance?. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Painter, M., & Pierre, J. (Eds.). (2005). Challenges to state policy capacity: Global trends and comparative perspectives. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission. (2010). Strengthening evidence-based policy in the Australian federation [Roundtable Proceedings]. Canberra: Productivity Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Quah, J. S. T. (2010). Public administration Singapore-style. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Radin, B. (2000). Beyond Machiavelli: Policy analysis comes of age. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. (1997). Understanding governance. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodan, G. (2009). New modes of political participation and Singapore’s nominated members of parliament. Government & Opposition, 44, 438–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodan, G., & Jayasuriya, K. (2007). The technocratic politics of administrative participation: Case studies of Singapore and Vietnam. Democratization, 14, 795–815.
   Google Scholar
• Rudd, K. (2008). Prime Minister: Address to heads of agencies and members of senior executive service, April 30, Canberra, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, I. (2010). The public sector in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singapore Government. (2013). A sustainable population for a dynamic Singapore: Population White Paper. Singapore: Office of Prime Minister.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, A., & Lam, K. (2009). Urban conflicts and the policy learning process in Hong Kong. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 2, 190–208.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. (2002). Choosing items from the menu: New public management in Southeast Asia. International Journal of Public Administration, 25, 1493–1512.
   Google Scholar
• UK Cabinet Office. (1999). Professional policy making for the twenty first century. London: Cabinet Office.
   Google Scholar
• UK Treasury. (2007). Analysis for policy: Evidence-based policy in practice. London: Government Social Research Unit, Treasury.
   Google Scholar
• Waller, M. (1992). Evaluating policy advice. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 51, 440–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthington, R. (2003). Governance in Singapore. London: Routledge-Curzon.
   Google Scholar