Community visioning: the role of traditional and online public participation in local government

References

• Andrews, R., Cowell, R., Downe, J., Martin, S., & Turner, D. (2008). Supporting effective citizenship in local government: Engaging, educating and empowering local citizens. Local Government Studies, 34, 489–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2011). Census of population and housing. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, M. (1999). Researching public participation. Local Government Studies, 25, 60–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Hansen, D. (2012). The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 30–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biernacki, P. & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 10, 141–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham, L. B., Nabatchi, T., & O’Leary, R. (2005). The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholders and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Administration Review, 65, 547–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, P. (1999). Representative democracy and the place of participation. Canberra Bulletin of Public Administration, 94, 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Bonson, E., Torres, L., Royo, S., & Flores, F. (2012). Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 123–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, F., Newenham-Kahindi, A., & Herremans, I. (2010). When suits meet roots: The antecedents and consequences of community engagement strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 297–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brackertz, N. & Meredyth, D. (2009). Community consultation in Victorian local government: A case of mixing metaphors? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68, 152–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, S. D., Godschalk, D. R., & Burby, R. J. (2003). Mandating citizen participation in plan making: Six strategic planning choices. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69, 245–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, K. & Keast, R. (2003). Citizen-government engagement: Community connection through networked arrangements. Asian Journal of Public Administration, 25, 107–131.
   Google Scholar
• City of Kingston. (2012). 2011/12 Annual Report. Melbourne: City of Kingston.
   Google Scholar
• City of Kingston. (2014). 2013/14Annual Report. Melbourne: City of Kingston.
   Google Scholar
• Chappell, B. (2008). Community engagement handbook: A model framework for leading practice in local government in South Australia. Adelaide: Local Government Association of South Australia/Government of South Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cuthill, M. (2001). Developing local government policy and processes for community consultation and participation. Urban Policy and Research, 19, 183–202.
   Google Scholar
• Cuthill, M. (2002). Coolangatta: A portrait of community well-being. Urban Policy and Research, 20, 187–203.
   Google Scholar
• Cuthill, M. (2004). Community visioning: Facilitating informed citizen participation in local area planning on the Gold Coast. Urban Policy and Research, 22, 427–445.
   Google Scholar
• Delli-Carpini, M. X., Cook, F. L., & Jacobs, L. R. (2004). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 315–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development (2013). 2010-11 Local government national report: 2010-11 report on the operation of the Local Government (Financial Assistance) Act 1995. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. (2013). Engaging today for a better tomorrow: Code of best practice for engagement with the not-for-profit sector. Licensed from the Commonwealth of Australia under a creative commons attribution 3.0 Australia licence.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, M., & Reid, R. (2013). Public participation in an era of governance: Lessons from Europe for Australian local government. Sydney: Australian Centre of Excellence for Local Government, University of Technology, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• French, C. A. & Gagne, M. (2010). Ten years of community visioning in New Hampshire: The meaning of “success”. Community Development, 41, 223–239.
   Google Scholar
• Gooding, A. (2013), Review of current local government reform processes in Australia and New Zealand. Sydney: Australian Centre of Excellence for Local Government, University of Technology Sydney & Local Government Association of South Australia, Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. (2007). Community engagement: Participation on whose terms? Australian Journal of Political Science, 42, 441–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. (2014). Public administration and the promise of evidence-based policy: experience in and beyond Australia. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 36, 48–59.
   Google Scholar
• Herrimann, J. (2011). Local government and community engagement in Australia. Working Paper No. 5, Sydney: Australian Centre of Excellence for Local Government, University of Technology, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, A. 2012, Connecting with communities: How local government is using social media to engage with citizens. Sydney: ANZSOG Institute for Governance at the University of Canberra & Australian Centre of Excellence for Local Government, University of Technology, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E. & Booher, D. E. (2004). Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice, 5, 419–436.
   Google Scholar
• International Association for Public Participation. (2014). IAP2 public participation spectrum. Accessible at http://www.iap2.org.
   Google Scholar
• Jagodick, J., Courvisanos, J., Yearwood, J., & Braun, P. (2009). Key public sector individuals as ICT change agents: An analysis of Australian and German experience. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 31, 197–212.
   Google Scholar
• Kahane, D., Loptson, K., Herriman, J., & Hardy, M. (2013). Stakeholder and citizen roles in public deliberation. Journal of Public Deliberation, 9, 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54, 241–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. (2008). Local electronic government leadership and innovation: South Korean experience. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 30, 165–192.
   Google Scholar
• Lachapelle, P., Emery, M., & Hays, R. L. (2010). The pedagogy and the practice of community visioning: Evaluating effective community strategic planning in rural Montana. Community Development, 41, 176–191.
   Google Scholar
• Mahjabeen, Z., Shrestha, K. K., & Dee, J. A. (2009). Rethinking community participation in urban planning: The role of disadvantaged groups in Sydney metropolitan strategy. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 15, 45–63.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13, 522–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrone, M. & Basta, T. B. (2013). Public opinion, local pollution havens, and environmental justice: a case study of a community visioning project in Appalachian Ohio. Community Development, 44, 350–363.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, M. L. & Grunkemeyer, W. T. (2010). Building shared visions for sustainable communities. Community Development, 41, 240–254.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, N., & Wright, S. (Eds.) (1995). Power and participatory development: Theory and practice. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, D. F. & Reddick, C. G. (2013). Local e-government in the United States: Transformation or incremental change. Public Administration Review, 73, 165–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• One World Action. (2008). Citizens’ participation and local governance in South East Asia. London: One World Action.
   Google Scholar
• Patten, S. (2001). Democratizing the institutions of policy-making: Democratic consultation and participatory administration. Journal of Canadian Studies, 35, 221–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd. ed.), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pillora, S., & McKinlay, P. (2011). Local government and community governance: A literature review. Working Paper No. 2, Sydney: Australian Centre of Excellence for Local Government, University of Technology, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reddel, T. & Woolcock, G. (2004). From consultation to participatory governance? A critical review of citizen engagement strategies in Queensland. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 63, 75–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, L. & Dalbey, M. (2006). Creating great places: The role of citizen participation. Community Development, 37, 18–32.
   Google Scholar
• Sancton, A., & Zhenming, C. (Eds). (2015). Citizen participation at the local level in China and Canada. Boca Rato: Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Seltzer, E. & Mahmoudi, D. (2013). Citizen participation, open innovation, and crowd sourcing: Challenges and opportunities for planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 28, 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipley, R. & Utz, S. (2012). Making it count: A review of the value and techniques for public consultation. Journal of Planning Literature, 27, 22–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, S. F., & Artist, S. (2011). Strategic planning in Australian local government: A comparative analysis of state frameworks. Sydney: Australian Centre of Excellence for Local Government, University of Technology, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Twyfords, Straight Talk & ENVision (2010). Improving community consultation: A report prepared for the ACT Government. Canberra: ACT Government.
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, N. (Ed.). (1996). Community strategic visioning programs. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Watters, J. K. & Biernacki, P. (1989). Targeted sampling: Options for the studying of hidden populations. Social Problems, 36, 416–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yigitcanlar, T. (2006). Australian local governments’ practice and prospects with online planning. URISA Journal, 18, 7–17.
   Google Scholar