Governance and policy problems: instruments as unitary and mixed modes of policy intervention

References

• Alford, J., & O’Flynn, J. (2012). Rethinking public service delivery: Managing with external providers. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, J. O., & Gates, S. (1997). Working, shirking and sabotage: Bureaucratic response to a democratic public. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bressers, H., & Klok, P. J. (1988). Fundamentals for a theory of policy instruments. International Journal of Social Economics, 15, 22–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunsson, N., & Jacobsson, B. (Eds.). (2000). A world of standards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, P. (2012). Policy as palimpsest. Policy & Politics, 40, 423–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donahue, J. D., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2011). Collaborative governance: Private roles for public goals in turbulent times. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duit, A., & Galaz, V. (2008). Governance and complexity: New issues in governance theory. Governance, 21, 311–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenner, F., Henderson, D. A., Arita, I., Jezek, Z., & Ladnyi, I. D. (1999). Smallpox and its eradication. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, G. P. (1985). National styles and policy sectors: Explaining structured variation. Journal of Public Policy, 5, 467–96.
   Google Scholar
• Gazley, B. (2008). Beyond the contract: The scope and nature of informal government-nonprofit relationships. Public Administration Review, 68, 141–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, P., & Noland, R. B. (2003). Building new roads really does create extra traffic. Applied Economics, 35, 1451–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritier, A., & Lehmkuhl, D. (2008). The shadow of hierarchy and new modes of governance. Journal of Public Policy, 28, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, G. A., & Greve, C. (Eds.). (2006). The challenge of public private partnerships: Learning from international experience. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hogwood, B. W., & Peters, B. G. (1983). Policy dynamics. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1983). The tools of government. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., & Margetts, H. (2007). Tools of government in a digital age. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hoornbeek, J. A. (2015). Understanding policy problems: A refinement of past work. Paper presented at 2nd International Conference on Public Policy, Milan, 1–4 July.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppe, R. (2011). The governance of problems: Puzzling, powering and participation. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Lejano, R. P. (2013). Tales from the Crypt: The rise and fall (and rebirth?) of policy design. Administration & Society, 45, 357–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M., & Matthews, J. S. (2012). Why do citizens discount the future? Public opinion and the timing of policy consequences. British Journal of Political Science, 42, 903–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschen, E. S. (1964). Economic policy in our time. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, K., Cashore, S., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45, 121–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1984). From social theory to policy design. Journal of Public Policy, 4, 237–59.
   Google Scholar
• Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1989). Instruments of government: Perceptions and contexts. Journal of Public Policy, 9, 35–58.
   Google Scholar
• Margetts, H., & Hood, C. (2016). The instruments approach. In B. G. Peters & P. Zittoun (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to public policy. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• May, P. J. (2002). Social regulation. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The tools of government: A guide to the new governance (pp. 202–234). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R. (1977). The moon and the ghetto. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1993). Institutions and credible commitment. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 149, 11–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Painter, M., & Pierre, J. (2010). Why legality cannot be contracted out: Exploring the limits of new public management. In M. Ramesh, E. Araral Jr, & X. Wu (Eds.), Reasserting the public in public services: New public management reforms (pp. 49–62). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (2002a). Contracts and resource allocation: Markets and law as the basis of policy instruments. In A. Heritier (Ed.), Common goods: Reinventing European and national governance (pp. 125–149). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (2002b). The politics of tools choice. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The tools of government: A guide to the new governance (pp. 552–564). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (2011). Steering, rowing, drifting or sinking? Changing patterns of governance. Urban Research & Practice, 4, 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (2015). An advanced introduction to public policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G., & Hoornbeek, J. (2005). The problem of policy problems. In P. Eliadis, M. Hill, & M. Howlett (Eds.), Designing government (pp. 136–161). Montreal: McGill/Queens University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J. (2012). Governance and institutional flexibility. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 376–402). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H., W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in the general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (2008). Learning from difference: The new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU. European Law Journal, 14, 271–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (2011). Experimentalist governance. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 265–288). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. (2002). The new governance and the tools of public action: An introduction. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The tools of government: A guide to the new governance (pp. 1–27). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M., & Lund, M. S. (1989). Beyond privatization: The tools of government action. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1988). The joint decision trap: Lessons from German federalism and European integration. Public Administration, 66, 239–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulman, P. R. (1980). Large-scale policymaking. New York, NY: Elsevier-North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Sørenson, E., & Torfing, J. (2009). Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration, 87, 234–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, F. J. (2012). Medicaid politics: Federalism, policy durability, and health reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Sørensen, E. (2012). Interactive governance: Advancing the paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (2013). The transaction cost economics project: The theory and practice of contractual relationships. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar