An Asian perspective on policy instruments: policy styles, governance modes and critical capacity challenges

References

• Adhikari, B. (2009). Market-based approaches to environmental management: A review of lessons from payment for environmental services in Asia. Accessible at: http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/155989/adbi-wp134.pdf; accessed 1 October 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, G. T. (1971). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Aucoin, P. (1997). The design of public organizations for the 21st century: Why bureaucracy will survive in public management. Canadian Public Administration, 40, 290–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardhan, P. (2002). Decentralization of governance and development. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16, 185–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayon, R., & Jenkins, M. (2010). The business of biodiversity. Nature, 466, 184–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson, M. (2014). Regionalism and globalization in East Asia: Politics, security and economic development. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bekke, H. G. J. M., & van der Meer, F. M. (Eds.). (2000). Civil service systems in Western Europe. Cheltanham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bekke, H. G. J. M., Perry, J. L., & Toonen, T. (1993). Comparing civil service systems. Research in Public Administration, 2, 191–212.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, M. T. (2008). China’s sloping land conversion program: Institutional innovation or business as usual? Ecological Economics, 65, 699–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, S. (1981). Organizing interests in Western Europe: Pluralism, corporatism and the transformation of politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. R., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (2003). Interpreting British government. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bobrow, D. B. (2006). Policy design: Ubiquitous, necessary and difficult. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of public policy (pp. 75–96). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bobrow, D. B., & Dryzek, J. S. (1987). Policy analysis by design. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• British Cabinet Office. (2001). Strengthening leadership in the public sector. Accessible at:http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/media/cabinetoffice/strategy/assets/piu%20leadership.pdf; accessed 10 October 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Bullock, H., Mountford, J., & Stanley, R. (2001). Better policy-making. London: Centre for Management and Policy Studies, Cabinet Office, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Burstein, P. (1991). Policy domains: Organization, culture, and policy outcomes. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 327–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capano, G., Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (Eds.). (2015). Varieties of governance: Dynamics, strategies, capacities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Capistrano, D. (2012). Decentralization and forest governance in Asia and the Pacific: Trends, lessons and continuing challenges. In C. J. P. Colfer, G. R. Dahal, & D. Capistrano (Eds.), Lessons from forest decentralization: Money, justice and the quest for good governance in Asia-Pacific (pp. 211–232). London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Castles, F. G. (1990). The dynamics of policy change: What happened to the English-speaking nations in the 1980s. European Journal of Political Research, 18, 491–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. B. L. (2005). The politics of administrative reforms in Asia: Paradigms and legacies, paths and diversities. Governance, 18, 257–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colfer, C. J. P., Dahal, G. R., & Capistrano, D. (Eds.). (2012). Lessons from forest decentralization: Money, justice and the quest for good governance in Asia-Pacific. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Considine, M., & Lewis, J. (1999). Governance at ground level: The frontline bureaucrat in the age of markets and networks. Public Administration Review, 59, 467–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dam, B. V., Catacutan, D. C., & Hoang, M. H. (2014). Importance of national policy and local interpretation in designing payment for forest environmental services scheme for the Ta Leng river basin in Northeast Vietnam. Environment and Natural Resources Research, 4, 39–53.
   Google Scholar
• de Bruijn, J. A., & ten Heuvelhof, E. F. (1995). Policy networks and governance. In D. L. Weimer (Ed.), Institutional design (pp. 161–179). Boston, MA: KluwerAcademic.
   Google Scholar
• de Janvry, A., & Sadoulet, E. (2004). Conditional cash transfer programs: Are they really magic bullets? ARE Update, 7, 9–11.
   Google Scholar
• del Río, P. (2010). Analysing the interactions between renewable energy promotion and energy efficiency support schemes: The impact of different instruments and design elements. Energy Policy, 38, 4978–4989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwivedi, O. P., & Gow, J. I. (1999). From bureaucracy to public management: The administrative culture of the government of Canada. Toronto: Broadview Press & Institute of Public Administration of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, M. A. (1993). Regulatory politics in transition. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engel, S., Pagiola, S., & Wunder, S. (2008). Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues. Ecological Economics, 65, 663–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). (2014). State of the world's forests: Enhancing the socio-economic benefits from forests. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, G. P. (1985). National styles and policy sectors: Explaining structured variation. Journal of Public Policy, 5, 467–496.
   Google Scholar
• George, A., Pierret, A., Boonsaner, A., Christian, V., & Planchon, O. (2009). Potential and limitations of payments for environmental services (PES) as a means to manage watershed services in mainland Southeast Asia. International Journal of the Commons, 3, 16–40.
   Google Scholar
• Gilabert, P., & Lawford-Smith, H. (2012). Political feasibility: A conceptual exploration. Political Studies, 60, 809–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, J. (2014). New transnational governance and the changing composition of regulatory pluralism in Southeast Asia. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 9, 65–95.
   Google Scholar
• Grabosky, P. N. (1994). Green markets: Environmental regulation by the private sector. Law and Policy, 16, 419–448.
   Google Scholar
• Gunningham, N. P., Grabosky, P. N., & Sinclair, N. (1998). Smart regulation: Designing environmental policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, G., & Richardson, J. (1980). Post-industrial changes in policy style. Scandinavian Political Studies, 3, 21–37.
   Google Scholar
• Haggard, S. M. (1998). Business, politics and policy in East and Southeast Asia. In H. S. Rowen (Ed.), Behind East Asian growth: The political and social foundations of prosperity (pp. 81–82). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R., & Milkis, S. (1989). The politics of regulatory change. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K., & Thomas, J. N. (Eds.). (1989). Making regulatory policy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2010). The blame game: Spin, bureaucracy, and self-preservation in government. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (1991). Policy instruments, policy styles, and policy implementation. Policy Studies Journal, 19, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (2000). Beyond legalism? Policy ideas, implementation styles and emulation-based convergence in Canadian and US environmental policy. Journal of Public Policy, 20, 305–329.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (2004). Administrative styles and the limits of administrative reform: A neo-institutional analysis of administrative culture. Canadian Public Administration, 46, 471–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (1993). Patterns of policy instrument choice: Policy styles, policy learning and the privatization experience. Review of Policy Research, 12, 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2015a). The two orders of governance failure: Design mismatches and policy capacity issues in modern governance. Policy and Society, 33, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2015b). Achilles’ heels of governance: Critical capacity deficits and their role in governance failures. Regulation and Governance, doi:10.1111/rego.12091, 26 May.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2007). Design principles for policy mixes: Cohesion and coherence in “new governance arrangements”. Policy and Society, 26, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Jayasuriya, K. (2001). Globalization and the changing architecture of the state: The regulatory state and the politics of negative coordination. Journal of European Public Policy, 8, 101–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A. G., Wurzel, R. K., & Zito, A. R. (2003). European governance and the transfer of “new” environmental policy instruments (NEPIs) in the European Union. Public Administration, 81, 555–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A. G., Wurzel, R. K., & Zito, A. R. (2005). The rise of “new” policy instruments in comparative perspective: Has governance eclipsed government? Political Studies, 53, 477–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordana, J., & Levi-Faur, D. (Eds.). (2004). The politics of regulation: Institutions and regulatory reforms for the age of governance. Cheltanham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, R. (1991). Adversarial legalism and American government. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 10, 369–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, R. (2000). Introduction: Comparing national styles of regulation in Japan and the United States. Law & Policy, 22, 225–244.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, R. A., & Axelrad, L. (1997). Adversarial legalism: An international perspective. In P. S. Nivola (Ed.), Comparative disadvantages? Social regulations and the globaleconomy (pp. 146–202). Washington. DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Keast, R., Mandell, M., & Brown, K. (2006). Mixing state, market and network governance modes: The role of government in “crowded” policy domains. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behaviour, 9, 27–50.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2000). Public management and policy networks: Foundations of a network approach to governance. Public Management, 2, 135–158.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2012). Governance network theory: Past, present and future. Policy & Politics, 40, 587–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knill, C. (1999). Explaining cross-national variance in administrative reform: Autonomous versus instrumental bureaucracies. Journal of Public Policy, 19, 113–139.
   Google Scholar
• Kooiman, J. (1993). Governance and governability: Using complexity, dynamics and diversity. In J. Kooiman (Ed.), Modern governance (pp. 35–50). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kooiman, J. (2000). Societal governance: Levels, models, and orders of social-political interaction. In J. Pierre, J. (Ed.), Debating governance (pp. 138–166). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lapeyre, R., Pirard, R., & Leimona, B. (2015). Payments for environmental services in Indonesia: What if economic signals were lost in translation? Land Use Policy, 46, 283–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H. D. (1958). Politics: Who gets what, when, how. New York, NY: Meridian.
   Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H. D., Lerner, D., & Fisher, H. H. (1951). The policy sciences: Recent developments in scope and method. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmbruch, G., & Schmitter, P. (1982). Patterns of corporatist policymaking. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Leimona, B., van Noordwijk, M., de Groot, R., & Leemans, R. (2015). Fairly efficient, efficiently fair: Lessons from designing and testing payment schemes for ecosystem services in Asia. Ecosystem Services, 12, 16–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi-Faur, D. (2012). From “big government” to “big governance”? In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 3–18). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1989). Instruments of government: Perceptions and contexts. Journal of Public Policy, 9, 35–58.
   Google Scholar
• Lindquist, E. A. (1992). Public managers and policy communities: Learning to meet new challenges. Canadian Public Administration, 35, 127–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lowi, T. J. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review, 32, 298–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1994). The rise of the regulatory state in Europe. West European Politics, 17, 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1997). From the positive to the regulatory state: Causes and consequences of changes in the mode of governance. Journal of Public Policy, 17, 139–167.
   Google Scholar
• May, P. J. (2005). Regulation and compliance motivations: Examining different approaches. Public Administration Review, 65, 31–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElwee, P., Nghiem, T., Le, H., Vu, H., & Tran, N. (2014). Payments for environmental services and contested neoliberalisation in developing countries: A case study from Vietnam. Journal of Rural Studies, 36, 423–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menahem, G., & Stein, R. (2013). High-capacity and low-capacity governance networks in welfare services delivery: A typology and empirical examination of the case of Israeli municipalities. Public Administration, 91, 211–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meuleman, L. (2008). Public management and the metagovernance of hierarchies, networks and markets: The feasibility of designing and managing governance style combinations. Heidelberg: Physica Verlag Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Meuleman, L. (2009). Metagoverning governance styles: Increasing the metagovernors’ toolbox. Paper presented at the panel on metagoverning interactive governance and policymaking, ECPR general conference, 10-12 September, Potsdam.
   Google Scholar
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and human well being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mok, K. H. (2006). The search for new governance: Corporatization and privatization experiences in Singapore and Malaysia. Paper presented at the international workshop on university restructuring in Asia. Research Institute for Higher Education, Hiroshima University, 16 January.
   Google Scholar
• Mok, K. H., & Forrest, R. (Eds.). (2008). Changing governance and public policy in East Asia. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Montpetit, E. (2003). Misplaced distrust: Policy networks and the environment in France, the United States, and Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, D. W. (1995). Public policy: An introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Cheltanham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, D. W. (2001). Modernising policy-making for the twenty first century: The professional model. Public Policy and Administration, 16, 93–110.
   Google Scholar
• Peluso, N. L., & Lund, C. (2011). New frontiers of land control: Introduction. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38, 667–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (1996). Governing: Four emerging models. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. A., Brandsen, T., & Verschuere, B. (2012). New public governance, the third sector and co-production. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pirard, R. (2012). Payments for environmental services (PES) in the public policy landscape: “Mandatory” spices in the Indonesian recipe. Forest Policy and Economics, 18, 23–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirard, R., de Buren, G., & Lapeyre, R. (2014). Do PES improve the governance of forest restoration? Forests, 5, 404–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quitzow, R., Holger, B., & Jacob, K. (2013). Environmental governance in India, China, Vietnam and Indonesia: A tale of two paces. Berlin: Freie Universitat Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Ramesh, M., & Fritzen, S. (Eds.). (2009). Transforming Asian governance: Rethinking assumptions, challenging practices. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, J,K., McNutt, S., & Wellstead, A. (2013). Dispersed capacity and weak coordination: The challenge of climate change adaptation in Canada’s forest policy sector. Review of Policy Research, 30, 66–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rein, M., Esping-Andersen, G., & Rainwater, L. (1987). Stagnation and renewal in social policy: The rise and fall of policy regimes. Armonk: ME Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. J., Gustafsson, G., & Jordan, A. G. (1982). The concept of policy style. In J. J. Richardson (Ed.), Policy styles in Western Europe (pp. 1–16). London: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. J., Jordan, A. G., & Kimber, R. H. (1978). Lobbying, administrative reform and policy styles: The case of land drainage. Political Studies, 26, 47–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotberg, R. I. (2014). Good governance means performance and results. Governance, 27, 511–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. (1981). Rethinking public management: Third-party government and the changing forms of government action. Public Policy, 29, 255–275.
   Google Scholar
• Scherr, S. J., & Bennett, M. T. (2011). Buyer, regulator, and enabler: The government’s role in ecosystem services markets – international lessons learned for payments for ecological services in the People’s Republic of China. Accessible at: http://www.forest-trends.org/publication_details.php?publicationID=2893; accessed 1 October 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C. (2004). Regulation in the age of governance: The rise of the post regulatory state. In J. Jordana, & D. Levi-Faur (Eds.), The politics of regulation: Institutions and regulatory reforms for the age of governance (pp. 145–174). Cheltanham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, R. H., Davis, B. W., Chapman, R. J., & Sager, D. D. (1974). Policy flow analysis: A conceptual model for comparative public policy research. The Western Political Quarterly, 27, 457–468.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, R. H., Davis, B. W., Chapman, R. J., & Sager, D. D. (1974). Policy flow analysis: A conceptual model for comparative public policy research. The Western Political Quarterly, 27, 457–468.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. J., Marsh, D., & Richards, D. (1993). Central government departments and the policy process. Public Administration, 71, 567–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suhardiman, D., Wichelns, D., Lestrelin, G., & Hoanh, C. T. (2013). Payments for ecosystem services in Vietnam: Market-based incentives or state control of resources? Ecosystem Services, 6, 64–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suyanto, S., & Leimona, B. (Eds.). (2005). Review of the development of environmental service markets in Indonesia. Bogor, Indonesia: ICRAF.
   Google Scholar
• Swallow, B. M., Kalleso, M. K., Iftikhar, U. A., van Noordwijk, M., Bracer, C., Scherr, S. J., Raju, K. V., Poats, S. V., Duraiappah, A. K., Ochieng, B. O., Mallee, H., & Rumley, R. (2009). Compensation and rewards for environmental services in the developing world: Framing pan-tropical analysis and comparison. Ecology and Society, 14, 26–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiernan, A., & Wanna, J. (2006). Competence, capacity, capability: Towards conceptual clarity in the discourse of declining policy skills. Paper presented at the Govnet International Conference, Australian National University, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• To, P. X., Dressler, W. H., Mahanty, S., Pham, T. T., & Zingerli, C. (2012). The prospects for payment for ecosystem services (PES) in Vietnam: A look at three payment schemes. Human Ecology, 40, 237–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tollefson, C., Zito, A. R., & Gale, F. (2012). Symposium overview: Conceptualizing new governance arrangements. Public Administration, 90, 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunzelmann, N. V. (2010). Technology and technology policy in the postwar UK: Market failure or network failure? Revue d’économie industrielle, 129–130, 237–258.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M., & Hulme, D. (1997). Governance, administration and development: Making the state work. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• van der Heijden, J. (2011). Institutional layering: A review of the use of the concept. Politics, 31, 9–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Nispen, F. K. M., & Ringeling, A. B. (1998). On instruments and instrumentality: A critical assessment. In B. G. Peters & F. K. M. van Nispen (Eds.), Public policy instruments: Evaluating the tools of public administration (pp. 204–217). New York, NY: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• van Noordwijk, M., Leimona, B., Jindal, R., Villamor, G. B., Vardhan, M., Namirembe, S., Catacutan, D., Kerr, J., Minang, P. A., & Tomich, T. P. (2012). Payments for environmental services: Evolution toward efficient and fair incentives for multifunctional landscapes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37, 389–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Waarden, F. (1995). National regulatory styles: A conceptual scheme and the institutional foundations of styles. In B. Unger & F. van Waarden (Eds.), Convergence or diversity: Internationalism and economic policy response (pp. 333–372). Avebury: Aldershot.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. (1986). National styles of regulation: Environmental policy in Great Britain and the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, K. (2009). Target compliance: The final frontier of policy implementation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, K. (2010). But will it work? Implementation analysis to improve government performance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Weimer, D. L., & Vining, A. (2011). Policy analysis: Concepts and practice (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Wilensky, H. L., & Turner, L. (1987). Democratic corporatism and policy linkages: The interdependence of industrial, labor-market, incomes, and social policies in eight countries. Berkeley CA: Institute of International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. J. (1989). The underclass: Issues, perspectives, and public policy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 501, 182–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo, J. J. (2015). Singapore’s policy style: Statutory boards as policymaking units. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 8, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, X., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2015). Blending skill and resources across multiple levels of activity: Competences, capabilities and the policy capacities of government. Policy and Society, (forthcoming).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu, X., Ramesh, M., Howlett, M., & Fritzen, S. (2010). The public policy primer: Managing public policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wunder, S. (2007). The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. Conservation Biology, 21, 48–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wunder, S., Campbell, B., Frost, P. H. H., Sayer, J. A., Iwan, R., & Wollenberg, L. (2008). When donors get cold feet: The community conservation concession in Setulang (Kalimantan, Indonesia) that never happened. Ecology and Society, 13, 12–23.
   Google Scholar
• Wurzel, R., Zito, A. R., & Jordan, A. J. (2013). Environmental governance in Europe: A comparative analysis of the use of new environmental policy instruments. Cheltanham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R., Liu, T., Yao, S., & Zhao, M. (2013). Designing and implementing payments for ecosystem services programs: Lessons learned from China’s cropland restoration experience. Forest Policy and Economics, 35, 66–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar