Alignments of instruments and action in governance: a synthesis – revisited and extended

References

• Ansell, C. (2012). Collaborative governance. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 499–511). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aulich, C., Wettenhall, R., & Evans, M. (Guest Eds.). (2012). Special issue: understanding integrity in public administration. Policy Studies, 1, 1–113.
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, D. (2013). The legitimation of power (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M., Schillemans, T., & ‘t Hart, P. (2008). Does public accountability work? An assessment tool. Public Administration, 86, 225–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donahue, J. D., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2008). Public-private collaboration. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. E. Goodin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 498–525). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead – Long live digital era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 467–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2011). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, P. (1997). Government action, social capital, and development: Reviewing the evidence on synergy. In P. Evans (Ed.), State-society synergy: Government and social capital in development (pp. 178–209). Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley (International and Area Studies).
   Google Scholar
• Follett, M. P. (1941a). Constructive conflict. In H. C. Metcalf & L. Urwick (Eds.), Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett (pp. 30–49). London: Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Follett, M. P. (1941b). Business as an integrative unity. In H. C. Metcalf & L. Urwick (Eds.), Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett (pp. 71–94). London: Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R. B., & Biersteker, T. J. (2002). The emergence of private authority in the international system. In R. B. Hall & T. J. Biersteker (Eds.), The emergence of private authority in global governance (pp. 3–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. W., Brown, A. J., & Connors, C. (Eds.). (2008). Promoting integrity: Evaluating and improving public institutions. Abingdon: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1986a). Administrative analysis: An introduction to rules, enforcement and organisations. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1986b). The hidden public sector: The quango-cratization of the world. In F-X. Kaufman, G. Majone, & V. Ostrom (Eds.), Guidance, control and evaluation in the public sector (pp. 183–205). Berlin: Walther de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2011). The blame game: Spin, bureaucracy, and self-preservation in government. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huberts, L. W. J. C., Maesschalck, J., & Jurkiewicz, C. L. (Eds.). (2008). Ethics and integrity of governance: Perspectives across frontiers. Northampton: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kaul, I., Grunberg, I., & Stern, M. (Eds.). (1999). Global public goods: International cooperation in the 21st Century. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lasthuizen, K., Huberts, L., & Heres, L. (2011). How to measure integrity violations: Towards a validated typology of unethical behaviour. Public Management Review, 13, 383–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, P., & Wheeler, J. (Eds.). (2006). Rights, resources and the politics of accountability. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2003). Managing conflict of interest in the public service: OECD guidelines and country experiences. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. P. (2010). Change and continuity: An institutional approach to institutions of democratic government. In J. Pierre & P. W. Ingraham (Eds.), Comparative administrative change and reform: Lessons learned (pp. 15–47). Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. P. (2015). Democratic order, autonomy, and accountability. Governance, 28, 425–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, V., & Ostrom, E. (1977). Public goods and public choices. In E. S. Savas (Ed.), Alternatives for delivering public services: Toward improved performance (pp. 7–49). Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perri, 6, Leat, D., Seltzer, K., & Stoker, G. (2002). Towards holistic governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Poteete, A. R., Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2010). Working together: Collective action, the commons, and multiple methods in practice. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thynne, I. (2008). Symposium introduction – climate change, governance and environmental services: institutional perspectives, issues and challenges. Public Administration and Development, 28, 327–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thynne, I. (2009). The reform of the Northern Territory correctional services: Process, content and challenges. Public Administration Today, 19, 23–37.
   Google Scholar
• Thynne, I. (2012). Institutional maturity and challenges for integrity bodies. Policy Studies, 32, 37–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thynne, I. (2015). Alignments of instruments and action in governance: A synthesis. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 37, 264–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thynne, I., & Massey, A. (2013). Globalism and constellational governance: Challenges for service in the global public interest. In D. Argyriades & G. Timsit (Eds.), Moving beyond the crisis: Reclaiming and reaffirming our common administrative space (pp. 295–326). Brussels: Bruylant.
   Google Scholar
• Thynne, I., & Peters, B. G. (2015). Addressing the present and the future in government and governance: Three approaches to organising public action. Public Administration and Development, 35, 73–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Sørensen, E. (2012). Interactive governance: Advancing the paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, G. (1968). Science and the appreciative system. Human Relations., 21, 99–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organisation. Translated and edited by A. M. Henderson & T. Parsons. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weimer, D. L., & Vining, A. R. (2011). Policy analysis: Concepts and practice (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Wettenhall, R., & Thynne, I. (1999). Emerging patterns of governance: Synergy, partnerships and the public-private mix. Asian Journal of Public Administration, 21, 157–178.
   Google Scholar