699
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commissioned Research Articles

Factionalism and Chinese-style democracy: the 2017 Hong Kong Chief Executive election

Pages 100-119 | Received 22 Apr 2017, Accepted 26 Apr 2017, Published online: 24 May 2017

References

  • Angle, S. C. (2005). Decent democratic centralism. Political Theory, 33, 518–546.
  • Apple Daily. (2017a). Regina Ip is finished and she does not want to see C. Y. Leung 2.0. 2 March.
  • Apple Daily. (2017b). John Tsang: Hong Kong people are my boss. 8 March.
  • Apple Daily. (2017c). Protestors grasp the opportunity, but Tsang smiles and Woo receives the letter. 9 March.
  • Apple Daily. (2017d). Judge Woo urges democrats to divide votes in the first round but to support one candidate wholly in the second round. 10 March.
  • Apple Daily. (2017e). John Tsang’s popularity is far ahead and he gets the support of age groups and classes at all levels. 14 March.
  • Apple Daily. (2017f). Votes from all the people show that the result of John Tsang is a far cry from that of Carrie Lam. 21 March.
  • Apple Daily. (2017g). “No time” is the excuse of Carrie Lam’s escape and her moral deficiency. 21 March.
  • Apple Daily. (2017h). Leader of Federation of Trade Union is discovered as a staff of Liaison Office. 24 March.
  • Apple Daily. (2017i). Zhang Dejiang went to Shenzhen to acquire votes for Carrie Lam. 25 March.
  • Apple Daily. (2017j). New China News Agency announced election result when the counting of votes was yet completed. 27 March.
  • Apple Daily. (2017k). John Tsang: Miracle would happen. 26 March.
  • Boucek, F. (2009). Rethinking factionalism: Typologies, intra-party dynamics and three faces of factionalism. Party Politics, 15, 455–485.
  • Brown, K. (2015). Factions in modern Chinese politics: A help or hindrance? The Journal of the Oriental Society of Australia, 47, 61–72.
  • Cable TV. (2017a). Cable TV programme on Chief Executive election debate. 19 March.
  • Cable TV. (2017b). Cable TV programme on the Chief Executive election. 26 March.
  • CCP (Chinese Communist Party). (2007). Constitution of the Communist Party of China. Amended and adopted at the Seventeenth National Congress of the Communist Party of China on 21 October. Accessible at: www.cct.net.
  • Chief Secretary. (2016). Chief Secretary attends Palace Museum ceremony (2016). 29 December. Accessible at: http://www.news.gov.hk/en/categories/admin/html/2016/12/20161229_191245.shtml.
  • Dittmer, L. (2002). Modernizing Chinese informal politics. In J. Unger (Ed.), The nature of Chinese politics: From Mao to Jiang (pp. 3–37). New York: M. E. Sharpe.
  • Fewsmith, J. (2006). Intra-party democracy: Development and limitations. China Leadership Monitor, 3, 1–11.
  • Gilley, B. (2004). China’s democratic future: How it will happen and where it will lead. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Gilley, B. (2006). Elite-led democratization in China: Prospects, perils and implications. International Journal, 61, 341–358.
  • Guo, D. (2004). The potentialities and limitations for Chinese democracy. The Korean Journal of International Relations, 44, 185–200.
  • Headline Daily. (2017a). Carrie Lam stably gets 300 votes and she will submit nominations early next week. 24 February.
  • Headline Daily. (2017b). Mainly playing the card of livelihood issues and economy, Carrie Lam issues her platform and advocates the experiment of renting out home ownership units. 28 February.
  • Hong Kong Commercial Daily. (2017a). Tam Kam-kau says 217 Hong Kong members of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conferences at provincial level publicly recognize Carrie Lam as the suitable candidate for the Chief Executive. 24 February.
  • Hong Kong Commercial Daily. (2017b). Carrie Lam gets 579 nominations and enters the gate and she explains her policy ideals, trying to win public recognition. 1 March.
  • Hong Kong Commercial Daily. (2017c). Carrie Lam leads Hong Kong to touch off again. 27 March.
  • Hong Kong Economic Times. (2017). John Tsang energetically promotes his monetary experiences, his ability to deal with finance and hi wide monetary networks. 7 March.
  • Lai, T.-Z. (2017). Relying on “devil exchange” would not get the trust from the central government. Wen Wei Po, 25 February.
  • Lau, S., & Cheung, G. (2015). Hong Kong reform package rejected as pro-Beijing camp walk out in ‘miscommunication. South China Morning Post, 18 June.
  • Lau, S., Yeung, R., & Ng, J. (2017). Lam seeks to mend fences with call for talks on education. South China Morning Post, 28 March.
  • Lee, C.-S. (2017a). 80 percent of the nominees came from the pan-democrats and how can this secure the trust from the center? Ta Kung Pao, 27 February.
  • Lee, C.-S. (2017b). Opposition faction distributes votes and this undermines its image and slaps its own mouth. Ta Kung Pao, 28 February.
  • Lee, M. (2016). Changing the soup but not changing the medicine. Next Magazine, 22 December.
  • Lieberthal, K. (1995). Governing China: From revolution through reform. New York: W. W. Norton Company.
  • Leong, A. (2016). The next step of “Democratic 300 Plus”. Ming Pao, 22 December.
  • Leung, Y.-T., & Yung, S.-Y. (2016). Directly seeing the kingmaking process: Carrie Lam visiting Tung Chee-hwa. Next Magazine, 22 December.
  • Liu, Y., & Chen, D. (2012). Why China will democratize? The Washington Quarterly, 35, 41–63.
  • Liu, L., & Wu, W. (2017). Carrie Lam to join race for Chief Executive. The China Daily, 13 January.
  • Lo, S. S.-H. (2008). The dynamics of Beijing-Hong Kong relations: A model for Taiwan?. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
  • Lo, S. S.-H. (2009). Competing Chinese political visions: Hong Kong vs Beijing on democracy. Connecticut: Praeger Security International.
  • Lo, S. S.-H. (2015). Hong Kong’s indigenous democracy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Lo, S. S.-H. (2016). The politics of policing in greater China. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Ming Pao. (2017a). Participants in the meeting where rumor of Tsang not to be appointed say Tung did not name anybody, but Tung’s announcement says the elected candidate must need the center’s trust and support. 23 February.
  • Ming Pao. (2017b). Carrie Lam’s 579 nominations do not have the pro-democracy vote, are less than half of the total votes of the Election Committee members, and yet get full votes from five sectors. 1 March.
  • Nathan, A. J. (1973). A factionalism model for CCP politics. The China Quarterly, 53, 33–66.
  • Nathan, A. J. (1985). Chinese democracy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
  • Nathan, A. J. (1990). China’s crisis: Dilemmas of reform and prospects for democracy. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Ng, J. (2016). Political reform tops election platform of Hong Kong chief executive hopeful Woo Kwok-hing, South China Morning Post, 14 December.
  • Ng, K.-C., & Lam, J. (2017). Handshake with Chinese president Xi Jinping among reasons John Tsang decided to run for Hong Kong leadership. South China Morning Post, 3 February.
  • Pye, L. W. (1992). The spirit of Chinese politics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • Pye, L. W. (2002). Factions and the politics of guanxi: Paradoxes in Chinese administrative and political behavior. In J. Unger (Ed.), The nature of Chinese politics: From Mao to Jiang (pp. 38–57). New York: M. E. Sharpe.
  • Sing Pao. (2017a). Rumour that Tung Chee-hwa indicates if John Tsang were elected he would not be appointed by Beijing. Beijing’s source is that the center does not crown anybody. 23 February.
  • Sing Pao. (2017b). John Tsang’s letter to the Hong Kong people. 26 February.
  • Sing Tao Daily. (2017a). John Tsang first enters the gate with 160 nominations in which 80 percent is from democrats and some from pro-establishment camp. 26 February.
  • Sing Tao Daily. (2017b). Political reform and the legislation on Article 23 have no timetable. 5 March.
  • Ta Kung Pao. (2017a). The criteria for the Chief Executive are far exceeding that of the secretaries. 5 March.
  • Ta Kung Pao. (2017b). Fat Jimmy Lai manipulates the election and there are shadows of devil. 10 March.
  • Ta Kung Pao. (2017c). Jimmy Lai’s support of John Tsang is like a dying kiss. 13 March.
  • Ta Kung Pao. (2017d). Three public opinion polls show Carrie Lam’s popularity is suppressing Tsang. 17 March.
  • Ta Kung Pao. (2017e). Democratic Alliance for Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong: Carrie Lam is the best Chief Executive candidate. 22 March.
  • Ta Kung Pao. (2017f). 83 percent of public opinion says Carrie Lam is trusted and supported by the center. . 24 March.
  • Ta Kung Pao. (2017g). Carrie Lam’s huge victory and she asserts to repair the societal splits. 27 March.
  • Ta Kung Pao. (2017h). Carrie Lam shares her growth and career path at her alma mater. 31 March.
  • Tik, C.-Y. (2017). Why Beijing would prefer a clear favorite in Hong Kong’s Chief Executive election. South China Morning Post, 16 January.
  • To, H.-M. (2017). How to recognise the substantial power of endorsement of the Center on the Chief Executive? Ta Kung Pao, 10 March.
  • Tsou, T. (1976). Prolegomenon to the study of informal groups in CCP politics. The China Quarterly, 65, 114–117.
  • Tsou, T. (2002). Chinese politics at the top: Factionalism or informal politics? Balance-of-power politics or a game to win all? In J. Unger (Ed.), The nature of Chinese politics: From Mao to Jiang (pp. 98–160). New York: M. E. Sharpe.
  • Un, P. (2017a). Spy claims “baloney”. The Standard, 13 March.
  • Un, P. (2017b). Jasper in near miss with death. The Standard, 16 March.
  • Un, P. (2017c). Unite with me and heal the divide. The Standard, 27 March.
  • Verge, T., & Gomez, R. (2012). Factionalism in multi-level contexts: When party organisation becomes a devise. Party Politics, 18, 667–685.
  • Wen Wei Po. (2017a). Hong Kong Mao Affairs Office reiterates that Chief Executive has to meet four conditions. 24 February.
  • Wen Wei Po. (2017b). Center’s substantial appointment has comprehensive and thorough considerations in making the decision. 2 March.
  • Wen Wei Po. (2017c). The election platform of Mrs. Lam is the most considerate for the next generation. 2 March.
  • Wen Wei Po. (2017d). Carrie Lam has the dedication and energies, hoping for the center’s support. 2 March.
  • Wen Wei Po. (2017e). Carrie Lam has the self-confidence and capability to implement her election platform. 7 March.
  • Wen Wei Po. (2017f). Carrie Lam deals with both development and environment protection and possesses the track record of governance that deserves to be appreciated. 12 March.
  • Wen Wei Po. (2017g). Jimmy Lai manipulates the election with the shadows of demons. 13 March.
  • Wen Wei Po. (2017h). 71 percent of the people predict that Carrie Lam would have the highest chance of being elected. 14 March.
  • Wen Wei Po. (2017i). Henry Tang praises Carrie Lam as being able to unite the civil servants. 20 March.
  • Wen Wei Po. (2017j). Carrie Lam has already prepared to lead the people of Hong Kong to walk and proceed forward. 23 March.
  • Wen Wei Po. (2017k). Li Ka-shing: votes should be cast for the candidate trusted by the center. 23 March.
  • Wen Wei Po. (2017l). Carrie Lam’s huge victory with 777 high number of votes. 27 March.
  • Wen Wei Po. (2017m). Support the Chief Executive candidate trusted by the central government to realize Hong Kong’s mainstream public opinion. 28 March.
  • Wen Wei Po. (2017n). Business sector strongly supports Carrie Lam to improve the livelihood and boost the economy. 29 March.
  • Wen Wei Po. (2017o). Center appoints and approves Carrie Lam as the new Hong Kong chief executive. 1 April.
  • Wen Wei Po. (2017p). Carrie Lam visits Liaison Office and Zhang Xiaoming supports her to administer Hong Kong in accordance with the law. 1 April.
  • Yeung, C.-K. (2016). Opposition faction is immoral in being the kingmaker. Hong Kong Commercial Daily. 22 December.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.