Quality of government, public service delivery and institutional impartiality in ethnically polarised societies: evidence for policy makers

References

• Alesina, A., Baqir, R., & Easterly, W. (1999). Public goods and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(4), 1243–1284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askvic, S., & Jamil, I. (2013). Citizens’ trust in public officials: Bangladesh and Nepal compared. In I. Jamil, S. Askvik, & T. N. Dhakal (Eds.), In search of better governance in South Asia and beyond (pp. 145–164). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A., & Somanathan, R. (2007). The political economy of public goods: Some evidence from India. Journal of Development Economics, 82(2), 287–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, D. (2016). Incomplete integration: Local government, citizenship and the Tamil identity in the Upcountry. In A. Amarasingam & D. Bass (Eds.), Sri Lanka struggle for peace in the aftermath of civil war (pp. 129–145). London: Hurst and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bok, D. (2011). The politics of happiness: What government can learn from the new research on well-being. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, S., & Holmberg, S. (2014). Democracy and bureaucracy: How their quality matters for popular satisfaction. West European Politics, 37(3), 515–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einhorn, M. R. (2007). Legal and institutional frameworks accountability in budgeting and service delivery. In A. Shah (Ed.), Performance accountability and combating corruption (pp. 183–229). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (2013). What is governance? Governance, 26(3), 347–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaventa, J. (2002). Introduction: Exploring citizenship, participation and accountability. IDS Bulletin, 33(2), 1–14. UK: Bridgton.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopakumar, K. (1997). Public feedback as an aid to public accountability: Reflections on an alternate approach. Public Administration and Development, 17(2), 281–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hettige, S. T. (2003). Local government in the central province: Ambagamuwa Pradeshiya Sabha. In S. T. Hettige & C. Bigton (Eds.), Local government and conflict management in Sri Lanka (pp. 35–57). Colombo: Development Studies Institute of the University of Colombo and South Asia Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hitinayake, G. (2009). Root causes for poor delivery of government services to the estate community and present status of their social security. LST Review, 19, 258.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Policy Studies. (2018). Tea industry in transition: 150 years and beyond. Colombo: IPS.
   Google Scholar
• Jamil, I., Dhakal, T., & Paudel, N. (2015). Governance and trust survey 2: Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka. Data for Sri Lanka can be accessible via email at: [email protected]
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, T. B., & Sørensen, D.-L. (2012). Codes of good governance: National or global public values? Public Integrity, 15(1), 71–96.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N. (2003). Making rights work for the poor: Nijera Kori and the construction of collective capabilities in rural Bangladesh ( IDS Working Paper 2003). Brighton, Sussex: Institute of Development Studies. Accessible at: https://www.ids.ac.uk/files/wp200.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N., & HaqKabir, A. (2009). Citizenship narratives in the absence of good governance: Voices of the working poor in Bangladesh ( IDS working paper 331). Accessible at: https://www.ids.ac.uk/files/dmfile/Wp331.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kader, B. A. (2017). Upcountry Tamils: An endangered community in Sri Lanka. London: Solidarity for Malayagam.
   Google Scholar
• Keefer, P., & Khemani, S. (2005). Democracy, public expenditure, and the poor: Understanding political incentives for providing public services. The World Bank Research Observer, 20(1), 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumlin, S., & Rothstein, B. (2010). Questioning the new liberal dilemma: Immigrants, social networks and institutional fairness. Comparative Politics, 41(1), 63–87.
   Google Scholar
• La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 15(1), 222–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H., Gao, H., & Huang, Q. (2019). Better government, happier residents? Quality of government and life satisfaction in China. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-019-02172-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendelsohn, O., & Vieziany, M. (1998). The untouchables, subordination, poverty and state in modern India. London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T. (2017). Public values frames in administration and governance. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(1), 59–72.
   Google Scholar
• Narayan, D., Patel, R., Schafft, K., & Rademacher, A. (2000). Can anyone hear us?: Voices of the poor. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Narayanan, D., Chambers, R., Shah, M. K., & Petesch, P. (2000). Voices of the poor: Can anyone hear us? New York: Oxford University Press and the World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, S. (1992). Accountability in public services: Exit, voice and control. World Development, 20(7), 1047–1060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paz Arauco, V., Gazdar, H., Hevia-Pacheco, P., Kabeer, N., Lenhardt, A., Masood, S. Q., … Scalise, E. (2014). Strengthening social justice to address intersecting inequalities: Post-2015. London: Overseas Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ramesh, R. (2018). Citizenship rights, public service delivery and the Quality of Government in Sri Lanka ( Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Bergen, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, J., Lawton, A., & Williams, H. M. (2012). Organizational citizenship behaviour and the public service ethos: Whither the organization? Journal of Business Ethics, 106(2), 117–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. (2004). Social trust and honesty in government: A causal mechanisms approach. In J. Kornai, B. Rothstein, & S. Rose-Ackerman (Eds.), Creating social trust in post-socialist transition. Political evolution and institutional change (pp. 14–30). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. (2011). The quality of government, corruption, social trust, and inequality in the international perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. (2019). Epistemic democracy and quality of government. European Politics and Society, 20(1), 16–31.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B., Samanni, M., & Teorell, J. (2012). Explaining the welfare state: Power resources vs. the quality of government. European Political Science Review, 4(1), 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein., B., & Stolle, D. (2002). How political institutions create and destroy social capital: An institutional theory of generalized trust. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston. Retrieved from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p65250_index.html
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B., & Stolle, D. (2003). Impartiality and the welfare state: An institutional approach. In M. Hooghe & D. Stolle (Eds.), Generating social capital: Civil society and institutions in comparative perspective (pp. 191–210). London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2008). What is the quality of government: Theory of impartial government institutions. Governance, 21(2), 165–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2012). Defining and measuring quality of government. In S. Holmberg & B. Rothstein (Eds.), Good government: The relevance of political science (pp. 13–40). London: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Shunsuke, K. (2012). Governance over Estate Tamils in the Tea Plantation community of the Upcountry Sri Lanka ( Unpublished PhD thesis submitted to International Graduate School of Social Sciences). Yokohama National University, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2010). Doing qualitative research (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stensöta, H. O. (2012). Impartiality and the need for a public ethics of care. In S. Holmberg & B. Rothstein (Eds.), Good government: The relevance of political science (pp. 87–102). London: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki, K., & Demircioglu, M. A. (2019). Is impartiality enough?: government impartiality and citizens’ perception of public service quality ( Working Paper Series: 07). Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute.
   Google Scholar
• The Ministry of Hill Country New Villages and Community Development. (2016). National plan of action for the social development of the plantation community. Colombo Kollupitiya, Sri Lanka.
   Google Scholar
• The United Nations. (2016). The world social situation report. New York: United Nations Publication.
   Google Scholar
• The United Nations Development Program. (2016). The human development report. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank. (2004). Making services work for poor people. World Development Report. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank. (2016). Sri Lanka –poverty and welfare: recent progress and remaining challenges ( Working Paper No.103281). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group valued model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 830–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why do people obey the law? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uslaner, M. E. (2008). Corruption, inequality, and the rule of law: The bulging pocket makes the easy life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uyangoda, J. (2012). Reframing democracy: Perspectives on the cultures of inclusion and exclusion in contemporary Sri Lanka. Colombo: Social Scientists Association.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ryzin, G. G. (2015). Service quality, administrative process, and citizens’ evaluation of local government in the US. Public Management Review, 17(3), 425–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijayasiri, J., Arunatilake, N., & Kelegama, S. (2017). Sri Lankan tea industry: 150 years and beyond. Colombo: Institute of Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Woo, C. (2018). Good governance and happiness: Does technical quality of governance lead to happiness universally in both rich and poor countries? Journal of International and Area Studies, 25(1), 37–56.
   Google Scholar