References
- AbouAssi, K., Amirkhanya, A., Billingsley, G., & Lyon, R. (2019). Reflections on the persistent issue of relevance in public administration. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 2(4), 239–243. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvz007
- Agarwal, P. K. (2018). Public administration challenges in the world of AI and bots. Public Administration Review, 78(6), 917–921. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12979
- Ansell, C., Sondorp, E., & Stevens, R. H. (2012). The promise and challenge of global network governance: The global outbreak alert and response network. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 18(3), 317–337. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-01803005
- Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (1999). The politics, power, and pathologies of international organizations. International Organization, 53(4), 699–732. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081899551048
- Beem, B. (2009). Leaders in thinking, laggards in attention? Bureaucratic engagement in international arenas. Policy Studies Journal, 37(3), 497–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00325.x
- Biermann, F., Siebenhüner, B., Bauer, S., Busch, P., Campe, S., Dingwerth, K., Grothmann, T., Marchinski, R., & Tarradell, M. (2009). Studying the influence of international bureaucracies: A conceptual framework. In F. Biermann & B. Siebenhüner (Eds.), Managers of Global Change: The Influence of International Environmental Bureaucracies (pp. 37–74). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262012744.003.0003
- Blessett, B., Dodge, J., Edmond, B., Goerdel, H. T., Gooden, S. T., Headley, A. M., Riccucci, N. M., & Williams, B. N. (2019). Social equity in public administration: A call to action. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 2(4), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvz016
- Bowornwathana, B. (2010). Minnowbrook IV in 2028: From American Minnowbrook to global Minnowbrook. Public Administration Review, 70(1), 64–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02247.x
- Caiden, G. E. (1994). Globalizing the theory and practice of public administration. In J. C. Garcia Zamor & R. Khator (Eds.), Public administration in the global village (pp. 45–59). Praeger.
- Cerny, P. (2001). From ‘iron triangles’ to ‘golden pentangles’? Globalizing the policy process. Global Governance, 7(4), 397–410. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-00704005
- Cerny, P. G. (1995). Globalization and the changing logic of collective action. International Organization, 49(4), 595–625. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300028459
- Dahl, R. A. (1947). the science of public administration: Three problems. Public Administration Review, 7(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.2307/972349
- Drewry, G. (2014). The administrative sciences, from the past to the future (by a roundabout route). International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852313511766
- Dwivedi, Y. K., & Weerakkody, V. (2010). A profile of scholarly community contributing to the international journal of electronic government research. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR,), 6(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4018/jegr.2010100101
- Feldman, M. S., Khademian, A. M., Ingram, H., & Schneider, A. S. (2006). Ways of knowing and inclusive management practices. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00669.x
- Fernandez, S., & Lee, H. (2016). The transformation of the South African Public Service: Exploring the impact of racial and gender representation on organisational effectiveness. Journal of Modern African Studies, 54(1), 91–116. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X15000816
- Frederickson, H. G. (1999). The repositioning of American public administration. PS, Political Science & Politics, 32(4), 701–712. https://doi.org/10.2307/420159
- Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. Straus and Giroux.
- Fritzen, S. A. (2010). Envisioning public administration as a scholarly field in 2020: Toward global and comparative administrative theorizing. Public Administration Review, 70(s), 300–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02292.x
- Giauque, D., Ritz, A., Varone, F., Anderfuhren-Biget, S., & Waldner, C. (2011). Putting public service motivation into context: A balance between universalism and particularism. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(2), 227–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311399232
- Gulrajani, N., & Moloney, K. (2012). Globalizing public administration: Today’s research and tomorrow’s agenda. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02489.x
- Harari, Y. N. (2020, March 20). The world after coronavirus. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/19d90308-6858-11ea-a3c9-1fe6fedcca75
- Heeks, R., & Bailur, S. (2007). Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2006.06.005
- Hocking, B. (1999). Patrolling the ‘frontier’: Globalization, localization and the ‘actorness’ of non‐central governments. Regional and Federal Studies, 9(1), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597569908421069
- Hopkins, R. F. (1976). The international role of “domestic” bureaucracy. International Organization, 30(3), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830001835X
- Hou, Y., Anna, Y. N., Poocharoen, O., Yang, K., & Zhao, Z. J. (2011). The case for public administration with a global perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq070
- Huddleston, M. W. (2000). Onto the darkling plain: Globalization and the American public service in the twenty-first century. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 665–684. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024286
- Karippacheril, T., Kim, G. S., Beschel, R. P., & Choi, C. Y. (2016). Bringing government into the 21st century: The Korean digital governance experience. World Bank Institute, World Bank.
- Karns, M. P., Stiles, K. W., & Mingst, K. A. (2015). International organizations: The politics and processes of global governance. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
- Kettl, D. F. (2000). The transformation of governance: Globalization, devolution, and the role of government. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 488–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00112
- Kim, S., Ashley, S., & Lambright, H. (2014). Public administration in the context of global governance. Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Kim, S., O’Leary, R., Van Slyke, D., Frederickson, H. G., & Lambright, W. H. (2010). Introduction: The legacy of Minnowbrook. In R. O’Leary, D. M. Van Slyke, & S. Kim (Eds.), The future of public administration, public management, and public service around the world: The Minnowbrook perspective (pp. 1–16). Georgetown University Press.
- Kim, S., & Vandenabeele, W. (2010). A strategy for building public service motivation research internationally. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 701–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02198.x
- Kim, S., Vandenabeele, W., Wright, B. E., Andersen, L. B., Cerase, F. P., Christensen, R. K., Desmarais, C., Koumenta, M., Leisink, P., Liu, B., Palidauskaite, J., Pedersen, L. H., Perry, J. L., Ritz, A., Taylor, J., & De Vivo, P. (2013). Investigating the structure and meaning of public service motivation across populations: Developing an international instrument and addressing issues of measurement invariance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus027
- Koehler, M., & Rainey, H. G. (2008). Interdisciplinary foundations of public service motivation. In J. Perry & A. Hondeghem (Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp. 33–55). Oxford University Press.
- Koppell, J. G. S. (2010). World rule: Accountability, legitimacy, and the design of global governance. University of Chicago Press.
- Krishnan, R. (2020). Big data, AI, and algorithmic platforms: Implications for governing and public policy. In J. L. Perry (Ed.), Public Service and good governance for the twenty-first century (pp. 68–86). University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Kummitha, R. K. R., (2020). Smart technologies for fighting pandemics: The role of techno and human driven approaches in controlling virus transmission, Government Information Quarterly. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3578108
- Lambright, W. H. (2016). A reflections on leadership: Jean-Jacques Dordain of the European Space Agency. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 507–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12548
- Lambright, W. H., & Pizzarella, C. (2008). The space station and multinational collaboration: A merger of domestic and foreign policy. In Lisa B. Bingham & R. O’Leary (Eds.), Big ideas in collaborative public management (pp. 230–246). M.E. Sharpe.
- Liu, B., Liu, N. T., & Zhu, X. (2008). Public service motivation and job satisfaction in China: An investigation of generalisability and instrumentality. International Journal of Manpower, 29(8), 684–699. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720810919297
- Nabatchi, T. N., & Carboni, J. L. (2019). Assessing the sast and future of public administration: Reflections from the Minnowbrook at 50 conference. IBM Center for the Business of Government.
- Nesbit, R., Moulton, S., Robinson, S., Smith, C., DeHart-Davis, L., Feeney, M. K., Gazley, B., & Hou, Y. (2011). Wrestling with intellectual diversity in public administration: Avoiding disconnectedness and fragmentation while seeking rigor, depth, and relevance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq062
- Newland, C. (2000). The public administration review and ongoing struggles for connectedness. Public Administration Review, 60(1), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00059
- Nielson, D. L., & Tierney, M. J. (2003). Delegation to international organizations: Agency theory and world bank environmental reform. International Organization, 57(2), 241–276. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818303572010
- O’Leary, R., Van Slyke, D., & Kim, S. (2010). The future of public administration around the world: the Minnowbrook perspective. Georgetown University Press.
- O’Toole, L. J., Jr.. (1997). Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review, 57(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/976691
- O’Toole, L. J., Jr., & Hanf, K. I. (2002). American public administration and impacts of international governance. Public Administration Review, 62(1), 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.62.s1.26
- Ospina, S. M., & Dodge, J. (2005). Narrative inquiry and the search for connectedness: Practitioners and academics developing public administration scholarship. Public Administration Review, 65(4), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00468.x
- Perry, J. L. (2016). Building global public administration knowledge public administration review. Public Administration Review, 76(4), 533–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12588
- Perry, J. L., & Hondeghem, A. (2008). Directions for future theory and research. In motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp. 294–314). Oxford University Press.
- Perry, J. L., Hondeghem, A., & Wise, L. R. (2010). Revisiting the motivational bases of public service: Twenty years of research and an agenda for the future. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 681–690. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02196.x
- Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367–373. https://doi.org/10.2307/976618
- Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (1998). Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024379
- Pollitt, C. (2013). New perspectives on public services: place and technology. Oxford University Press.
- Raadschelders, J. C. (2011). The study of public administration in the United States. Public Administration, 89(1), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01906.x
- Raadschelders, J. C. (2018, March 9–13). Comparative public administration in a globalizing world: A new psychological challenge next to the traditional scholarly challenges [paper presentation]. American Society for Public Administration Annual Conference, Denver, CO, USA.
- Raadschelders, J. C., & Lee, K. (2011). Trends in the study of public administration: Empirical and qualitative observations from Public Administration Review, 2000–2009. Public Administration Review, 71(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02303.x
- Riccucci, N. (2010). Public administration: Traditions of inquiry and philosophies of knowledge. Georgetown University Press.
- Riggs, F. W. (1991). Guest editorial: Public administration: A comparativist framework. Public Administration Review, 51(6), 473–477. https://doi.org/10.2307/976597
- Ritz, A., Brewer, G., & Neumann, O. (2016). Public service motivation: A systematic literature review and outlook. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 414–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12505
- Schmidt, M. R. (1993). Grout: Alternative kinds of knowledge and why they are ignored. Public Administration Review, 53(6), 525–530. https://doi.org/10.2307/977362
- Scholl, H. J. (2010). Electronic government: A study domain past its infancy. In H. J. Schooll (Ed.), e-Government: Information, technology, and transformation (pp. 11–30). M.E. Sharpe.
- Stone, D. (2008). Global public policy, transnational policy communities, and their networks. Policy Studies Journal, 36(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2007.00251.x
- Stout, M. (2012). Competing ontologies: A primer for public administration. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 388–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02530.x
- Thurner, P. W., & Binder, M. (2009). European union transgovernmental networks: The emergence of a new political space beyond the nation‐state? European Journal of Political Research, 48(1), 80–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00825.x
- Vandenabeele, W., & Van de Walle, S. (2008). International difference in public service motivation: Comparing regions across the world. In J. L. Perry & A. Hondeghem (Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp. 223–244). Oxford University Press.
- Walker, R. M. (2011). Globalized public management: An interdisciplinary design science? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq064
- Walt, G., Shiffman, J., Schneider, H., Murray, S. F., Brugha, R., & Gilson, L. (2008). ‘Doing’ health policy analysis: Methodological and conceptual reflections and challenges. Health Policy and Planning, 23(5), 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czn024
- Wei, J. (2004). Global comparisons of e-government environments. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 1(3), 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2004.005550
- Welch, E., & Wong, W. (1998). Public administration in a global context: Bridging the gaps of theory and practice between western and non-western nations. Public Administration Review, 58(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/976888
- White, J. D. (1986). On the growth of knowledge in public administration. Public Administration Review, 46(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/975438
- Wright, B. E. (2015). The science of public administration: Problems, progress, presumptions, and possibilities. Public Administration Review, 75(6), 795–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12468
- Young, M. M., Bullock, J. B., & Lecy, J. D. (2019). Artificial discretion as a tool of governance: A framework for understandingthe impact of artificial intelligence on public administration. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 2(4), 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvz014