References
- Acha, V., & Balazs, K. (1999). Transitions in thinking: Changing the mindsets of policy makers about innovation. Technovation, 19(6–7), 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(99)00032-2
- Anthes, G. (2015). Estonia: A model for E-Government. Communications of the ACM, 58(6), 18–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/2754951
- Asatryan, Z., Heinemann, F., Yeter, M., Rubio, E., Rinaldi, D., & Fabian, Z. (2016). Public sector reform: How the EU budget is used to encourage it. A study by the European Parliament’s Directorate-General for Internal Policies. Brussels: European Parliamentary Research Service. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=IPOL_STU(2016)572696
- Bilokon, O. I., & Bilenka, N. O. (2010). A survey of innovation in the Ukrainian economy 2008-2010 (in Ukrainian). Kiiv: Ukrainstat. http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/publnauka_u.htm
- Cornell University, INSEAD, & WIPO. (2018). The Global Innovation Index 2018: Energizing the world with innovation. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.
- Dakhli, M., & De Clercq, D. (2004). Human capital, social capital and innovation: A multi-country study. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620410001677835
- Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2008). Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: Assessing the role of managers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 495–522. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mun021
- Damanpour, F., Walker, R. M., & Avellaneda, C. N. (2009). Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational performance: A longitudinal study of service organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 650–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00814.x
- De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209
- Demircioglu, M. A. (2019). The effects of organizational and demographic context for innovation implementation in public organizations. Public Management Review, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1668467
- Demircioglu, M. A., & Audretsch, D. B. (2017). Conditions for innovation in public sector organizations. Research Policy, 46(9), 1681–1691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.004
- Ebbinghaus, B. (2005). When less is more: Selection problems in large-N and small-N cross-national comparisons. International Sociology, 20(2), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580905052366
- Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation: Technologies, organisations and institutions. Pinter.
- E-Estonia. (2020). E-Estonia. https://e-estonia.com/
- European Commission. (2012). Innovation Union Scoreboard. Innovation Union Scoreboard. Brussels: European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing. https://ec.europa.eu/eip/ageing/library/innovation-union-scoreboard-2011_en
- Freedom House. (2019). Freedom in the world 2019. New York: Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2019/democracy-retreat
- Freeman, C. (1995). The “national system of innovation” in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035309
- Freeman, C. (2006). “Catching up” and innovation systems: Implications for Eastern Europe. In K. Piech & S. Radošević (Eds.), The knowledge-based economy in Central and Eastern Europe countries and industries in a process of change (pp. 13–30). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Godin, B. (2006). The linear model of innovation: The historical construction of an analytical framework. Science, Technology & Human Values, 31(6), 639–667. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243906291865
- Godin, B. (2009). National innovation system: The system approach in historical perspective. Science, Technology & Human Values, 34(4), 476–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243908329187
- Goldberg, I., Goddard, J. G., Kuriakose, S., & Racine, J. L. (2011). Igniting innovation: Rethinking the role of government in emerging Europe and Central Asia. The World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/2358?show=full
- Ilyash, O., Dzhadan, I., & Ostasz, G. (2018). The influence of the industry’s innovation activities indices on the industrial products’ revenue of Ukraine. Economics & Sociology, 11(4), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-4/21
- Innovation Policy Platform. (2017). Estonia: STI outlook 2016 country profile. The World Bank. https://www.innovationpolicyplatform.org/content/estonia
- Kaasa, A. (2017). Culture and innovation: Evidence from the European Union and neighbouring countries. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 108(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12194
- Kolosok, V., & Trusova, Y. (2015). Competitiveness and innovative development of industrial enterprises: A case of Ukraine. International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets, 7(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBEM.2015.068352
- Libman, A., & Obydenkova, A. (2013). Communism or communists? Soviet legacies and corruption in transition economies. Economics Letters, 119(1), 101–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.02.003
- Lowndes, V. (2005). Something old, something new, something borrowed… Policy Studies, 26(3– 4), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442870500198361
- Lufkin, B. (2017). Could Estonia be the first “digital” country? BBC FutureNow. http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20171019-could-estonia-be-the-first-digital-country
- Lundvall, B. Å. (1992). National systems of innovation-towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Anthem Press.
- Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). National innovation systems — Analytical concept and development tool. Industry and Innovation, 14(1), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710601130863
- Mahoney, J. (2000). Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29(4), 507–548. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007113830879
- Mahoney, J., & Rueschemeyer, D. (2003). Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences. Cambridge University Press.
- Masso, J., Rollaht, T., & Varblane, U. (2012). Links between foreign direct investment and innovation in Estonia. In E. G. Carayannis, U. Varblane, & T. Roolaht (Eds.), Innovation systems in small catching-up economies (pp. 39–57). Springer.
- McTaggart, D., & O’Flynn, J. (2015). Public sector reform. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 74(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12128
- Meyer-Sahling, J.-H. (2010). In search of the shadow of the past: Legacy explanations and administrative reform in post-communist East Central Europe. In M. Painter & B. G. Peters (Eds.), Tradition and public administration (pp. 203–205). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Mokyr, J. (2008). The institutional origins of the industrial revolution. In E. Helpman (Ed.), Institutions and economic performance (pp. 64–119). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Nelson, R., & Nelson, K. (2002). Technology, institutions, and innovation systems. Research Policy, 31(2), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00140-8
- Niosi, J. (2002). National systems of innovations are “x-efficient” (and x-effective): Why some are slow learners. Research Policy, 31(2), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00142-1
- OECD. (2005). Governance of innovation systems, Vol. 1: Synthesis report. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/governanceofinnovationsystemsvol1synthesisreport.htm
- OECD. (2016a). OECD open government case studies: Dozorro. https://oecd-opsi.org/innovations/dozorro/
- OECD. (2016b). OECD science, technology and innovation outlook: Estonia. Paris: OECD. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/oecd-science-technology-and-innovation-outlook-2016/estonia_sti_in_outlook-2016-58-en#page1
- OECD. (2017). Reviews of innovation policy: Kazakhstan 2017. http://www.oecd.org/countries/kazakhstan/oecd-reviews-of-innovation-policy-kazakhstan-2017-9789264270008-en.htm
- OECD. (2018). The public private collaboration model, eZdorovya, and the transformation of the healthcare system in Ukraine. Paris: OECD. https://oecd-opsi.org/innovations/the-public-private-collabroation-model-ezdorovya-and-the-transformation-of-the-healthcare-system-in-ukraine/
- Paas, T., & Poltimäe, H. (2012). Innovation measurement problems: An illustrative case of the Baltic countries. In E. G. Carayannis, U. Varblane, & T. Roolaht (Eds.), Innovation systems in small catching-up economies (pp. 99–119). Springer.
- Painter, M., & Peters, B. G. (2010). Administrative traditions in comparative perspective: Families, groups and hybrids. In M. Painter & B. G. Peters (Eds.), Tradition and public administration (pp. 19–30). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Perry, J. L., & Danziger, J. N. (1980). The adoptability of innovations: An empirical assessment of computer applications in local governments. Administration & Society, 11(4), 461–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539978001100405
- Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267.
- Radosevic, S., & Myrzakhmet, M. (2009). Between vision and reality: Promoting innovation through technoparks in an emerging economy. Technovation, 29(10), 645–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.04.001
- Raghupathi, V., & Raghupathi, W. (2017). Innovation at country-level: Association between economic development and patents. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 6(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-017-0065-0
- Rogers, E. M. (1995). Lessons for guidelines from the diffusion of innovations. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 21(7), 324–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1070-3241(16)30155-9
- Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), 71–102. https://doi.org/10.1086/261725
- Schreyögg, G., & Sydow, J. (2009). The hidden dynamics of path dependence: Institutions and organizations. Springer.
- Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907313077
- Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. A. (Eds.). (2005). Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Suzuki, K., & Demircioglu, M. A. (2018). The association between administrative characteristics and national level innovative activity: Findings from a cross-national study. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(4), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1519449
- Svyetlov, O. (2007). Ukraine's ‘return to Europe’: Path dependence as a source of mutual elite misunderstanding. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 8(4), 528–543.
- Thelen, K. (1999). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 369–404. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369
- Torugsa, N. A., & Arundel, A. (2016). The nature and incidence of workgroup innovation in the Australian public sector: Evidence from the Australian 2011 state of the service survey. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 75(2), 202–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12095
- UNECE. (2012). Kazakhstan: Innovation Performance Review. Geneva: United Nations. https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/ceci/publications/icp5.pdf
- UNECE. (2013). Ukraine: Innovation performance review. Geneva: United Nations. https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/ceci/publications/icp7.pdf
- United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2018). The United Nations E-Government Survey. New York: United Nations. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/Portals/egovkb/Documents/un/2018-Survey/E-Government%20Survey%202018_FINAL%20for%20web.pdf
- Vadi, M., & Lepisk, H. (2012). Creativity and learning in innovation processes. In E.G. Carayannis, U. Varblane, & T. Roolaht (Eds.), Innovation systems in small catching-up economies (pp. 79–96). New York: Springer.
- Van der Wal, Z. (2017). The 21st century public manager. Macmillan International Higher Education.
- Varblane, U., Ukrainski, K., & Lillestik, O. (2012). Path dependency factors affecting the innovation systems of latecomer countries: Comparison of Central and Eastern Europe, Asia, and Latin America. In E. G. Carayannis, U. Varblane, & T. Roolaht (Eds.), Innovation systems in small catching-up economies (pp. 39–57). Springer.
- Viia, A., Terk, E., & Lumiste, R. (2007). Innovaatiline tegevus Eesti ettevõtetes: Euroopa Liidu neljanda innovatsiooniuuringu (CIS 4) tulemused (in Estonian). Enterprise Estonia.
- Walker, R. M. (2014). Internal and external antecedents of process innovation: A review and extension. Public Management Review, 16(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.771698
- Wang, C. (2013). Can institutions explain cross country differences in innovative activity? Journal of Macroeconomics, 37, 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2013.05.009
- Watkins, A., & Agapitova, N. (2004). Creating a 21st century national innovation system for a 21st century Latvian economy. Washington, DC: World Bank.
- World Bank. (2017). Worldwide governance indicators: Rule of law. Washington, DC: The World Bank. https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/
- World Value Survey. (2014). Wave 6 (2010 – 2014). Vienna: World Values Survey Secretariat. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp
- Yegorov, I. (2009). Post-Soviet science: Difficulties in the transformation of the R&D systems in Russia and Ukraine. Research Policy, 38(4), 600–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.010
- Yesilkagit, K. (2010). The future of administrative tradition: Tradition as ideas and structure. In M. Painter & B. G. Peters (Eds.), Tradition and public administration (pp. 147–157). Palgrave Macmillan.