References
- Abbott, A. (1997). Of time and space: The contemporary relevance of the Chicago school. Social Forces, 75(4), 1149–1182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2580667
- Berman, E. M., Moon, M. J., & Choi, H. (2010). Public administration in East Asia: Mainland China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Taylor & Francis.
- Bouwman, R., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2016). Experimental public administration from 1992 to 2014: A systematic literature review and ways forward. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29(2), 110–131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2015-0129
- Bozeman, B., & Scott, P. (1992). Laboratory experiments in public policy and management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2(3), 293–313. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037133
- *Cai, M., Liu, P., & Wang, H. (2020). Land commodification and hukou policy innovation in China: Evidence from a survey experiment. Journal of Chinese Governance, 5(4), 419–438. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2020.1746511
- *Campbell, J. W. (2020). Red tape, rule burden, and legitimate performance trade-offs: Results from a vignette experiment. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(4), 741–765. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2019.1676273
- *Christensen, R. K., & Whiting, S. W. (2018). Evaluating inrole and extrarole behaviors across sectors. Public Personnel Management, 47(3), 314–334. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026018767464
- *Christensen, R. K., Whiting, S. W., Im, T., Rho, E., Stritch, J. M., & Park, J. (2013). Public service motivation, task, and non-task behavior: A performance appraisal experiment with Korean MPA and MBA students. International Public Management Journal, 16(1), 28–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2013.796257
- *Focacci, C. N., & Lam, P. H. (2020). Why do unemployed people avoid participation in training? An experiment for policy making. Social Policy & Administration, 54(7), 1231–1245. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12602
- Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Jilke, S., Olsen, A. L., & Tummers, L. (2017). Behavioral public administration: Combining insights from public administration and psychology. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12609
- *Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., & Im, T. (2013). The effect of transparency on trust in government: A cross-national comparative experiment. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 575–586. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12047
- Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Klijn, A. (2015). The effects of judicial transparency on public trust: Evidence from a field experiment. Public Administration, 93(4), 995–1011. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12149
- Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., & Meijer, A. J. (2014). Effects of Transparency on the perceived trustworthiness of a government organization: Evidence from an online experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(1), 137–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus048
- Hales, A. H., Wesselmann, E. D., & Hilgard, J. (2019). Improving psychological science through transparency and openness: An overview. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 42(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-018-00186-8
- Hansen, J. A., & Tummers, L. (2020). A systematic review of field experiments in public administration. Public Administration Review, 80(6), 921–931. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13181
- Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
- James, O., Jilke, S., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (Eds). (2017). Experiments in public management research: Challenges and contributions. Cambridge University Press.
- *Jilke, S., Lu, J., Xu, C., & Shinohara, S. (2019). Using large-scale social media experiments in public administration: Assessing charitable consequences of government funding of nonprofits. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(4), 627–639. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy021
- *Kim, M. H. (2019). Human resource strategies in response to government cutbacks: A survey experiment. Public Management Review, 21(8), 1125–1147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1544659
- *Kim, S. H., & Kim, S. (2016a). National culture and social desirability bias in measuring public service motivation. Administration & Society, 48(4), 444–476. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713498749
- *Kim, S. H., & Kim, S. (2016b). Social desirability bias in measuring public service motivation. International Public Management Journal, 19(3), 293–319. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2015.1021497
- *Kim, S. H., & Kim, S. (2017). Ethnic differences in social desirability bias: Effects on the analysis of public service motivation. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(4), 472–491. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X15605147
- *Lee, D. S., & Park, S. (2020a). Bureaucratic responsiveness in times of political crisis: The case of presidential impeachment. Public Administration. Advance Online Publication, 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12701
- *Lee, D. S., & Park, S. (2020b). Ministerial leadership and endorsement of bureaucrats: Experimental evidence from presidential governments. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 426–441. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13153
- *Lee, D. S., & Park, S. (2020c). Civil servants’ perceptions of agency heads’ leadership styles: The role of gender in public sector organizations. Public Management Review. Advance Online Publication, 1–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1730941
- *Lee, M. J., Moon, M. J., & Kim, J. (2017). Insights from experiments with duopoly games: Rational incremental decision-making. Public Management Review, 19(9), 1328–1351. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1282002
- *Lim, S., & Tanaka, S. (2019). Work disincentive perceptions and welfare state attitudes: A survey experiment in South Korea. Governance, 32(3), 457–473. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12386
- *Lu, X., Xu, H., & Wang, W. (2021). Clients’ help deservingness, crowd situational stress and discretionary decision-making: An experimental study of regulatory street-level bureaucrats in China. International Public Management Journal, 24(2), 287–312. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2019.1661892
- Margetts, H. Z. (2011). Experiments for public management research. Public Management Review, 13(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2010.532970
- *Moon, M. J., Kim, J., Jung, S., & Cho, B. (2020). What makes administrative and hierarchical procedures more burdensome? Effects of degree of procedures, outcome favorability, and Confucian values on red tape perception. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(6), 1237–1259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1760113
- *Moseley, A., & Stoker, G. (2015). Putting public policy defaults to the test: The case of organ donor registration. International Public Management Journal, 18(2), 246–264. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2015.1012574
- *Newland, S. A., & Liu, J. C. E. (2021). Ethnic identity and local government responsiveness in Taiwan. Governance, 34(3), 875–892. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12546
- Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(1), 5200–5205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307545100
- *Noda, Y. (2020). Performance information and learning effects on citizen satisfaction with public services. Public Management Review. Advance Online Publication, 1–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1775281
- Ongaro, E. (2021). Non-Western philosophies and public administration. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 43(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2020.1844027
- *Park, S. Y., Kim, E., & Moon, M. J. (2020). Designing public information campaigns as an effective policy tool: Construal-level fit effects and evidence from an experimental study. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 22(6), 579–592. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2019.1703554
- Peters, B. G. (2021). Studying public administration in authoritarian regimes. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 43(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2020.1870241
- *Porumbescu, G. A., Cucciniello, M., Belle, N., & Nasi, G. (2020). Only hearing what they want to hear: Assessing when and why performance information triggers intentions to coproduce. Public Administration. Advance Online Publication, 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12697
- *Qian, B., & Zheng, Q. (2012). An issue of public affairs management: The effect of time slack and need for cognition on prediction of task completion. Public Personnel Management, 41(5), 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/009102601204100501
- Roberts, A. (2021). How to bridge East and West. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 43(2), 63–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2020.1869046
- *Ryan, M., Stoker, G., John, P., Moseley, A., James, O., Richardson, L., & Vannoni, M. (2018). How best to open up local democracy? A randomised experiment to encourage contested elections and greater representativeness in English parish councils. Local Government Studies, 44(6), 766–787. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2018.1473769
- Simon, H. A. (1996). Sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). MIT Press.
- *Stewart, P. A., Méhu, M., & Salter, F. K. (2015). Sex and leadership: Interpreting competitive and affiliative facial displays based on workplace status. International Public Management Journal, 18(2), 190–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2014.996626
- Stroik, P., Chakraborty, D., Ge, W., Boulter, J., & Jamelske, E. (2019). Effect of reciprocity on public opinion of international climate treaties: Experimental evidence from the US and China. Climate Policy, 19(8), 959–973. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1617666
- *Walker, R. M., Brewer, G. A., Bozeman, B., Moon, M. J., & Wu, J. (2013). An experimental assessment of public ownership and performance: Comparing perceptions in East Asia and the United States. Public Management Review, 15(8), 1208–1228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.825480
- Walker, R. M., Brewer, G. A., Lee, M. J., Petrovsky, N., & Witteloostuijn, A. V. (2019). Best practice recommendations for replicating experiments in public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(4), 609–626. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy047
- Walker, R. M., James, O., & Brewer, G. A. (2017). Replication, experiments and knowledge in public management research. Public Management Review, 19(9), 1221–1234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1282003
- *Walker, R. M., Lee, M. J., James, O., & Ho, S. M. (2018). Analyzing the complexity of performance information use: Experiments with stakeholders to disaggregate dimensions of performance, data sources, and data types. Public Administration Review, 78(6), 852–863. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12920
- *Walker, R. M., Yeung, D. Y. L., Lee, M. J., & Lee, I. P. (2020). Assessing information-based policy tools: An eye-tracking laboratory experiment on public information posters. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 22(6), 558–578. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2020.1753035
- *Yoo, S. C., & Drumwright, M. (2018). Nonprofit fundraising with virtual reality. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 29(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21315