Power-sharing in governments, clarity of responsibility, and the control of corruption

References

• Adsera, A., Boix, C., & Payne, M. (2003). Are you being served? Political accountability and quality of government. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 19(2), 445–490. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewg017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, M., Fjeldstad, O., & Shifa, A. B. (2020). European colonization and the corruption of local elites: The case of chiefs in Africa. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 179, 80–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.08.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. J. (2000). Economic voting and political context: A comparative perspective. Electoral Studies, 19(x), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(99)00045-1
   Google Scholar
• Ariotti, M. H., & Golder, S. N. (2018). Partisan portfolio allocation in African democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 51(3), 341–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017710256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baniamin, H. M. (2019). Linking socio-economic performance, quality of governance, and trust in the civil service: Does culture intercede in the perceived relationships? Evidence from and beyond Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 41(3), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2019.1658926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baniamin, H. M. (2021). Linking trust, performance, and governance quality: What can explain the incongruity? Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 59(2), 128–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2020.1863018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995). What to do (and what not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634–647. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caiden, G. E., & Caiden, N. J. (1977). Administrative Corruption. Public Administration Review, 37(3), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.2307/974828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cha, S. (1998). Chatichai coalition government and Thai politics. 한국태국학회논총, 7(7), 7. http://www.riss.kr/search/detail/DetailView.do?p_mat_type=1a0202e37d52c72d&control_no=f67bf01dc1172510d18150b21a227875
   Google Scholar
• Chadova, K. (2017). Measuring corruption in Europe: Public opinion surveys and composite indices. Quality & Quantity, 51(4), 1877–1900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0372-8
   Google Scholar
• Chang, E. C., & Golden, M. A. (2007). Electoral systems, district magnitude and corruption. British Journal of Political Science, 37(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123407000063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charron, N. (2016). Do corruption measures have a perception problem? Assessing the relationship between experiences and perceptions of corruption among citizens and experts. European Political Science Review, 8(1), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773914000447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charron, N., & Lapuente, V. (2010). Does democracy produce quality of government? European Journal of Political Research, 49(4), 443–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01906.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charron, N., & Lapuente, V. (2011). Which dictators produce quality of government? Studies in Comparative International Development, 46(4), 397–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-011-9093-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charron, N., Lapuente, V., & Rothstein, B. (2013). Quality of government and corruption from a European perspective: A comparative study of good government in EU regions. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cheibub, J. A., Gandhi, J., & Vreeland, J. R. (2010). Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice, 143(1/2), 67–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9491-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheibub, J. A., Przeworski, A., & Saiegh, S. M. (2004). Government coalitions and legislative success under presidentialism and parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science, 34(4), 565–587. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123404000195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, A., De La O, A. L., Karlan, D., & Wantchekon, L. (2015). Does corruption information inspire the fight or quash the hope? A field experiment in Mexico on voter turnout, choice, and party identification. The Journal of Politics, 77(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1086/678766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlström, C., & Lapuente, V. (2017). Organizing leviathan: Politicians, bureaucrats, and the making of good government. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlström, C., Lapuente, V., & Teorell, J. (2012). The merit of meritocratization: Politics, bureaucracy, and the institutional deterrents of corruption. Political Research Quarterly, 65(3), 656–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912911408109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Figueiredo, M. F., Hidalgo, F. D., & Kasahara, Y. (2011). When do voters punish corrupt politicians? Experimental evidence from Brazil. Unpublished manuscript. University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Doig, A., & Theobald, R. (eds). (2000). Corruption and democratization. Frank Class.
   Google Scholar
• Dollar, D., Fisman, R., & Gatti, R. (2001). Are women really the “fairer” sex? Corruption and women in government. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 46(4), 423–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00169-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraz, C., Finan, F., & Moreira, D. B. (2012). Corrupting learning: Evidence from missing federal education funds in Brazil. Journal of Public Economics, 96(9), 712–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fish, M. S., & Kroenig, M. (2009). The handbook of national legislatures. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, M. S., Michel, K., & Lindberg, S. I. (2015, June 1). Legislative powers and executive corruption. V-Dem Working Paper 2015:7. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2622570
   Google Scholar
• Fisman, R., & Gatti, R. (2002). Decentralization and corruption: Evidence across countries. Journal of Public Economics, 83(3), 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00158-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuda, E., & Muto, S. (2010). Dynamic analysis of stability of coalition governments in Japan 1993. 日本オペレーションズ・リサーチ学会論文誌, 53(1), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.15807/jorsj.53.69
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A. (1961). A theory of coalition formation. American Sociological Review, 26(3), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.2307/2090664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J., & Thacker, S. C. (2004). Political institutions and corruption: The role of unitarism and parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science, 34(2), 295–330. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123404000067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, A. M. (2007). Political cleaners: Women as the new anti‐corruption force? Development and Change, 38(1), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00404.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golder, S. N., & Thomas, J. A. (2014). Portfolio allocation and the vote of no confidence. British Journal of Political Science, 44(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, S. (2009). Corruption in Sub-Saharan Africa. Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/corruption-sub-saharan-africa
   Google Scholar
• Haque, M. (2014). Accountability for public expenditure in Bangladesh: The principal-agent problem and role of the Office of the Comptroller and Auditor General. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 36(4), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2014.979018
   Google Scholar
• Henisz, W. J. (2017). The political constraint index (POLCON) dataset 2017 release. The University of Pennsylvania. https://mgmt.wharton.upenn.edu/profile/1327
   Google Scholar
• Incerti, T. (2020). Corruption information and vote share: A meta-analysis and lessons for experimental design. American Political Science Review, 114(3), 761–774. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542000012X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indriðason, I. (2015). Live for today, Hope for tomorrow? Rethinking Gamson’s Law (Department of Political Science Working paper). University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Jilke, S., & Baekgaard, M. (2020). The political psychology of citizen satisfaction: Does functional responsibility matter? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(1), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muz012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kailash, K. K. (2014). Institutionalizing a coalitional system and games within coalitions in India (1996–2014). Studies in Indian Politics, 2(2), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/2321023014551875
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2009). Governance matters 8: Aggregate and individual governance indicators 1996–2008. Policy Research working paper; no. WPS 4978. World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/598851468149673121/Governance-matters-VIII-aggregate-and-individual-governance-indicators-1996-2008
   Google Scholar
• Keele, L. J., & Kelly, N. J. (2006). Dynamic models for dynamic theories: The ins and outs of lagged dependent variables. Political Analysis, 14(2), 186–205. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpj006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. (2008). Intra-party politics and minority coalition government in South Korea. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 9(3), 367–389. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1468109908003186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klašnja, M., Tucker, J. A., & Deegan-Krause, K. (2016). Pocketbook vs. sociotropic corruption voting. British Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 67–94. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123414000088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko, K., & Samajdar, A. (2010). Evaluation of international corruption indexes: Should we believe them or not? The Social Science Journal, 47(3), 508–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2010.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2008). The economic consequences of legal origins. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(2), 285–332. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.46.2.285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1999). The quality of government. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15(1), 222–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/15.1.222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, D., Loayza, N. V., & Soares, R. R. (2005). Accountability and corruption: Political institutions matter. Economics and Politics, 17(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.2005.00145.x
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D. S. (2020). Executive control of bureaucracy and presidential cabinet appointments in East Asian democracies. Regulation & Governance, 14(1), 82–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D. S., & Park, S. (2020). Ministerial leadership and endorsement of bureaucrats: Experimental evidence from presidential governments. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 426–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Licht, A. N., Goldschmidt, C., & Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Culture rules: The foundations of the rule of law and other norms of governance. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35(4), 659–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2007.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (1994). Designing Bureaucratic Accountability. Law and Contemporary Problems, 57(1), 91–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/1191988
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, M. G., & Gurr, T. R. (2020). Polity 5: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2018: Dataset users’ manual. Center for Systemic Peace. http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/p5manualv2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mauro, P. (1998). Corruption and the composition of government expenditure. Journal of Public Economics, 69(2), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00025-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCubbins, M. D. (1985). The legislative design of regulatory structure. American Journal of Political Science, 29(4), 721–748. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulinge, M. M., & Lesetedi, G. N. (1998). Interrogating our past: Colonialism and corruption in Sub-Saharan Africa. African Journal of Political Science, 3(2), 15–28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23493651
   Google Scholar
• Müller, W. C., & Strøm, K. (2000). Coalition governments in Western Europe. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nistotskaya, M., Charron, N., & Lapuente, V. (2015). The wealth of regions: Quality of government and SMEs in 172 European regions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(5), 1125–1155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X15610058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olken, B. A. (2009). Corruption perceptions vs. corruption reality. Journal of Public Economics, 93(7), 950–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Painter, M., & Pierre, J. (2005). Unpacking policy capacity: Issues and themes. In M. Painter & J. Pierre (Eds.), Challenges to state policy capacity (pp. 1–18). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, G. B., Jr. (2000). Elections as instruments of democracy: Majoritarian and proportional visions. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, G. B., Jr, & Whitten, G. D. (1993). A cross-national analysis of economic voting: Taking account of the political context. American Journal of Political Science, 37(2), 391–414. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A., Stokes, S., & Manin, B. (1999). Introduction. In A. Przeworski, S. Stokes, & B. Manin (Eds.), Democracy, accountability, and representation(pp. 1–26). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quah, J. S. T. (2009). Benchmarking for excellence: A comparative analysis of seven Asian anti-corruption agencies. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 31(2), 171–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2009.10779362
   Google Scholar
• Razafindrakoto, M., & Roubaud, F. (2010). Are international databases on corruption reliable? A comparison of expert opinion surveys and household surveys in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Development, 38(8), 1057–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. (2011). The quality of government: Corruption, social trust, and inequality in international perspective. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwindt-Bayer, L. A., & Tavits, M. (2016). Clarity of responsibility, accountability, and corruption. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shukhova, A., & Nisnevich, Y. (2017, January 18). Measurement of validity of corruption indices. Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP 42/PS/2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2901307
   Google Scholar
• Sommer, U., Bloom, P. B., & Arikan, G. (2013). Does faith limit immorality? The politics of religion and corruption. Democratization, 20(2), 287–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.650914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standaert, S. (2015). Dividing the level of corruption: A Bayesian state-space approach. Journal of Comparative Economics, 43(3), 782–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2014.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepan, A., & Skach, C. (1993). Constitutional frameworks and democratic consolidation: Parliamentarism versus presidentialism. World Politics, 46(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/2950664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strøm, K. (2000). Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 37(3), 261–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swamy, A., Knack, S., Lee, Y., & Azfar, O. (2001). Gender and corruption. Journal of Development Economics, 64(1), 25–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(00)00123-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavits, M. (2007). Clarity of responsibility and corruption. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00246.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teehankee, J. (2002). Electoral politics in the Philippines. In A. Croissant, G. Bruns, & M. John (Eds.), Electoral politics in Southeast and East Asia (pp. 149–202). Friedrich Ebert Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Treisman, D. (2000). The causes of corruption: A cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics, 76(3), 399–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00092-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, D. (2007). What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research? Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 211–244. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.081205.095418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahman, M., Teorell, J., & Hadenius, A. (2013). Authoritarian regime types revisited: Updated data in comparative perspective. Contemporary Politics, 19(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2013.773200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar