767
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Does bureaucratic performance vary across authoritarian regimes?

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Abdurasulov, A. (2019, June 7). Kazakhstan election: Rare protests in a country that bans dissent. BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-48545166
  • Anckar, C. (2019). Most-similar and most-different systems designs in comparative policy analysis. In B. G. Peters & G. Fontaine (Eds.), Handbook of methodology for comparative policy analysis (pp. 33–48). Edward Elgar.
  • Baimenov, A., & Liebert, S. (2019). Governance in the post‐Soviet era: Challenges and opportunities. Public Administration Review, 79(2), 281–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13014
  • Baimyrzaeva, M. (2012). Institutional reforms in public sector: What did we learn? Emerald Publishing.
  • Baimyrzaeva, M. (2019). Public administration in Kyrgyzstan. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance (p. 78). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3657-1
  • Baisalov, B. (2019, May). Edil Baisalov nominated for Ambassador of Kyrgyzstan to UK. Central Asia News.
  • BBC News. (2019, March 19). Kazakh leader Nazarbayev resigns after three decades. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-47628854
  • Bekbolotov, K. (2007). On the path to ideal Bureaucracy: The future of public service in Kyrgyzstan. Institute for Public Policy.
  • Bertelli, A. M., Hassan, M., Honig, D., Rogger, D., & Williams, M. J. (2020). An agenda for the study of public administration in developing countries. Governance, 33(4), 735–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12520
  • Bertelsmann Transformation Index. (2021). Kyrgyzstan Country Report. https://www.bti-project.org/content/en/downloads/reports/country_report_2021_KGZ.pdf
  • Cilliler, Y. (2021). Revisiting the authoritarian pattern in Turkey: Transition to presidential system. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies (pp. 1–17). doi:10.1080/14683857.2021.1992908
  • Civil Service Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2020). National civil service report.
  • Collins, K. (2006). Clan politics and regime transition in Central Asia. Cambridge University Press.
  • Costa Buranelli, F. (2020). Authoritarianism as an institution? The case of Central Asia. International Studies Quarterly, 64(4), 1005–1016. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaa058
  • Cummings, S., & Norgaard, O. (2004). Conceptualising state capacity: Comparing Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. Political Studies, 52(4), 685–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00503.x
  • Cummings, S. (2000). Kazakhstan: Centre – periphery relations. The Royal Institute of International Affairs.
  • Dahlström, C., & Lapuente, V. (2017). Organizing leviathan: Politicians, bureaucrats, and the making of good government. Cambridge University Press.
  • De Neve, J. E., & Sachs, J. D. (2020). Sustainable development and human well-being. World Happiness Report (pp. 112–127).
  • De Vries, M., & Sobis, I. (2014). Reluctant reforms: The case of Kazakhstan. Public Organization Review, 14(2), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-012-0210-y
  • Del Sordi, A., & Libnam, A. (2020). Kazakhstan: A possible future authoritarian gravity center? In M. Kneuer, and T. Demmelhuber (Eds.), Authoritarian gravity centers: A cross-regional study of authoritarian promotion and diffusion (pp. 138–171). International: WBI Studies Repository.
  • Dukenbaev, A., & Tanyrykov, V. (2001). Politico–administrative relations in Kyrgyzstan and Central Asia. In T. Verheijen (Ed.), Politico-administrative relations: Who rules? (pp. 175–202). NISPAcee.
  • Emrich-Bakenova, S. (2009). Trajectory of civil service development in Kazakhstan: Nexus of politics and administration. Governance, 22(4), 717–745. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01460.x
  • Emrich-Bakenova, S. (2021). Public service provision in Kazakhstan: Challenges to procedural fairness. In A. Koulouri, and N. Mouraviev (Eds.), Kazakhstan’s developmental journey: Entrenched paradigms, achievements, and the challenge of global competitiveness (pp. 131–152). Singapore: Springer.
  • Engvall, J. (2014). Why are public offices sold in Kyrgyzstan? Post-Soviet Affairs, 30(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2013.818785
  • Evans, P. (1995). Embedded autonomy. Princeton University Press.
  • Freedom House. (2021). Nations in transit: Dropping the democratic Façade. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2020-04/05062020_FH_NIT2020_vfinal.pdf
  • Fuchs, D., Schlipphak, B., Treib, O., Long, L. A. N., & Lederer, M. (2020). Which way forward in measuring the quality of life? A critical analysis of sustainability and well-being indicator sets. Global Environmental Politics, 20(2), 12–36. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00554
  • Gafuri, A., & Muftuler-Bac, M. (2021). Caught between stability and democracy in the Western Balkans: A comparative analysis of paths of accession to the European Union. East European Politics, 37(2), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2020.1781094
  • Ibrayeva, A. R., & Nezhina, T. (2017). Public sector reforms in Kazakhstan. In S. Liebert, S. E. Condrey, & D. Goncharov (Eds.), Public administration in post-communist countries (pp. 43–68). Routledge.
  • Isaacs, R. (2013). Nur-Otan, Informal networks, and the countering of Elite instability in Kazakhstan: Bringing the ‘formal’ back in. Europe-Asia Studies, 65(6), 1055–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2013.802547
  • Janenova, S., & Knox, C. (2019). Civil service reform in Kazakhstan: Trajectory to the 30 most developed countries? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(3), 419–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317722397
  • Junisbai, B., & Junisbai, A. (2019). Regime type versus patronal politics: A comparison of “ardent democrats” in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. Post-Soviet Affairs, 35(3), 240–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2019.1568144
  • Junisbai, B. (2010). A tale of two Kazakhstans: Sources of political cleavage and conflict in the post-Soviet period. Europe-Asia Studies, 62(2), 235–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130903506813
  • Knox, C., & Janenova, S. (2019). The e-government paradox in post-Soviet countries. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(6), 600–615. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-08-2018-0173
  • Knox, C., & Janenova, S. (2020). Depicting public servants in authoritarian regimes. In H. Sullivan, H. Dickinson, & H. Henderson (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of the public servant (pp. 1–19). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03008-7_55-1
  • Kudaibergenova, D. (2015). The ideology of development and legitimation: Beyond ‘Kazakhstan 2030. Central Asian Survey, 34(4), 440–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2015.1115275
  • Levy, J. S. (2008). Case studies: Types, designs, and logics of inference. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 25(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388940701860318
  • Liebert, S. (2014). Challenges of reforming the civil service in the Post-Soviet era: The case of Kyrgyzstan. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 34(4), 403–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X13500320
  • Liu, X., Zhang, Y., & Vedlitz, A. (2021). Political values and life satisfaction in China. The China Quarterly, 245, 276–291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741020000272
  • Marat, E. (2006). The state-crime nexus in Central Asia: State weakness, organized crime, and corruption in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program.
  • Masanov, N. (2000). Political elite in Kazakhstan: The changes of Kazakhstani political elite during the period of sovereignty. International Eurasian Institute for Economic and Political Research.
  • Means, G. P. (1996). Soft authoritarianism in Malaysia and Singapore. Journal of Democracy, 7(4), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1996.0065
  • Mehta, K., Ehrenwirth, M., Trinkl, C., Zörner, W., & Greenough, R. (2021). The energy situation in central asia: A comprehensive energy review focusing on rural areas. Energies, 14(10), 2805. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14102805
  • Mill, J. S. (1970/1885). A system of logic. Longman.
  • Mollah, M., & Hossain, A. (2015). Does colonial rule matter for governance? A study in the context of bureaucracy in Bangladesh. International Journal of Political Science and Development, 3(10), 416–427. doi:10.14662/IJPSD2015.050
  • Mussagulova, A. (2021a). Three Essays on Bureaucracy: Post-Communist Context [ PhD Thesis]. Nanyang Technological University.
  • Mussagulova, A. (2021b). Newly independent, path dependent: The impact of the Soviet past on innovation in post-Soviet states. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 43(2), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2020.1805338
  • Nistotskaya, M., Dahlberg, S., Dahlström, C., L Sundström, A., Axelsson, S., Dalli, C. M., & Pachon, N. A. (2021). The quality of government expert survey (Wave III) report. University of Gothenburg.
  • Novikova, I., & Liebert, S. (2021). Citizens’ perception of government responsiveness: Building an engaged citizenry. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 43(4), 298–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2021.1966815
  • O’Connor, K., Janenova, S., & Knox, C. (2019). Open government in authoritarian regimes. International Review of Public Policy, 1(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.4000/irpp.325
  • O’Connor, K., Knox, C., & Janenova, S. (2021). Bureaucrats, authoritarianism, and role conceptions. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 41(2), 358–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X19888009
  • OECD. (2018). Benchmarking civil service reform in Kazakhstan. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264288096-en
  • Oleinik, A., Yermekov, M., & Kuatbekov, Z. (2015). Power distance, sub-ethnic groups, and teams of civil servants: Overlooked factors of administrative reform in Kazakhstan? Public Policy and Administration, 30(2), 182–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076714559327
  • Pelizzo, R., & Knox, C. (2021). Sobriety, human dignity and public morality’: Ethical standards in Kazakhstan. Public Money and Management, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1948671
  • Pepinsky, T., Pierskalla, J., & Sacks, A. (2017). Bureaucracy and service delivery. Annual Review of Political Science, 20(1), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-022705
  • Peters, B. G. (2015). Policy capacity in public administration. Policy and Society, 34(3–4), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.09.005
  • Peters, B. G. (2021). Studying public administration in authoritarian regimes. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 43(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2020.1870241
  • Pomfret, R. (2005). Kazakhstan’s economy since independence: Does the oil boom offer a second chance for sustainable development? Europe-Asia Studies, 57(6), 859–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130500199467
  • Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The logic of comparative social inquiry. Wiley.
  • Rauch, J. E., & Evans, P. B. (2000). Bureaucratic structure and bureaucratic performance in less developed countries. Journal of Public Economics, 75(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00044-4
  • Satpayev, D. (2007). An analysis of the internal structure of Kazakhstan’s political elite and an assessment of political risk levels. In M. Haghayeghi (Ed.), Empire, Islam and politics in Central Asia (pp. 283–300). Slavic Eurasian Research Center.
  • Schatz, E. (2004). Modern clan politics and beyond: The power of ‘blood’ in Kazakhstan. University of Washington Press.
  • Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case study selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907313077
  • Sharipova, D. (2015). State retrenchment and informal institutions in Kazakhstan: People’s perceptions of informal reciprocity in the healthcare sector. Central Asian Survey, 34(3), 310–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2015.1044199
  • Sloane-White, P., & Beaulieu, I. (2010). Beyond 50 years of political stability in Malaysia: Rent and the weapons of the power elite. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue Canadienne D’études Du Développement, 30(3–4), 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2010.9669308
  • The Astana Times. (2021, April 22). Kazakhstan’s national council of public trust has become integral part of civil society. https://astanatimes.com/2021/04/kazakhstans-national-council-of-public-trust-has-become-integral-part-of-civil-society/
  • Tunçer-Kilavuz, I. (2009). Political and social networks in Tajikistan and Uzbekistan: “Clan”, religion, and beyond. Central Asian Survey, 28(3), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634930903445052
  • UN E-Government Index. (2020). https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2020
  • United Nations Development Programme. (2020). Human development reports. http://hdr.undp.org/en/2020-report
  • World Bank Country Reports. (2020). https://data.worldbank.org/country
  • World Bank Country Reports. (2021). https://data.worldbank.org/country
  • Worldwide Governance Indicators. (2021). https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.