Public administration in authoritarian regimes

References

• Bauer, M. W., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., Yesilkagit, K., & Becker, S. (Eds.). (2021). Democratic backsliding, populism and public administration. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bermeo, N. (2016). On democratic backsliding. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boese, V. A., Lindberg, S. I., & Lührmann, A. (2021). Waves of autocratization and democratization: A rejoinder. Democratization, 28(6), 1202–1210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1923006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boix, C., & And, M. W. S. (2013). The foundations of limited authoritarian government: Institutions, commitment and powersharing in dictatorships. The Journal of Politics, 75(2), 300–316. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613000029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, T.-J., Haggard, S., & Kang, D. (1998). Institutions and growth in Korea and Taiwan: The bureaucracy. The Journal of Development Studies, 34(6), 87–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389808422547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. N. L. (2005). The politics of administrative reform in Asia: Paradigms and legacies, paths and diversities. Governance, 18(2), 257–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2005.00275.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chibber, V. (2002). Bureaucratic rationality and the developmental state. The American Journal of Sociology, 107(4), 951–989. https://doi.org/10.1086/341010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deare, C. A. (2021). Militarization a la AMLO: How bad caniIt get?. The Wilson Center).
   Google Scholar
• Duong, H. (2023). Political parties and policy transfer in authoritarianism. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2022.2045206
   Google Scholar
• Frankenberg, G., (2019). Authoritarian constitutionalism: Coming to terms with modernity’s nightmares. In H. A. Garcia and Frankenberg (Ed.), Authoritarian Constitutionalism: Analysis and critique (pp. 1–36). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gong, H., Jiang, H., & Leung, J. C. B. (2018). The changing relationship between the Chinese government and non-governmental organizations in social service delivery. Asia-Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 29(2), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2018.1525762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernes, T. (2005). Four ideal-type organizational responses to new public management reforms and some consequences. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852305051680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hupe, P. (2019). Research handbook on street-level bureaucracy. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Knox, C. G. A., & Janenova, S. (2023a). Does bureaucratic performance vary across authoritarian regimes? Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2022.2026794
   Google Scholar
• Knox, C. G. A., & Janenova, S. (2023b). Political patronage in Kazakhstan. In B. G. Peters, C. G. Knox, & B. S. Kim (Eds.), Political patronage in Asian countries. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., & Way, L. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the cold war. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muno, W., & Briceno, H. (2021). Venezuela: Sidelining public administration under a revolutionary, populist regime. In M. W. Bauer, B. G. Peters, J. Pierre, K. Yesilkagit, & S. Becker (Eds.), Democratic backsliding, populism and public administration (pp. 200–220). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muno, W., & Briceño, H. (2023). Autocratization and public administration: The revolutionary-populist regime in Venezuela in comparative perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussagulova, A., & Van der Wal, Z. (2021). “All still quiet on the non-Western front?” non-Western public service motivation scholarship: 2015–2020. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 43(1), 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2020.1836977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, G. (1988). Bureaucratic authoritarianism: Argentina 1966-1973 in comparative perspective. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. (2006). The New Public Governance? 1. Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600853022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepinsky, T. (2014). The institutional turn in comparative authoritarianism. British Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 631–653. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123413000021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L. A., & Hondeghem, A. (2008). Motivation in public management: The call of public service. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (2023). Success and failure in administrative reform. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Riggs, F. W. (1964). Administration in developing countries: A theory of prismatic society. Houghton-Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Ripoll, G., & Rode, M. (2023). Is there passion for public service in authoritarian bureaucracies? exploring public service motivation across regime types. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2022.2035238
   Google Scholar
• Schedler, A. (2013). The Politics of Uncertainty: Sustaning and Subverting Electoral Authortarianism. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., Andersen, L. B., Greve, C., & Klausen, K. K. (2020). Public governance paradigms. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Truex, R. (2017). Consultative Authoritarianism and its Limits. Comparative political studies, 50, 329–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Soest, C., & Grauvogel, J. (2017). Identity, procedures and performance: How authoritarian regimes legitimize their rule. Contemporary Politics, 23(3), 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2017.1304319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigoda, E. (2002). From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens and the next generation of public administration. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerramsetti, S. (2023). Public sector digitalisation and stealth intrusions upon individual freedoms and democratic accountability. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2022.2110909
   Google Scholar