Necessary But Not Sufficient: Science and Sentencing Reform

Reference

• Blumstein, Alfred (1984) “Sentencing Reforms: Impacts and Implications,” 68 Judicature 129.
   Google Scholar
• Carrow, Deborah M. (1984) “Judicial Sentencing Guidelines: Hazards of the Middle Ground,” 68 Judicature 161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, Lief H. (1986) “How Trial Judges Talk: Speculations About Formalism and Pragmatism in Legal Culture.” Paper presented at the annual meeting ofthe American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, John (1978) “The Law and Its Promises: Flat Terms, Good Time, and Flexible Incarceration,” in Determinate Sentencing: Reform or Regression? Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Fogel, David (1975) We are the Living Proof: The Justice Model for Corrections. Cincinnati: Anderson.
   Google Scholar
• Galegher, Jolene and John S. Carroll (1983) “Voluntary Sentencing Guidelines: Prescription for Justice or Patent Medicine?” 7 Law and Human Behavior 361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, Don, Leslie T. Wilkins, Peter B. Hoffman and Susan M. Singer (1974) The Utilization of Experience in Parole Decision-Making: A Summary Report. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, Stephen D. and Ralph B. Tayler (1984) “Public Policy and Prison Populations: Measuring Opinions About Reform,” 68 Judicature 190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt, John D., Robert M. Regoli and Todd R. Clear (1982) “Evaluating the Cook County Sentencing Guidelines: A Replication and Extension,” 4 Law and Policy Quarterly 252.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, Peter B. and Don M. Gottfredson (1973) Paroling Policy Guidelines: A Matter of Equity. Davis, California: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, Kay A. (1984) “What Sentencing Reform in Minnesota Has and Has Not Accomplished,” 68 Judicature 181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, Martin A. (1977) Urban Politics and the Criminal Courts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mcallister, Bill (1987) “If a Human Life is Worth $1 Million, What’s a Recliner Worth?” Washington Post National Weekly Edition, June 8, p. 33.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, Norval and Marc Miller (1987) Predictions of Dangerousness in the Criminal Law. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Packer, Herbert L. (1968) The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petersilia, Joan (1983) Racial Disparities in the Criminal Justice System. Santa Monica, California: The RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Price, Albert and B. Grant Stitt (1987) “Consistent Crime Control Philosophy and Policy: A Theoretical Analysis,” 11 Criminal Justice Review 23.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, William D., L. Paul Sutton, Todd R. Clear and Michael J. Saks (1982) Sentencing by Mathematics: An Evaluation of the Early Attempts to Develop and Implement Sentencing Guidelines. Williamsburg, Virginia: National Center for State Courts.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, Martin (1982) “On Predicting the Future of Administrative Law,” 6 Regulation 18 (#3, May/June).
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, Martin (1986) “Who Guards the Guardians: Judicial Control of Bureaucratic Discretion.” Richard B. Russell Lectures at the University of Georgia (October 1 and 2).
   Google Scholar
• Sperlich, Peter W. (1985) “The Evidence on Evidence: Science and Law in Conflict and Co-operation,” in Saul M. Kassin and Lawrence S. Wrightsman (eds.) The Psychology of Evidence and Trial Procedure. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Talarico, Susette M. (1979) “What Do We Expect of Criminal Justice: Questions of Sanction Policy, Sentencing Reform, and Politics in the Post-Conviction Process,” 4 Criminal Justice Review 55.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Haag, Ernest (1975) Punishing Criminals: Concerning a Very Old and Painful Question. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Von Hirsch, Andrew (1976) Doing Justice: The Choice of Punishments. New York: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, Leslie T., Jack M. Kress, Don M. Gottfredson, Joseph C. Calpin and Arthur M. Gelman (1978) Sentencing Guidelines: Structuring Judicial Discretion: Report on the Feasibility Study. Washington, D.C.: U.S.Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, James Q. (1983) Thinking About Crime. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar