A Comparison of the Degree of Effort Involved in the TOMM and the ACS Word Choice Test Using a Dual-Task Paradigm

REFERENCES

• An, K., Zakzanis, K. K. & Joordens, S. (2012). Conducting research with non-clinical healthy undergraduates: Does effort play a role in neuropsychological test performance? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27, 849–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armistead-Jehle, P. & Gervais, R. O. (2011). Sensitivity of the Test of Memory Malingering and the Nonverbal Medical Symptom Validity Test: A replication study. Applied Neuropsychology, 18, 284–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelrod, B. N. & Schutte, C. (2011). Concurrent validity of three forced-choice measures of symptom validity. Applied Neuropsychology, 18, 27–33. doi:10.1080/09084282.2010.523369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batt, K., Shores, A. & Chekaluk, E. (2008). The effect of distraction on the Word Memory Test and Test of Memory Malingering performance in patients with a severe brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 14, 1074–1080. doi:10.1017/S135561770808237X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, L. & McCaffrey, R. J. (2006). Coverage of the Test of Memory Malingering, Victoria Symptom Validity Test, and Word Memory Test on the Internet: Is test security threatened? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21, 121–126. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2005.06.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender, S. D. (2008). Malingered traumatic brain injury. In R. Rogers (Eds.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (3rd ed., pp. 69–86). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, A. M., Meyer, S., David, E., Pella, R., Hill, B. D. & Gouvier, D. (2009). The vulnerability to coaching across measures of effort. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 314–328. doi:10.1080/13854040802054151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane, H. J., Baker, G. A. & Meudell, P. R. (1998). Simulating a memory impairment: Can amnesics implicitly outperform simulators? British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 31–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craik, F. J. M. (1982). Selective changes in encoding as a function of reduced processing capacity. In F. Klic J. Hoffman & E. Van der Meers (Eds.), Cognitive research in psychology (pp. 152–161). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• DenBoer, J. W. & Hall, S. (2007). Neuropsychological test performance of successful brain injury simulators. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21, 943–955. doi:10.1080/13854040601020783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdal, K. (2004). The effects of motivation, coaching, and knowledge of neuropsychology on the simulated malingering of head injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 73–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, R. O., Rohling, M. L., Green, P. & Ford, W. (2004). A comparison of WMT, CARB and TOMM failure rates in non-head injured disability claimants. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 475–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, P. (2011). Comparison between the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) and the Nonverbal Medical Symptom Validity Test (NV-MSVT) in adults with disability claims. Applied Neuropsychology, 18, 18–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, P., Allen, L. M. & Astner, K. (1996). The Word Memory Test: A user's guide to the oral and computer-administered forms, US Version 1.1. Durham, NC: CogniSyst.
   Google Scholar
• Heilbronner, R. L., Sweet, J. J., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., Millis, S. R. & Conference Participants. (2009). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology consensus conference statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 1093–1129. doi:10.1080/13854040903155063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iverson, G. L., Lange, R. T., Brooks, B. L. & Rennison, V. L. A. (2010). ‘Good old days’ bias following mild traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 24, 17–37. doi:10.1080/13854040903190797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelicic, M., Ceunen, E., Peters, M. J. V. & Merckelbach, H. (2011). Detecting coached feigning using the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) and the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67, 850–855. doi:10.1002/jclp/20805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M., Boone, K., Victor, T., Marion, S., Amano, S., Cottingham, M. & Zeller, M. A. (2010). The Warrington Recognition Memory Test for Words as a measure of response bias: Total score and response time cutoffs developed on “real world” credible and noncredible subjects. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 25(1), 410–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabee, G. J. (2007). Introduction: Malingering, research designs, and base rates. In G. J. Larrabee (Ed.), Assessment of malingered neuropsychological deficits (pp. 3–13). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarter, R. J., Walton, N. H., Brooks, D. N. & Powell, G. E. (2009). Effort testing in contemporary UK neuropsychological practice. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 1050–1066. doi:10.1080/13854040802665790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merten, T., Boosink, L. & Schmand, B. (2007). On the limits of effort testing: Symptom validity tests and severity of neurocognitive symptoms in nonlitigant patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 29, 308–318. doi:10.1080/13803390600693607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. B., Millis, S. R., Rapport, L. J., Bashem, J. R., Hanks, R. A. & Axelrod, B. N. (2011). Detection of insufficient effort using the Advanced Clinical Solutions for the Wechsler Memory Scale, Fourth Edition. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 25, 160–172. doi:10.1080/13854046.2010.533197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Bryant, S. E. & Lucas, J. A. (2006). Estimating the predictive value of the Test of Memory Malingering: An illustrative example of clinicians. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20, 533–540. doi:10.1080/13854040590967568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (1991). Images in mild: The evolution of theory. New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson. (2009). Advanced clinical solutions for the WAIS-IV and WMS-IV. Sans Antonio, TX: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Pivovarova, E., Rosenfeld, B., Dole, T., Green, D. & Zapf, P. (2009). Are measures of cognitive effort and motivation useful in differentiating feigned from genuine psychiatric symptoms? International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 8, 271–278. doi:10.1080/14999011003635514
   Google Scholar
• Powell, M. R., Gfeller, J. D., Hendricks, B. L. & Sharland, M. (2004). Detecting symptom- and test-coached simulators with the Test of Memory Malingering. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 693–702. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2004.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees, L. M., Tombaugh, T. N., Gansler, D. A. & Moczynski, N. P. (1998). Five validation experiments of the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM). Psychological Assessment, 10, 10–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (1997). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Russler, J., Brett, A., Klaue, U., Sailer, M. & Munte, T. F. (2008). The effect of coaching on the simulated malingering of memory impairment. BMC Neurology, 8, 37–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharland, M. J. & Gfeller, J. D. (2007). A survey of neuropsychologists' beliefs and practices with respect to the assessment of effort. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22, 213–223. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2006.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard, R. N. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 61, 156–163.
   Google Scholar
• Sollman, M. J. & Berry, D. T. R. (2011). Detection of inadequate effort on neuropsychological testing: A meta-analytic update and extension. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 26, 774–789. doi:10.1093/arclin/acr066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of inference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.
   Google Scholar
• Suhr, J. A. & Gunstad, J. (2007). Coaching and malingering: A review. In G. J. Larrabee (Ed.), Assessment of malingered neuropsychological deficits (pp. 287–311). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teicher, G. & Wagner, M. T. (2004). Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM): Normative data from cognitively intact, cognitively impaired, and elderly patients with dementia. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 455–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tombaugh, T. N. (1996). TOMM—Test of Memory Malingering. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Tombaugh, T. N. (1997). The Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM): Normative data from cognitively intact and cognitively impaired individuals. Psychological Assessment, 9, 260–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickery, C. D., Berry, D. T. R., Dearth, C. S., Vagnini, V. L., Baser, R. E., Crager, D. E. & Orey, S. A. (2004). Head injury and the ability to feign neuropsychological data. Archives of Neuropsychology, 19, 37–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrington, E. K. (1984). Recognition Memory Test. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Weinborn, M., Woods, S. P., Nulsen, C. & Leighton, A. (2012). Effects of coaching on the Verbal and Nonverbal Medical Symptom Validity Tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 26, 832–849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar