REFERENCES
- Bryden, P. J., & Roy, E. A. (2005). A new method of administering the Grooved Pegboard Test: Performance as a function of handedness and sex. Brain and Cognition, 58, 258–268. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2004.12.004
- Halstead, W. C. (1947). Brain and intelligence. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Heaton, R. K., Grant, I., & Matthews, C. G. (1992). Comprehensive norms for an expanded Halstead-Reitan Battery. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
- Lafayette Instrument. (2002). Grooved Pegboard Test user instructions. Lafayette, IN: Author.
- Reitan, R. M., & Davison, L. A. (1974). Clinical neuropsychology: Current status and applications. Washington, DC: V. H. Winston.
- Ruff, R. M., & Parker, S. B. (1993). Gender- and age-specific changes in motor speed and eye–hand coordination in adults: Normative values for the Finger Tapping and Grooved Pegboard Tests. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76, 1219–1230.
- Schmidt, S. L., Oliveira, R. M., Rocha, F. R., & Abreu-Villaca, Y. (2000). Influences of handedness and gender on the Grooved Pegboard Test. Brain and Cognition, 44, 445–454.
- Thompson, L. L., Heaton, K. R., Matthews, C. G., & Grant, I. (1987). Comparison of preferred and nonpreferred hand performance on four neuropsychological motor tasks. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 1, 324–334.
- Tiffin, J., & Asher, E. J. (1948). The Purdue Pegboard: Norms and studies of reliability and validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 234–247.