1,427
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Test–retest reliability and convergent validity of attention measures

, &

References

  • Becker, R. E. (2007). Lessons from Darwin: 21(st) century designs for clinical trials. Current Alzheimer Research, 4(4), 458–467. doi:10.2174/156720507781788828
  • Borenstein, M., Cooper, H., Hedges, L., & Valentine, J. (2009). Effect sizes for continuous data. The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis, 2, 221–235.
  • Botella, J., Contreras, M. J., Shih, P. C., & Rubio, V. (2001). Two short tests fail to detect vigilance decrements. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(1), 48–55. doi:10.1027//1015-5759.17.1.48
  • Brickenkamp, R. (2002). d2, test de atención (adapt. Nicolás Seisdedos Cubero) [d2 Test of Attention]. Madrid, Spain: TEA Ediciones.
  • Castillo, M. D. (2009). La atención [Attention]. Madrid, Spain: Pirámide.
  • Chan, R. C., & Lai, M. K. (2006). Latent structure of the test of everyday attention: Convergent evidence from patients with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 20(6), 653–659. doi:10.1080/02699050600676974
  • Chan, R. C., Lai, M. K., & Robertson, I. H. (2006). Latent structure of the test of everyday attention in a non-clinical Chinese sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21(5), 477–485. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2006.06.007
  • Chen, H. C., Koh, C. L., Hsieh, C. L., & Hsueh, I. P. (2013). Test of everyday attention in patients with chronic stroke: Test–retest reliability and practice effects. Brain Injury, 27(10), 1148–1154. doi:10.3109/02699052.2013.775483
  • Conners, C. K. (1994). The Conners Continuous Performance Test. Toronto, Canada: Multi Health Systems.
  • Conners, C. K. (2004). Conners Continuous Performance Test (2nd ed.). Toronto, Canada: Multi Health Systems.
  • Conners, C. K., & Staff, M. H. S. (2000). Conners’ Continuous Performance Test II (CPT II V. 5). North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
  • Course-Choi, J., Saville, H., & Derakshan, N. (2017). The effects of adaptive working memory training and mindfulness meditation training on processing efficiency and worry in high worriers. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 89, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2016.11.002
  • Fillmore, M. T. (2003). Drug abuse as a problem of impaired control: Current approaches and findings. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 2, 179–197. doi:10.1177/1534582303257007
  • García-Sevilla, J. (2008). Manual de psicología de la atención [Manual of psychology of attention, 2nd edition] (Segunda Edición). Madrid, Spain: Síntesis.
  • Gordon, M. (1986). Gordon diagnostic system. Manual. New York, NY: Gordon Diagnostic Systems.
  • Hernández-Mendo, A., del Pozo, A., & Pastrana, J. L. (2012). Procesos Atencionales. [Attentional processes]. Safe Creative: Código: 1204281545550. 28-abr-2012 15:23
  • Jensen, A. R. (1965). Scoring the Stroop test. Acta Psychologica, 24, 398–408. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(65)90024-7
  • Lavie, N. (2010). Attention, distraction, and cognitive control under load. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(3), 143–148. doi:10.1177/0963721410370295
  • Leark, R. A., Greenberg, L. K., Kindschi, C. L., Dupuy, T. R., & Hughes, S. J. (2007). Test of variables of attention: Clinical manual. Los Alamitos: The TOVA Company.
  • Lee, P., Li, P. C., Liu, C. H., & Hsieh, C. L. (2011). Test–retest reliability of two attention tests in schizophrenia. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 26(5), 405–411. doi:10.1093/arclin/acr038
  • Lemay, S., Bedard, M. A., Rouleau, I., & Tremblay, P. L. G. (2004). Practice effect and test–retest reliability of attentional and executive tests in middle-aged to elderly subjects. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 18(2), 284–302. doi:10.1080/13854040490501718
  • Logan, G. D. (1980). Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 523–553. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90019-5
  • Lord, F. M., Novick, M. R., & Birnbaum, A. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores.
  • Lozano, J. H., Capote, E., & Fernández, M. P. (2015). Validez convergente de las medidas de atención e impulsividad del Test de Discriminación Visual Simple de Árboles (DiViSA-UAM). [Convergent validity of the measures of attention and impulsivity of The Trees Simple Visual Discrimination Test (DIVISA)]. Anales de Psicología 31 (1), 74–83.
  • Lufi, D., & Fichman, N. (2012). Development and use of a computerized test, Math–CPT, to assess attention. Perceptual and motor skills, 114(1), 59–74. doi:10.2466/08.11.22. pms.114.1.59-74
  • Paap, K. R., & Sawi, O. (2016). The role of test–retest reliability in measuring individual and group differences in executive functioning. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 274, 81–93. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.10.002
  • Petersen, S. E., & Posner, M. I. (2012). The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 35, 73–89. doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150525
  • Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25–42. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.13.1.25
  • Reitan, R. M. (1992). Trail Making Test: Manual for administration and scoring. Tucson, AZ: Reitan Neuropsychology Laboratory.
  • Ríos-Lago, M., Periáñez, J. A., & Rodríguez-Sánchez, J. M. (2011). Neuropsicología de la atención. En J. Tirapu, M. Ríos-Lago, & F. Maestú (Eds.), Manual de Neuropsicología [Manual of Neuropsychology] (2nd ed., pp. 149–188). Barcelona, Spain: Viguera.
  • Robertson, I. H., Ward, T., Ridgeway, V., & NimmoSmith, I. (1994). The Test of Everyday Attention. Bury St. Edmunds,UK: Thames Valley Test Company
  • Rousson, V., Gasser, T., & Seifert, B. (2002). Assessing intrarater, interrater and test–retest reliability of continuous measurements. Statistics in Medicine, 21(22), 3431–3446. doi:10.1002/sim.1253
  • Ruff, R. M., & Allen, C. C. (1996). Ruff 2 and 7 Selective Attention Test professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
  • Ruff, R. M., Evans, R. W., & Light, R. H. (1986). Automatic detection vs. controlled search: A paper and pencil approach. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 62, 407–416. doi:10.2466/pms.1986.62.2.407
  • Santacreu, J., & Quiroga, M. A. (2015). The DiViSA’s predictive validity by age: An objective online test of attention. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 18, E98. doi:10.1017/sjp.2015.103
  • Santacreu, J., Shih, P. C., & Quiroga, M. A. (2011). DiViSA. Test de Discriminación Visual Simple de Árboles. Manual. [The Trees Simple Visual Discrimination Test. Manual.]. Madrid, Spain: TEA Ediciones, SA.
  • Servera, M., & Llabrés, J. (2004). CSAT. Test de atención sostenida en la infancia [Test of sustained attention in childhood]. Madrid, Spain: TEA Ediciones, SA.
  • Shalev, L., Ben-Simon, A., Mevorach, C., Cohen, Y., & Tsal, Y. (2011). Conjunctive Continuous Performance Task (CCPT)—A pure measure of sustained attention. Neuropsychologia, 49(9), 2584–2591. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.05.006
  • Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643–662. doi:10.1037/h0054651
  • Verbruggen, F., Logan, G. D., & Stevens, M. A. (2008). STOP-IT: Windows executable software for the stop-signal paradigm. Behavior Research Methods, 40(2), 479–483. doi:10.3758/brm.40.2.479
  • Weafer, J., Baggott, M. J., & de Wit, H. (2013). Test–retest reliability of behavioral measures of impulsive choice, impulsive action, and inattention. Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 21(6), 475–481. doi:10.1037/a0033659
  • Wilding, J., & Cornish, K. (2007). Independence of speed and accuracy in visual search: Evidence for separate mechanisms. Child Neuropsychology, 13(6), 510–521. doi:10.1080/09297040601160574
  • Wöstmann, N. M., Aichert, D. S., Costa, A., Rubia, K., Möller, H. J., & Ettinger, U. (2013). Reliability and plasticity of response inhibition and interference control. Brain and Cognition, 81(1), 82–94. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2012.09.010
  • Zhao, Q., Guo, Q., Li, F., Zhou, Y., Wang, B., & Hong, Z. (2013). The shape trail test: Application of a new variant of the trail making test. PLoS ONE 8(2), e57333. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057333

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.