Organizational Formation for Priority Setting: Historical Perspectives and Thematic Analysis of India’s Health Technology Assessment Agency

References

• Roberts M, Hsiao W, Berman P, Reich M. Getting health reform right: a guide to improving performance and equity. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton BD. Health care market concentration trends in the United States: evidence and policy responses. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017;36(9):1530–13. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu T, Wu AW, Makary MA. The potential hazards of hospital consolidation: implications for quality, access, and price. JAMA. 2015;314(13):1337–38. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.7492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boin A, Christensen T. The development of public institutions: reconsidering the role of leadership. Adm Soc. 2008;40(3):271–97. doi:10.1177/0095399707313700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boin A, Fahy LA, ‘t Hart P. Guardians of public value: how public organisations become and remain institutions. Boin A, Fahy LA, ‘t Hart P, editors. Springer Nature; 2021. 10.1007/978-3-030-51701-4.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas S, Schillemans T, ‘t Hart P, Ansell C, Bøgh Andersen L, Flinders M, Head B, Moynihan D, Nabatchi T, O’Flynn J. et al. Rising to Ostrom’s challenge: an invitation to walk on the bright side of public governance and public service. Policy Des Pract. 2021;4(4):441–51. doi:10.1080/25741292.2021.1972517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tendler J. Good government in the tropics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett M, Ramesh M. Studying public policy: policy cycles and policy subsystems. Toronto; New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Campos PA, Reich MR. Political analysis for health policy implementation. Health Syst Reform. 2019;5(3):224–35. doi:10.1080/23288604.2019.1625251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planning Commission, Government of India. Twelfth five year plan (2012–2017): social sectors. New Delhi, India: SAGE Publications; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Rajya Sabha Secretariat. Department-related parliamentary standing committee on health and family welfare sixty-ninth report on demands for grants 2013–14 (demand No.49) of the department of health research (ministry of health and family welfare). Report No.: 69. New Delhi: New Delhi: Parliament of India, Rajya Sabha; 2013. p. 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• The Department of Health Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, UK. Memorandum of understanding (MoU) between the department of health research, ministry of health and family welfare, government of India and the national institute for health and care excellence, UK on a strategic and technical cooperation with regard to evidence-informed healthcare policy and practice; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• NICE International. Better decisions for better health: priority setting and health technology assessment for universal health coverage in India; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• National Health Systems Resource Center, New Delhi, World Health Organization Country Office for India. Compendium of health technology assessments: an evidence-based approach to technology-related policy making in health care. World Health Organization; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Report on the 2016 conference on priority setting for universal health coverage. Bangkok, Thailand: Prince Mahidol Award Conference (PMAC); 2016. p. 1–181.
   Google Scholar
• NICE International, International Decision Support Initiative (IDSI). The Current Status of Priority setting and Health Technology Assessment for Universal Health Coverage in India. 2015. p. 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Sonawane DB, Karvande SS, Cluzeau FA, Chavan SA, Mistry NF. Appraisal of maternity management and family planning guidelines using the agree II instrument in India. Indian J Public Health. 2015;59(4):264. doi:10.4103/0019-557X.169651.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Study Visit of Indian Delegation to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Minutes of the Joint Steering Committee meeting held as per the MoU between DHR and NICE, UK on 16.12.2015 through Video Conferencing (First Meeting); 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Government of India Department of Health Research and NICE International. Minutes of the second joint steering committee (DHR-NICE UK) meeting held at 2: 00 pm, March 1, 2016 through video conferencing. Conference Hall. ICMR Hqrs, New Delhi; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Jhalani M. Prince Mahidol award conference 2016 “priority setting for universal health coverage”; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava RK. Paper for PMAC 2016 (26–31, January 2015) sub-theme-3 priority setting in action - learning & sharing experience moving towards universal health coverage-indian experience in development of national medical technology assessment board. Vol. PS 2.5. Bangkok, Thailand; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Government of India Department of Health Research (DHR), Government of India Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), International Decision Support Initiative (IDSI). Health technology assessment stakeholder’s consultative workshop, 25th July, 2016, India habitat centre, New Delhi, India; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• HITAP. Report on topic selection workshop in India. New Delhi: The International Decision Support Initiative (iDSI); 2016. p. 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Press Information Bureau, Government of India. International workshop on Health Technology Assessment (HTA) inaugurated; government is committed to reducing out of pocket expenses on healthcare: Smt Anupriya Patel; HTA will lead India to have a robust universal health coverage programme: Shri Faggan Singh Kulaste. Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; 2016 Jul 25.
   Google Scholar
• Capacity gap analysis questionnaire to inform DHR partnerships.
   Google Scholar
• IDSI Health Technology Assessment Capacity Questionnaire Cover Note; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Concept Note for establishing Medical Technology Assessment Board (MTAB) and institutionalizing HTA in India; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. National health policy. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2017, p. 28. https://main.mohfw.gov.in/documents/policy.
   Google Scholar
• Gleed G, Kalyanwala S. iDSI country learning review: India. Brighton (UK): ITAD; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Dabak SV, Pilasant S, Mehndiratta A, Downey LE, Cluzeau F, Chalkidou K, Luz ACG, Youngkong S, Teerawattananon Y. Budgeting for a billion: applying Health Technology Assessment (HTA) for universal health coverage in India. Health Research Policy And Systems. 2018;16(1):115. doi:10.1186/s12961-018-0378-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Downey LE, Mehndiratta A, Grover A, Gauba V, Sheikh K, Prinja S, Singh R, Cluzeau FA, Dabak S, Teerawattananon Y, et al. Institutionalising health technology assessment: establishing the medical technology assessment board in India. BMJ Glob Health. 2017;2(2):e000259. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NICE International. Report on NICE international’s engagement in India. ITAD; 2015. p. 1–61.
   Google Scholar
• NICE International, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Mid-term learning review: International Decision Support Initiative (IDSI). Brighton (UK): ITAD; 2016. p. 1–71.
   Google Scholar